Controversial MJ Documentary Leaving Neverland [GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD]

Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Quick comment on Jacobshagen:

The book he's claiming was personally signed by Michael c. 1997 is The Boy: A Photographic Essay.
Of which there was only ever one copy known to be in Michael's possession.
Which was found at Neverland and seized in November 2003.
Which they never gave back.

Jacobshagen's narrative, then, is that Michael gave him the one and only copy of the book complete with a personalized autograph, took it back sometime before November 2003, somehow had the inscription removed, had it seized by the FBI and LAPD to be later used in his trial, re-obtained it from law enforcement, re-signed it for Jacobshagen, and gave it back at any time after his return to the United States in 2007.

The likely defense will be that Michael owned two copies, which (1) is complete guesswork, and (2) plays against the presentation of Michael as a paranoid pedophile who didn't want to leave a trail.

This ****ing guy, wow.

And this is that book of where we got to see some photos from, from the FBI files and where Radar Online photoshopped some photos to make it look like young boys actual were nude in this, right? And originally when the police found the book it was even unopened and sent to a fan iirc?
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

many people in UK starting to see this as a savile/cosby style where everyone is coming forward - even if the claims are many years old [neverland maids]

I've not seen it mentioned on the BBC news, Radio one, Good Morning Britain, The One Show, not seen too many articles on the daily mail, just the one independent article, nothing among my friends on Facebook, zero links related to the documentary on Facebook I.e Ladbible etc.

Unless you've experienced otherwise it seems as though it is America again hell bent on destroying Michael.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I've not seen it mentioned on the BBC news, Radio one, Good Morning Britain, The One Show, not seen too many articles on the daily mail, just the one independent article, nothing among my friends on Facebook, zero links related to the documentary on Facebook I.e Ladbible etc.

Unless you've experienced otherwise it seems as though it is America again hell bent on destroying Michael.
There has hardly been anything at all here in Sweden either. Just a couple of article in one newspaper/tabloid.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

The Sun newspaper has been dreadful though but what did we expect? The people that read that newspaper will believe the sky is green if it was printed in the newspaper. There's no hope for those kind of people.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

The promo starts on monday in the U.K we will see then. Radio 5 are already doing a interview with reed
 
KOPV;4242140 said:
While we can be upset to see reviews that praise the documentary, we can't really be that upset at the individuals that watch it and indeed to find it 'powerful' 'compelling' etc.. To speak through our annoyance and anger, we have to come to grips with the fact the MAIN reason we see through the BS is because we've spent decades studying the allegations. If we can't come to terms with the idea that IF you/I did not have the information we are aware of, we too would probably find the documentary compelling.

It's ok to even state that to them. "Look, I totally get how he comes off, and if I did not go through hundreds (if not thousands) of legal documents/including FBI files - I would probably be thinking the same thing..." Starting convos off like this more so opens the discussion and gets people curious of what you know..

pull them in to listen to you by using the same emotion Dan Reed does to suck them in.. We suck them out by first reaching them emotionally and introducing ACTUAL facts!
Well we did see through it to begin with because we were interested and that is why we have spent decades even by now studying court documents which is why we still see through it... But I agree with you in how to best talk to people in general. It is the medias job to investigate the background of the news not just report x said this y said that. If that is all they do then what good are they but as Charles Thomson says then people are not willing to pay for news they have less empoyees and often don’t have the time to investigate still they shoot themself in the foot because reporting like that will not make people more inclined to pay for news so they make themself unnessecary.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I've not seen it mentioned on the BBC news, Radio one, Good Morning Britain, The One Show, not seen too many articles on the daily mail, just the one independent article, nothing among my friends on Facebook, zero links related to the documentary on Facebook I.e Ladbible etc.

Unless you've experienced otherwise it seems as though it is America again hell bent on destroying Michael.

Same here, not seeing much other than what I'm searching for
 
elusive moonwalker;4242151 said:
The promo starts on monday in the U.K we will see then. Radio 5 are already doing a interview with reed

Yeh the tv commercials will start from Monday I believe so the public will start to become more aware of it. There will be a heightened interest in this over the next couple of weeks. I’m just hoping it then dies down and isn’t reported on. Let’s just get through the next few weeks and see what happens.

Still hoping the Estate have more planned. A letter and a couple of statements won’t cut it.
 
KOPV;4242140 said:
While we can be upset to see reviews that praise the documentary, we can't really be that upset at the individuals that watch it and indeed to find it 'powerful' 'compelling' etc.. To speak through our annoyance and anger, we have to come to grips with the fact the MAIN reason we see through the BS is because we've spent decades studying the allegations. If we can't come to terms with the idea that IF you/I did not have the information we are aware of, we too would probably find the documentary compelling.

It's ok to even state that to them. "Look, I totally get how he comes off, and if I did not go through hundreds (if not thousands) of legal documents/including FBI files - I would probably be thinking the same thing..." Starting convos off like this more so opens the discussion and gets people curious of what you know..

pull them in to listen to you by using the same emotion Dan Reed does to suck them in.. We suck them out by first reaching them emotionally and introducing ACTUAL facts!


Agree. And another thing us fans should do is admit that some of MJ’s behaviour wasn’t advisable or necessarily appropriate. He should not have been sharing his room or his bed with other children, even though I genuinely believe his intentions were completely innocent.

If you admit that to people they’re more likely to listen and not think you are a crazed fan who thinks MJ could do no wrong. All of us as human beings have our failures and our flaws. MJ had his own too.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Michael has lied to the public, he's done many publicity stunts, has used PR to build and image and has been less than honest about a variety of topics.. THIS is also what haters use against us fans as reason not to believe Michael was innocent of molestation.. That said, ADMIT that to yourself and them! Trying to defend everything Michael has claimed only makes us look like our heads our in the clouds.

USE it for your advantage, Yeah Michael lied about things for PR reasons, and he was a HORRIBLE liar. He naturally was such an honest person that when he did lie it was very obvious - from the fidgeting, lack of eye contact and so on.. NOW when he discussed allegations, his demeanor was different, his body language showed openness, conviction and never wavered.

We have to be willing to be honest with ourselves to expect people to believe what we know as truth! I understand protecting his image, the best way of doing it is getting rid of the myth surrounding him (including the ones SOME fans hold onto)




PS. I am seeing people online calling Michael out about calling Brett Barns and another kid his cousins on 'private home videos' when they were not his cousins.. They are finding that odd (If he had nothing to hide).. I really can't think of a good comeback aside from using the fact "Johnny Jackson" wasn't a cousin either but the family called him that. I have a feeling that would quickly get dismissed as a reasonable response though.. IDK!
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Michael has lied to the public, he's done many publicity stunts, has used PR to build and image and has been less than honest about a variety of topics.. THIS is also what haters use against us fans as reason not to believe Michael was innocent of molestation.. That said, ADMIT that to yourself and them! Trying to defend everything Michael has claimed only makes us look like our heads our in the clouds.

USE it for your advantage, Yeah Michael lied about things for PR reasons, and he was a HORRIBLE liar. He naturally was such an honest person that when he did lie it was very obvious - from the fidgeting, lack of eye contact and so on.. NOW when he discussed allegations, his demeanor was different, his body language showed openness, conviction and never wavered.

We have to be willing to be honest with ourselves to expect people to believe what we know as truth! I understand protecting his image, the best way of doing it is getting rid of the myth surrounding him (including the ones SOME fans hold onto)




PS. I am seeing people online calling Michael out about calling Brett Barns and another kid his cousins on 'private home videos' when they were not his cousins.. They are finding that odd (If he had nothing to hide).. I really can't think of a good comeback aside from using the fact "Johnny Jackson" wasn't a cousin either but the family called him that. I have a feeling that would quickly get dismissed as a reasonable response though.. IDK!


I call some of my dear female friends my sisters even though they are not my relatives. How many guys call their male friends "brothers" but aren't related to them? I was an exchange student and I still call the parents of my host family my "mom and dad" and the kids my "sisters and brothers" and introduce them to people that way even though we're not related and they too would always introduce me to people as their daughter or sister...and STILL call me that and sign letters with "Love mom" or "Love, dad". I called the parents of the boy whose nanny I used to be my "adoptive parents" as a joke because we got along so well and they treated me like part of the family and we still keep in touch and they keep in touch with my mom as well. And they called me their "adopted daughter". And the boy's aunt would sign her cards to me as "aunt so and so" too. i called an older nurse I used to work with my "mom" because she was so nice and caring and because we were friends. I called the mom of MY nanny my grandma and my nanny my aunt when I was little because I ADORED them and to us they were part of the family because we got so close but they weren't related to us in any way nor did my parents know any of them until our nanny was hired to look after my sister and me. I also visted my nanny's family in another city alone with her and stayed the weekend there with just her without my sister or my parents because I wanted to and yes, slept in the same bed with her because I was probably 5 years old and there was nothing sinister or shady going on and I most definitely wasn't abused by anyone in any way and just had a FABULOUS time. I still have photos from that visit of me smiling and playing with my nanny's little nephew. Point is that if you start making innuendos about ANYTHING or ANYONE, you will start to see everything as weird or shady or "suspicious".....Things that other wise no one would give two shits about because they are the most natural thing in the world.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Is it worth to write a complaint mail to the Swedish television who is going air it?
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Is it worth to write a complaint mail to the Swedish television who is going air it?

One word: YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Is it worth to write a complaint mail to the Swedish television who is going air it?
Maybe but take your time and explain in detail the background of the allegations.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

By the way....people were mentioning getting e-mails from the Estate? How do you get on the list? I'd like to get notified too.
 
Full wording from the Estate today:

An update from the MJ Estate: From the Estate of Michael Jackson MJFam:

This morning, The Estate of Michael Jackson filed a lawsuit against HBO. HBO is not just a distributor but a co-producer of this so-called documentary Leaving Neverland.

As many of you know, in 1992 HBO entered into an agreement for the broadcast of “Live From Bucharest” which became HBO’s highest rated special. As part of that agreement, HBO agreed to non-disparagement provisions which remain in effect. This program is the epitome of disparagement. Therefore, HBO stands in breach of contract. Even though Michael is not here to defend himself and there is no claim for defamation, this is a contractual obligation.

Link as above
https://twitter.com/andjustice4some/status/1098644689148829697
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Great news re the HBO contract. They were producers for this nonsense and therefore should be in huge trouble. Hopefully this stops a worldwide broadcast!
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Now if only this lawsuit could make HBO pull from airing only 10 days away and after advertisement.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Big MOOD <a href="https://t.co/4yKJc8BSQo">pic.twitter.com/4yKJc8BSQo</a></p>&mdash; Odell Beckham Jr (@obj) <a href="https://twitter.com/obj/status/1098324357242220544?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">20. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="de"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"> <a href="https://t.co/cqrQ3epFSg">pic.twitter.com/cqrQ3epFSg</a></p>&mdash; Rocky Racoon (@BooRadleyTweets) <a href="https://twitter.com/BooRadleyTweets/status/1098328942514237440?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">20. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

THE ESTATE SUED HBO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! :sarmoti:sarmoti:sarmoti

https://twitter.com/andjustice4some/status/1098644689148829697

YES. YES. YES. The Estate is ****ing stepping it up right now.

Branca, McClain, Weitzman -- BRAVO. Even if you don't win (which I can't attest to because I'm not entirely sure of non-disparagement agreements), you're putting yourselves on the line and you're doing everything you can. Two thumbs up.

The best part about this?

If this makes it to court, HBO will likely have to produce any and all financial records. Meaning if they ever ONCE donated money to Robson's hokey "charity," we're gonna find out about it.

Holy shit. Standing ovation.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Good news. Wonder if it was branca who wrote the bucharest contract. Still should have a P.R firm destroying their reps though. It inst gonna help in getting the facts out
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The ESTATE FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST HBO!!!!!! <a href="https://t.co/uEhYtXjBWf">pic.twitter.com/uEhYtXjBWf</a></p>&mdash; andjustice4some (@andjustice4some) <a href="https://twitter.com/andjustice4some/status/1098644689148829697?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">21. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">No fan of Michael Jackson is here to support the abuse of children! Many are parents themselves and as a collective they would not excuse abuse because they “like the music” or they “like the way he danced.” The facts are clear, MJ was NOT a child molester.</p>&mdash; Dr. Andrew Greene (@AndrewGreene864) <a href="https://twitter.com/AndrewGreene864/status/1098617228537356290?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">21. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">JERMAINE SAID. ****. THIS. SHIT <a href="https://t.co/ualAEwR5l5">pic.twitter.com/ualAEwR5l5</a></p>&mdash; &#120432;. (@michaelskings) <a href="https://twitter.com/michaelskings/status/1098303759048945665?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">20. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Yep. I’m 100% behind bringing abusers to justice; I’m also 100% behind due process. At some point, history will see the MJ media coverage for what it is: a mindless mob in the grip of a moral panic, not a search for truth.</p>&mdash; Joe Vogel (@JoeVogel1) <a href="https://twitter.com/JoeVogel1/status/1098042243649290240?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">20. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Today on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BreakfastClub?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BreakfastClub</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/cthagod?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@cthagod</a> stated that <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/LeavingNeverland?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#LeavingNeverland</a> documentary is unethical because the two men as adults swore under oath that they weren’t abused. I appreciate Charlemagne for spreading truth. Perhaps <a href="https://twitter.com/tajjackson3?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@tajjackson3</a> can stop by <a href="https://twitter.com/breakfastclubam?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@breakfastclubam</a> to shed more light...</p>&mdash; Hii Shadow (@KingSani_1958) <a href="https://twitter.com/KingSani_1958/status/1098096784277164032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">20. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">3 months old today and what keeps me fighting for the truth. &#10084;&#65039; <a href="https://t.co/17FJxkxUyc">https://t.co/17FJxkxUyc</a></p>&mdash; Taj Jackson (@tajjackson3) <a href="https://twitter.com/tajjackson3/status/1098634407143829504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">21. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&#128240; ARTICLE! What the media refuses to tell you about Michael Jackson, Leaving Neverland &amp; the allegations of child molestation<br><br>Read here: <a href="https://t.co/NztuZfG3aZ">https://t.co/NztuZfG3aZ</a> <a href="https://t.co/KDPWCEdrEb">pic.twitter.com/KDPWCEdrEb</a></p>&mdash; Damien Shields (@damienshields) <a href="https://twitter.com/damienshields/status/1098291578794172416?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">20. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Exactly. People can be so ignorant some times. You are family <a href="https://twitter.com/jmoffettmjm?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@jmoffettmjm</a> &#128522; <a href="https://t.co/YWvmzxr4c6">https://t.co/YWvmzxr4c6</a></p>&mdash; Taj Jackson (@tajjackson3) <a href="https://twitter.com/tajjackson3/status/1098307006002122752?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">20. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Thank you &#128591;&#127997; <a href="https://t.co/KV86xctjax">https://t.co/KV86xctjax</a></p>&mdash; Taj Jackson (@tajjackson3) <a href="https://twitter.com/tajjackson3/status/1098342500610203649?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">20. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Now if only this lawsuit could make HBO pull from airing only 10 days away and after advertisement.

It might depend on how much money HBO think they may have to pay in compensation. The longer this runs, the more they might have to pay, assuming the Estate wins. So they might just pull it, pending the outcome of this dispute.

By which time, The Robson/ Safechuck appeal might be decided. If their the appeal is thrown out, I wonder if HBO would still screen the film. It would be 'old news' about a completely 'dead ' case.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Considering they're the producers &amp;those who put this whole thing in motion &amp; paid for it &amp; orchestrated it, they're responsible for it. And if that mockumentary will get spread around the world HBO will have to pay for the damages caused worldwide because it was of their doing.</p>&mdash; July #BeKindBeReal (@alwaysjuly2011) <a href="https://twitter.com/alwaysjuly2011/status/1098656141784027140?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">21. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If any other country or Channel 4 still airs it, HBO will be still held accountable because they are the co-producers. Also, don't forget that the film was already shown at Sundance so they already HAVE breached the contract.</p>&mdash; July #BeKindBeReal (@alwaysjuly2011) <a href="https://twitter.com/alwaysjuly2011/status/1098656955000856577?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">21. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Michael Jackson WAS innocent and WILL always be innocent <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MichaelJackson?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MichaelJackson</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/StopLeavingNeverland?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#StopLeavingNeverland</a> <a href="https://t.co/TXBY2A4X5u">pic.twitter.com/TXBY2A4X5u</a></p>&mdash; #MJInnocent (@jjacksonnss) <a href="https://twitter.com/jjacksonnss/status/1098663564242534407?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">21. Februar 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
SeeingVoices;4242026 said:
I've adopted a new way of trying to argue our case for MJ on social media. I've recognised that force feeding people with facts doesn't work. It causes people to instantly discredit you as you're considered the caricature portrayal of an insane MJ fan. You have to play the part of an uninformed member of the public, creating doubt by making sutble suggestions and leaving breadcrumbs of evidence for them to make their own conclusions. I've noticed that you're taken far more seriously and as you're considered somewhat neuteral so the barriers don't shoot up so quick. It's almost like someone forcing religion down your throat. Your instant reaction is to brickwall them.

Slight tip for those who feel like their fire fighting at the moment..

In saying that - the response so far to the trailer hasn't been as horrrific as I first imagined *staying optimistic*

This post is spot on

Whilst we are all obviously at one of end of the spectrum and love mj and love reading about him and equally obsessed haters are at the other - the vast majority of the public have much more of a passing interest in all this. Put yourself in those peoples shoes when replying on social media. These ppl are unlikely to click on some random FBI link with hundreds of pages (I haven’t even read the FBI stuff and I’ve been a fan 25 years).
 
https://deadline.com/2019/02/finding-neverland-lawsuit-michael-jackson-estate-sues-hbo-1202562002/

Michael Jackson Estate Hits HBO With $100M &#8216;Leaving Neverland&#8217; Lawsuit

The burgeoning battle between the estate of Michael Jackson and HBO over the controversial Leaving Neverland sex abuse documentary is moving into a full-scale legal war that could cost the premium cabler up to $100 million.

&#8220;The Jackson Estate will seek all damages proximately caused by HBO&#8217;s reprehensible disparagement of Michael Jackson, which could exceed $100 million should HBO succeed in the damage it is intending to cause to the legacy of Michael Jackson,&#8221; said an injunction and arbitration seeking breach of contract complaint filed today by lawyers from Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump & Aldisert LL and Freedman + Tailtelman LLP in L.A. Superior Court (read it here).https://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/mj-arbitration-doc-1.pdf

&#8220;Petitioners further pray that the arbitrator award punitive damages in the maximum amount permissible if and when Petitioners show their entitlement to such damages,&#8221; the 53-page filing adds.

Having premiered under a heavy police presence at the Sundance Film Festival last month, the Dan Reed directed Leaving Neverland is set to debut on HBO on March 3 and 4.

&#8220;HBO breached its agreement not to disparage Michael Jackson by producing and selling to the public a one-sided marathon of unvetted propaganda to shamelessly exploit an innocent man no longer here to defend himself,&#8221; Jackson estate attorney Howard Weitzman told Deadline Thursday. &#8220;

&#8220;HBO could have and should have ensured that Leaving Neverland was properly sourced, fact checked and a fair and balanced representation,&#8221; he added in language similar to a letter sent to HBO CEO Richard Plepler over a week ago. &#8220;Instead they chose to fund and produce a film where they knew the two subjects had for many years testified under oath and told family, friends and law enforcement that Mr. Jackson did nothing inappropriate to either of them.&#8221;

HBO did not respond to request for comment on today&#8217;s legal move.

However, HBO execs asserted earlier this month that they stood by the film and nothing was going to stop it from airing in early March. &#8220;The one thing I would say about this documentary is I would ask everybody to watch it and make their judgments after seeing it,&#8221; the premium cabler&#8217;s programming chief Casey Bloys asserted on February 21.

&#8220;Nearly four years after Michael died they suddenly changed their recollections, sued the Estate of Michael Jackson for hundreds of millions of dollars and had all of their lawsuits dismissed,&#8221; Weitzman continued in his statement attacking Wade Robson and James Safechuck, who claim in the film that they were sexually abused by the &#8216;Thriller&#8217; superstar when they were children. &#8220;Yet they are still seeking money, having appealed. HBO and the director were well aware of their financial motives and that ample opposing facts are available from numerous sources, but made the unconscionable decision to bury any evidence casting doubt on their chosen narrative. Had they made an objective film it would have allowed viewers to make up their own minds about these allegations, instead of having a television network dictate to them that they must accept these false claims about Michael Jackson.&#8221;

Since it was announced in early January that Leaving Neverland would open at Sundance, Jackson fans around the world have taken to social media and elsewhere to condemn the documentary.

With the constant whiff of legal action in the air from the very beginning, representatives for the estate of Jackson &#8212; who died in 2009, four years after being acquitted of seven counts of child molestation and two counts of giving a drug to a 13-year-old boy &#8212; previously tainted Neverland as &#8220;just another rehash of dated and discredited allegations.&#8221;
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

So glad to see the Estate making GREAT headlines, (at least in the current circumstances, they're great).

HBO have already aired this publicly at Sundance, and at at least 2 media screenings, plus other likely screenings for influencers. They ran with this after being fully warned by the Estate.

Hope we'll see some TV schedule changes soon.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Okay, question for anyone in the legal world:

Do non-disparagement agreements hold up after death? I haven't been able to find anything yet, but if not, the Estate doesn't have a chance.
 
Back
Top