Be Careful Who You Love: Inside the Michael Jackson case

I've never ever read a book about Michael (or even a magazine for that matter). I don't need a book to tell me who I should and should not love.

I truly, truly believe that it takes an 'advanced soul' to really appreciate, love, and understand Michael. Sure, he wasn't a perfect saint... but who is??

I'm so glad I found this forum... and God Bless you all. :cry: :huggy:

:angel:
 
Some time ago in a little 'chat' with Diane Dimond I pointed out how dead wrong she was with so many facts about the case--specifically pointing out how she reported that Gavin Arvizo's 'genetic DNA' was found in Michael's room and that they couldn't call 911 from within Neverland. Both of these claims were completely proven false in court by multiple witnesses yet after pointing this out she still insisted that she was right and that her claims were proven in court, when the dead opposite actually occurred. The source she cited with regards to the 911 theory, whom I believe she also cites in her book, in fact confirmed on the stand that nothing prevented the Arvizo's from reaching an outside operator from Neverland if they so desired--just as Janet Arvizo was able to call her boyfriend and mom from the ranch; they just never tried. She also doesn't know the difference between ordinary fingerprints and DNA evidence. After confronting her with more proof that she was wrong, she put me on 'ignore'.

Of all the people in this world who truly serve no purpose and should not exist, Diane Dimond has to be towards the top of the list. Her entire career has been to slander Michael Jackson and negotiate deals with tabloid-selling witnesses to make up stories about him.

Isn't that illegal?. She cannot just say that something was proven in court when the opposite was the case... Michael should have sued her. Maybe the estate could now.

It's sad, really, how is that people like her don't fell the need or interest to do something more important and positive with their time on this earth...
 
Read A. Jones' or Ian Halperin's books: they clearly prove that Diane Dimond is a liar.


Diane gave money to almost every prosecution witness to invent stuff about Michael. If I'm not mistaken she is a close friend of Sneddon and some even think she was his mistress. Besides, she was known, during the trial and the '93 accusations, for inventing "evidence" (ex: Victor Gutierrez, MJ's love letters to Gavin). At one time, Sneddon told her to stop.

Yeah... when one reads about it, she was involved with pretty much everyone who has accused Michael of something. She is responsible to such a large degree for all that Michael went through and for the damage to his reputation...

Don't believe in what that woman has to say. As Halperin said;" Diane knows that Michael is innocent, but she makes lots of money by slandering him".

I remember that a ET male journalist told her that she was a liar and the devil. He was immediately threatened by her, his address was changed by her (so that he would be called a liar) and was fired because Diane told his boss that he had tried to rape her.


THAT WOMAN IS THE DEVIL.

I certainly don't mean to suggest you're lying, but do you have a link or something?.
 
Back
Top