8701girl
Proud Member
Good point I mean Diana is like 10× older than mj so I don't think she would go down like thatWell if they said it on Facebook then it must be true, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good point I mean Diana is like 10× older than mj so I don't think she would go down like thatWell if they said it on Facebook then it must be true, right?
So they totally scrapping everything that happened in 93 out of the movie??????In THAT case, the alleged claims about the script of the biopic is probably the big news. I seriously doubt the story at all, for what it's worth.
I personally do feel that these particular claims against certain people are no less malicious than those against Michael. But some will say "I just focus on Michael, I don't have anything to say or think about these others."
Supposedly, there are reports that reshoots that are scheduled are to remove anything regarding the allegations. There are reshoots coming, but as of yet, nothing to say that removing mention of the case is the reason.So they totally scrapping everything that happened in 93 out of the movie??????![]()
Here is the translation and next time in English, please:Michael ın masum olduğunu artık tüm dünya anlasın lütfen sıkıldık bu durumdan :dikkatli:
Please let the whole world understand that Michael is innocent, we are tired of this situation.
If they do that I'm not watching it sorry but THE WHOLE TRUTH NEEDS TO BE TOLD!!Supposedly, there are reports that reshoots that are scheduled are to remove anything regarding the allegations. There are reshoots coming, but as of yet, nothing to say that removing mention of the case is the reason.
Jin Chohan's documentary may be our only hope if it comes down to that. Maybe Taj's too (but that's a very big maybe).If the movie won't tell the story then there needs to be a quality high budget documentary to do the job better. You'd think they'd be on that.
If either one makes it to Netflix sure.Jin Chohan's documentary may be our only hope if it comes down to that. Maybe Taj's too (but that's a very big maybe).
*gasp* omg valentines day :0Yes. Finally!
@andjustice4some
"Regarding the Safechuck/Robson lawsuit against the MJJ companies, the judge has ordered a trial date of November 23, 2026. Next hearing is on March 14, 2025."
"If you're interested in this case, one person you should know about is the retired Hon. Gerald Rosenberg, who will be the discovery referee prior to the trial."
![]()
![]()
In a recent court filing, the Estate labeled Safechuck’s claims as “frivolous” and pointed out glaring inconsistencies that cast doubt on the credibility of his accusations.
In their filing, the companies did not hold back, calling the lawsuit “scurrilous” and “baseless.” They have asked the court to dismiss the case entirely and are seeking reimbursement for the legal fees they’ve incurred defending against what they describe as a smear campaign against the King of Pop. For years, the estate and companies have tirelessly defended his name against accusations that lack evidence, insisting that Michael was a victim of false narratives driven by greed and media sensationalism.
The thing that jumped out to me when I saw the story were these comments on X from @JuliaBerkowitz1Mj vibe is saying about a leaving neverland part 2! Sorry if wrong place to put this, is this true?
47min is a bit laughable, honestly.The thing that jumped out to me when I saw the story were these comments on X from @JuliaBerkowitz1
"So the origin of these news is the British tabloid, The Sun. I haven't seen it yet anywhere else. And the unnamed source they cite calls it "Finding Neverland"
"Not saying, that it's not true. The Sun might have information on it coming up, but notice how they fell since 2019. Instead of a worldwide, HBO backed PR campaign they are now getting promoted in The Sun by sloppy unnamed sources..."
Extra comments from @Mjvibe:
"Rod McPhee who wrote this article is very close to Channel 4 PR team. As I said in my articles, it seems only Channel 4 has commissioned and paid for the second mockumentary. HBO is out of the picture."
"This "movie" is said to be only 47 min long. We cannot see it will have as an impact as the first one and clearly Channel 4 is only trying to recoup the money they invested in. Lucky Reed is bold or he would be pulling his hair out! LOL"
Thank you for posting news about it in this thread; it doesn't deserve any attention in its own thread. I'm having trouble finding it being discussed anywhereMj vibe is saying about a leaving neverland part 2! Sorry if wrong place to put this, is this true?
47min is a bit laughable, honestly.
I wonder if the Cascios are going to be part of it.
But anyway, looks like they are coming very weak for this one.
Yeah it is alas happening March 18th, its pretty much on most news sites here . I think and hour or 90 mins . Didn't read full article but https://deadline.com/2025/02/leavin...ckson-premiere-date-channel-4-hbo-1236296110/ ,
47min is a bit laughable, honestly.
I wonder if the Cascios are going to be part of it.
But anyway, looks like they are coming very weak for this one.
Mmm ...that is too much now.Can’t do this again.
![]()
‘Leaving Neverland’ Sequel ‘Surviving Michael Jackson’ Set for March
'Leaving Neverland 2: Surviving Michael Jackson' will debut on Channel 4 in March.variety.com
I really feel your pain here. It would be a kick in the teeth to M & his fans who endured it, twice. Those who took their lives...If they do that I'm not watching it sorry but THE WHOLE TRUTH NEEDS TO BE TOLD!!
oh jfc!They bastards at Channel 4 and planning on playing the original Leaving Neverland documentary before the new Leaving Neverland 2.
The second one will have very little impact but for them to show the original 2019 in prime time tv again makes me sick