Rochelle Riley: Didn't we all play a part in Michael Jackson's death?

claudiadoina

Proud Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2011
Messages
4,316
Points
0
Location
Bucharest, Romania
I found this posted on another forum.It's a very disturbing article for many reasons.:sad: one of them being that there's probably some truth in it :cry:
Let me know what you think

Rochelle Riley: Didn't we all play a part in Michael Jackson's death?


Oct. 9, 2011

In the case of the death of Michael Joseph Jackson (Aug. 29, 1958-June 25, 2009), we are all accessories after the fact.

The fans who fueled his need to keep performing when he wasn't well, who pushed him to be bigger when he was already the greatest, should remember that most of us looked the other way.

Oh, you know when ...

When Jackson announced that he would do 50 straight concerts in London, it was like a piece of science fiction. He looked like he weighed 90 pounds. His wig was as big as his jacket. My first thought was: That could kill him. And we looked the other way.

When he was rehearsing relentlessly, and video leaked of a stick figure in a gray coat singing some of the most enduring pop songs of the past 20 years, we looked the other way.

So when the singer, dancer, songwriter, musician and king of pop was rushed out of his rented Los Angeles mansion, filled with the mixture of drugs he used to make us happy, we looked the other way -- for someone to blame.

And then "This Is It" was released. I didn't see it. I didn't want to watch a grown man die. I still don't.

Selfish fans

Even the previews made clear that the star needed to be in bed, in a hospital, instead of going through the motions of trying to please us one more time -- we insatiable, selfish fans who want more and more, even from someone who wasn't in a position to give.

The previews looked more like news clips of a tragedy waiting to happen. Every day, I expected the announcement that the concerts were off.

So tired was Michael Jackson -- so eager to become universally beloved and relevant for music rather than controversy -- that he put his life in the hands of a man named Conrad Murray (He's no doctor.). Murray, according to prosecutors, started Propofol drips and left the room, then later cleaned up the scene before beginning CPR on his patient.

So giving was Michael Jackson that he put his hope in millions of fans who didn't care how he got to the stage as long as he got there. He needed us to like him one more time. He needed to build a children's hospital, one he told Murray about as he lay dying.

"That will be remembered more than my performances," he told Murray.

I gasped with America when I learned during Murray's trial that Jackson's children watched him die. And I realized that, in the end, Michael was Elvis, dead of drugs and fatigue in his own home with people he thought cared about him, people who probably thought they cared about him.
What if we had known?

In the end, it has become clearer and clearer that Murray did what we all did: looked the other way while we got what we wanted.

Murray was there to place the IV in Jackson's arm. He was there to make those secret recordings of Jackson sounding like the gifted 10-year-old son of Joseph Jackson, desperately trying to please his father, his family, the fans.

Again and again and again.

Conrad Murray is sure to get what's coming to him.

But we need to remember that we were counting the days until the 50-show circus. Would we have done something differently had we known he was killing himself to make us happy?

Yes, Conrad Murray is on trial. But each of us should look in the mirror and demand just a little less than death from our stars, especially those who place our approval above their own lives.

http://www.freep.com/article/2011100...ckson-s-death-
 
Some form of guilt is usually involved when someone dies. I love that man beyond the pale and beyond any form of sanity.

However, I feel no need to beat myself up over something that was NOT within my power to change. All I did since the 90ies was write letters of support and just send him my love. There are quite a few people who were in his closer vicinity whom I see beating down on him even after death- those would be more appropriately addressed than those fans who loved him through thick and thin and through all things possible and impossible.

I'm very sad about many things and their turnout, but I know that it was NOT within my power to change that. If I could have- I would have.

Guilt is normal, grief often comes along with some form of guilt. But I would not recommend extend your own personal guilt on others. Guilt while grieving is normal- trying to see if others feel the same guilt is also normal- but not everyone has an obligation to feel the same guilt.

I do not feel guilty, but I certainly weep for him and his children.

People that bought a ticket to the shows do not need to feel guilt- if they do, then I find that understandable. But please think carefully if you yourself deserve the guilt label for loving and supporting an artist. Fans collectively loved and supported Michael Jackson when people literally spat him in the face- fans were always seeing through the media's label of 'child m.'- I am sure Michael would thank you for the love and the support. THAT love and support deserves a round of applause. Don't forget that.

Also, pleasepleaseplease, can people refrain from labeling others just based on their own actions. It's okay if you saw TII and it's totally okay if you didn't see it.
People are so quick to establish themselves on that kind of stuff. Including sending others on guilt trips. I have seen TII, that doesn't mean I have blood on my hands (as someone did tell me once- that kind of judgment is not theirs to make...)

My absence of feelings of guilt does not mean less love. At all. I cannot change anything. Guilt tripping myself is not bringing Michael back, is not helping anyone. If you do feel guilt, just know that it is normal.

Focus on the love and support you gave him- it means the world. Love and support is not equal to being responsible for someone's death. Free will goes both ways, always.

Rather then feeling guilty I would much rather think of the incredible bond that exists between Michael and those who truly love him. It can't be broken- and just think of the beauty of such bond. Rather than labeling it the coffin's nail, cherish this love and think of everlasting beauty. You supported him, you cherish and appreciate his art. You didn't kill him. You loved him. Love doesn't kill. I will not confuse love with guilt since I know that my love certainly did not kill Michael Jackson.

Love does not mean the equation of 'how much have I done" and love is also not the equation of "who feels the most guilt", love is just love.
As wrong as it is to ignore the feelings of guilt that someone feels- it would also be wrong to assume that all must carry this type of guilt.

And I will write long paragraphs just in the hope of maybe lightening one person's heart. You love him and he loves you more. Always. Just remember. He meant it.
 
Last edited:
I have made the same comment. This also apply to people who want to talk about MJ never having a childhood and his father. Well, if you own a Jackson 5 cd, album, etc, some can say you contribute to MJ not having a childhood. The radio dJ, the record company, the public, etc did not say "why is this little boy on this stage, he should be outside playing". No everyone brought into it and did not care just as long as he performed for us. Joe could not do not more than what the public would have allowed.
 
Back
Top