wednesday
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 550
- Points
- 0
mj_frenzy;4235265 said:Also, rejecting a book judging only by the title of it (‘Making Michael’, shows the superficial way of your research.
You sound so gullible. Hope you don't judge the book by its cover, in this case its title. Let's hope you at least read it. I have read books on Michael too, btw. And no book is EVER objective. Every book, even if written by an academic, has its bias and its flaws. And it is on the reader to detect those flaws or not. It is very clear from your posts that you are not objective when it comes to Michael yourself. You are obsessively arguing what Michael did not do, what Michael supposedly stole (without evidence) and so on. Seems you rely heavily on 'Making Michael'. Guess we will find all YOUR arguments there...