The Official 'Michael' Bio-Pic Thread

Gordon Sandler
That's a brilliant one. I really think that could work.

Gordan Daniels
Dan leftonread lol
Gordan Dan Landler
...Landis gets a bit too. Basically combining all the naysayers to make one accuser. the story needs to be told. Wish there was a way ..
 
That's a brilliant one. I really think that could work.

Gordan Daniels
Dan leftonread lol
Gordan Dan Landler
...Landis gets a bit too. Basically combining all the naysayers to make one accuser. the story needs to be told. Wish there was a way ..
John randles
 

You can get the popcorn hat and tumblr here
 
They bought the rights to the Cascios' life story... couldn't they reach out to Jordan and June and see if they would be interested in selling the rights to their story? Maybe they ran out of money by now, who knows... And it's not like their story would make either one of them look bad, since they can blame it all on Evan.
 
Genuinely shocked that the whole “they had to re-film the last third of the movie because somehow nobody bothered to look at the Chandler settlement” rumor was true. Absolute incompetence on the part of whatever legal team was responsible here.
I don't believe they just forgot. Branca was probably there when the godforsaken settlement was signed. Really shady story.
 
I don't believe they just forgot. Branca was probably there when the godforsaken settlement was signed. Really shady story.
One wonders why they didn't just use the argument that since Michael, Evan Chandler, Johnnie Cochran and Howard Weitzman are dead, that condition no longer is valid, and that "it only pertains if the parties are all alive." That they decide, "Let's go for it" and just push it out there.

Of course some might say, "The Estate can't argue that and simultaneously argue that HBO's nondisparagement clause still holds decades later, they'll be accused of having it both ways." Well, legalese often allows you to have it both ways all the time.

Cutting the scenes surely isn't to please the critics. They would've been angry with the showing of Michael as innocent. Now they'll be just as angry that the movie ends at the Bad era and "completely ignores the actual story."

If the two-movie idea comes to pass, would they even try to go there again, or simply pretend nothing happened? If they pretend, can HIStory even be mentioned at all?
 
I see the media are all trying their best to try and sabotage the film already. Mentioning that the film ends at the Bad tour, instead of addressing the allegations, literally using those words.

It’s well known that they had to scrap that section , they wanted to address it but fucked up.
 
If the two-movie idea comes to pass, would they even try to go there again, or simply pretend nothing happened? If they pretend, can HIStory even be mentioned at all?
The article mentions they wanted to cover the Dangerous and Invincible era in the possible 2nd movie. No HIStory, so yeah, it seems like they won't try.
 
I see the media are all trying their best to try and sabotage the film already. Mentioning that the film ends at the Bad tour, instead of addressing the allegations, literally using those words.

It’s well known that they had to scrap that section , they wanted to address it but fucked up.
I think they needed to make sure to announce Part II soon, even before the movie is released. So people don’t think the allegations will be completely “forgotten”.
 
I see the media are all trying their best to try and sabotage the film already. Mentioning that the film ends at the Bad tour, instead of addressing the allegations, literally using those words.

It’s well known that they had to scrap that section , they wanted to address it but fucked up.
Variety, owned by Penske Media Group, so no surprises at all
 
Back
Top