Latest on MJJC

Be Careful Who You Love: Inside the Michael Jackson case

iblush

iblush

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
36
Points
0
Hi. Has anyone read this book? I'm reading it now to see what kind of "proof" she had against Michael.
 
yeah i know i just borrowed the book from the library ;)
 
I wouldn't even read this book for free. Diane Dimond can suck it. :(
 
Stupid b*tch...

Her and the rest of the media/haters actually left the court-room when the defence went to take the stand. She makes me sick ya know, always having to hang-on the Michael in order to make herself get ahead on journalism. Everytime, there's a story on the man, she or Nancy Grace rear their heads....hope someday they know what it's like to be looked at and scrutinized by others.
 
I would not trust anything that comes out of that awful womens mouth she is a liar.

Julia
 
the pages of that book are only good for wiping your bum with, Picking up your dogs poo, Lining your bird cage with and wrapping rotting fish in to get tossed in the bin. Its also a waste of brain cells to read it.

One "Woman's" opinion doesn't mean jack sh!t to me. I know why i love Michael. That's all the reason i need.
 
Some time ago in a little 'chat' with Diane Dimond I pointed out how dead wrong she was with so many facts about the case--specifically pointing out how she reported that Gavin Arvizo's 'genetic DNA' was found in Michael's room and that they couldn't call 911 from within Neverland. Both of these claims were completely proven false in court by multiple witnesses yet after pointing this out she still insisted that she was right and that her claims were proven in court, when the dead opposite actually occurred. The source she cited with regards to the 911 theory, whom I believe she also cites in her book, in fact confirmed on the stand that nothing prevented the Arvizo's from reaching an outside operator from Neverland if they so desired--just as Janet Arvizo was able to call her boyfriend and mom from the ranch; they just never tried. She also doesn't know the difference between ordinary fingerprints and DNA evidence. After confronting her with more proof that she was wrong, she put me on 'ignore'.

Of all the people in this world who truly serve no purpose and should not exist, Diane Dimond has to be towards the top of the list. Her entire career has been to slander Michael Jackson and negotiate deals with tabloid-selling witnesses to make up stories about him.
 
TSCM said:
Some time ago in a little 'chat' with Diane Dimond I pointed out how dead wrong she was with so many facts about the case--specifically pointing out how she reported that Gavin Arvizo's 'genetic DNA' was found in Michael's room and that they couldn't call 911 from within Neverland. Both of these claims were completely proven false in court by multiple witnesses yet after pointing this out she still insisted that she was right and that her claims were proven in court, when the dead opposite actually occurred. The source she cited with regards to the 911 theory, whom I believe she also cites in her book, in fact confirmed on the stand that nothing prevented the Arvizo's from reaching an outside operator from Neverland if they so desired--just as Janet Arvizo was able to call her boyfriend and mom from the ranch; they just never tried. She also doesn't know the difference between ordinary fingerprints and DNA evidence. After confronting her with more proof that she was wrong, she put me on 'ignore'.

Of all the people in this world who truly serve no purpose and should not exist, Diane Dimond has to be towards the top of the list. Her entire career has been to slander Michael Jackson and negotiate deals with tabloid-selling witnesses to make up stories about him.
Click to expand...



ouch.. but i won't disagree with you have to say.
 
hence the reason why i don't wast my time or money or my library card on such utter rubbish. Her book and books like it are a waste of tree. They do nothing but get peoples dander up and want to know the truth that they already know. They want reminded of something that shouldn't be brought up again. Michael went through hell in that trial and it was plastered all over the world. His pain was seen in his face and eyes but no one cared. His physical appearance suffered because he thought people were trying to kill him during this thing and more then likely he had it right.
 
I'd much rather just sit on my ass and do NOTHIGN all day...than even take a look at that book. Diane Dimond? Oh brother.
 
I would never buy or borrow this book, I know MJ didn't do it, so why waste my time on reading lies? I feel by buying it your supporting her, because that what she wants people to do buy it so she can get money from it.
 
TSCM said:
Some time ago in a little 'chat' with Diane Dimond I pointed out how dead wrong she was with so many facts about the case--specifically pointing out how she reported that Gavin Arvizo's 'genetic DNA' was found in Michael's room and that they couldn't call 911 from within Neverland. Both of these claims were completely proven false in court by multiple witnesses yet after pointing this out she still insisted that she was right and that her claims were proven in court, when the dead opposite actually occurred. The source she cited with regards to the 911 theory, whom I believe she also cites in her book, in fact confirmed on the stand that nothing prevented the Arvizo's from reaching an outside operator from Neverland if they so desired--just as Janet Arvizo was able to call her boyfriend and mom from the ranch; they just never tried. She also doesn't know the difference between ordinary fingerprints and DNA evidence. After confronting her with more proof that she was wrong, she put me on 'ignore'.

Of all the people in this world who truly serve no purpose and should not exist, Diane Dimond has to be towards the top of the list. Her entire career has been to slander Michael Jackson and negotiate deals with tabloid-selling witnesses to make up stories about him.
Click to expand...

well said
 
She needs to let it go, if it wasn't for Michael, nobody would know who she was. And now, she's only known as being a rubbish reporter who couldn't face the truth. She's obsessed.
 
You know what goes around comes around. Be careful Lady that your own tablois junkies do not turn on you..Then Michael will have the last laugh and so will us fans..
 
parli123 said:
You know what goes around comes around. Be careful Lady that your own tablois junkies do not turn on you..Then Michael will have the last laugh and so will us fans..
Click to expand...

I pray that I am still here when that day comes!
 
I never read the book but I do know all she does is dragged MJ name and personal life badly especially his case will lies thats why she not even respected bum ass hoe
 
Read A. Jones' or Ian Halperin's books: they clearly prove that Diane Dimond is a liar.


Diane gave money to almost every prosecution witness to invent stuff about Michael. If I'm not mistaken she is a close friend of Sneddon and some even think she was his mistress. Besides, she was known, during the trial and the '93 accusations, for inventing "evidence" (ex: Victor Gutierrez, MJ's love letters to Gavin). At one time, Sneddon told her to stop.

Don't believe in what that woman has to say. As Halperin said;" Diane knows that Michael is innocent, but she makes lots of money by slandering him".

I remember that a ET male journalist told her that she was a liar and the devil. He was immediately threatened by her, his address was changed by her (so that he would be called a liar) and was fired because Diane told his boss that he had tried to rape her.


THAT WOMAN IS THE DEVIL.
 
Last edited:
the only time id touch that book is to set fire to it
 
whaaa?! wow.

I wouldn't read Ian Halperin either..

Lol007 said:
Read A. Jones' or Ian Halperin's books: they clearly prove that Diane Dimond is a liar.


Diane gave money to almost every prosecution witness to invent stuff about Michael. If I'm not mistaken she is a close friend of Sneddon and some even think she was his mistress. Besides, she was known, during the trial and the '93 accusations, for inventing "evidence" (ex: Victor Gutierrez, MJ's love letters to Gavin). At one time, Sneddon told her to stop.

Don't believe in what that woman has to say. As Halperin said;" Diane knows that Michael is innocent, but she makes lots of money by slandering him".

I remember that a ET male journalist told her that she was a liar and the devil. He was immediately threatened by her, his address was changed by her (so that he would be called a liar) and was fired because Diane told his boss that he had tried to rape her.


THAT WOMAN IS THE DEVIL.
Click to expand...
 
I wouldnt read Halperin, Demon, or Rabbi books as most of it is make up rubbish that they think will seell their blood book. Damn all these People.
 
LOL....Ian Needs-Helperin? Oh please...don't read that book. That guy is a JOKE!
It however is all great to wipe your bottoms off with or anything similar.
 
Don't feel bad. A while ago, before I knew any better, I picked that book up in a drug store and started reading it. I just couldn't shake the stuff she was saying, because it was all so damning. I was so confused thinking "How could this be Michael?..." I couldn't wrap my head around the "facts". Then, the farther I got in the book, the worse her claims became, and soon it was almost laughable. I knew then that she was just lying. I should have known from the start, but I just couldn't fathom the fact that someone could get away with that. I figured she was slanting, sure, but *complete fabrication*??? It's pretty incredible, but yep, she went there. Needless to say, I returned my book and got the blood money back (I had to go through the general manager to do it) and I also got the number, address, and e-mail for the higher-ups, so that I could complain about them even selling the book.

Read these reviews on Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/Be-Careful-Who-You-Love/dp/0743270916
Here's her site. http://dianedimond.net Feel free to comment, she usually replies. However, if you expose her too much, she'll delete your comment.
I, however, can't deal with her directly anymore, for fear of losing my sanity. She makes my blood boil.
Vile vile woman.
 
PrincessMichaela said:
Don't feel bad. A while ago, before I knew any better, I picked that book up in a drug store and started reading it. I just couldn't shake the stuff she was saying, because it was all so damning. I was so confused thinking "How could this be Michael?..." I couldn't wrap my head around the "facts". Then, the farther I got in the book, the worse her claims became, and soon it was almost laughable. I knew then that she was just lying. I should have known from the start, but I just couldn't fathom the fact that someone could get away with that. I figured she was slanting, sure, but *complete fabrication*??? It's pretty incredible, but yep, she went there. Needless to say, I returned my book and got the blood money back (I had to go through the general manager to do it) and I also got the number, address, and e-mail for the higher-ups, so that I could complain about them even selling the book.

Read these reviews on Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/Be-Careful-Who-You-Love/dp/0743270916
Here's her site. http://dianedimond.net Feel free to comment, she usually replies. However, if you expose her too much, she'll delete your comment.
I, however, can't deal with her directly anymore, for fear of losing my sanity. She makes my blood boil.
Vile vile woman.
Click to expand...

You should read her conversations with National Enquirer former director (leaked some time ago). She even altered court transcripts and the settlement documents. That woman is an obsessed liar. She constantly lies. Dimond invented "facts" in her book. Those "facts" were addressed on court and immediatelyproven false. Even Sneddon told her to stop.

Read this:
http://floacist.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/the-settlement-did-jackson-admit-to-any-wrongdoing/

But that's nothing compared to the things I've read that she did. She will end up in hell.
 
Why even give her the satisfaction by caring about what she has to say!
I just let all the bull shit and the lies go over my head now! I no why i love Mj i dont need anyone else to tell me a thing about him!
 
I would never buy this book, altough I have to say I,d be curious to read it (for free!) just to know what she said in it, to search for all the lies and see how she puts them. I'M reading Aphrodite jones book at the moment, and, I just can't imagine how Demon could have put all this in a way to make people believe Michael was guilty. It's so obvious that this was a extorsion!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top