redfrog
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2015
- Messages
- 947
- Points
- 0
Frank said Emily is not Shana awhile ago.
He said it where? I only know his twitter timeline. Was it in some interview?
Frank said Emily is not Shana awhile ago.
Shana Mangatal
Follow · <a class="_39g5" href="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153594369313233&set=a.10150580771038233.377146.667538232&type=3&permPage=1"><abbr title="Friday, April 8, 2016 at 9:21pm" data-utime="1460143298" data-shorten="1">April 8</abbr> ·
#fbf I just found these notes that I scribbled 2 decades ago. It was 20 years ago TODAY that Michael Jackson called me at work and asked if I would be able to take some time off to act in a short film with him called "2 Bad". Less than a week later we were on the set filming his masterpiece that would later be called "Ghosts". Time flies. Cherish every moment.
@redfrog
I don't have a dog in this, but you seem to because you are writing long essays to try to convince me that Shana is the real deal. I am sceptical and I am yet to see anything that would dissolve that scepticism,
but I am open to evidence. Nothing that you listed so far is that evidence to me. You are just quoting people about MJ making flirty remarks about Shana. I can see that but that doesn't mean a relationship.
Also you went from going on in the allegations thread about MJ supposedly being asexual to now wanting so much to believe this Shana story. It's weird.
It's like you desperately need this for some reason regarding the allegations.
We will see, but so far to me the things Shana is posting seem more like a business relationship than a romantic one. Eg.
If her claim about Paul Walker is the best you have against her that's not convincing.
So I would like to see any and all evidence that Shana is lying and so far I haven't seen any. You don't have any either, apparently.
^ LOL. You are funny. It's not up to me to disprove Shana's story. It's up to her to prove her story. The burden of proof is always on the one who makes a claim.
Yes she has to show proof but that doesn't change the fact that your arguments so far as to why you think she is a liar
are weak to say the least. And unlike me who is on the fence you did suggest that she is deluded and making shit up.
You sounded like someone who already dismisses her as just another Tatiana.
Maybe I wasn't clear enough. I'm investigating this matter because of the way haters use MJ's relationships with women or lack thereof to prove that he was into boys and because of its potential impact on the Robson/Safechuck case including the possibility of the
Glenda tapes being played in court. So I just want to see reasonable arguments or proof people who think she is a liar may have.
What do you think about the girl MJ talked about on the tape? You think it's a coincidence? Do you have any idea who the girl she was talking about is, if it's not Shana?
I knew that this is all about the allegations and haters to you. That's all you ever focus on regarding MJ. LOL.
Whether Shana was his girlfriend or not doesn't prove or disprove the allegations. Many child molesters are married to women or date women.
Mez could have called Lisa Marie, maybe others if he had wanted to prove MJ was heterosexual (which IMO he was, on contrary with your assumption about him being asexual)
It may also be an umbrella term used to categorize a broader spectrum of various asexual sub-identities.
Due to the wide range of this spectrum, gray asexuality encompasses a variety of individuals under the "ace umbrella." Individuals who identify with gray asexuality are referred to as being gray-A, a grace or a gray ace. Within this spectrum includes terms such as "hyposexual", "demisexual", "semisexual", "low sexual intensity", "asexual-ish" and "sexual-ish".
Some asexual people engage in sexual activity despite lacking sexual attraction or a desire for sex, due to a variety of reasons, such as a desire to pleasure themselves or romantic partners, or a desire to have children.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexuality
, but he knew it's as much of a red herring as Sneddon trying to prove MJ was gay by showing art books.
He focused on the actual case rather than red herrings or making up lies in MJ's defense (such as him being asexual) which was good IMO.
The woman on the tapes is called Melissa, not Shana. That's what I think about it. You may think MJ used a code name for her or something but that again is just speculation. There is no evidence the Melissa of the Glenda tapes is Shana.
You keep missing the point on who has the burden of proof here. It's not me. I have every right to be sceptical as long as a claim is not proven.
I suggest you take the allegations talk to the relevant thread. No need to pollute this one with that too just because you are unable to talk about anything else when it comes to MJ.
Nope, it's just this is the subject I talk about here in order to gather info and have better arguments against haters.
I don't see much reason to post about other things that doesn't mean I'm not interested in other things.
Why do you think that's funny?
In case you missed it this is the one thing which killed MJ and which they are trying to use to destroy his legacy once and for all as we speak.
No, this is another thing haters like to use. The Lanning profile.
Yes people who are serial boy molesters may get married to cover what they really are. And heterosexual male molesters
may be attracted to little girls and women.
But I can't think of any serial boy molester who go from one woman to another to another who have romances who show a continuous
interest in women for years and years whether they are married to them or not. You don't see that with Sandusky, Porter, Geoghan, Grady, Bambaataa.
One of his accusers just recently challenged people to show any woman he was with! People do make this argument whether you admit it or not
and Zonen made it too during the trial.
@redfrog
I don't have a dog in this, but you seem to because you are writing long essays to try to convince me that Shana is the real deal. I am sceptical and I am yet to see anything that would dissolve that scepticism, but I am open to evidence. Nothing that you listed so far is that evidence to me. You are just quoting people about MJ making flirty remarks about Shana. I can see that but that doesn't mean a relationship.
Also you went from going on in the allegations thread about MJ supposedly being asexual to now wanting so much to believe this Shana story. It's weird. It's like you desperately need this for some reason regarding the allegations. If Shana's story is true, cool, but I am not desperate to believe it.
We will see, but so far to me the things Shana is posting seem more like a business relationship than a romantic one. Eg.
^ Yawn. I have no interest in discussing with this any further, because anything I say will just give you an excuse to further derail the thread to turn it into your pet topic which is the allegations.
You literally can't speak about anything else when it comes to MJ.
You cannot discuss any topic without somehow writing long essays about the allegations. Now once again you write essays about the allegations, the trial, Brett, the Chandlers, the prosecution and what not in a thread that is about Shana Mangatal's book.
I have no obligation to believe Shana just because she says something. You will just have to deal with it.
If she provides proof that changes my mind about her story then I will change my mind. I have no dog in this fight while you obviously do. The burden of proof is on her, no matter how you try to twist it. That's where it ends to me.
PLEASE!!! Take this over to the Trials and Tribulations thread-your only interest in Shana and her book is if she'll be a good witness or not in the Robson trial-which we all hope to God there will not be a trial at all-and it gets THROWN OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have no reason to doubt Shana's story, but it does seem odd that she talked about being "dumped" when Michael married Lisa Marie-in 94- then she shows this note from 96 where Michael doesn't recognize her voice?? Maybe it's because I'm just reading part of it.
^ LOL. You are funny. It's not up to me to disprove Shana's story. It's up to her to prove it in the first place. The burden of proof is always on the one who makes a claim.
If she is telling the truth she should have some evidence of this romance - like personal notes written to her by MJ or poems or photos in a personal setting, not just the ones she shared so far that any fan can have. With such a long relationship that she claims she must have something more personal and more intimate.
Where are the pictures of them holding hands, hugging, kissing, going out to dinner together, being on holiday together, or anything else that people in love do?
Knowing how much Michael loved to write, can't she share a little note that he wrote for her with us?
As for the day of the event, her responsibility was to take care of all the Jackson family needs, therefore she coordinated everything that involved the Jackson family, the photos, the place they would be seated, and whatever they needed, etc. As Shana and I talked I asked her to give me some details about the day of the event. She pointed out that she was very pleased to assist with the coordinating, and felt the event was very successful.
MJ She's a, you now, she's a coordinator and stuff and she does a lot of stuff with the band.
Q She models too?
MJ: She does all kinds of things.
I don't know what she has but if I wanted to keep a relationship secret I wouldn't want such pictures to be taken.
Do you believe the bodyguards and their story about Flower and Friend? They seemed genuine but the story is odd, to say the least
and there is no evidence to back it up.
But we know Lisa married Michael, she has nothing to prove to the world. Michael is on record talking about how he wanted to have children with her. Besides, Lisa is not the one writing a book about their relationship so I have no idea why you brought her up.It's not that Lisa shared any such notes with us in fact she was livid when one went public. She kept them for herself
even after most people said the marriage was a sham.
Maybe Shana wants everyone to buy the book to see that evidence. If there is nothing there she should come up with
some really good explanation why she has only one photo with him and nothing more.
Just because Michael (supposedly) didn't want to share this relationship with the world doesn't mean he didn't allow any pictures to be taken for himself. In fact I think it's pretty much impossible to be with someone for years without any record of it, especially when it's someone like Michael who was always surrounded by cameras and who was always leaving notes.
I don't know which bodyguards and which story you are talking about but as a general rule, I don't believe the bodyguards on their word, no. And I think it's very unprofessional for them to be sharing personal details about Michael's life like that, no matter what their intentions are.
But we know Lisa married Michael, she has nothing to prove to the world. Michael is on record talking about how he wanted to have children with her. Besides, Lisa is not the one writing a book about their relationship so I have no idea why you brought her up.
We'll see. In any case your argument that Michael being with Shana somehow proves he wasn't a pedophile is absurd.
If two marriages didn't convince the haters that Michael had no sexual interest in children, this sure as hell won't.
Not to mention it's a flawed argument to begin with and I hope you're not actually using this in discussions with haters.
Yes I can and I did and now you are flat out lying.
You repeat yourself and sound hysterical when you could have simply answered my question with a yes or no:
If she provides proof that changes my mind about her story then I will change my mind. I have no dog in this fight while you obviously do. The burden of proof is on her, no matter how you try to twist it. That's where it ends to me.
The woman on the tapes is called Melissa, not Shana. That's what I think about it. You may think MJ used a code name for her or something but that again is just speculation. There is no evidence the Melissa of the Glenda tapes is Shana.
If they wanted to keep it secret then yes it's possible they were never in a situation together
where someone could have taken a revealing photo. That's the whole point of a SECRET relationship, don't you think?
Anyway, I was talking about the type of photos which would indicate a romantic relationship.
I don't think photos showing them in the same room or walking side by side somewhere would prove anything.
At the same time her not having any "romantic" photos in and of itself would not prove she is lying, either.
She just should give a reasonable explanation why she has no more than one photo with him,
which so far she has not.
Oh yes, I forgot once you discussed the Estate for a short while. But 99% it's the allegations. BTW, you are not someone to call others a liar here. You have had about 2-3 different accouts here and lied about it when called out. And with all your accounts here your obsession have always been the allegations.
I repeat myself because that's my simple stance.
I have no obligation to believe her until she provides evidence, no matter how many long rants you write about how necessary she is to defend MJ against the allegations. Until she provides evidence all that is pretty much a moot point.
I didn't even say Melissa cannot be Shana by any means, I just said at this point we have no evidence it is her and this is a speculation. That's all I said. Not that it is definitely not her.
But you obviously want me to embrace the Melissa=Shana idea right now because you keep pushing me about it further.
It's alright with me if you think Melissa is Shana, or if any female name ever mentioned in connection with MJ is now Shana in your book - that's your opinion and maybe you are right,
But it sounds like he calls her Melissa so that certainly doesn't make things any clearer LOL
Anyway, if not true this would be an awful lot of coincidences don't you think?
maybe you are wrong. All I say is that I need more evidence to say Melissa is Shana but you are trying to push me to say something that I cannot honestly say at this point.
If you believe that Melissa is Shana that's fine with me. I am not here to convince you otherwise. Maybe you will be proven right too. But it's just a speculation so far. You are the one trying to millitantly convince others about Shana
and not being able to admit that until there is actual evidence of anything it's a matter of opinion and speculation and people who think she is not telling the truth have every right to think so about these unproven claims and they are not the ones who have to prove anything. It's Shana. Because no, the burden of proof doesn't shift on people who don't believe her for not believing her. That's an absurd idea.
Photos are not the only way to prove a relationship. It can be notes, poems, letters. Which are bound to happen between lovers. Especially when it comes to MJ who seemed to write notes and letters to people all the time. Just show us something that is more intimate than "I want you to appear in Ghosts".
The Lisa Marie analogue is a bad one. First of all we DO have a note from MJ to Lisa that has an intimate tone.
We don't have any such thing from Shana as of now. Maybe we will but for now we don't. Lisa didn't release notes but she is not someone who has to prove anything.
Shana, however, is yet to prove her relationship with MJ. She is just about to release a book about her supposed relationship with MJ, so she is not being private about it or keeping it a secret. If she had something, anything substantial to back up her claims I am pretty sure she would. Maybe she will. But so far she hasn't. All she provided so far rather suggests a distant, working relationship.
You flat out suggested that Shana is delusional and a liar and her mother too
and the people who support her book are liars too.
There is a reason why Zonen was so desperate to establish that MJ was not attracted to women at all and never had a relationship with any woman and his marriages were shams. He was no fool. I know for a fact based on years of experience that this is an effective weapon against MJ, you chose to not acknowledge it, fine.
No you didn't answer what I actually asked. Do you think it's a coincidence that all those things apply to Shana?
If you think that it's fine but that's what you think? Yes or no?
I just want to see some reasonable explanation about those similarities.
2004: Shana helped coordinate the celebration at Michael’s Never Land Ranch.
Her brother Todd blogged about this back in 2004
1-15-04 My sister Shana Mangatal still supports Michael Jackson 100%, and as promised I must update you on the issue with Shana and Michael. You may recall in my previous e-mails I indicated that my sister was busy with helping coordinate the celebration at Michael’s Never Land Ranch in Santa Barbara. Yes, two weeks prior to Christmas she was asked to contact and invite many of her celebrity friends as well as Michaels’ to attend the celebration. Of course, she was glad to help and immediately got busy inviting folks. Needless to say, she did a great job, because many of the celebrities were thrilled to receive an invitation, and many attended. As for the day of the event, her responsibility was to take care of all the Jackson family needs, therefore she coordinated everything that involved the Jackson family, the photos, the place they would be seated, and whatever they needed, etc. As Shana and I talked I asked her to give me some details about the day of the event. She pointed out that she was very pleased to assist with the coordinating, and felt the event was very successful. She was happy that her good friend Tommy Davidson had agreed to host the event, and was a bit distracted and embarrassed the day of the event when he gave her a loud “shout out” on the Mic. Being as personal as she is, she didn’t go in much detail about the day’s activities, except that she was very busy making sure everything she was responsible for was handled properly and correctly. I asked if she had time to mingle with the celebrities and she stated she really didn’t have much time, but was able to say hi to many. At the end of the day she did spend a little time with Michael, who expressed his appreciation to her for “being there for him”, for her help with the event and it’s success, and most importantly for all her support. Of course, this touched her dearly.
I'm not pushing you to do anything. I was ASKING you whether you think it's just a coincidence and whether you or others
have a reasonable explanation as to why these two girls are so similar.
Which part of that you don't understand?
I repeatedly said that I'm on the fence on this issue
Anyway, all I'm saying that just because Shana is not publishing intimate notes does not mean she is a lying.
My parents never wrote notes or letters to each other I know it for a fact that doesn't mean they didn't have a relationship.
LOL explain that to the millions who think her relationship with MJ was a sham.
I agree that she doesn't have to prove anything to us but it's not that Lisa has not been called a liar just like
you thought Shana is a liar. Even after that note was published people still think she lied MJ lied and the whole thing
was a fraud.
LOL, redfrog.
For someone who keeps claiming that he doesn't mind if others don't believe Shana you sure do very long and emotional rants in her defense
It may also be an umbrella term used to categorize a broader spectrum of various asexual sub-identities. Due to the wide range of this spectrum, gray asexuality encompasses a variety of individuals under the "ace umbrella." Individuals who identify with gray asexuality are referred to as being gray-A, a grace or a gray ace.[1][4] Within this spectrum includes terms such as "hyposexual", "demisexual", "semisexual", "low sexual intensity", "asexual-ish" and "sexual-ish".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_asexuality
Attraction
Many asexual people experience attraction, but we feel no need to act out that attraction sexually. Instead we feel a desire to get to know someone, to get close to them in whatever way works best for us. Asexual people who experience attraction will often be attracted to a particular gender, and will identify as lesbian, gay, bi, or straight.
Arousal
For some sexual arousal is a fairly regular occurrence, though it is not associated with a desire to find a sexual partner or partners. Some will occasionally masturbate, but feel no desire for partnered sexuality.
http://www.asexuality.org/home/?q=overview.html
Also you were being misleading with the quote that you put here from Todd Mangatal about Shana being a coordinator for MJ. In the context Todd talked about one event in 2004. That is more than 10 years after that Melissa worked for MJ. Once again, the full quote doesn't only show that we are talking only about one event here in 2004, but also it seems to portray a more formal, working relationship than anything.
So why would this be the big story that would help to defend MJ?
Some woman claiming something with no evidence won't convince anyone.
You will not be able to tell a jury what you keep telling me here: "prove me she is lying and she is delusional if you don't want to believe her". LOL.
In a court it will be the exact opposite (as it should be): "Shana dear, prove us you had a romantic relationship with MJ. What's your evidence for that? Backstage photos with MJ's band won't do."
^^I laughed about Shana and Melissa being the same person-I was reading different interviews with people who worked with Prince the last few years. Three different ones about exhausted assistants who worked there, toured with him, coordinated everything he needed. 24 years old. Former models. Three different girls.
Yes, for now I think it is a coincidence or not even that. Maybe it is just you who make them strikingly similar in your mind. What I mean is that when I look at this timeline on this Shana supporting blog: http://michaeljacksonandshanamangatal.blogspot.hu/ it does not seem to me that her contact with MJ was more than sporadic over the years. Shana was Sandy Gallin's secretary and as such she had a couple of visits to MJ shows backstage and stuff like that. It doesn't seem to me that she was a co-ordinator for MJ or worked on the Dangerous tour. She was there two times (Hawaii, Tokyo) as a visitor. That's when her photos with the band were taken.
I had an on and off relationship with a guy for three years and we didn't leave notes, although I'm a prolific note writer. Reading this, I realized I have no pictures either. So, I guess proof or no proof doesn't really mean anything-
I think it just matters if her story sounds credible. Tatiana's story sounded too crazy to be credible.
Actually that website says that the drum photo was taken during the rehearsals "playing around on the drums at MJ's Dangerous tour rehearsal." and whoever the girl is on the tape was prepared to go on tour with him then for whatever reason she would not.
Glenda: Is she going on tour with you?
MJ: No....not anymore.
The tape was made in Jun 1992 before MJ went on tour.
The towelhead meeting took place amid rehearsals and according to that photo Shana was there. It's possible that she was just there as a friend but it could also mean that she was a coordinator and dealt with the band during the rehearsals.
Prince liked to be surrounded by hot chicks all the time it's not that surprising that he would employ former models.
But MJ as far as I know didn't have that habit and it's not just that they are both models and were young. There are other strange
coincidences.
To make it worse your whole theory makes no sense.
Why the heck would I want to convince YOU of all people that she is telling the truth?
Are you a potential juror? No.
What difference would it make if you believed her? You believing her would suddenly make her a good witness?
Where is the connection between your opinion of her and whether her story, if true, could help beat Robson/Safechuck or the perception that MJ was into boys?
You keep repeating the same falsehoods about what I supposedly think and it's obvious you didn't even bother to read my previous post.
So for the last time:
- The reason why I asked you to show proof was that you were sure not sceptical but sure that she was nuts.
I merely was interested in whatever info you and others may have about her which proves she is liar.
sceptical: doubting that something is true or useful:
Shana sounds like delusional groupie to me.
But I don't go as far as you did and say that she is deluded either simply because there is not proof of that
like there is proof that Tatiana is in lala land, for example.
- You know very well that in criminal court the burden of proof is higher than in a civil court.
So just because Zonen's tactic didn't work in 2005 does not mean it would not work in a civil court.
You also know that Ken Lanning was on the prosecution witness list and Clemente would have testified
if he had not cancer. Did you read the report they wrote? Do you know why haters love that report?
You can bet that they would call experts like Clemente or Lanning or even those two themselves.
- This is yet another idiotic exaggeration: "BTW, your selectiveness about what is a good argument in court is funny. Apparently if it is your idea then it is a great argument. LOL.""When and where I did I say that only my ideas are good arguments in court? Stop putting words in my mouth.
- Whether you like to admit it or not those who are not MJ's fans DO make the leap from frequent bed sharing to him being a predator. That perception can be fatal in a civil court.
- You are totally clueless about asexuality that's why you have no idea why an asexual would have adult magazines.
- It's funny that you demand proof from Shana but you don't apply the same standard for MJ's entire adult life and are convinced that he was heterosexual as in having sex with women like other "normal" hetero guys. What proof do you have that was the case? I'm certainly open to new evidence and I change my mind if I see it but I never saw any proof that MJ had regular sex like sexual people do.
- Tom Mez should have explained why MJ didn't see sharing a bed with children as something sexual and most of all why he could spend so many nights with kids in his bed without doing anything sexual while he didn't have an adult companion with him during the same period. He and MJ were damn lucky that Hultman was pressured by the other jurors to put that bedsharing equals sex idea aside and only focus on the evidence against the Arvixos because that idiot and Cook and a third juror were quite ready to convict MJ and one reason Hultman said was this:
"It's hard for me to imagine that this man would spend 365 days in bed with a boy and only watch television".
- It's hardly desperate if it's the truth. If MJ was asexual that should have been established in court.
If he was having regular sex with women that should have been established. You are only glad Tom Mez didn't bother with any of that because Hultman and Cook and the Asian-American juror were willing to give up ultimately. Otherwise it would have been a hung jury, a disaster for MJ. Two jurors declared on TV that MJ was a pedo and got away with it. Are you glad about that too?
At the same time the reasons you gave why you think she is nuts
were just silly. Her mother supporting her because she is her mother stuff like that. That's just not enough to convince me that she is crazy. Just like some MJJ employee backing her does not convince me that she is telling the truth.
Her mother is backing her up regarding this whole thing, so is Gregg Mitchell who worked for MJJ Productions
now I see Shaq O'Neill being quoted supporting this whole notion that something was going on between the two.
Shana's mother? Are you kidding me? It's not surprising if she supports her daughter.
- People didn't believe Lisa because of the timing and because the marriage went south quickly. And frankly, because she is Elvis's daughter. The whole thing looked PR and damage control.
No I didn't want to suggest that Todd was talking about 1992 just that Shana was working as a coordinator.
MJ didn't even say on the tape that she was a coordinator during the rehearsals just that she was a coordinator.
Like if you said that someone is a DJ but that doesn't mean he was the DJ at a particular party.
Can two girls who were both models, who both loved MJ, who both were around the band, who were both coordinators be with MJ in 1992? Sure it's possible. I just don't think it's very likely.
Sandusky, Father Porter, Rodney Allen, Marc Collin Rector , Africa Bambataa, Christopher Michael Bradshaw, Thomas Hacker, Norbert Maday, William Vahey -- all serial boy molesters none of them had romances with women.
MJ says "not anymore" which suggests earlier Melissa went on tour with him. Probably Bad Tour then.
I am sure there have been many rehearsals before and during the Dangerous tour and Shana being at the tour twice as a guest including attending a rehearsal doesn't prove in any way that she is the Melissa of the Glenda tapes and that she is the girl in this "towelhead" story.
I don't think it even makes it a strange "coincidence" or anything like that. I am sure MJ had a lot of people around on tours and he often invited guests. Eg. he invited the whole office of Arnold Klein to the HIStory tour etc. Shana might have got those invitations to the Dangerous tour in a similar way - as she was working for Sandy Gallin. It doesn't seem anything more to me.
I don't think models in and around Hollywood who also work in another job (or people with other aspiration who do modelling for extra cash or fun) are that much rare. Many people go to Hollywood to make it this or that way, and that often includes some modeling too.
Do you know about any girl on the Bad tour who was a model and was in love with MJ and whom MJ was interested in? I sure don't.
And during the all years these tapes have been public there hasn't been anyone who figured out the link between a girl named Melissa on the Bad tour
and the girl on the tape?
Shana wasn't in Hawai on the Dangerous tour that was during the HIStory tour in 1997. The Dangerous tour didn't even have concert in Hawaii.
On the drum picture she looks like on the picture taken in Japan so it was in 1992.
Yes it could have been taken in Japan but what was she doing there and what was she doing with the band?
Yes but how many girls can you name who were around MJ in 1992, they got invited on the tour, hung out with the band, were models, were coordinators
were in love with MJ who knew where all the offices were including MJ's (which Shana most likely did if she worked for his manager)?
MJ: And I was in the back office?
Glenda: So she knows where the office is?
MJ: Of course she always knows where all the offices are...
That's the question, what are the chances of ALL those things being true to two girls at the same time? One who nobody ever saw or heard (Melissa) and another who pops up around MJ time and again for 15 years.
That's more than just both Shana and Melissa having some kind of link to the band or both being on tour with him at some point at least.
Anyway, what do you think about Shana's response? I find it odd, for the sake of change.
She didn't say the girl on the tape is not her rather that she wrote a similar episode in his book and what was said on the tape sounds familiar.
If she is a liar she stole the story and pretends to be Melissa isn't she afraid that the real Melissa would expose her? Why would she risk something like that what's the point? It's not that she will become rich because of this book so why would she tell such a blatant lie pretending to be someone else even?
If Shana claims her relationship with MJ was secret than his relationship with this Melissa should be taught to the CIA.
Prince liked to be surrounded by hot chicks all the time it's not that surprising that he would employ former models.
But MJ as far as I know didn't have that habit (except maybe in the studio if LA Reid was telling the truth) and it's not just that they are both models and were young.