Latest on MJJC

Chris Brown

bok22 said:
You don't like nobody
Click to expand...

That's bullshit. I like lots of people. I just don't like Chris as an artist and you can't stand it so you excuse me of hating on everyone. Maybe you just don't go in to threads on actually talented artists where you can see me talking about how talented they are.
 
wannabestartinsomthin21 said:
That's bullshit. I like lots of people. I just don't like Chris as an artist and you can't stand it so you excuse me of hating on everyone. Maybe you just don't go in to threads on actually talented artists where you can see me talking about how talented they are.
Click to expand...

What?? Chris is very talented, what is it you don't like about Chris? can you not see how talented he is?? He could put on a show, I could tell that much. Maybe hes not original but hes very orginal with his music, his music his good!!! How could you say hes not talented and he is talented, he could sing, a couple years back he couldnt sing at all he had bad bad grammer, he couldnt even talk. but now he as improve himself, now he could sing and dance, alot of ppl can't even dance and sing at one time. So i give props to Chris, hes doing his thing, but sometimes I be thinking that hes trying to be Michael Jackson, but I do know he admire him ALOT. So you tell me if Michael Jackson say Chris a very talented young man, and you don't believe he is????
 
Last edited:
No, I don't believe he's "very" talented. I've already said WHY on numerous occasions and I don't feel like repeating myself.
 
wannabestartinsomthin21 said:
Naw man, that's Michael that's gonna take over in 09!
Click to expand...

How do you know?? did mike said that?? did you hear music from him yet?? doe he have hes plan tour updated yet?? NO, Michael an't gonna release anything in 09, he probably do a apperance here and there, but...nothing really exciting... probably in 2010 which I doudt. but anyways, you don't like to see a man who admire mike so much to take that fame, i just realize that, are you jealous?
 
Man, be quiet. You're talking like you're on crack. Chris ain't a threat and never will be. He's a poor man's Michael Jackson.

And you're acting like you know Michael won't release anything this year, so I ask you the same question you asked me. How the hell do you know?

At least I base my prediction on an actual press release from Michael while you obviously base your's on your obsessive greed for something new from him.

Chris is gonna have to step back once Michael hits the scene again. Not that he's got that far to step back from. Last I heard, he isn't exactly creating earthquakes on the charts.
 
wannabestartinsomthin21 said:
Man, be quiet. You're talking like you're on crack. Chris ain't a threat and never will be. He's a poor man's Michael Jackson.

And you're acting like you know Michael won't release anything this year, so I ask you the same question you asked me. How the hell do you know?

At least I base my prediction on an actual press release from Michael while you obviously base your's on your obsessive greed for something new from him.

Chris is gonna have to step back once Michael hits the scene again. Not that he's got that far to step back from. Last I heard, he isn't exactly creating earthquakes on the charts.
Click to expand...

Step back?? Is you on crack? he just starting his career....for goddness sake, hes young and having fun...But how do you know michael "new album" is goin to be a success?? same question you ask me... how do you know? Chris and nobody wont have to step back when mike comes back, wth nobody an't scared of mike...but we'll see though
 
lol, Michael's album will be a success based on past performances, that's how I know. The man hasn't had anything less then a number one album since "Off The Wall". That's 30 years ago holmes. And I said Chris will have to step back because he's just another in a long line of Michael Jackson imitators who want's to be Mike. But he ain't and never will be. He doesn't have the talent. See, at least I base my judgements and predictions on facts. You on the other hand just seem to be going off of pure emotion.
 
wannabestartinsomthin21 said:
lol, Michael's album will be a success based on past performances, that's how I know. The man hasn't had anything less then a number one album since "Off The Wall". That's 30 years ago holmes. And I said Chris will have to step back because he's just another in a long line of Michael Jackson imitators who want's to be Mike. But he ain't and never will be. He doesn't have the talent. See, at least I base my judgements and predictions on facts. You on the other hand just seem to be going off of pure emotion.
Click to expand...

Michael havent had number one single in like 13 years, his last album was horrible as I recall, but it did sold a lot, ofcourse


Just wanted you to let you know, I hope he come back with a big hit...but you shouldnt have say that chris should step back, thats not fair...you wouldnt like if i said michael should step back...anyways...
 
Man come on now. "Invincible" sold 10 million copies and was number one around the world, with practically ZERO promotion and only one single which was rushed and forced on Michael, and still went top ten. It was a very big success. More successful then anyone elses album in recent years. And it was very good music.

Chris will need to step back along with everyone else in the industry because Michael is a force and nobody can touch him.
 
but Invincible suck though, the songs was over produced, it was horrible...who cares if it sold alot...matter of fact ofcourse it sold alot because hes Michael Jacskon, that doesnt mean the album a hit, it wasnt at all
 
Ofcourse nobody cant touch him, but I still sat Invincible sucks and I could tell you Chris 2 album was way better than Invincible, now what you gotta say about that now?
 
The album was a hit if it went to number one and the songs didn't suck. The songs, the ballads specifically were melodically strong and Michael's vocals were killer. They were a hell of a lot better then any of that crap Chris puts out with his layered voice and mind numbing 4 minute hooks.

The point being is Michael's album will be a success based on the fact that all of his albums since he went solo as an adult have been. You're failing to look at all the dicerning factors, such as the obvious antipation of the entertainment world to see what Michael can come up with and how well it will do. Based on that alone there will be massive hype and anticipation around his next move and everyone will be watching. And Michael always dilivers, so you know on an artistic front it will be amazing.
 
bok22 said:
Ofcourse nobody cant touch him, but I still sat Invincible sucks and I could tell you Chris 2 album was way better than Invincible, now what you gotta say about that now?
Click to expand...

I'm gonna say you need to get your ears checked. Based on vocals alone, "Invincible" crushes Chris' two "efforts", and the songs are obviously much stronger melodically, rhythmically, emotively, etc...
 
The album was a hit if it went to number one and the songs didn't suck. The songs, the ballads specifically were melodically strong and Michael's vocals were killer. They were a hell of a lot better then any of that crap Chris puts out with his layered voice and mind numbing 4 minute hooks.


^^^
The damn album suck, point blank!!! it sold alot cuz hes michael jackson...the alnum was over writin and over produced, too much techno
 
You know what Im done competing with you, I could tell you most fans dont like Invincible that much.
 
There's plenty of fans on this very board who love the album. If you call "Invincible" overproduced and too much tecno. then what the hell is Chris Brown, lol?

You don't have to like the album, but it's high quality music, and the original point wasn't even whether you think the album was any good artistically, but whether it was a commercial success, which it was, which goes back to supporting my argument that anything Michael put's out will be a success and that's why I said what I did. First you said nobody is scared of Michael and that there's no way to tell whether his album will be successful or not and now you're saying "of course it was successful because he's Michael Jackson" and decide instead to attack the artistic integrity of the work, doing nothing to support your point but to say it sucked, lol.
 
Yup just on this board...

If you had one choice out of all his albums, im sure you wounldnt pick Invincible, if you u love the album so much.
 
It's a good album, bottom line, and I've seen that said in numerous places. Preference has nothing to do with objective judgement.

And the discussion isn't about how much I like "Invincible", it's about why Michael's next project will be successful.
 
wannabestartinsomthin21 said:
There's plenty of fans on this very board who love the album. If you call "Invincible" overproduced and too much tecno. then what the hell is Chris Brown, lol?

You don't have to like the album, but it's high quality music, and the original point wasn't even whether you think the album was any good artistically, but whether it was a commercial success, which it was, which goes back to supporting my argument that anything Michael put's out will be a success and that's why I said what I did. First you said nobody is scared of Michael and that there's no way to tell whether his album will be successful or not and now you're saying "of course it was successful because he's Michael Jackson" and decide instead to attack the artistic integrity of the work, doing nothing to support your point but to say it sucked, lol.
Click to expand...

OMg i said its probably succesful cuz hes michael jackosn, BUT THAT DOESNT MEAN ITS AN HIT!!! and it wasnt a hit at all, it suck
 
wannabestartinsomthin21 said:
It's a good album, bottom line, and I've seen that said in numerous places. Preference has nothing to do with objective judgement.

And the discussion isn't about how much I like "Invincible", it's about why Michael's next project will be successful.
Click to expand...

I thoUHGT the disscussion was about Chirs, but since you hate chirs so much you are actually enjoyING praysin miChael IN CHRIS THREAD
 
All I said was Michael's gonna take over 09 and you came at me asking how I know and so I told you. You started the convo., basically. I was just airing my excitment over Michael's plans, it was an off comment not intended to turn the thread in to a discussion about how much "Invincible" sucks, according to you. A commercial success is equivilent to a hit, don't you understand that? "Invincible" was a hit despite the media telling you it wasn't. Do you always believe what the media tells you?
 
wannabestartinsomthin21 said:
All I said was Michael's gonna take over 09 and you came at me asking how I know and so I told you. You started the convo., basically. I was just airing my excitment over Michael's plans, it was an off comment not intended to turn the thread in to a discussion about how much "Invincible" sucks, according to you. A commercial success is equivilent to a hit, don't you understand that? "Invincible" was a hit despite the media telling you it wasn't. Do you always believe what the media tells you?
Click to expand...

And do you undertstand that Chirs is a talented man? do you understand that? Michael never said hes goin to have a album out in 09, so I dont know where you got your info from
 
It's a "p-r-e-d-i-c-t-i-o-n" based on what he's told fans and on the press release he just put out. It wasn't even meant as a serious comment.

And Chris isn't talented when you compare him to people who can truly sing and dance. Chris is a dime a dozen act.
 
wannabestartinsomthin21 said:
It's a "p-r-e-d-i-c-t-i-o-n" based on what he's told fans and on the press release he just put out. It wasn't even meant as a serious comment.

And Chris isn't talented when you compare him to people who can truly sing and dance. Chris is a dime a dozen act.
Click to expand...

He says that every year...so whats new?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top