What is true about this?

Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
5,603
Points
113
I was visiting my stepfather and he knows i'm a hardcore MJ fan. He said, young man, i know you love his music and he made some great music, but just don't mind the news too much. So i asked what he was talking about and basically he says that they said on tv that they have recordings/videos of MJ doing 'things' to children. I told him that he shouldn't even bother with that kind of bullshit news, cause it's all nonsense. I don't follow any news anymore...is there even any truth to this? As in..that a tabloid or some stupid show is claiming this now?
 
I suppose if Michael had a water balloon fight with children and other adults ,journalists would say he was doing things with children
 
Back in '94 or '95 it was claimed that there was a videotape where Michael was in the shower with one of Jermaine's children that turned out to be a total hoax. The tabloids would say that there were often videotapes of Michael "in the act" of child abuse, or audio recordings when he owned up to doing it, but none of them ever turned up. Like it's been said, the tabloids will often make up stores that will catch a fans' eye and make them buy it.
 
NO I would ask him where he heard such nonsense. There has been nothing like that reported or on TV. If so it would be all over twitter FB ect etc. I think someone just likes to pull your chain.
 
I doubt such a claim has been on the news recently, otherwise, like Qbee said it would be all over the Internet and everywhere. Back in 1995 Victor Gutierrez claimed (and Diane Dimond ran with it without background checking the story) that he saw a tape on which Michael molested his nephew, Jeremy. But the whole story was made up by VG. No such tape ever existed. Jeremy's mother, Margaret Maldonado wrote this about it in her book:

“I received a telephone call from a writer named Ruth Robinson. I had known Ruth for quite a while and respected her integrity. It made what she had to tell me all the more difficult to hear. 'I wanted to warn you, Margaret,' she said. 'There's a story going around that there is a videotape of Michael molesting one of your sons, and that you have the tape.' If anyone else had said those words, I would have hung up the phone. Given the long relationship I had with Ruth, however, I gave her the courtesy of a response. I told her that it wasn't true, of course, and that I wanted the story stopped in its tracks. She had been in contact with someone who worked at the National Enquirer who had alerted her that a story was being written for that paper. Ruth cross-connected me with the woman, and I vehemently denied the story. Moreover, I told her that if the story ran, I would own the National Enquirer before the lawsuits I brought were finished.

To its credit, the National Enquirer never ran the piece. Hard Copy, however, decided it would. Hard Copy correspondent Diane Dimond had reported that authorities were reopening the child molestation case against Michael. She had also made the allegations on L.A. radio station KABC-AM on a morning talk show hosted by Roger Barkley and Ken Minyard. Dimond's claims were based on the word of a freelance writer named Victor Gutierrez. The story was an outrageous lie. Not one part of it was true. I'd never met the man. There was no tape. Michael never paid me for my silence. He had never molested Jeremy. Period.”
 
Nothing. As usual, the media are a bunch of sick dogs. I'm sorry, dogs. I can't think of anything else, right now.
The media is evil. There. That's on it.
 
I don't think you guys need to blame his step-dad..he heard something and sadly thought there could be some truth to it, which is of course, IMPOSSIBLE. Just warn him next time..99.9% of the stuff that's said about Michael to this day is bullshit, especially if it's related to his relationship with children. I'm so fed up with these kind of "news".. :rolleyes:
 
he says that they said on TV that they have recordings/videos of MJ doing 'things' to children .I don't follow any news anymore...is there even any truth to this? As in..that a tabloid or some stupid show is claiming this now

Nothing. As usual, the media are a bunch of sick dogs. I'm sorry, dogs. I can't think of anything else, right now.
The media is evil. There. That's on it.

I don't think you guys need to blame his step-dad..he heard something and sadly thought there could be some truth to it, which is of course, IMPOSSIBLE. Just warn him next time..99.9% of the stuff that's said about Michael to this day is bullshit, especially if it's related to his relationship with children. I'm so fed up with these kind of "news".. :rolleyes:

NO there is no truth to this ..
There is nothign on TV that stated that. If there was it would be reported all over and on the internet and fans would be coming against it. Now it's possible someone may have told your stepdad that story, but I will say will all assurance it was NOT reported on TV or the news. Fans would have seen or heard it. Nothing gets by MJ fans and the media would have run with that and had a field day by now had it ever been on TV or tabloid publication.
 
I suppose if Michael had a water balloon fight with children and other adults ,journalists would say he was doing things with children

The National Enquirer actually did that in about 1997, had Carole Lieberman talking about how it was a sign of him being a pedophile. Not even kidding.

There is no footage of Michael molesting anyone, the police went through all his videos to see if they could find anything, they could find nothing in all his video footage. The FBI raided his computers and could find nothing. There is no videotape.
 
The National Enquirer actually did that in about 1997, had Carole Lieberman talking about how it was a sign of him being a pedophile. Not even kidding.

There is no footage of Michael molesting anyone, the police went through all his videos to see if they could find anything, they could find nothing in all his video footage. The FBI raided his computers and could find nothing. There is no videotape.

The same Carole Lieberman who believed Daniel "I wrote MJ's songs when I was 2 years old" Kapon?

It's not even funny how desperate people are in looking for clues that MJ was a pedo (they find nothing, of course), but they completely overlook someone like Victor Gutierrez openly advocating pedophilia...

It just shows what it is about. It's not about people wanting to catch pedophiles. It's about a witch hunt against Michael Jackson.
 
It's about a witch hunt against Michael Jackson.
Yea and if anyone knows the history of where the name Jac.ko came from and why it was then given to MJ, they would know why. Or do some really think he was a target just cause he was eccentric and some didn't like it? That may be true for some but, deep down that is just an excuse for the real reason. An they get people to fall for it all the time til this day!

See, if anyone know what I mean? :timer:
 
Back
Top