mjlivesimmortal
Proud Member
I was just doing some reading about the catalogue and wondered how much of this is true. Obviously most of us are speculating but someone might be able to help:
I read that although Michael has 50% of the catalogue, that the value of his share of the catalogue has decreased so that the total amount that he would actually possess would be more like 20%. This was because the decisions that have been made have been Sony's investments and so Michael can't profit from them. If Michael wasn't putting much in to the business then if he were to sell in the future, then wouldn't his share be not as valuable since he'd end up paying millions in investments made by Sony and tax and several other things.
And also, in 2013, are the rights of the Beatles songs going to revert to McCartney and Lennon? I'm sure they're going to be keen to get it back.
I don't have sources but just general reading through the net.
I read that although Michael has 50% of the catalogue, that the value of his share of the catalogue has decreased so that the total amount that he would actually possess would be more like 20%. This was because the decisions that have been made have been Sony's investments and so Michael can't profit from them. If Michael wasn't putting much in to the business then if he were to sell in the future, then wouldn't his share be not as valuable since he'd end up paying millions in investments made by Sony and tax and several other things.
And also, in 2013, are the rights of the Beatles songs going to revert to McCartney and Lennon? I'm sure they're going to be keen to get it back.
I don't have sources but just general reading through the net.
Last edited: