I just watched evenining news in the crazy hope that at some point someone will finally say something about hoe lame the defense of dr. Murray is but to my dismay they continue to subtley be in the back pocket of the defense. The continue to argue for the "drama", the theory that Michael swallowed 8 pills not found in his autopsy (something they neglected to mention) and bla bla bla. This is the same selective cut and paste snippet reporting they were using in Michael's trial. On top of that the same lawyers and pundits who say the jury must acquit because Murray's story sounds plausible. Why do I think they'll learn, better yet why don't they?