Latest on MJJC

Where did this came from? / Love letter from Michael to????

I read this on Rushka's Bergman twitter
"It disturbs me that personal letters were taken from me and posted on the Internet. Some things should be sacred and private."
 
hmmmmmmmmmmmmm. if the letter was indeed addressed to her, she should have kept quiet about it and let the fans think it's fake.
 
di12 said:
I read this on Rushka's Bergman twitter
"It disturbs me that personal letters were taken from me and posted on the Internet. Some things should be sacred and private."
Click to expand...

This was my first reaction:

:rofl:

I thought you made a (good) joke.
But then I checked her account and saw it myself.

Here's a printscreen:

printscreenrushka.PNG


She also added:

" This cuts very deep but the assistance and love from my friends and family have helped as well as emails from you. "

And apperently (according to other MJ fans who contacted her on Twitter via direct message), she is indeed talking about this letter.

Still don't believe the letter is authentic though.
 
well, I guess it's real then. knowing they were friendly till the end, we can assume that whatever happened between them, the letter served its purpose and she was back in his arms after he sent it to her.
 
^^^ Do we know for sure if that's the real Rushka's twitter? I only ask because that account isn't verified, and her official website does not link back to any Twitter account as far as I can see.
 
/\ I also wanted to know this.
But everything seems logical and match. Do remember the words of Michael's bodyguards for the woman with Eastern European accent, which was called "friend"?
 
Buttercup said:
^^^ Do we know for sure if that's the real Rushka's twitter? I only ask because that account isn't verified, and her official website does not link back to any Twitter account as far as I can see.
Click to expand...

Yes, it's her account.
She posted a part of the interview "The Last Dinner With Michael Jackson" on her Twitter account before it was published to the public. It's on that Twitter account that she released the private pics of her and Michael for the first time.

Am I the only one who still finds it strange?
 
No, you are not but... this is Michael. Еverything around him is strange. Sometimes.
 
liliyyy said:
No, you are not but... this is Michael. Еverything around him is strange. Sometimes.
Click to expand...

I don't find Michael strange :D ;) (kidding, I know what you mean)
I find her coming forward very strange, just after someone claimed that the letter was stolen from his/her PC. Now she claims the letter has been taken from her. Meaning she and that person are the same one?

If she finds it so terrible, then why does she now claim the letter to be hers? If I would have found it soooo terrible, I would have kept silent and I would have left the mystery for what is was.

And when she gave her interview "The Last Dinner With Michael Jackson" she didn't exactly tried to avoid people from thinking that she had a relationship with Michael. To the contrary, she said it just the way people would think they had something.

Strange... But possible. Who will tell it's not her letter?
 
I also find it strange that she came forward with this info.

But I don't find it strange that Michael and her might have been a couple. It that's really true she is a VERY lucky lady because judging from that letter Michael loved her very deeply.
 
Webbie said:
I don't find Michael strange :D ;) (kidding, I know what you mean)
I find her coming forward very strange, just after someone claimed that the letter was stolen from his/her PC. Now she claims the letter has been taken from her. Meaning she and that person are the same one?

If she finds it so terrible, then why does she now claim the letter to be hers? If I would have found it soooo terrible, I would have kept silent and I would have left the mystery for what is was.

And when she gave her interview "The Last Dinner With Michael Jackson" she didn't exactly tried to avoid people from thinking that she had a relationship with Michael. To the contrary, she said it just the way people would think they had something.

Strange... But possible. Who will tell it's not her letter?
Click to expand...
I find it strange too. who would scan the physical love letter on their computer, and later complained that someone hacked her computer and steal the letter?:doh: I think the letter is fake.
 
Webbie said:
Yes, it's her account.
She posted a part of the interview "The Last Dinner With Michael Jackson" on her Twitter account before it was published to the public. It's on that Twitter account that she released the private pics of her and Michael for the first time.

Am I the only one who still finds it strange?
Click to expand...

Are you sure? Seems like quite a new account. The first tweet was this Spring. And the article and photos are from last year.... Or did she delete her old tweets?
 
JMie said:
But I don't find it strange that Michael and her might have been a couple. It that's really true she is a VERY lucky lady because judging from that letter Michael loved her very deeply.
Click to expand...
I agree :wub: and I don't think the letter is fake.
 
JMie said:
Are you sure? Seems like quite a new account. The first tweet was this Spring. And the article and photos are from last year.... Or did she delete her old tweets?
Click to expand...

I noticed that too. Her old posts are gone indeed.
But when you check Google Cache, you still find some posts (going back to mid 2009) that are not posted on her Twitter anymore. But it's the same Twitter link.

Anyway, couldn't help myself but I've send her a (kind) email.
Now she can claim tomorrow "that her Twitter account was taken from her" and that she did not say these things. Or who knows, maybe she'll tell she was not referring to this letter.
 
webbie said:
i don't find michael strange :d ;) (kidding, i know what you mean)
i find her coming forward very strange, just after someone claimed that the letter was stolen from his/her pc. Now she claims the letter has been taken from her. Meaning she and that person are the same one?

If she finds it so terrible, then why does she now claim the letter to be hers? If i would have found it soooo terrible, i would have kept silent and i would have left the mystery for what is was.

And when she gave her interview "the last dinner with michael jackson" she didn't exactly tried to avoid people from thinking that she had a relationship with michael. To the contrary, she said it just the way people would think they had something.

Strange... But possible. Who will tell it's not her letter?
Click to expand...

loveforever said:
i find it strange too. Who would scan the physical love letter on their computer, and later complained that someone hacked her computer and steal the letter?:doh: I think the letter is fake.
Click to expand...

I agree with you.
But now the only thing I know for sure is that:
1. Rushka argues that the letters are addressed to her, which makes them authentic.
2. They are out in the net. Evil is done.

I'm just glad Michael has finally found his soul mate and maybe the love of his life. That's enough for me.
 
Last edited:
Interesting, if that Rushka Bergman twitter is real (which apparently it is? I'm not sure, it hasn't been verified or anything but it seems like lots of people don't bother verifying) then the letter was sent to her? Apparently someone took it and then posted them online..
 
If it is Ruska then to be honest that makes me really happy knowing that Michael had love in the last years of his life after everything that he has been through.
 
Not sure if it's 100% yet, but it does truly seem like this is about Rushka..With the tweet and everything around this, it could very well be her..
 
Reading this story about Rushka's stolen letters I do not understand one thing. Why a person who stole them would put black spots on them where we are assuming had to be a person’s name? Why would she/he care about her privacy?

The second, why Rushka on her twitter was saying that something has to remain private and AT THE SAME TIME she came forward claiming that letters were addressed to her. It does not make any sense.
Rushka worked for Michael in 2007. They had two years to get married. In 2009 he died a lonely man with nobody beside him.:(
From the last Rushka's interview I understood that she not just liked him, she was crazy about him (calling him "sexy" etc) like most women who ever met him personally which is normal. Why would Michael write something about a woman walking away from him?

That’s was in this latter as far as I remember. Besides, most Michael’s lyrics are about a woman walking away from him. The meaning of this letter is no different from his lyrics.
Reading Rushka's last interview it seems like she did not disappear suddenly or something. From my point of view it does not look like Rushka walked away from him. :giggle:
At the same time Rushka has been in MJ house a few times as far as we know from her interview. I wonder if somehow this letter/poem addressed to nobody really appeared in Rushka's computer? Just saying… I think there is a possibility that Michael would show her his new poem, which is normal for an artist imo.
Could it be possible?
At the same time a person who posted this letter on the net said that this woman wanted it to be public only because she wanted to prove that Michael was not gay. What? :fear:

So, I do not understand was this letter stolen really or not as Rushka claims now? Why the person who stole it would know that a “secret girlfriend” wants to defend Michael from rumors? It does not make sense again. Something was fishy with this story from the beginning imo.
 
Last edited:
Asedora said:
Reading this story about Rushka's stolen letters I do not understand one thing. Why a person who stole them would put black spots on them where we are assuming had to be a person’s name? Why would she/he care about her privacy?

The second, why Rushka on her twitter was saying that something has to remain private and AT THE SAME TIME she came forward claiming that letters were addressed to her. It does not make any sense.
Rushka worked for Michael in 2007. They had two years to get married. In 2009 he died a lonely man with nobody beside him.:(
From the last Rushka's interview I understood that she not just liked him, she was crazy about him (calling him "sexy" etc) like most women who ever met him personally which is normal. Why would Michael write something about a woman walking away from him?

That’s was in this latter as far as I remember. Besides, most Michael’s lyrics are about a woman walking away from him. The meaning of this letter is no different from his lyrics.
Reading Rushka's last interview it seems like she did not disappear suddenly or something. From my point of view it does not look like Rushka walked away from him. :giggle:
At the same time Rushka has been in MJ house a few times as far as we know from her interview. I wonder if somehow this letter/poem addressed to nobody really appeared in Rushka's computer? Just saying… I think there is a possibility that Michael would show her his new poem, which is normal for an artist imo.
Could it be possible?
At the same time a person who posted this letter on the net said that this woman wanted it to be public only because she wanted to prove that Michael was not gay. What? :fear:

So, I do not understand was this letter stolen really or not as Rushka claims now? Why the person who stole it would know that a “secret girlfriend” wants to defend Michael from rumors? It does not make sense again. Something was fishy with this story from the beginning imo.
Click to expand...
:clapping:

Thanks for that. I agree with all that. And if it were me, I would keep this letter in a coffer to that nobody ever could have access! This is something very private. -_- Well, if that letter is real... :smilerolleyes: :fear:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top