The Odd List

  • Thread starter Dangerous Incorporated
  • Start date
About the TII statement - Yes I also thought that there was something odd about his behavior that day. He seemed distanced.. Back in the days he would be so calm and smiling, and you could really feel how he loved to be WITH his fans while on stage.
That day however, it was another Michael.. Somehow..

And then theres the picture from the ambulence.. He really has that vein in his forehead, as if the blood was still pumping. That seems VERY odd!??
 
I've started creating video.

I made a list of everything that is weird in the death of MJ and its similar from the Odd list!

The Part 1 is up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NJPIYDJAVQ

you're video is REALLY good! geez.. I'm starting to believe in this conspiracy :eek: could Michael be alive somewhere? If so, then I hope he's happy and that the kids will be able to see him..

This is scary :bugeyed:
 
# 116 on the odd list

Soon after Jackson arrived home, he started complaining of fatigue and that he needed sleep.
http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2010-06-20-michael-jackson-timeline_N.htm

MARLON JACKSON: I Talked to Frank Dileo, Michael’s manager. Frank told me that Michael last night was complaining about not feeling well.

MARTIN: And you said a doctor saw him last night, but he didn’t see a need to take him to the hospital?

JACKSON: He didn’t take him to the hospital.


Don't know if this interview was edited. Other source: Michael asked to be taken to hospital night before.



http://machronicles.com/2009/06/26/marlon-jackson-speaks-on-how-he-found-out-about-michaels-death/[/QUOTE]
 
I finally found this article(dnt think its the original though). Does anyone think this is article is just so strange? When I first read it just when it came out, I could NEVER understand why those words were wrapped in quotes. And to be honest, it just gave me a wierd feelings because it was THAT strange.

..moving back to LA "where all the action is"

"the second half (of Jackson's career) will be better than the first"

They didn't put into quotes ALL of what Thome said. ONLY those two lines. And who was the first to write this article? Does anyone know? Did Thome tell them to put those specific points in quotes? Or did the journalist themself choose to put only those two points in quotes. And why?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...ichael-Jackson-moves-back-to-Los-Angeles.html
 
Back
Top