Staffordshire Bullterrier;4243367 said:
Yeah I read that last week too while I was spending a good time reading on Vindicatemj.wordpress.com. It clearly has nothing to do with anything that implies abuse, because he said he would go after him if he ever found something like that, something along those lines. But wtf is worse than molesting a child? What the site itself speculated it could be sounded very farfetched to me personally.
But again, had it really been anything incriminating, he would have gone to the authorities with it.
Someone on a (non-MJ) forum I used to frequent years ago theorized that the thing that would be "worse than molesting a child" would be how Michael would supposedly "drop" the kids he was friends with after a while and not hang out with them much anymore. Which... I can see being a bad thing not just with him but with others, but definitely not worse than molestation. On the other hand, times change, and so do people, and life doesn't slow down for anyone. Him and others probably got busy and drifted apart as a result. It happens to lots of people, kids and adults.
ManBehindTheMirrOr - Dona;4243413 said:
What I found really tragic from the Brandi Jackson interview was that she didn't distroy Wades Lie "Everytime we where together it happen, there where no night that went by ... where he did not sexual aboused me." Cause in wades testimony in 2005 it turned out that brandi spend a night or maybe more with Wade and MJ in the same room.
Whhhhhy didn't she mentioned this in the interview!!! 😭
I hope oprah get simular crazy respectless embaressed questions in her mind for Wade that she ask MJ in 1993 like the virgin thing.
Is it possible she doesn't know the full details of his testimony and therefore, that's why she didn't mention it?
MJJ2theMAX;4243418 said:
Can I just ask why the CBS interviewer continually used the fact the Jacksons haven’t seen the doc against them? Her tone was very accusatory.
The framing of the question is bizarre when:
1. the Jacksons seemingly haven’t even been given the opportunity to watch the film when hundreds of reporters have. This is clearly a deliberate ploy by Reed to put them on the back foot. That in of itself is dispicable behaviour. Let’s assume Wade and James ARE real victims and the documentary did contain air-tight proof of guilt. Wouldn’t you as the creator of the doc, want to deal with the family of the deceased accused sensitively and allow them time to process all this? Even if they decline to watch it , at least offer them the opportunity.
2. The presenter on CBS is talking with the assumption that you can convict someone of a crime having only watched a 4 hour documentary. Instead of the family being bombarded with “how can you say MJs not guilty when you haven’t watched the documentary”, Reed (or indeed any viewer of this documentary) should instead be being asked if he or she has read the civil court transcripts in their entirety. Why is the documentary relevant but court documents not?
Just watch. She's going to be super sweet and coddling to R&S tomorrow. Unbiased reporting my ****ing ass.
La74;4243447 said:
She actually found it beleivable and that says a lot about her judgement. This is not her first witch hunt.
Like I said before Oprah seemed to embrace the anti-vaccination movement when she allowed Jenny McCarthy on her show some time ago. She didn't challenge or question it or anything. That alone has earned her a lot of hate.
Also, I didn't say it before but I want to say it now: **** Oprah.
Staffordshire Bullterrier;4243481 said:
So get this....
The MJ Facebook just posted about Mike again, nothing about what goes on now. So I made a comment asking why they don't cover actual news at all. Like the estate suing HBO. I got one reply asking me "first I've heard of this. What happened." so either he/she doesn't know about the "documentary" at all or doesn't know about the estate suing HBO's ass.
The official Instagram for Michael is doing the same thing, posting positive pictures and facts about him. I think for now they're trying to play it safe and avoid drawing in any trolls and/or avoiding saying things that could be used against them down the line.
Staffordshire Bullterrier;4243489 said:
This new? So he now goes from one show to the other? I'm not listening to that. I won't poison my ears with that annoying prick.
It's from years ago. He appeared on King Jordan's radio show and called Robson a liar.
SeeingVoices;4243495 said:
I think we're being duped!
I never saw the orginal broadcast in it's entirety so I was relying on the upload on Youtube.
Taj obvioulsy had a strong voice and it was attracting too much support for MJ. Fans are stating that CBS uploaded the orginal but later deleted and posted a revised more dumbed down version!
I seriously cannot believe this. I thought MJ was mad when he thought there was a consipiracy to destory him but I'm actually starting to believe him!
Good lord... if there really was an unedited/original version of that interview then I hope to God someone ripped it before CBS removed it and can mirror it somewhere. This is like a ****ing Twilight Zone episode.
uke: