Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, that's clear for me how he tries to explain away the timeline problems while blowing up the very narrative they wanted to convey with LN, so basically just making it worse.ksat9;4253722 said:He’s trying to justify the changing of the timeline in the train station story by saying James went after 94.
The problem is that
1) Michael’s alibi and timeline does not work with James’s accusation of being abused everyday at the train station.
2) he’s now saying Michael abused James at 16/17 and now they all need to be called out for their narratives of Michael abusing only young boys and dumping them when they hit puberty.
https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/wh...ng-neverland-while-the-u-k-press-is-pouncing/ksat9;4253725 said:Thank you.
While the media are reporting the discovery, I still think they’re soft-balling this.
This literally exposed his train station story as a lie which then makes you question if his other stories are true.
PoP;4253728 said:That idiot Marx is at it again, calling us dead brained and evil, we’ll I call him that right back and reminded him in the hashtag I used #MJHatersRIdiots.
smdh RIP Michael.
Yeah. Sorry im no good at embeding? In the actual tweet it shows the transcript of brancas depo. Finaldi goves a long list of supposed victims including siggy jackson! and trump. Maybe someone should tweet trump?
PoP;4253728 said:That idiot Marx is at it again, calling us dead brained and evil, we’ll I call him that right back and reminded him in the hashtag I used #MJHatersRIdiots.
The Egg: ''I don't know very much about Michael Jackson. I know a lot about Wade Robson and James Safechuck''
https://twitter.com/appleseed120/status/1113964127892987904
He just admitted on camera that he did no research and only listened to what Robson and Safechuck had to say. And people still find this egg credible
Yep, that's clear for me how he tries to explain away the timeline problems while blowing up the very narrative they wanted to convey with LN, so basically just making it worse.
What I don't get is the basic idea that having photos of a building can prove anything important at all.
Here is a video of Michael Jacobshagen (formerly known as Michael Mondtkowski) at age 13 with Michael Jackson. This is evidence he actually met Michael for the first time in 1995 at age 13.
Here is a video of Michael Jacobshagen (formerly known as Michael Mondtkowski) at age 13 with Michael Jackson. This is evidence he actually met Michael for the first time in 1995 at age 13.
Tbh, why would he defend Michael?
He could be sued for lying back in 1993 no????
Why german said that was in 1998 ?Here is a video of Michael Jacobshagen (formerly known as Michael Mondtkowski) at age 13 with Michael Jackson. This is evidence he actually met Michael for the first time in 1995 at age 13.
Hm we already know this video.... it was maybe the only situation he ever met MJ.
And the only time, despite what the piece of shit is now saying and god knows what he'll say in his "doc" sigh. The MJFam doesn't take him seriously and I get that, but I do hope that if he indeed comes with filth of his own that the estate is prepared. I don't think many took Wade and James seriously years ago... but I don't think anyone had expected something like LN to come out of it.
So no one knows when the castle was finally constructed. In 1992 ?
Cause Safeshuck said he didn't visited Nerverland since this year.
I read it. The Estate's response seems watertight to me. It's pretty in-depth, but basically:Is anyone going to read that appeal of 80 pages? I do want to know what it says but right now I don't have enough time to read through it all.