Controversial MJ Documentary Leaving Neverland [GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD]

Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Sad isn't it.

It's unbelievable and I truly see it as one of the biggest injustices in this world. Especially because the man really only wanted to do one thing, do nothing but good for this rotten ass world.

It's like how some people see a video of a incredibly sweet and loyal dog and they reply with "we really don't deserve dogs." we sure didn't deserve MJ is what I'd almost want to say.

If these haters and/or doubters only knew. And they look weird at us because we are fans. They think we would still support him if it was ever proven and that's where they are so wrong. That is the huge difference between the real MJ fans and fans of other celebrities of which certain things are very very questionable.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Agree largely with this.

Let's not forget in '93, Pepsi dropped MJ as his sponsor. In 2005, many radio stations removed him from their playlists after the allegations broke and only re-added him after his acquittal.

As you say, there is no possible "acquittal" here. If the public believe Wade and Jimmy, then the calls will grow to boycott MJ and remove his music from a variety of areas of public life.

UNLESS the Estate pull something significant out of the bag to discredit them. Here's hoping.

Plus there is the issue with the appeal result still outstanding. Finaldi et al are feeding and pushing this film. Even if the appeal is thrown out, all the statements about 'R and S are certain to win' carries weight with people who don't care about evidence or facts. (who strangely seem to be in the majority).

From today's (UK tabloid) Sun:

''Californian lawyer Finaldi added: "I'm absolutely positive we're going to win this appeal and we'll be back in the trial court and what we're looking for is a trial by a jury of 12 to render a verdict as to whether these kids were abused or not.'
 
Staffordshire Bullterrier;4238838 said:
It's unbelievable and I truly see it as one of the biggest injustices in this world. Especially because the man really only wanted to do one thing, do nothing but good for this rotten ass world.

It's like how some people see a video of a incredibly sweet and loyal dog and they reply with "we really don't deserve dogs." we sure didn't deserve MJ is what I'd almost want to say.

If these haters and/or doubters only knew. And they look weird at us because we are fans. They think we would still support him if it was ever proven and that's where they are so wrong. That is the huge difference between the real MJ fans and fans of other celebrities of which certain things are very very questionable.

One of the biggest injustices done to a now dead celebrity because he was an eccentric person and a really easy target, still is a really easy target.. Sometimes it’s difficult to say what the media really don’t know and what they deliberately leave out but I think maybe we should have a youtube channel
 
Last edited:
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

From today's (UK tabloid) Sun:

''Californian lawyer Finaldi added: "I'm absolutely positive we're going to win this appeal and we'll be back in the trial court and what we're looking for is a trial by a jury of 12 to render a verdict as to whether these kids were abused or not.'

How the hell can they have a trial when the defendant is no longer there to defend himself. That would be an absolute travesty. No wonder they are pushing this film.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

How the hell can they have a trial when the defendant is no longer there to defend himself. That would be an absolute travesty. No wonder they are pushing this film.

The civil cases are against the MJJ companies.....Lots of entities were named as defendants...basically, whoever they think they can sue. (This all goes back to 'running the world's biggest child procurement business', or however they phrased it in the complaint.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

The civil cases are against the MJJ companies.....Lots of entities were named as defendants...basically, whoever they think they can sue. (This all goes back to 'running the world's biggest child procurement business', or however they phrased it in the complaint.

They have zero evidence for any of this so how they see it going well in trial is something I don't really understand.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Appeals are done on points of law. They have no chance with an appeal. The judge made it clear in his ruling.this wasnt a borderline judgement. They are hoping for corrupt judges and the hope of a settlement
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

From today's (UK tabloid) Sun:

''Californian lawyer Finaldi added: "I'm absolutely positive we're going to win this appeal and we'll be back in the trial court and what we're looking for is a trial by a jury of 12 to render a verdict as to whether these kids were abused or not.'


Like I say, they are going to hang themselves even more. There is rub.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Back in 2014, Dan Reed did another documentary, about children being sexually abused called The Paedophile Hunter. Here's what one comment said:

Fascinating, but not because it reveals anything new about new sexual predation. In fact the documentary is more revealing about these vigilantes and the peculiar psychology that drives them to this particular form of vigilante justice. After all there are many kinds of criminals- why couldnt they catch white collar thieves who are stealing from the poor? No- these men have chosen child predators because of the sexual nature. The leader of the men (a former criminal himself, as well as a foster child) seems deeply titillated by the promise of catching a "bad guy". He and his buddies are both disgusted and in some way fascinated by the lurid texts and images they exchange with the predators. They pretend to be disgusted but I think find it alluring- and even arousing in a way, especially when they catch the predator and they get to humiliate him and watch him crumble before him.There is something deeply sexual about this kind of sadism. They get to feel powerful and morally superior by "helping" society, but in fact theres something weirdly perverse about what they are doing. Unlike Chris Hanson, whose show seems clinical by comparison- this guys journey to find pedophiles seems less about curing societies ills than about feeding his own repressed sexual desires in to control, dominate and humiliate men who are troubled and psychologically damaged.
https://www.amazon.com/Pedophile-Hu..._reviews&filterByStar=three_star&pageNumber=1

This is probably how Dan, Wade and Jimmy found each other. In a way, The Paedophile Hunter, has reemerged through Dan's latest project, going after Michael Jackson. Look Dan has Witnesses in his Court of Law within Society. The Court of Public Opinion. Dan is probably getting the same wierdly perverse satisfaction from antagonizing Michael Jackson's image.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Back in 2014, Dan Reed did another documentary, about children being sexually abused called The Paedophile Hunter. Here's what one comment said:

Fascinating, but not because it reveals anything new about new sexual predation. In fact the documentary is more revealing about these vigilantes and the peculiar psychology that drives them to this particular form of vigilante justice. After all there are many kinds of criminals- why couldnt they catch white collar thieves who are stealing from the poor? No- these men have chosen child predators because of the sexual nature. The leader of the men (a former criminal himself, as well as a foster child) seems deeply titillated by the promise of catching a "bad guy". He and his buddies are both disgusted and in some way fascinated by the lurid texts and images they exchange with the predators. They pretend to be disgusted but I think find it alluring- and even arousing in a way, especially when they catch the predator and they get to humiliate him and watch him crumble before him.There is something deeply sexual about this kind of sadism. They get to feel powerful and morally superior by "helping" society, but in fact theres something weirdly perverse about what they are doing. Unlike Chris Hanson, whose show seems clinical by comparison- this guys journey to find pedophiles seems less about curing societies ills than about feeding his own repressed sexual desires in to control, dominate and humiliate men who are troubled and psychologically damaged.
https://www.amazon.com/Pedophile-Hu..._reviews&filterByStar=three_star&pageNumber=1

This is probably how Dan, Wade and Jimmy found each other. In a way, The Paedophile Hunter, has reemerged through Dan's latest project, going after Michael Jackson. Look Dan has Witnesses in his Court of Law within Society. The Court of Public Opinion. Dan is probably getting the same wierdly perverse satisfaction from antagonizing Michael Jackson's image.

Wow, then there are red flags there. I believe Dan Reed has something to hide himself. It's very dangerous. I saw that "Wendy Williams Show" clip, and I just ignored it because it's nothing but tabloid gossip. Besides, Wendell--- I mean Wendy wasn't even there. She's going through some drama herself. Let's just say she can dish it, but she can't take the heat. Those who protest the loudest, are really the ones do it behind closed doors. Look at "45."

Besides that, I'm pretty sure the Jacksons and the Estate are looking closely into this. We have done what we could do so far, so in the meantime, let's continue to spread joy and happiness despite the cold world we live in.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

They want to take it to court? Good luck, goddamned numbskulls. Without any evidence it's gonna fail big time. Plus then we have the estate that will bring the incredible contradictions and inconsistencies from 2005 and then compared to 2015. All the holes and the things that don't add up at all. His constant praising of MJ etc.

Again, good luck. No way they will win that. I'm sure the judge will come to the same conclusion. I really wonder if it's gonna come to that. Who will initiate it, the estate or the scumbags? I'm sure if the estate's money is in jeopardy something will happen.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

He insisted Robson only lost his job because the choreographer at the time was let go and the show fell apart.
'Wade never got fired,' he said. 'There was more to it.'
Finaldi said that show bosses even struck a separate deal with Wade to be the choreographer himself to which he agreed, but the job never worked out because Robson was having 'problems' in dealing with his abuse secret and the show stood as a reminder of the horrors he'd endured.'He was having really bad emotional reactions to the music and everything else and pulled himself on that, he was never fired,' explained Finaldi.


Finaldi also insisted that Robson shopping a book deal happened in conjunction with the lawsuit against Jackson, NOT as a result of being snubbed by publishers.
King of Pop Jackson always denied allegations that he abused underage boys during his lifetime, and his estate has done the same in the decade since his death.
Reacting to the documentary the late singer's estate branded it 'the kind of tabloid character assassination Michael Jackson endured in life, and now in death.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6644797/Wade-Robsons-mom-said-denied-sexually-abused-Michael-Jackson-years.html
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

He insisted Robson only lost his job because the choreographer at the time was let go and the show fell apart.
'Wade never got fired,' he said. 'There was more to it.'
Finaldi said that show bosses even struck a separate deal with Wade to be the choreographer himself to which he agreed, but the job never worked out because Robson was having 'problems' in dealing with his abuse secret and the show stood as a reminder of the horrors he'd endured.'He was having really bad emotional reactions to the music and everything else and pulled himself on that, he was never fired,' explained Finaldi.


Finaldi also insisted that Robson shopping a book deal happened in conjunction with the lawsuit against Jackson, NOT as a result of being snubbed by publishers.
King of Pop Jackson always denied allegations that he abused underage boys during his lifetime, and his estate has done the same in the decade since his death.
Reacting to the documentary the late singer's estate branded it 'the kind of tabloid character assassination Michael Jackson endured in life, and now in death.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6644797/Wade-Robsons-mom-said-denied-sexually-abused-Michael-Jackson-years.html
REALLY? REALLY. These people crazy and think people are stupid. (again talking to a tabloid). Please bring out a rebuttal and put all of this nonsense in it.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I had read that statement in the past that Wade had left the show and was not fired. Do we know for a fact the truth on that?
 
Never mind the MTV tribute or the daily dance classes, it was suddenly while choreographing a Cirque show he broke down?

The same Cirque show he didn’t even work on?
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Thank you <a href="https://twitter.com/Forbes?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Forbes</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/JoeVogel1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JoeVogel1</a>. Maybe now people will learn the truth.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FactsMatter?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#FactsMatter</a> <a href="https://t.co/TcJfEf16gz">https://t.co/TcJfEf16gz</a></p>&mdash; Taj Jackson (@tajjackson3) <a href="https://twitter.com/tajjackson3/status/1090292743887151104?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">29. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I'm thankful there are still journalists out there that care about facts and the truth regarding this documentary. This is a must read. &#128591;&#127997; <a href="https://twitter.com/JoeVogel1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JoeVogel1</a> <a href="https://t.co/wjGvIBOEAZ">https://t.co/wjGvIBOEAZ</a></p>&mdash; Taj Jackson (@tajjackson3) <a href="https://twitter.com/tajjackson3/status/1090286049794781186?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">29. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is so well done and spells it all out. <a href="https://t.co/5QnwTui02u">https://t.co/5QnwTui02u</a></p>&mdash; Taj Jackson (@tajjackson3) <a href="https://twitter.com/tajjackson3/status/1090140669534908416?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">29. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/statement?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#statement</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/truth?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#truth</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/michaeljackson?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#michaeljackson</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/innocent?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#innocent</a> <a href="https://t.co/9JX8jUIwQM">pic.twitter.com/9JX8jUIwQM</a></p>&mdash; Jackson SOURCE (@JacksonSource) <a href="https://twitter.com/JacksonSource/status/1089971138086752256?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">28. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Forbes article is getting thousands of hits in a matter of minutes. Keep clicking the link, and hitting that tweet button on the Forbes site. Good job <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MJFam?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MJFam</a>. <a href="https://t.co/F4SfmvLQV3">https://t.co/F4SfmvLQV3</a></p>&mdash; andjustice4some (@andjustice4some) <a href="https://twitter.com/andjustice4some/status/1090338696904114176?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">29. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Thank you for sharing. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FactsMatter?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#FactsMatter</a> <a href="https://t.co/03wTmuY7sg">https://t.co/03wTmuY7sg</a></p>&mdash; andjustice4some (@andjustice4some) <a href="https://twitter.com/andjustice4some/status/1090305767859613698?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">29. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/StopLeavingNeverland?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#StopLeavingNeverland</a> After we Chinese fans furiously organized a wide protest, now the director hit back and singled us out. We will never stop. Justice for Michael Jackson, truth will win! Link: <a href="https://t.co/e59xJuiO1f">https://t.co/e59xJuiO1f</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/TheMJCast?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TheMJCast</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/tajjackson3?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@tajjackson3</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/andjustice4some?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@andjustice4some</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/tjjackson?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@tjjackson</a> <a href="https://t.co/7hYZaqdUYj">pic.twitter.com/7hYZaqdUYj</a></p>&mdash; Keen Zhang (@mkgenie) <a href="https://twitter.com/mkgenie/status/1090205310420115457?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">29. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A positive note in the middle of this chaos. When I was in line in the theater waiting to get in, there were people in front of me reading <a href="https://twitter.com/SirenLovesmj?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SirenLovesmj</a>'s pamphlet dedicated to MJ's innocence. Never underestimate the power of the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MJFam?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MJFam</a>. <a href="https://t.co/EHwW9Uvwsh">pic.twitter.com/EHwW9Uvwsh</a></p>&mdash; andjustice4some (@andjustice4some) <a href="https://twitter.com/andjustice4some/status/1089958052655026177?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">28. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"


The Rolling Stone interview is unbelievable. Reed plays the victim, implying that MJ Fans are sending him emails threatening his children. I can believe that he has gotten many emails from MJ Fans in the last couple of weeks, but I seriously doubt that he has gotten thousands saying awful things about his children.
 
MJJ'slilgrl;4238785 said:
This is actually a really good idea.
Even though there are some people who will always believe the worst, no matter what, there will be others who will be intrigued enough to do some research.

I agree. You would like to think that many people who do watch this shite will be so abhorred by it they will not want to believe it&#8217;s true. A little nudge in the right direction with the right encouragement (ie powerful) might be a little that goes a long way to get people looking for the truth. I honestly feel like I&#8217;ve lost perspective on all this but in my mind as an outsider looking in on all this I could never call someone a child molester without being confident in what I was saying. I don&#8217;t understand the logic of wanting someone to be that and painting it as fact without even really knowing anything about it.

Blondie;4238765 said:
Have tried replying on this thread a couple of times and its not showing up for some reason. I'll try again now. Do any of you think we need some kind of source with all the facts that doesn't have things like 'MJfan' etc in the title? This is no disrespect to fans but people simply don't want to listen if they think its just fans pushing an agenda. I also worry people won't take Taj seriously either as he's obviously going to defend his family. I feel like it needs to be someone impartial who can just deliver facts. Any ideas? Also do any of you know how to find direct sources of information, official statements, court transcripts etc. I keep trying to tell people stuff and linking them to MJ fan sources just doesn't work.

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the delay on your posts showing is because you have less than 10 posts so I have to manually approve them before they show. This is because of past trolling on the forum. I thought you guys might find it encouraging to know there hasn&#8217;t been any trolling or negative posts recently that have not been made public.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Watch Lost Video Interview in Which .<a href="https://twitter.com/michaeljackson?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MichaelJackson</a> Accuser Wade Robson Reminisces About Happily Being Discovered by King of Pop <a href="https://t.co/2nhj1zMQd3">https://t.co/2nhj1zMQd3</a> via <a href="https://twitter.com/showbiz411?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@showbiz411</a></p>&mdash; Showbiz 411 (@showbiz411) <a href="https://twitter.com/showbiz411/status/1090266216353083394?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">29. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Taj knows where 2 find me.</p>&mdash; Corey Feldman (@Corey_Feldman) <a href="https://twitter.com/Corey_Feldman/status/1090134343912026112?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">29. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Michael Jackson Estate Disapproves of Leaving Neverland _ E! News <a href="https://t.co/vlbnLjuKfe">pic.twitter.com/vlbnLjuKfe</a></p>&mdash; Michael Jackson CLUB (@mjjsource_) <a href="https://twitter.com/mjjsource_/status/1090180076019298304?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">29. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">These are my very raw, non-emotive notes on Leaving Neverland. Thanks to <a href="https://twitter.com/MJJJusticePrjct?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MJJJusticePrjct</a> for giving me a platform. Any questions, I'll be happy to answer. <a href="https://t.co/hZbZhN2n42">https://t.co/hZbZhN2n42</a></p>&mdash; andjustice4some (@andjustice4some) <a href="https://twitter.com/andjustice4some/status/1090273880336326662?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">29. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The fact you print that Michael Jackson was an “asset” is revolting, Ebony . Michael was a legendary performer &amp; humanitarian , who allowed you to photograph one of his last iconic photo shoots , How dare you , Ebony ? <a href="https://t.co/qMuPmVKDdr">https://t.co/qMuPmVKDdr</a></p>&mdash; Melanie321 (@Mellie4Justice) <a href="https://twitter.com/Mellie4Justice/status/1090347700858572800?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">29. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">All the people out here believing Wade and James are weak minding people, they need to learn the truth <a href="https://twitter.com/michaeljackson?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@michaeljackson</a> is innocent and will always be these men are broke and need money so they're going back on their word of Michael's innocence just so they can get money.</p>&mdash; Kelley Parker&#128139; (@IamKelleyParker) <a href="https://twitter.com/IamKelleyParker/status/1090103178866163714?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">29. Januar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
terrell;4238856 said:
Please bring out a rebuttal and put all of this nonsense in it.

Yes. And at this point, the rebuttal needs to happen soon. The fallout from that trash film just keeps getting larger with each passing day (or hour even). The estate needs to locate exculpatory court documents and other facts in Michael’s favor and start systematically shutting this trifling garbage down from 1993 to now. I’ve spent over half of my lifetime so far watching Michael and his legacy get attacked over and over again year after year. And I am sick of it. He can’t even rest in peace today. This needs to end.
 
Last edited:
StaceyMJ;4238863 said:
I agree. You would like to think that many people who do watch this shite will be so abhorred by it they will not want to believe it’s true. A little nudge in the right direction with the right encouragement (ie powerful) might be a little that goes a long way to get people looking for the truth. I honestly feel like I’ve lost perspective on all this but in my mind as an outsider looking in on all this I could never call someone a child molester without being confident in what I was saying. I don’t understand the logic of wanting someone to be that and painting it as fact without even really knowing anything about it.



Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the delay on your posts showing is because you have less than 10 posts so I have to manually approve them before they show. This is because of past trolling on the forum. I thought you guys might find it encouraging to know there hasn’t been any trolling or negative posts recently that have not been made public.

That is because you are trying to judge people on your logic. $100 million dollar lawsuit. Some people KILL even Kill whole families for a couple of bucks let alone lying for millions.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

He insisted Robson only lost his job because the choreographer at the time was let go and the show fell apart.
'Wade never got fired,' he said. 'There was more to it.'
Finaldi said that show bosses even struck a separate deal with Wade to be the choreographer himself to which he agreed, but the job never worked out because Robson was having 'problems' in dealing with his abuse secret and the show stood as a reminder of the horrors he'd endured.'He was having really bad emotional reactions to the music and everything else and pulled himself on that, he was never fired,' explained Finaldi.


Finaldi also insisted that Robson shopping a book deal happened in conjunction with the lawsuit against Jackson, NOT as a result of being snubbed by publishers.
King of Pop Jackson always denied allegations that he abused underage boys during his lifetime, and his estate has done the same in the decade since his death.
Reacting to the documentary the late singer's estate branded it 'the kind of tabloid character assassination Michael Jackson endured in life, and now in death.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6644797/Wade-Robsons-mom-said-denied-sexually-abused-Michael-Jackson-years.html

But other MJ -related dance projects that he worked on up to 2012 never triggered him. Strange only the Cirque show did that.
 
Staffordshire Bullterrier;4238757 said:
I absolutely discredit all their claims. They sure have proven that they deserve that. Countless of inconsistencies and contradictions in what he said in 2005 compared to 2015 and now in this doc. Basically completely different stories really, I would say it's no better than what mommy Arvizo claimed and her constant changing story.

The things he said about MJ in the opus, in interviews, to him via postcards or whatever the **** it was where he thanked MJ for sharing his sacred land Neverland. I firmly believe without a doubt that MJ never touched these people. That just wasn't him. As Corey Feldman said it, he just wasn't that kind of guy. I find it extremely telling how all of the accusers always had something off about them, something shady. Look, if there had been at least one kid or family that was NOT off, not trying to go for a easy money grab, not having said drastically different things in the past in defense of MJ and now coming out with a ludicrous new claim.... it wouldn't have been so easy to just say I discredit it all.

These two are no better than the Chandlers and Arvizos and I see zero reason, zero, to even consider the possibility that they could be telling truth here.

Amen. I don't defend Michael "because I'm a fan". I defend him because there has not been ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE to thisi day that shows in ANY way that he did something wrong. There IS however a LOT of evidence against ALL of the accusers. Lots of evidence of being unreliable, asking for money, shopping their story, suing for money, and CHANGING THEIR STORIES MULTIPLE TIMES to fit whatever is convenient at that moment. Don't forget that back in the day when Sneddon first came out with the charges saying MJ supposedly abused Gavin "between these dates in CALIFORNIA"....we could IMMEDIATELY PROVE that MICHAEL WASN'T EVEN IN CALIFORNIA DURING THAT TIME!!!! He was in effing FLORIDA!!! And lo and behold, sooner than you could say IT'S A SCAM....Sneddon changed the dates because he knew he didn't have a case if he came with those charges. HE HAD TO CHANGE GAVIN'S STORY TO BE ABLE TO EVEN CHARGE MICHAEL. How "convenient". That is how I knew fr a fact FRO THE START that it was all BULLSHIT! They were just fishing for smething that would stick. ANYTHING: And trust me...they tried E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G but they found NOTHING!!! N-O-T-H-I-N-G!!!!!!!!!! Because there was NOTHING to be found!!! As long as they keep coming with bullshit like "love faxes" as evidence and as long as Wade keeps coming up with a different version every time he speaks, I will keep CALLING THE OUT for AS LONG AS I LIVE. Why? because I believe ini effing JUSTICE!! Has nothing to do with being an MJ fan or not. If you believe in JUSTICE you will NOT let people destroy someone based on HEARSAY ONLY. And we have laws and courtrooms FOR A REASON. Destroying someone in public by using the media based on hearsay is BULLYIING in the highest and most dangerous form. If we all let that happen, then it's "free for all". If there are no consequences, then ANYONE can do that to ANYONE ELSE. If you talk to peple, remind them that they can't apply different rules for others. If their children or they themselves for some reason are targeted with bullying or mobbing at work, they should remember their own words and behaviour. They are spreading it and making it acceptable. So if it happens to them, they better not complain. It's what they wanted. Them judging Michael and calling him a "monster" and a "predator" based on hearsay and some film they watched that provided ZERO evidence or facts is BULLYING and MOBBING and publically LYNCHING a person. They are participating in it and if they don't want that to ever happen to themselves or anyone they love, they better check their own behaviour and FAST. Maybe that will wake some up and make them look at it all differently. I know you can tell some all you want and present all the facts you want and it will not change a thing, but some may listen if you remind the that THEY TOO could potentially be a target of false accusations. Maybe not in the scale of how Michael is being slandered, but it will be devastating nevertheless in their lives. Remind them that there are a lot of children, teenagers and young adults, who commit suicide for this very reason: people spreading lies about them and publicly shaming them for NO REASON just because they decided so. All those who judge Michael are responsible for making bullyinig acceptable.

Gwyneira;4238768 said:
I wonder why no interviewers have asked Wade or Jimmy whether they have thought about his children at all and how this movie might affect them? Seeing as they're fathers themselves.. In fact anyone has barely mentioned them at all?

Good point. It seems they try to justify all this to themselves by repeating (to themselves mostly) that "Michael is dead. This isn't about Michael. We're not trying to mute Michael." but if someone would remind them of Mchael's children WHO ARE ALIVE and who WILL suffer from this and who PERSONALLY KNEW WADE and KNOW what he's saying is BULLSHIT.....it would put them under a WHOLE different kind of pressure. It's called GUILT. the more we pressure them, the more they will show their true colors and will not be able to keep their stories straight, because LYING takes a lot of energy and if your mind is under pressure it#s even HARDER to keep your stories straight. Telling the truth is easy. You don't have to try to remember what you said earlier. Lying gets difficult under pressure. And the more people ask questions, the more they will paint themselves in a corner.

terrell;4238780 said:
Listening to the radio. I LOVE CHARLAMANE THE GOD. HE and his staff went in on Wade and James called anyone who believes this film a naïve FOOL and can not believe anyone who buys into this trash. As he say who is the @#$ can you believe Guys who swore UNDER OATH nothing happen and now that money is involved they do a doc and now you want to believe them? He went in on these fools and his co hosts. One said this is foul on MJ. LOLOLOLL

dam2040;4238781 said:
Joe Vogel has written a good piece for Forbes

Yeah it was a BRILLIANT article!!! THAT is what I call JOURNALISM!! Especially INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM!! It's nice to know that not EVERYONE in the media si rotten to the core! Some still have integrity left in them! GO JOE!!!

dmehta;4238783 said:
Re-posting part of what I posted in another forum:

I don't believe Wade or Jimmy would ever have done this if Mike were still alive. This is contrived to extort money out of his Estate.

However, this saga has only just started. Just wait until it's shown on TV. The media will whip this up, and the general public will understandably be outraged with what they have seen in the doc as it's graphic, completely one sided and Joe Bloggs watching this won't have the knowledge we do regarding their lies and prior behaviour.

Unless the Estate comes out and vigorously expose Wade/Jimmy and their lies, this will escalate badly with calls to remove his music from shops/radio stations/streaming sites. Sony will be under pressure to cancel their recording contract with the Estate, there will be calls for the MJ Cirque show, the upcoming Broadway show and things like Thriller Live in London to be ditched.

It's now or never for the Estate to protect MJ's legacy. They can't hold their nose, release a few statements and hope the furore dies down with things going back to normal. It won't this time. Wade and Jimmy are hell bent on getting what they want. The appeal against their lawsuits being dismissed will ramp up.

The last 10 years have been relatively good for MJ's legacy. Despite the tragedy of his death, there was always drama following him in life that was never-ending. Since 2009, many people have re-evaluated his legacy. Cirque du Soleil and the Broadway shows are proof that people want to buy into his musical legacy and celebrate it. His music sales have been high, his Estate has grossed hundreds of millions of dollars. His popularity has been high. Yes, there have always been many people out there who have continued to believe he was guilty, but there would have been a silent majority out there who would at the very least have given him the benefit of the doubt over the last 10 years, as he was acquitted in 2005.

This film threatens ALL of that. I'm genuinely terrified that this could be the end of us ever being able to celebrate MJ and his legacy publicly. We may be consigned to only being able to listen to his music in private. What an absolute tragedy that would be. Devastating.

I recognise I may be sounding dramatic. I am not in life a dramatic person, however we live in an age where "victims" are always believed and the baying mob want to boycott anyone who is accused of a crime, despite the evidence.

I really hope the Estate recognise the gravity of the situation we are in and have a plan. They can't just denounce Wade and Jimmy as perjurers. They are perjurers, but they have an explanation for that. The Estate need to expose the copious lies they have told in their lawsuits. If the public begin to understand what their motives have actually been over the last 6 years, and the devious tactics they've used to achieve it then maybe public sympathy for them will diminish.

If they don't have a plan then they can kiss goodbye to all of the money they've generated. We can kiss goodbye to his legacy being kept intact.

They would have NEVER been able to do this while Michael was alive because Michael could have sued them for DEFAMATION. Or if they would have tried to sue, consdering both of them ALREADY TESTIFIED THAT NOTHING HAPPENED...I doubt any judge would have allowed it to go anywhere. And even if they would have...Wade and James would have needed to provide EVIDENCE: And I'm sorry but if they would have appeared in front of a judge with these "love faxes" as evidence....no one would have taken them seriously. T-MEZ would have DESTROYED them. There is so much evidence AGAINST THE proving they are lying and in it for money.

Sorry but I can't see how this ifilm will change anything for me. I haven't seen any evidence and I will keep liistening to Michael and proudly say I'm a fan of Michael to who ever is willing to listen. Or not willing to listen. I don't give a rat's ass. If someone wants to believe any bullshit story they hear, I pity them. but it will not change how I feel about Michael.

And also, as Michael used to say...."wait a few days/months and another story will come along and this one will be forgotten". People are all over it now, but the thing with these people is that they are hungry for SCANDALS. Any scandals. They just want to be "outraged". it doesn't matter who it is. They will jump on any bandwagon that comes their way. Now it's Michael Jackson. Next month it will be someone else. Wade and James may get their 15 minutes of fame now but soon they will fade into oblivion. THey can't keep millking this for a long time because people simply won't care about it for that long. After the tenth time people will get bored and tired of reading about the same thing. They can try to milk it for a while but after some time, the story just will be "old" in the eyes of the public. And if they take their "evolving memory" too far, even the dumbest of dumbasses will start seeing through them and realize they are FULL OF CRAP and will get tired of these two clowns. At some point it will die down. We just need to keep fighting until then and bombard people with facts and remind them that it is MOB MENTALITY and BULLYING. And remember that people tend to go with what is "popular". If they see that fans aren't swayed and still listen to MJ's music and if radio stations see that people still want to hear Michael's music, they will let it go. Remember that most of the people who are "keyboard warriors" and calling MJ all these names, aren't really THAT invested in it all. They say things but to have them go march and protest and all that....I can't see them getting that invested. I doubt they care THAT much. Because most of them just read the headlines anyways. They dn't even read the whole articles. So to get them to start some protests....I just can't see it happening. Don't forget that WE ARE out there protesting too with FACTS....they know it.

MJJ'slilgrl;4238785 said:
This is actually a really good idea.
Even though there are some people who will always believe the worst, no matter what, there will be others who will be intrigued enough to do some research.

I don't really want HBO or Channel 4 to get a PENNY of Michael's money. Besides if the documentary is graphic, many might be so disgusted that they wont even watch until the end and will switch the channel or they will be too angry to watch anything MJ related right after it. I think a better I idea would be to show it at the same time on some OTHER channel or a few days afterwards and call it "MICHAE JACKSON - THE TRUTH THEY DIDN'T WANT YOU TO SEE" or something provokative like that to make people watch and then show them the facts and clips of Wade saying one thing and then right after that a clip of him saying the complete opposite. And pointing out what he said earlier and what he said in the court documents and compare it to what he said in the film.


dmehta;4238786 said:
It's not about keeping the story going for the media. The damage will have been done to MJ's legacy. This film will be viewed by a large audience and it will be discussed at the top of the media. People will see and hear these disgusting accusations, and if there is no plan by the Estate to counter this effectively, the allegations will stick. We will have no trial to demonstrate MJ's innocence, there will be no Not Guilty verdict to hang our hats on. We will have had two men describe in great detail on TV, how they were allegedly sexually abused by MJ as children. We've never really had that before, apart from a couple of TV interviews that Wade has done.

Just imagine in a few months time you putting on an MJ song at a party. How will other people react if they're aware of these claims and believe them?

I will play my MJ music and if peopel don't like it they can leave. Anyone who judges someone based on hearsay isn't someone I wanna hang out with anyways. Good riddance. MY opinon.



MJTruth;4238788 said:
according to vulture.com

When questioned about the fans’ rebuttals, Dan Reed says “ I know the reasons why they think that Wade’s lying, and none of them have any validity. It’s just not factual. “

WHAT?!?!?

this guy just killed all his credibility in one.
IF he truly believes what he says then it's concrete proof that he has NOT researched the civil case at all. the only other option is that he is lying through his teeth in the interview to make them all sound more credible.

The majority of fans have done nothing but quote Wade's OWN legal documents and his OWN interviews.

MJ fans need to keep rebutting this dodgy documentary.
Keep quoting legal documents. Keep quoting Wade's own words. Keep linking to appropriate videos or sites like DailyMichael.com

Contact the press editors directly. one day one of them might listen and that could be just enough to blow the lid off this. If we can get one major news outlet to cover the inaccuracies, inconsistencies, lies etc then others may follow the usual "cut and paste" journalism we've all become accustomed to.

That's the only way they can try to discredit us because they have nothing else they can use. Not like they can show FACTS like we do. They try to explaiiin everything with "Well, sexual abuse is complex and it takes victims long to deal with it.....Fans ar ejust defending MJ because they are fans..." Bullshit. No victim of child abuse LAUGHS when asked questions about it like Wade and James did. And no victim keeps PRAISING their so called abuser for YEARS even UNTIL THEY ARE ADULTS. Especially when they claim they KNEW AND REMEMBERED what he did to them. Wade is talking about all of it like he'd be talking about any film project. And James laughing at the abuse victi in the audience with a waving of the hand "Ah, it wasn't your fault." Yeah, haha, it's all SO FUNNY isn't it? They make me SICK!

terrell;4238797 said:
It will not be that easy to destroy MJ legacy. The more this goes on the more people are going to have to look at the other side and more investigative people and journalist will get involved if grows. It is not that simple or easy. See, this situation open many doors to other things from testify under oath; speaking on the dead; unfounded claims that anyone can say, etc. This can go beyond MJ and backfire on these fools. As things cool down, people start to think.

My thoughts exactly. The longer it goes on, the longer Wade, Dan and James will have to talk and at some point someone WILL ask questins and challenge them and that#s when their true colors will start to show.



Very.b;4238820 said:
Thanks this is the first thing that’s made me smile since all this sxxx started.

BRILLIANT! LOL!

SmoothGangsta;4238845 said:
They have zero evidence for any of this so how they see it going well in trial is something I don't really understand.

Exactly. If they go to trial there will also be a CROSS EXAMINATION and that's when the seat will start getting REALLY hot. because remember....unlike when they are talking to the media and can say whatever they want because they know they can't be sued....during a trial they have to bring actual EVIIDENCE if they keep talking about all of these things. There needs to be PROOF. And also...at a trial THERE WILL BE A DEFENSE TEAM ON MICHAEL'S BEHALF asking them questions and pointing out all the holes in their story. Right now they can say whatever they want because no one can challende them and there aren't any legal consequences. They are WELL aware of that. That's why their memory "keeps evolving". Pathetic liars!
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

He insisted Robson only lost his job because the choreographer at the time was let go and the show fell apart.
'Wade never got fired,' he said. 'There was more to it.'
Finaldi said that show bosses even struck a separate deal with Wade to be the choreographer himself to which he agreed, but the job never worked out because Robson was having 'problems' in dealing with his abuse secret and the show stood as a reminder of the horrors he'd endured.'He was having really bad emotional reactions to the music and everything else and pulled himself on that, he was never fired,' explained Finaldi.


Finaldi also insisted that Robson shopping a book deal happened in conjunction with the lawsuit against Jackson, NOT as a result of being snubbed by publishers.
King of Pop Jackson always denied allegations that he abused underage boys during his lifetime, and his estate has done the same in the decade since his death.
Reacting to the documentary the late singer's estate branded it 'the kind of tabloid character assassination Michael Jackson endured in life, and now in death.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6644797/Wade-Robsons-mom-said-denied-sexually-abused-Michael-Jackson-years.html

He was having "BAD REACTIONS" t the music?! LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE!!! HOW EFFING STUPID DO THEY THINK WE ALL ARE??!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JESUS CHRIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I DO BELIEVE that Robson and Safechuck as well as Reed ARE ON THIS BOARD (and all over the twitter net), reading all the info about them, they are collecting all the info, their lawyer is getting ready for the trial, they NEED US to fix their bs and fit them into new claims.
 
terrell;4238871 said:
That is because you are trying to judge people on your logic. $100 million dollar lawsuit. Some people KILL even Kill whole families for a couple of bucks let alone lying for millions.

Oh yes absolutely. I was talking about the general public who may watch this when it airs. You&#8217;d like to think they won&#8217;t just lap it up and believe it all without at least exploring the subject a little further. The enormity of actively calling someone what they&#8217;re trying to call Michael is in my mind one of if not the worst things somebody can be. It&#8217;s massive. That&#8217;s why I think the idea of buying ad time when this airs for some sort of rebuttal could be a great idea - target people while their emotions are still raw and fresh and hasn&#8217;t faded with time. Strike while the iron is hot so to speak. There has to be something that can be done this too unfair and unjust to continue so one sidedly!
 
ILoveHIStory;4238884 said:
I DO BELIEVE that Robson and Safechuck as well as Reed ARE ON THIS BOARD (and all over the twitter net), reading all the info about them, they are collecting all the info, their lawyer is getting ready for the trial, they NEED US to fix their bs and fit them into new claims.

Probably right but they can’t fix it. There has to be someone else behind all this. Wade and Jimmy didn’t come up with this all by themselves. How will this all play out? Any predictions on how this will all end?
 
StaceyMJ;4238885 said:
Oh yes absolutely. I was talking about the general public who may watch this when it airs. You&#8217;d like to think they won&#8217;t just lap it up and believe it all without at least exploring the subject a little further. The enormity of actively calling someone what they&#8217;re trying to call Michael is in my mind one of if not the worst things somebody can be. It&#8217;s massive. That&#8217;s why I think the idea of buying ad time when this airs for some sort of rebuttal could be a great idea - target people while their emotions are still raw and fresh and hasn&#8217;t faded with time. Strike while the iron is hot so to speak. There has to be something that can be done this too unfair and unjust to continue so one sidedly!

We will have to see but I think younger people normally do check on the internet and older people have heard it all before many times so you have to be rather biased to begin with to just beleive this in 2019.
 
Back
Top