They will need a ton of security . I hope the media stay out. Don't want their noses in this.It will become a place of pilgrimage like Graceland
My guess is it will turn out to be nothing major, another MJ themed show or some kind of permanent exhibit in US or just the biopic. Do don't hold your breath!!
Would that be over on TikTok ? Could someone post John's video please?
Thank YouJohn Branca on Instagram: "Would you go to a Michael Jackson museum? We’re so excited to share that we have a lot of projects that we are currently working on. #MichaelJackson #Reels"
4,466 likes, 422 comments - johnbrancaofficialNovember 23, 2022 on : "Would you go to a Michael Jackson museum? We’re so excited to share that we have a lot of projects that we are currently working on. #M..."www.instagram.com
I am all for a Michael Jackson museum, but not a casino. I don't want Michael's name to be associated with betting and gambling.John Branca on Instagram: "Would you go to a Michael Jackson museum? We’re so excited to share that we have a lot of projects that we are currently working on. #MichaelJackson #Reels"
4,466 likes, 422 comments - johnbrancaofficialNovember 23, 2022 on : "Would you go to a Michael Jackson museum? We’re so excited to share that we have a lot of projects that we are currently working on. #M..."www.instagram.com
I will go on this journey as many times as possible!It will become a place of pilgrimage like Graceland
There has only been one person in here that has said that..Only MJ fans would look at a something as legacy-solidifying as a museum and say, “We WaNt CoNcErTs!!1!”
Mike is known as the "greatest performer ever to exist", yet only has 2 official concerts released out of hundreds. I get your point, but it's justified no matter which project is coming. Someone does not want to literally see him shineOnly MJ fans would look at a something as legacy-solidifying as a museum and say, “We WaNt CoNcErTs!!1!”
By the time of this project, NFTs will be a thing of a distant past.
Let's me be second . I want both, love the idea of museum it's solid, it's there for everyone and I would probably never be able to visit it. I am also selfish, and want live performance in HD that I can actually see and enjoy.There has only been one person in here that has said that..
Yeah well the two aren’t mutually exclusive. We can both get a museum and HD concertsLet's me be second . I want both, love the idea of museum it's solid, it's there for everyone and I would probably never be able to visit it. I am also selfish, and want live performance in HD that I can actually see and enjoy.
Dying from the overwhelm of seeing the Bad tour in 4k is the only way I want to goYeah well the two aren’t mutually exclusive. We can both get a museum and HD concerts
I agree.I am all for a Michael Jackson museum, but not a casino. I don't want Michael's name to be associated with betting and gambling.
I’m not just talking about here; I mean fan accounts on social media, other forums, etc. The response seems to be about 50/50, which is astonishing to me.There has only been one person in here that has said that..
I am also surprised that anyone would be against a Museum.I’m not just talking about here; I mean fan accounts on social media, other forums, etc. The response seems to be about 50/50, which is astonishing to me.
To be fair, the 2nd thing is not his fault. It's the engineers fault.Nah, can't you see he's protecting MJ's legacy? Refusing to promote or even acknowledge Thriller 40, making released songs sound worse than they were, not releasing new content, making projects that are only available in very certain parts of the world of which most fans won't be able to consume, putting out shitty looking t-shirts/hoodies/masks on their website, never acknowledging MJ's career past the 80's, releasing fake songs, lying and lying more to the fans. Be happy about it. Btw new biopic coming soon.
I think it's more doable now than it was even 5 years ago. But it's not gonna be easy or perfect. Unless they truly go wild with itI don't want to be constantly negative on here but I really don't want a biopic.
I don't think it will do Michael's legacy justice and I don't think there is a human being alive that can capture his essence, without coming across as parody.
Gotta disagree. As co-executors of the estate, Branca and McClain should represent the finish line of quality assurance. They should’ve slammed on the breaks as soon as these mixes/masters were turned in and demanded better, or changed engineers.To be fair, the 2nd thing is not his fault. It's the engineers fault.
I understand that they play a role in it, but they've been experimenting a lot it seems, and some efforts sound better than others. They should just not give certain people chances. But, the sound quality was already getting worse when MJ and Bruce Swedien were alive, and they were the best about it, so what's the standard at this point? They can't do any worse than TUC.Gotta disagree. As co-executors of the estate, Branca and McClain should represent the finish line of quality assurance. They should’ve slammed on the breaks as soon as these mixes/masters were turned in and demanded better, or changed engineers.
Only MJ fans would look at a something as legacy-solidifying as a museum and say, “We WaNt CoNcErTs!!1!”
Like most Broadway plays it'll will probably tour in other countries at some pointNot to be too negative but I hope it's not one of those projects like the MJ One or the musical where it's only available in some parts of the world and not accessible to most fans. Getting really tired of those.
I would never say or suggest that.What makes your opinion more valuable than anyone else's?
It's my opinion that a museum is an exciting project for MJ's current fans, and maybe tourists - but is MJ's legacy material items, or his music and showmanship? Elvis has Graceland, Dolly Parton has Dollywood - neither of these things "solidify" a legacy, there's just places fans and tourists visit.
Yeah, aside from just playing MJ's classic music, remastering it, etc, it's things like this that liven up the brand and keep MJ relevant as a historical element. And adds more credentials as a true artist.I would never say or suggest that.
In my opinion, a museum serves a greater and more viable purpose to an artist’s legacy than random releases. How many of Elvis’s posthumous releases solidified, or even made a significant impact on, his legacy? How about Prince’s? Or Lennon’s? Concerts and albums are fun trinkets for longtime fans, but they seldom hold a candle to the artist’s core body of work. Now, in fairness, a museum likely wouldn’t completely turn the tides either, but I would argue that there is more long-term value in a permanent public establishment at Hayvenhurst than a random 1988 show that the general public will pay no mind to and will be forgotten within two weeks of its release (or even an album, despite my hunger for new MJ music).