filmandmusic
Proud Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2021
- Messages
- 5,895
- Points
- 113
Amazing this is playing around with sound, distorting it and coming up with something new and fresh, sampling is really cool
Aha, yes… but that’s sampling, i.e., a completely different discussion.
Invincible album is one of the best MJ albums! Haters sucks) Michael Jackson's Invincible just like his album InvincibleAnd Invincible's sampling game goes quite hard as well. Another plus, some of the most creative I've ever heard.
I definitely worded my comment poorly lol. The majority of the song is a D major chord, with some other ones interspersed throughout. It’s not a standard progression or sequence, it’s a stunningly simple yet sophisticated arrangement.It has more than two chords though because the bridge plays another set of chords.
Keep in mind that Dan Beck (who worked closely with Michael Jackson) is basically in agreement with me about that.This is objectively one of the most asinine and nonsensical claims anyone has ever made on this site. Excluding the fact that most musicians have no technical prowess and limited musical capabilities (e.g., Madonna, The Beatles) and thus would require people to record and mix their material, the idea that MJ’s music was only listenable due to outside producers is hilarious.
I held out for so long, but I just can’t anymore. Welcome to the Ignore list.
Michael Jackson also took certain lyrics in order to use them in his own songs without giving proper credits for that.From this point we can name a lot of songs as plagiarism....For example Shout! MJ litterally took main sample from this song... Same thing about Ghosts and a lot of other songs... Michael always took music samples from songs of other artists to create his own music... That's what most singers do
I believe only the main theme was subjected to the plagiarism claim. Maybe I’m confused, but I thought that was what we were talking about.It has more than two chords though because the bridge plays another set of chords.
One of these 3 music experts was Luciano Chailly (Italian composer and musicologist) who presented his arguments inside the courtroom and he managed to convince the judge of the strong similarity.@mj_frenzy : I find it remarkable that “music experts” would look at this case of alleged plagiarism, to conclude such a thing as “37 out of 40 notes … are the same”. To your defense, you were paraphrasing (you didn’t use quotation marks, after all). Makes me wonder what they really said, though! Because the aforementioned statement is inept to the point of not really meaning anything at all. No “music expert” would say such a thing. And you say there were three of them?