wonderouzmj
Proud Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2017
- Messages
- 3,263
- Points
- 113
No promo or sht....lmao I hate the estate so much its funny now because like..... bruh wtf at this point
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WTFBRAHH..No promo or sht....lmao I hate the estate so much its funny now because like..... bruh wtf at this point
No promo or sht....lmao I hate the estate so much its funny now because like..... bruh wtf at this point
michaeljackson What’s your favorite demo of a song on “Thriller” that was included on “Thriller 40” – is it the stripped-down demo for “Billie Jean”, the beatboxing on the “Beat It” demo, the group vocals on the demo of “Wanna Be Startin’ Somethin’” or the completely different R&B slow jam demo of “P.Y.T.” that you like the most? Hit the link in stories to listen now and let us know in the comments:
It is on Spotify.all the mentioned tracks are not present on the cd version of T40
But they were all already released on other projects. Even on spotify except for the P.Y.T. demo which wasn’t available on spotify but was release on The Ultimate Collection.It is on Spotify.
Surprised they didn't include Hollywood Tonight in the list.all the mentioned tracks are not present on the cd version of T40
You're moving the goal posts kinda. Idk what that has to do with saying what's on the CD version. Anyway they've already did this with those demoes anyway, they've shouted out all those demoes. Basically a whole year ago but still. It makes more sense to emphasize Thriller and not the 40 as time goes on.But they were all already released on other projects. Even on spotify except for the P.Y.T. demo which wasn’t available on spotify but was release on The Ultimate Collection.
FINALLY
Apparently they read my last comment
Rumor has it they’re thinking of releasing it on an exclusive silver sparkly VHS tapeI hope it will be released on Blu Ray with extras
To everybody who criticized and still criticize Spike Lee's docs and now are getting the exact same formula from a different director, accept my best regards.I still think such interviews are extraneous and unnecessary, but given the chaos of the last few years, it’s nice to see.
Well yeah, I'll still criticise him and his docs and say that I'm probably not gonna be a fan of this one as well. Not really sure what the point being made here is.To everybody who criticized and still criticize Spike Lee's docs and now are getting the exact same formula from a different director, accept my best regards.
I was referring to @AlwaysThere being soft ("but given the chaos of the last few years, it’s nice to see") when they've been one of the most critical of Spike's docs.Well yeah, I'll still criticise him and his docs and say that I'm probably not gonna be a fan of this one as well. Not really sure what the point being made here is.
I said that they’re extraneous and unnecessary, so I’m not sure how that qualifies as being “soft.” I said that in this specific case, it’s nice to see A-listers offering public love.I was referring to @AlwaysThere being soft ("but given the chaos of the last few years, it’s nice to see") when they've been one of the most critical of Spike's docs.
Everybody is entitled to their own opinions and tastes, but I don't get all the hate towards Spike. His docs are not flawed, they're just not what you're all looking for (behind the scenes, making of sort of production).
Looks the same to me so far as talking heads about how he made them wanna danceI said that they’re extraneous and unnecessary, so I’m not sure how that qualifies as being “soft.” I said that in this specific case, it’s nice to see A-listers offering public love.
Whenever Spike does a documentary, the actual people who matter get second shift behind contemporary artists. Why is Questlove getting more airtime in Off the Wall than Stevie Wonder or Greg Phillinganes? Why is Chris Brown telling me his opinion on “Another Part of Me”? I think it’s completely valid to expect a documentary chronicling the making of an album to show more behind the scenes material than pow wows with Kanye and Mariah Carey. It’s fine if you enjoy them, but there are legitimate criticisms to be made regarding their quality, and I’m thrilled (no pun intended) that he’s gone for this one.
Yeah, I'm not seeing all that much difference from the trailer. I'm also not a fan of the director thinking MJ molested kids so I'm not all that interested in it beyond the 5 seconds of new footage that will be in it.Looks the same to me so far as talking heads about how he made them wanna dance![]()
Questlove has become the go-to music "historian" these days it seems, even having forewords for various Beatles reissues.Whenever Spike does a documentary, the actual people who matter get second shift behind contemporary artists. Why is Questlove getting more airtime in Off the Wall than Stevie Wonder or Greg Phillinganes? Why is Chris Brown telling me his opinion on “Another Part of Me”?
The criticism is valid, but aiming it at Spike is quite dumb.I think it’s completely valid to expect a documentary chronicling the making of an album to show more behind the scenes material than pow wows with Kanye and Mariah Carey. It’s fine if you enjoy them, but there are legitimate criticisms to be made regarding their quality, and I’m thrilled (no pun intended) that he’s gone for this one.
I can somewhat quantify the Beatles, as many of their collaborators have sadly passed on. The majority of MJ’s are still with us and, by all accounts, are willing and eager to contribute. There is no reason they shouldn’t.Questlove has become the go-to music "historian" these days it seems, even having forewords for various Beatles reissues.
CB and Mariah on Bad 25 are bollocks, agreed.
This is one of the more wild assertions I’ve seen on this forum lately. The idea that a documentary’s quality falls on anyone’s shoulders but the director is objectively wrong. Spike has never once given any indication that he was given limitations or requirements; quite the opposite, actually. Would you then argue that the Estate deserves acclaim for his productions, since they were in charge of planning? Or are we picking and choosing based on preconceived bias? Sure, you could argue that the Estate could’ve sent him back to the drawing board, but asserting that that puts them at fault when he’s the one turning in piss-poor products is asinine.The criticism is valid, but aiming it at Spike is quite dumb.
The Estate is in charge of planning, they should be criticized. If they wanted to produce a documentary focused on exploring the making of an album, technicalities and all, with the personnel being interviewed, they would do it. They have the final say, always, so they're the ones to be blamed for you guys not getting what you want.
Shall I remind you that Branca turned his back on Sonic Fantasy, which is literally the type of documentary you guys been asking for?
I'd love to have a doc describing the production steps of the albums, but I'm aware that it's not a director's fault it doesn't happen.
Let's agree to disagree.This is one of the more wild assertions I’ve seen on this forum lately. The idea that a documentary’s quality falls on anyone’s shoulders but the director is objectively wrong. Spike has never once given any indication that he was given limitations or requirements; quite the opposite, actually. Would you then argue that the Estate deserves acclaim for his productions, since they were in charge of planning? Or are we picking and choosing based on preconceived bias? Sure, you could argue that the Estate could’ve sent him back to the drawing board, but asserting that that puts them at fault when he’s the one turning in piss-poor products is asinine.
It has nothing to do with us “not getting what [we] want,” and everything to do with Spike being assigned to create a documentary showing the creation of two of the most influential albums ever released, and instead releasing surface-level schlock that sidelines the things that matter for people who had no involvement. Spike absolutely deserves every ounce of criticism he gets.
All I’ll say is, there is a severe difference between focusing on the mainstream public with a new studio album of unreleased music, and doing so by immortalizing a historic piece of art while minimizing the voices of those who created it.Let's agree to disagree.
It is plain and simple to me that if the Estate wanted a project to have this behind-the-scenes sort of approach, they could have just shelved Spike's concept and hired somebody else to do it, especially giving them directions.
If Spike was given freedom to conduct the project whichever way he wanted, I don't see how he can be faulted for not doing what some people expected if he wasn't given any directions of "it should be like this" or "like that".
Also, since you're one of the people who say the Estate is right to focus on the mainstream public, well, Spike's docs are just that. Interviews by MJs acquaintances, people who worked with him, studio personnel and random celebrities of the given period voicing their opinions on how the man influenced them. Couldn't be more appealing to general audiences.
A documentary exploring the technical side of things, how it came to be, with personnel involved discussing the production would be focused on us, as I fail to see how a random casual, especially youngsters, would have any interest in it.