Latest on MJJC

Wow! Blanket Looks Just Like His Dad!

nintchdbpict000285190040.jpg

plastic5.jpg


They look nothing alike.
 
I agree, this subject shouldn't be allowed because it's slips into gossip about a part of the man's life that is really none of our business.
 
barbee0715 said:
If I could post this ten times, I would. Michael said they're his. So did Debbie. So do the kids. He was there when they were born. His name is on their birth certificates. Millions of Pictures and wannabe baby daddies prove nothing either way.
Unless the kids say otherwise with a DNA test, Michael's words are facts.

I'm pretty sure this subject is taboo on the forum anyway.
Click to expand...

Exactly! he was there, we were not. I believe in Michael's words
 
My problem isn't with people saying that the kids aren't MJ's bio kids because people will say and believe that until the cows come home.

My problem is the subtext that comes along with that assumption (because yes, unless you have a DNA test it IS an assumption).
When people say the kids aren't Michael's and that theyre white, let's not pretend that the accusation of Michael being gay, asexual, and/or a self hater that didn't want black kids isn't soon to follow because it almost always is.
When people say the kids aren't biologically Michael's that subtext is almost always there.
Whether that's the subtext of what some of you are saying in this thread I don't know, I sincerely hope it isn't though. :/

I also don't like when people sit there act arrogant and pretend that it's a fact the kids aren't biologically his when they legit have zero proof other then just looking at the kids and passing judgement.
People do that and literally expect what is only their opinion to be taken as fact. :rofl:
 
lougrizli said:
I have never disrespected you and I have always talked to you correctly so watch your mouth bitch. I say whatever the **** I wanna say. **** you and your thoughts ! Nobody's insulting Michael, I said he's not his biological kid. That's all I said ! He's still his kid. Y'all trying to start drama for nothing.



Any kind of proof ? Michael was black, the kids are white. End of the topic.


So, what's the problem ? Saying they are not his biological kids doesn't mean I don't consider them as Michael's childrens.
Click to expand...



Actually ignore that question, after reading this what a nasty piece of work - trolls are not wanted here 'BANNED' - who's next?

Now back to being polite and respectful irrespective of your opinion to the paternity of Michael's children.
 
MattyJam said:
Well, Michael was less than candid himself when he changed his story about Blanket's conception on Bashir. TBH, I think he didn't exactly help matters, with regards to people speculating on the subject. If even he can't stick to the same story about the conception, then how are people supposed to take him at his word when he insists he used his own sperm? Especially when the children don't physically resemble him or the family in the slightest.


I know this is a taboo subject on here, I'm sure some of this thread will either get moved or deleted. But I do think some fans are very naive on this subject.
Click to expand...

It's not about being naive, it's about not giving a damn.
Here we have the greatest entertainer ever and people want to talk about the paternity of his kids when literally nothing will come of the conversation.
The people that believe they're his will argue that naysayers have no actual proof, and the people that don't believe their biologically his will say they don't look like him and tout that as 'proof'.
Neither side will change their minds and then we're right back at square one.
As far as I can see there is literally zero point to the conversation.
 
Last edited:
regarding if Michaels children are biologically his... well I really don't know and there are definite doubts for obvious reasons. while my curiosity at times wants to explore the truth - the fact of the matter is that we don't know and I don't think his children would ever confirm 100% if they were not simply for the meaning behind it.
 
Ugh. This forum is quickly heading to the gutter lately. Such a shame.
 
^ well lol! did anyone really think a thread about one of Michaels kids resembling him would not turn into a paternity convo?
 
KOPV said:
^ well lol! did anyone really think a thread about one of Michaels kids resembling him would not turn into a paternity convo?
Click to expand...

I somehow thought at least his own fans were above this - regardless of anyone's opinion. Why does it even matter? Besides, I thought the rule was that such discussions are allowed but should be in the "In The Hood" section.
 
MattyJam said:
I don't personally see why it should remain an off-limits discussion. It was different when his kids were younger, I think MJJC were right to restrict those kind of discussions back then. But they're all old enough now to know some of the unusual realities of their lives. They must all know by now that this speculation is out there, and they can choose themselves to have a DNA test if being biologically related to MJ is important to them.

I personally do not condone anybody asking them directly about it on social media or things like that, as it really is nobody elses business but theirs and they shouldn't feel like they have to explain themselves to anybody else. As I said, they were MJ's kids from birth, and it wouldn't matter one jot to me, if I found it I wasn't biologically related to my parents.

But as to whether it is morally wrong for his fans to discuss on an MJ fan forum the parentage of his children, I personally don't think it is at this stage, with his kids being fully grown. As long as nobody is harassing them about it, then I don't see the problem.
Click to expand...

It has nothing to do with the kid's age, but it has all to do with respect and dignity. The discussion is disrespectful to MJ and his kids IMO. How would you like to be publicly dissected by total strangers analyzing and speculating about your and your parent's DNA and relationship? Of course, since MJ was a celebrity such discussions are inevitable generally, but I thought at least his fans would have a basic respect towards him and the basic dignity to be above this. They keep saying it doesn't matter, yet someone starts a topic about Blanket resembling MJ and people lose their mind and call each other names over something that supposedly doesn't matter. Okay.
 
Banning people because they think MJ isn't the biological father of his children, lol
 
Did God say that they could decide
Who will live and who will die?
All my Griz ever did
Was try to take care of MJ's kids

#weneedthismanbackonthecommunity
 
You ain't done enough for me
You are disgustin' me, yeah yeah
You're aiming just for me
You are disgustin' me
Just want your cut from me
But too bad, too bad
 
MattyJam said:
Well, it's a difficult one I think, because where do you draw the line? respect77, you mention about upholding MJ's dignity and yet we discuss things like the 2003 Neverland raid and MJ's porn collection. I know those things are, unfortunately, a matter of public record, but we still discuss them nonetheless in the Trials & Tribulations forum, with little regard as to whether or not we are upholding the mans dignity.
Click to expand...

Because it is a criminal allegation it does matter whether he is guilty or not of child molestation, so even if we, unfortunately, have to discuss very personal issues during the course of such discussions, it is very much a legit and important discussion. However, I do not see the importance and benefit in discussing PPB's paternity. It is a private matter that is noone's business but MJ's and his kids'. There is an irony in people saying "it doesn't matter" yet they want to discuss it and get as heated over it as they are in this thread. If it doesn't matter then why do you want to discuss it so much?

He led his life in the spotlight and fans have discussed and poured over every aspect of his life for years, not just his career. Discussions about the other Jackson family members is never off-limits and I've witnessed many fans bad mouthing MJ's family on this board. Are we going to be saying when Blanket is 35 that we cannot discuss whether or not MJ was his biological father or not? Why is it acceptable to discuss things like Joe Jackson's infidelity, or MJ's physical appearance, but not his childrens heritage?
Click to expand...

Again, this has nothing to do with how old Blanket is. This has to do with basic human respect IMO. I know the general public discusses it. I know other forums discuss it. I know of forums where you cannot mention PPB, in any context, without someone smart-assing in with his 2 cents of stating "but they are not his children!" and each and every mention of them turning into a paternity debate. Do we want MJJC go down that path? I know I don't.

As for the other discussions, I think there are certain segments of the forum where those discussions are allowed (eg. discussions about the family in 2300 Jackson Street, allegations in the Trials section). Paternity talk too IS allowed, but in the Hood section.
 
Last edited:
MattyJam said:
Well, it's a difficult one I think, because where do you draw the line? respect77, you mention about upholding MJ's dignity and yet we discuss things like the 2003 Neverland raid and MJ's porn collection. I know those things are, unfortunately, a matter of public record, but we still discuss them nonetheless in the Trials & Tribulations forum, with little regard as to whether or not we are upholding the mans dignity.

He led his life in the spotlight and fans have discussed and poured over every aspect of his life for years, not just his career. Discussions about the other Jackson family members is never off-limits and I've witnessed many fans bad mouthing MJ's family on this board. Are we going to be saying when Blanket is 35 that we cannot discuss whether or not MJ was his biological father or not? Why is it acceptable to discuss things like Joe Jackson's infidelity, or MJ's physical appearance, but not his childrens heritage?

I'm playing devils advocate here to a degree, I'm not saying I have all the answers, or that I don't see your point about respecting the dignity of MJ and his children, but I'm just raising some genuine questions, about why certain areas of MJ's personal life are okay to dissect and other areas are taboo.
Click to expand...

I mostly agree with this, too.

For me I'm invested very much in Michael Jackson as a man and his life - not just his professional career, though they clearly interwine at various stages.

I think mature, educated discussion should remain on the table.

If it's people deliberately trying to belittle him, cause trouble or get a rise out of other posters then that's a different story.
 
personally I don't think talking about biology of his children is a big deal.. I mean why pretend it's not a thought in peoples minds. It's not like we can go and have a 'smart' conversation about it with dummies at work regarding ANYTHING Michael.. But that's just me
 
So, this girls are twins, yes twins. And one is black and one is white with red hair. So if their are twins, why can't Prince, Paris and Blanket be Michael's bios children?
And also, to me Blanket is a copy of Michael, i totally see the reseblance.
Cute pics btw. He is such a big boy now, time really flies by

twins-non-identical-main.jpg
 
Last edited:
^ The big argument would be having one kid that looks totally one raced when biracial is one thing.. but having 3 kids that seem to be a single race when they would have to biracial is virtually impossible.. Look at all the siblings but one, you can tell they are mixed in this pic.

Blanket does have a different look than the other two though!
 
respect77 said:
Because it is a criminal allegation it does matter whether he is guilty or not of child molestation, so even if we, unfortunately, have to discuss very personal issues during the course of such discussions, it is very much a legit and important discussion. However, I do not see the importance and benefit in discussing PPB's paternity. It is a private matter that is noone's business but MJ's and his kids'. There is an irony in people saying "it doesn't matter" yet they want to discuss it and get as heated over it as they are in this thread. If it doesn't matter then why do you want to discuss it so much?



Again, this has nothing to do with how old Blanket is. This has to do with basic human respect IMO. I know the general public discusses it. I know other forums discuss it. I know of forums where you cannot mention PPB, in any context, without someone smart-assing in with his 2 cents of stating "but they are not his children!" and each and every mention of them turning into a paternity debate. Do we want MJJC go down that path? I know I don't.

As for the other discussions, I think there are certain segments of the forum where those discussions are allowed (eg. discussions about the family in 2300 Jackson Street, allegations in the Trials section). Paternity talk too IS allowed, but in the Hood section.
Click to expand...

All of the bolded is SO damn true.

I in general don't really care about the kids, so I never see the need to discuss them at length in the first place.
I wish them all well in life because they're Michael's kids, but I don't see why some MJfans follow them on social media, talk about them as much as they do MJ himself, etc.

And let any of the people in here spend a day on Trashy Alley even INSIDE the MJ forum and I bet they'd be BEGGING to come back to MJJC.
I myself stopped visiting that website because of all of the f***ery about MJ and general MJ hate on there.
If MJJC became even half way like Trashy Alley I know a lot of people would leave, so I don't want this website going that way either.

And I do believe that this thread should be moved to the hood, but that's up to a mod.
 
Last edited:
It's quite obvious that MJ is not the biological father of any of his kids unless you never been in any of your science class. But at the end of the day he is indeed their dad. It's like someone's who who's been adopted and every day people said your parent (that adopted you).
But yeah people need to stop making threads "his kids just looked like him". It will avoid all those dramas.
 
vanou said:
It's quite obvious that MJ is not the biological father of any of his kids unless you never been in any of your science class. But at the end of the day he is indeed their dad. It's like someone's who who's been adopted and every day people said your parent (that adopted you).
But yeah people need to stop making threads "his kids just looked like him". It will avoid all those dramas.
Click to expand...

Blanket in particular DOES look like him though.
 
You really don't want to let it go. Are you really that naive?
I'm a huge MJ fan and really respect him but you cannot believe everything he said during interviews.
 
Blanket actually looks very native American ( Indian) . I really have never cared about the paternity thing. I think its quite obvious he is not the bio father to the two oldest but again he was still their father at the end of the day. Blanket defo has the original large nose pre surgery i think though if you look closely. However I think the pale skin is down to him being red indian.
 
vanou said:
You really don't want to let it go. Are you really that naive?
I'm a huge MJ fan and really respect him but you cannot believe everything he said during interviews.
Click to expand...

I have every right to respond to what you say, I'm not being naive, and this isn't even about believing everything MJ said during interviews because even when he told to truth people didn't believe him.
Blanket DOES look like him, and Blanket (not the two other kids) was the focus of this thread.
I've even seen people that don't think Prince and Paris are his biologically say that they think Blanket is his only bio child.
 
It's no use arguing about whether Blanket, Prince, and Paris are Michael's biological children. It doesn't matter. They're grown up now. He raised them, they're his kids. :popcorn:
Y'all see how they just randomly included that video at the end of the article? Not surprising.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top