Posted by me below this upload of the Oprah's incredibly weak platform for the three leeches
(my personal highlight is when Robson's "dramatic acting" later - don't bother to find the runtime again - didn't work and noone reacted while they cut directly to Oprah continuing with her cheap talk):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aWjKDih1G8
There are many RED FLAGS on both accusers and the director. But neither the "fake-umentation" nor the Oprah "Distracting-from-Weinstein"-nonsense-talk will show you those.
There was no grooming, the director makes you think so, they lived their everyday lives and were hardly a part of MJ's life. MJ did boost Robson's career and his mother - just like Janet Arvizo - wanted her son to be famous and took advantage of MJ. Robson had sold all his valuable MJ memoriablia before, the fake burning is for dramatic purposes.
You think you know Michael Jackson by watching this presentation.
What do you know about Dan Reed, Wade Robson and James Safechuck?
Get to realize that you do not know anything about them and there is a lot of evidence that there are three people who are lying through their teeths.
You say humans could never lie like that? The truth is that mankind has shown there are all sorts of opportunists.
People do lie, it is easy. How often did you lie to someone? Lying is easy.
If you think someone is saying true things, how hard is it for you to accept you were wrong in believing so? Do you like being wrong?
Don't be lazy humans and just blindly buy a product that was made for personal profit, instead research the lies by the two accusers who you have witnessed ACTING. They are NOT victims of anything, only of being deceitful, horrible human beings that are taking advantage of the fact that people have always been emotionnally weak if they see/hear what AT FIRST might sound convincing. Who is brave and searches for the truth however?
Acknowledge the many RED FLAGS by the people who have spoken and you listened to them.
Acknowledge their lies. Sooner or later they will be collapsing like a house of cards, even before your very eyes.
- "no financial interest" is what the director and "victims" claim, yet it's been advertized like a blockbuster movie ==> BD/DVD will follow soon
- "it's not about Michael Jackson" --> the whole selling point and what people talk about is MICHAEL JACKSON and only MICHAEL JACKSON, the alleged pedophile
People do not research, uncover and take actions against Wade Robson, James Safechuck, other free riders, the director Dan Reed, the networks and people who wanted this story to RUN NOW
- Wade Robson's wife, Amanda, claims to have "learnt" about Wade's alleged abuse and knew nothing, yet in coordination with profiting from the "fake-umentation" by setting up a fraud fund - it suddenly said "Amanda, also a survivor of child abuse" - Robson had messed up his career, has a bad reputation in the industry due to him making things up - eg alleged projects with MJ - and being overly self-serving and had mental breakdowns that had nothing to do with MJ until they were also "re-written" to make the mockery convincing because people - as evident here - are easily fed by tabloid stories
- Dan Reed: "A jury would have to weigh up evidence – of which there is plenty...." (Guardian newspaper, March 10th 2019)
Also Dan Reed: "In the end, there is no video of Michael Jackson abusing Wade and James. There is no cache of photographs. So what you’re doing is listening to the person and making a judgment about whether there is any truth or not.” (January 24, 2019)
LET ME REPEAT:
Dan Reed: There is plenty of evidence ...
Also Dan Reed: There is none but listen to these guys. How can you not believe them or me?
This manipulation - as he is illogical and contradicts himself - is called "Poisoning The Well Fallacy" which means he tries to shore up the allegations made by Wade Robson and James Safechuck by shaming on people who do not believe them or him. If Dan Reed was a real investigative journalist - there are hardly any - and as such actually truthful on the matter, he would not rely on such cheap tricks of manipulation...
In all of his talk, all of his interviews, he only tries to shift the blame upon the Jackson Estate eg for "protecting their assets". Dan Reed has not told anything of substance, he is covering up with insults to dub MJ's fans as deluded, yet he is the one telling "4 hours cannot be gossip".
- James Safechuck's "wedding ring" is a completely invented story, most of his tales are copy-pasted from a sensational book against MJ that is decades old, you'll find the name and info, the director and the two leeches won't tell you for free
- the timing and media circus is run by those who actually really have power and money - Weinstein & Co. - yet some people are so blind to think MJ had star power and money to walk away from alleged crimes. however apart from his career the rest of his life ever since the first allegations was a witch hunt in the media and he never had the power to stop the FBI and police investigations or silence the media. Michael Jackson has been CONTINUOUSLY slandered in the media, in the general public by those who only see him as some "monster", pedophile whatever. And there have never been "powerful" people to influence / silence any of you. The world isn't fair, life ain't a pony ride. Don't believe any accuser without checking their background. If you do, you'll find their narrative is plotted and doesn't stand the state of facts in their real lives.
There is too much more which I don't bother to write now, others have done their homework already. Lies are being thrown upon an audience, the truth is something you have to go searching, it doesn't sell as good as lies.
.
