[Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I took a photo of his page from the Opus. Wade sure feels a ton of compassion for a man who was ''abusing'' him for 7 years.


 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I think Michael did what he thought was best at that time with all the information given to him. Did he regret settling? I think so from what I have seen over the years. But in 93 he probably didn't think all the things that would happen to him later on. He thought it would go away and he would move forward with his life. I wish it would have been different. I feel bad for him that he had to be put in that situation in the first place. People use that to judge Michael but they could have done the same thing if they were in his shoes.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

although if an insurance firm wants to settle then they will u have no choice. car insurance is a good example. have an accident and the other side claims fake wiplash and they will settle in a second no matter if the injury is b.s. you have no choice whether u agree with your carrier settling or not

Hm, sounds again like settlements are supposedly dirty? Insurance company want to settle quickly, very quickly because they usually don't have a crystal ball that tells them what else comes up in the future - against them, the insurance company.
I don't know how that works in the UK - but settlements are standard practice here and are NEUTRAL. Just the same way Michael didn't admit guilt, is someone else not faking something. Arbitration and the like are also pretty usual in the European Union - especially in business contracts where both parties agree with a contract to an arbitrator and mediator and that the settlement reached will be accepted - before they enter into business.

If we want people to understand that Michael didn't color himself dirty with a settlement, it probably helps to understand that settlements are not a moral concession.

My car insurance accident might be unsuitable, I mentioned it because I sort of understood better that a settlement in and of itself is neutral and depending on physical (demonstrated) injuries insurance companies wanted to get rid off the liability ASAP - before the longterm injuries become too clear. They offer settlements typically unasked and with pressure, too.

It sounds to me that the insurance company in Michael's case also acted extremely hasty. They don't know what's coming down the pipe. Would be interesting to know if Michael's insurance company pushed for that settlement as hasty as possible - did they drop him afterwards? Did he retain the same company?
 
In the uk ambulance chasing in relation to car accidents is quite a new thing. theres alot of outrage about it because costs goes up and ppl are claiming for injury when there is none. but firms settle in the majority of cases regardless because lawyers fees are high.theres been goverment hearings into it. unfortunatley its american ways coming over the pond. all u get on t.v is adverts for have u had an accident u can get compensation. its become a compensation culture where ppl will try and pull any b.s to get a few £.

america is uniquie interms of its usage of lawsuits and settlements. no offence but from a uk\euro prespective its one of the things that ppl laugh at america for. interms of its love of money and lawsuits and the willingness for ppl to make accusations and for lawyers to take blantebt b.s on in the chance of getting a big pay out especually when jurys tend to award ridiculous amounts. i think maybe the euro prespective is if theres no criminal negligence then there should be no civil negligence. money is top of the list in america with punitive damages etc that doesnt happen in euro imo. priorities are very different

american culture is based on money u have a media that can do and say what they like and even the right to a fair trial takes second place to the media.something that astounds europeans
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

From what I read MJ was very distraught after the body search in late December 1993, and it shows in his videotaped statement where he describes it as the most humiliating experience of his life and something no one should hsve to experience (and I agree so much--that was an incredible violation of his Constitutional rights). I think he felt that the lawyers were unable to 'make it go away' even though they were supposed to handle it for him. For example, the State got hold of ALL his medical rrecords--he asked his lawyers in shock--Can they do that? I think he was amazed at the power of the State thrown at him and what that power was vs. his own power as an individual citizen. For another example, his lawyers wanted to see the reason for the warrant being issued for the body search (there is supposed to be 'due cause' demonstrated to a judge for a warrant to be issued)--but they were refused. His homes were searched, his possessions carted away, I think he was just amazed at what was happening to him. Meanwhile, the extortion investigation went nowhere--Evan and Barry Rothman refused to be interviewed and none of their homes or offices were searched. MJ was tearing his hair out. LMP and Elizabeth Taylor both were urging him to settle. The judge kept ruling against him--the judge should have been charged with something for all his rulings that denied MJ due process. I think he was distraught and up against the wall with not one but two D.A.'s (SB and LA) targeting him.

To have gone forward into the lion's den with the civil trial, probably with a criminal trial to follow, it was maybe too much to countenance and the outcome could have been an even bigger disaster--we can't see what would have happened but the way the prosecutors and the courts were acting, I think he really had little choice but to settle. The courts were rolling over for the prosecutors. He could have ended up in jail if he hadn't settled. I mean they had NO EVIDENCE except for Jordan's word and look how far it got.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

When Evan Chandler was a practicing Dentist in Beverly Hills, one of his patients had written a manuscript, which was "Robin Hood: Men In Tights." The writer was looking for a break in Hollywood and asked Evan Chandler to talk to another patient who knew Mel Brooks.

Evan Chandler thought he would go that avenue in Hollywood, he even got his name on the credits and all he was was just the messenger.

Whether or not Evan planned on taking the money to help him and his son, Jordy, will never come to light, in Show Business. Evan Chandler was nothing but an opportunist. His son, Jordy, is the same. How? He never showed up in Court, during Michael Jackson's trial to testify and set matters straight.

Frank Dileo did say Michael Jackson regretted not going to Court in 1993. And from what I have read on here, for the same reasons. It left the impression Michael Jackson was using a large sum of money to hush a criminal act. Wade Robson's time line does give one a moment to ponder on the inaccuracies. It's like Wade Robson has bragging rites, he was the first, the one before Jordy Chandler and the youngest, too. Both Jordy and Gavin Arvizo were 12 and did not go much past their 13th birthday.

The pattern of Michael Jackson taking advantage of a child of 7 year's does not fit his alleged profile. District Attorney Tom Sneddon spent a ton of money doing his best to find more victims, involving the FBI to check Michael Jackson's computer for child pornography.

There was a case where a middle aged man drove to Cody, Wyoming this past fall. It was a Monday afternoon, when this middle aged man approached a 12 year old girl with a story about helping him find his lost puppy. She was abducted by this middle aged man. One of the things she saw were hundreds of pictures of naked girls that he kept in his vehicle. Michael did not have child pornography any where. Michael Jackson would have used these to groom any of his lost boys, as Peter Pan.

You see how sick and twisted criminals are. They take the innocence, a lost puppy, or character's from a Disney Movie, to get a victim to trust them. Then they go in for the kill/crime.

Evan Chandler is the one who took advantage of Michael Jackson, making him appear to be a creep, when he was the creep. The guy, Evan Chandler owed his ex wife over $60,000 in back child support payments. Evan Chandler, in his quest to make tons of money working in Beverly Hills and rubbing shoulders with the rich and famous, was a dead beat Dad!
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

$$$$$$$ That's the answer to this question! A blind man could see this!
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

The settlement is just an excuse for people who already want to believe the worst about MJ. Because if you really think about it, it's a lot more understandable why an innocent MJ would settle than it is that a molested Jordan's family would accept a settlement. Not even close. I won't bother to get into the reasons as you all already know why.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Okay I cannot lie I am a bit ...... worried about this civil suit ( of it gets that far ) because now according to Mirror Wade's lawyers are looking for all of these " key " interviews to try and paint MJ poorly in the jurors eyes.

Yes this smells of desperation .... but one this is that Wade's lawyers know they only need a small amount of convincing in order to get that money. I have faith in Michael's team though because it appear's Wade's guys are playing this like amateurs.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I believe the biggest question is why did he call Wade to testify in 2005 if he molested him. How can you be so sure of your brain washing technic?

^Don't be silly; the King of Pop has super duper abilities. Have you forgotten that he makes a grown man afraid he would go to jail even when he has passed on. He can also molest a guy in one state while he is in another state--remember that extortion attempt? Yes his hands are that long.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I honestly think a lot of MJ's fate hate also to do with the general political climate in the US - both in 93 and 2005. Hysteria over Clinton. Please imagine France going nuts over Mitterand's mistresses.

France going nuts over Mitterand's mistresses? Lol nobody cared when the press revealed he had a daughter with someone who wasn't his wife.
 
Last edited:
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

bouee;3826693 said:
HUh when in the heck did lmp sue michael?
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

HUh when in the heck did lmp sue michael?

Lol ! I meant Chandler sued Michael, LMP, and the whole planet, sorry
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I took a photo of his page from the Opus. Wade sure feels a ton of compassion for a man who was ''abusing'' him for 7 years.



What a cute little kid he was; Who would have expected that he would grow up to be a crook.
 
You see how sick and twisted criminals are. They take the innocence, a lost puppy, or character's from a Disney Movie, to get a victim to trust them. Then they go in for the kill/crime.

I think it was LMP who said children were like flies around a piece of sugar,meaning Michael was the piece of sugar.
He didn´t ask the children to sleep in his bedroom, he let them do it because they wanted to.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

This is stupid

I was bored so I had to do a little bit of calculating so ....

According to Wade the abuse started in 1991 when he was 7 and ended in 1997 when he was 14 ?

All you have to do is factor in 1994 - 1997

How often did Mike and Wade even see each other let alone spend time alone for him to abuse him ?

Michael married Lisa in 1994 and there was a bunch of shit going on between them and plus he was touring , he then divorced her in 1996 ( they still spent time together for a few years ) and was with Debbie trying to make babies afterwards. What does Wade plan on putting into that part of the timeline ?
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I love how the press hardly gives a damn lol.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Damn I got my times mixed up and I can't delete my comment because I am new

but my bad Wade was 7 in 1989 , still makes no sense because he would have to explain the 1994-96 timeline so.... bloop

Bye Wade
 
From 2005:

[h=1]Former Protégé Vouches for *****[/h] Published April 07, 2005

FoxNews.com



No matter who testifies next in Michael Jackson's alleged "prior acts" of sexual abuse mini-trial, the prosecution will have to deal with the fact that only one boy will show up to say he was molested many years ago by the pop star.
Now comes Robert Newt, 30, long a "Holy Grail" for The National Enquirer from its investigation into Jackson circa 1993.
Newt and his twin brother Ronald Newt Jr. (now deceased) were aspiring performers and spent two weeks as guests in the Jackson family home in Encino, Calif., around 1985. They were about 11 years old. This all occurred before Neverland was completed. Michael, Janet Jackson and LaToya Jackson were all there, as well as the Jackson parents.
Fast-forward to December 1993. The National Enquirer, desperate to get a scoop that Jackson has abused children, heard that the Newt kids once spent time with Jackson.
The tabloid offered the Newts' father, Ronald Newt Sr., $200,000 to say that something happened between his kids and Jackson.
Newt, a San Francisco "character" and filmmaker whose past includes pimping and jail time, considered the offer.
A contract was drawn up, signed by Enquirer editor David Perel. Enquirer reporter Jim Mitteager, who is also now deceased, met with Newt and his son at the Marriott hotel in downtown San Francisco.
It seemed that all systems were go. But the Newts declined the offer at the last minute.
Ron Newt Sr., to whom $200,000 would have seemed like the world on a silver platter, wrote "No good sucker" where his signature was supposed to go. The reason: Nothing ever happened between Jackson and the Newt boys.
Indeed, no kids, no matter how much money was dangled by the tabloids, ever showed up to trade stories of Jackson malfeasance for big lumps of cash after the first scandal broke in 1993.
"Maybe there aren't any other kids," a current Enquirer editor conceded.
I met Bobby Newt yesterday near the office where he works as a mortgage broker in suburban Los Angeles.
Just as his dad promised me a few days earlier, he's a good-looking kid. He's half black and half Chinese.
Robert and his twin brother were likely very cute kids. They have the same features as other boys advertised as alleged Neverland "victims." But all Bobby Newt remembers of his encounter with Jackson is good times.
And all he remembers about the man from The National Enquirer is that he wanted Bobby, then 18, to lie.
"He said, 'Say he grabbed you on the butt. Say he grabbed you and touched you in any kind of way,'" Newt said. "He told us he took all these people down. Now he was going to take Michael down. That he would really destroy him. He told us he took all these other famous people down. All the major people that had scandals against them. He said, 'We take these people down. That's what we do.'"
Prior to Bobby's meeting with Mitteager, Bobby's father met with him and brought along an intermediary, San Francisco politician, businessman and fellow jailbird Charlie Walker.
Walker is infamous in San Francisco circles for being "hooked up" to anything interesting cooking on the West Coast.
"My dad said these dudes are offering this money to take Michael Jackson down. And the guy [Mitteager] said, 'Say he touched you. All you have to do is say it. But you might have to take the stand. You might have to go on 'Oprah' in front of all these people. You have to be prepared for this thing. Just say it. And we'll give you money,'" Newt said.
Two pieces of evidence confirm the Newts' story. One is the actual contract proffered by the Enquirer and signed by Perel, who declined to comment for this story.
The contract, written as a letter, says it's an agreement between the tabloid and the Newts for their exclusive story regarding "your relationship with and knowledge of Michael Jackson, and his sexuality, your knowledge of Michael Jackson's sexual contact and attempts at sexual contact with Robert Newt and others."
Mitteager expected them to sign, even though it was completely untrue and there was, in fact, no story.
He knew you were lying, I reminded Bobby Newt.
"Exactly! And he didn't care! He was like, 'Just say it and we'll give you the money.' And I was like, 'He [Jackson] never touched me!" Newt said. "He [Mitteager] was really fishing and really digging. Think about it — most people you say it to, 'We'll give you this money,' even [if it's not true]. And they'd take it."
Bobby Newt recalled more details of the 30-minute meeting with The National Enquirer's reporter:
"He was trying to coach me — if I decided to take the money, what would happen. He said 'You know, it's going to be a huge scandal. You'll probably have a lot of people not liking you. You're going to be famous!' But to me, you'd be ruined. And the truth is Michael didn't do anything even close to trying to molest us."
Ironically, the second piece of evidence also backs up the Newts' story. Unbeknownst to them, they were taped by Mitteager.
I told you last week that Mitteager did more surreptitious taping than Richard Nixon. When he died, the tapes were left to Hollywood investigator Paul Barresi. His dozens of hours of tapes include a conversation between Mitteager, Ron Newt Sr. and Charlie Walker.
When I read some of the transcript back to Newt the other day, he was shocked.
"I said all that," he observed, surprised to have his memory prodded some 12 years later.
Back in the mid-'80s, Ron Newt Sr. put his three sons together as a singing group much as Joseph Jackson did. He called them The Newtrons.
After much pushing, he got the attention of Joe Jackson, who agreed to manage the group. Joe Jackson got the Newtrons a showcase at the Roxy in West Hollywood.
Michael showed up and loved them. The result was a two-week stay for the boys at the Encino house on Hayvenhurst Ave., where they were supposed to work on their music.
"We would see Michael in passing. We didn't see him, maybe, because he was working on an album. We saw him downstairs in the kitchen and we talked to him," he said.
The Newtrons eventually got a record contract and recorded the Jackson 5 hit "I Want You Back" at Hayvenhurst. They also spent the night at Tito Jackson's house. But nothing about what Bobby Newt hears now about himself or others makes sense.
"I don't know what to believe. He had prime time with me and my brother in the guest room for two weeks," he said. "And he didn't try anything."


As a footnote to all of this: In the small world of the Los Angeles music business, Bobby Newt recently worked with choreographer and alleged Jackson "victim" Wade Robson on tracks for his first album, a potential hit compendium of original R&B ballads.

Jackson's former maid Blanca Francia implicated Robson in the case during Monday's testimony. Robson is not testifying for the prosecution.
"Wade is straight as they come. He's getting married. And nothing ever happened to him, either," Newt said.
He shakes his head, thinking about those who have made claims against Jackson.

"You have to look at these people, go back and see when their relationship with Michael fractured. The calls stopped coming," he said.
And Newt should know. After the adventure in 1985, the Newts never saw Jackson again. It didn't bother them, Bobby says, as much as it might have others.
"They probably didn't like it. And this is their way of getting back at him," he said.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,152708,00.html
 
I just looked at the Judith Hill thread with her latest performance on The Voice where she sings The Way You Make Me Feel. It was so emotional for her as she was paying homage to her "inspiration", and it became so emotional for me watching her, and I couldn't help but think of Robson. MJ helped him even more than he did Judith, and here she is so filled with gratitude and emotion for him, she could barely keep it together. And here we have Robson now vilifying him in the most heinous way. I will never be able to completely understand how he could do this. Be it money, revenge for not getting Cirque, or whatever his reason, never will be able to fully understand how he could be this cruel.

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...8217;-Frontrunner/page3?p=3826966#post3826966
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

If it was the insurance company who stood for the monetary settlement without the consent of Michael and his lawyers, why do some people say that Johnnie Cochran and Howard Weitzman only had an interest of settle the case and at least Cochran was buddy with Larry Feldman? Wouldn't the case still be settled by the insurance company if Michael still kept his lawyers Bert Fields and Anthony Pellicano? It is very confusing as Michael said in interviews that it was him personally who handed over the monetary settlement to the Chandlers without admitting to any guilt and without mentioning anything about the insurance company. By maybe he wasn't allowed to mentioned about the company?
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Why the heck has no one ever made a comprehensive documentary that doesn't attempt to be biased and that emphatically displays how ridiculous these allegations were/are? There's a mountain of evidence to slam dunk these accusations into utter falsehood, and frankly it's a fascinating story - all these shady characters.

I genuinely think the general public would be shocked at how misled they had been were they given any number of these facts that do the round on these fanboards.

I find it baffling how intelligent, normaly people that I know in life pride themselves at looking behind the curtain on major stories and events...yet when it comes to MJ everyone seems conditioned to believe the 'yeah he was weird' thus potentially criminal line. And if we ever have anything to say about it it's considered biased fan rambling that cannot be taken seriously.

Sorry for the rant but it's unbelievable.

A real in-depth documentary that examines all the supposed timelines - and the genuine ones - and all these vagabonds and charlatans and Hard Copy and the National Enquirer - the whole lot. I could see that doing really well at box office. Someone read this and get to it.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Why the heck has no one ever made a comprehensive documentary that doesn't attempt to be biased and that emphatically displays how ridiculous these allegations were/are? There's a mountain of evidence to slam dunk these accusations into utter falsehood, and frankly it's a fascinating story - all these shady characters.

I genuinely think the general public would be shocked at how misled they had been were they given any number of these facts that do the round on these fanboards.

I find it baffling how intelligent, normaly people that I know in life pride themselves at looking behind the curtain on major stories and events...yet when it comes to MJ everyone seems conditioned to believe the 'yeah he was weird' thus potentially criminal line. And if we ever have anything to say about it it's considered biased fan rambling that cannot be taken seriously.

Sorry for the rant but it's unbelievable.

A real in-depth documentary that examines all the supposed timelines - and the genuine ones - and all these vagabonds and charlatans and Hard Copy and the National Enquirer - the whole lot. I could see that doing really well at box office. Someone read this and get to it.


I agree wholeheartedly. It's such a HUGE story about law enforcement corruption, media manipulation, greed, prejudice, racism, generally the dark side of human nature that it goes far beyond MJ and it should be interesting for the general public as well. Yet no one dares to touch it. Instead you see Hollywood making movies defending convicted criminals such as Phil Spector with Al Pacino playing him. But no one wants to see the elephant in the room about Michael's story! My suspicion is that it's because the media played such an active role in the decades long slander of this man. And I don't think there are many journalists who have the guts to challenge this whole media establishment and certain practices in a big way. It's also because no one wants to take the risk to come under fire by child protective organizations (who often have knee-jerk reactions rather than informed opinion about MJ) and the like.

I think probably this generation of journalists has to pass for future generations to take a more honest look into what was done to Michael Jackson. The material is out there.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I replied this on the discussion thread but I'll reply here again.

As far as the AEG trial goes, I don't think this new allegations bring anything to AEG. Why you will ask?

- Jury is sworn in, they should not be paying attention to the media
- These allegations should not be a factor in trial unless they are introduced as evidence - but there are no attempts to do so
- Actual accusations, number of them etc. is irrelevant to AEG defense. They only wanted to mention the allegations to argue they affected Michael's income capacity and as a reason for Michael's drug use. They have everything they need with 93 and 05 allegations.

I would agree that the new Wade Robson allegations is a distraction - but mainly for the fans and not necessarily for the public. In my opinion public do not care for either the lawsuit or the allegations. There have been a number of stories about the allegations but it would slow down - and looks like already did. AEG trial is estimated to take 4 to 5 months, Wade's allegations would not get that much media time. So in my opinion at best from AEG's perspective the allegations were a short term distraction.

Thank you for your response. I didnt think these allegations would effect the current trial.

Money seems to be the motive here. But the reason why I am unsure. Unless its to do with the new Cirque Show as some have suggested.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Well, it does and it doesn't. It's just difficult to explain. Sometimes MJ fans jump on sound bites, too.

For example, I got hit by a car so hard that I had enough movement to total 3 other cars. The driver didn't admit any guilt - police officer comes along and determines driver at fault. That piece of paper then is what the insurance holds up.
I was offered a settlement (miiiinor) by the driver's insurance and it clearly stated that by cashing this check I will not be able to bring any claims toward the INSURANCE. To determine the amount etc is up to the adjuster (*shudder*, they love calling you out of the blue and want to tape the phone call and then watch out...), usually that is medical bills etc. (in this part of the US you can't even go to your regular Doctor for any car accident injuries because of liabilities and financies), not the insured.

I'm sure that MJ isn't exactly Joe Smith from Idaho, though. So in a sense it makes sense and it doesn't. I just don't think it's necessarily the best sound bite to hang onto since it's hard to explain - and since none of us were in the office of that insurance - hard to say.

I think MJ fans stand more chances at reasoning that a settlement is not an admission of guilt - and that an insurance settlement HAD NO BEARING on criminal charges that could have been filed against Michael. I think that distinction is more important because many people still think that Michael 'bought' his way out of a criminal trial - he didn't.

There also seems to be the difficulty of understanding that a criminal trial isn't the same as a civil trial. So perhaps working that angle is more promising than harping on Michael's views on that.
YOu can NOT buy your way out of a criminial trial especially if you did something. Even if a person does not want to talk, the STATE will pick it up with the evidence they have. I get tired of some people saying "he/she brought his/her way of a criminal court" not unless the JUDGE, the JURY, the WHOLE POLICE DEpt, and DA office is brought out.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

the establishment would not allow it and it goes against the medias agenda. look at tiabbi in 03-5

Why the heck has no one ever made a comprehensive documentary that doesn't attempt to be biased and that emphatically displays how ridiculous these allegations were/are? There's a mountain of evidence to slam dunk these accusations into utter falsehood, and frankly it's a fascinating story - all these shady characters.

I genuinely think the general public would be shocked at how misled they had been were they given any number of these facts that do the round on these fanboards.

I find it baffling how intelligent, normaly people that I know in life pride themselves at looking behind the curtain on major stories and events...yet when it comes to MJ everyone seems conditioned to believe the 'yeah he was weird' thus potentially criminal line. And if we ever have anything to say about it it's considered biased fan rambling that cannot be taken seriously.

Sorry for the rant but it's unbelievable.

A real in-depth documentary that examines all the supposed timelines - and the genuine ones - and all these vagabonds and charlatans and Hard Copy and the National Enquirer - the whole lot. I could see that doing really well at box office. Someone read this and get to it.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

From board to board
 
Back
Top