Latest on MJJC

Paul White's Expert Opinion

Status
Not open for further replies.

larry141094

Proud Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2010
Messages
437
Points
18
Location
A Place With No Name, Australia
What does everyone think about Paul White's expert opinion in regards to Michael injecting himself? I was under the impression that anesthesia experts have already clarified that this could not have been possible?
Although he is right about one thing, Conrad Murray couldn't of given Michael the fatal does via IV, and the evidence does indeed seem more consistant with a direct injection. And with murray out of the room on his Phone for 45 minutes, i don't think he was the one who did it.
What worries me is that the real perpetrators of this MURDER will get off.
 
No fingerprints on any syringes (bottles or vials) belong to Michael. Not even a partial print.

I'll prolly talk more about White's testimony after I've heard it all (cross-examined) and he's off the stand. We had Dr. Waldman act like MJ was addicted to demerol when the defense questioned him and then under cross-examination he admitted he probably could not diagnose MJ as an addict based on Klein's records (actual evidence).

So, I will wait to see what Walgren can get outta White before saying more than I have already in the court thread. What I will say is if I had the choice between White or Shafer to keep me interested and awake during scientific explanations, it's Dr. Shafer all the way. He makes things so easy to understand and his charts are easy to decipher and follow along with as well, imo.
 
Why couldn't Murray have given MJ the fatal dose via IV?
 
Im moving this thread to controversay forum where we discuss conspiracy "theories"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top