Deep Pockets behind Michael Jackson

kasume

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
2,740
Points
0
old article I found

Deep pockets behind Michael Jackson
May 30, 2009 | 9:56 am
This is a longer version of a story that will appear in The Times' Sunday (May 31) edition.

Others have tried to revive the onetime pop star's performing career. Tom Barrack is convinced he's the 'caretaker' to do it.

Tom Barrack, a Westside financier who made billions buying and selling distressed properties, flew to Las Vegas in March 2008 to check out a troubled asset. But his target was not a struggling hotel chair or failed bank.

It was Michael Jackson. The world's bestselling male pop artist was hunkered down with his three children in a dumpy housing compound in an older section of town. At 49, he was awash in nearly $400 million of debt and so frail that he greeted visitors in a wheelchair. The rich international friends who offered Jackson refuge after his 2005 acquittal on molestation charges had fallen away. His Santa Barbara ranch, Neverland, was about to be sold at public auction.

In Jackson, Barrack saw the sort of undervalued asset his private equity firm, Colony Capital, had succeeded with in the past. He wrote a check to save the ranch and placed a call to a friend, the conservative business magnate Philip Anschutz, whose holdings include the concert production firm AEG Live.

Fifteen months later, Jackson is living in a Bel-Air mansion and rehearsing for a series of 50 sold-out shows in London's O2 Arena. The intervention of two billionaires with more experience in the board room than the recording studio seems on course to accomplish what a parade of others over the last dozen years could not: getting Jackson back on stage.

His backers envision the shows at AEG's O2 as an audition for a career rebirth that could ultimately encompass a three-year world tour, a new album, movies, a Graceland-like museum, musical revues in Las Vegas and Macau, and even a "Thriller" casino. Such a rebound could wipe out Jackson's massive debt.

"You are talking about a guy who could make $500 million a year if he puts his mind to it," Barrack said recently. "There are very few individual artists who are multibillion-dollar businesses. And he is one."

Others have tried to resurrect Jackson's career, but previous attempts have failed, associates say, because of managerial chaos, backbiting within his inner circle and the singer's legendary flakiness.

Even as Jackson's deep-pocketed benefactors assemble an all-star team -- "High School Musical's" Kenny Ortega is directing the London concerts -- there are hints of discord. Last week, two different men identified themselves as the singer's manager and a month before, a respected accountant who had been handling Jackson's books was abruptly fired in a phone call from an assistant.

But his backers downplay the problems. "He is very focused. He is not going to let anybody down. Not himself. Not his fans. Not his family," said Frank DiLeo, his current manager and a friend of three decades.

Jackson needs a comeback to reverse the damage done by years of excessive spending and little work. He has not toured since 1997 or released a new album since 2001, but has continued to live like a megastar.

THE MICHAEL JACKSON 'PARADOX'

To finance his opulent lifestyle, he borrowed heavily against his three main assets -- his ranch, his music catalog and a second catalog that includes the music of the Beatles that he co-owns with Sony Corp. By the time of his 2005 criminal trial, he was nearly $300 million in debt and, according to testimony, spending $30 million more annually than he was taking in.

Compounding his money difficulties are a revolving door of litigious advisors and hangers on. Jackson has run through 11 managers since 1990, according to DiLeo.

At least 19 people -- financial advisors, managers, lawyers, a pornography producer and even a Bahraini sheik -- have taken Jackson to court for allegedly failing to pay bills or backing out of deals. He settled many of the suits. Currently, he is facing civil claims by a former publicist, a concert promoter and the writer-director of his "Thriller" video, John Landis.

John Branca, an entertainment lawyer who represented Jackson for more than 20 years, blamed the singer's financial straits partly on his past habit of surrounding himself with "yes men." Branca advised Jackson to buy half of the Beatles catalog in 1985 for $47.5 million. The catalog is now estimated to be worth billions and the purchase is considered his smartest business decision.

"The paradox is that Michael is one of the brightest and most talented people I've ever known. At the same time, he has made some of the worst choices in advisors in the history of music," said Branca, who represents Santana, Nickelback and Aerosmith, among others. He said he finally split with the singer because Jackson invited into his inner circle "people who really didn't have his best interests at heart."



The singer's financial predicament reached a crisis point in March 2008 when he defaulted on a $24.5-million loan and Neverland went into foreclosure. Jackson's brother Jermaine enlisted the help of Dr. Tohme Tohme, an orthopedic surgeon-turned-businessman who had previously worked with Colony Capital.

Tohme reached out to Barrack, who said he was initially reluctant to get involved because Jackson had already sought advice from fellow billionaire Ron Burkle, an old friend.

"I said, 'My God, if Ron can't figure it out, I can't figure it out,' " Barrack said.

But he was drawn to the deal. He owns a ranch five miles from Neverland, and his sons were among local children Jackson invited over for field days at the ranch. The financier retains close ties to the developer who built Neverland and is friendly with Wesley Edens, the chairman of the property's debt-holder, Fortress Investment Group.

With the auction of Jackson's home and possessions just days away, Barrack made the singer a proposition.

"I sat down with him and said, 'Look . . . we can buy the note and restructure your financial empire,' " Barrack said. But, he told him, "what you need is a new caretaker. A new podium. A new engine."

Tohme, who acted as Jackson's manager until recently, recalled the urgency of the situation. "If he didn't move fast, he would have lost the ranch," Tohme said. "That would have been humiliating for Michael."

Jackson and Barrack reached an agreement within seven days. Colony paid $22.5 million and Neverland averted foreclosure.

FROM NEVERLAND TO LONDON

Jackson has not spoken publicly since a March news conference and his representatives declined to make him available for an interview.

Barrack said his position outside the music industry seemed to endear him to Jackson. "He looks at me like 'the suit.' I have credibility because I don't live in that world. I'm not interested in hanging around him. I'm not interested in girls. I'm not interested in boys. I'm not interested in drugs," Barrack said.

After buying Neverland, Barrack called his friend Anschutz. Barrack said the prospect of helping Jackson, given his recent criminal case, gave Anschutz, a devout Christian, pause. (Anschutz declined to be interviewed.)

Barrack had spent significant time with Jackson and praised him as "a genius" and devoted father. Ultimately, Anschutz agreed to put Jackson in touch with Randy Phillips, the CEO of his concert subsidiary.

As the head of AEG Live, Phillips oversees a division that grossed more than $1 billion last year and has negotiated such lucrative bookings as Celine Dion's four-year, $400-million run in Las Vegas and Prince's 21 sold-out dates at the O2 Arena in 2007.

Phillips had his eye on Jackson for some time. In 2007, Phillips approached the singer with a deal for a comeback, but Jackson, who was working with different advisors, turned him down. "He wasn't ready," Phillips recalled.

This time, however, Jackson was receptive. He needed the money, and he has a second, more personal reason: His children -- sons Prince Michael, 7, and Michael Joseph Jackson Jr., 12, and daughter Paris Michael Katherine, 11 -- have never seen him perform live.

"They are old enough to appreciate and understand what I do and I am still young enough to do it," Phillips quoted Jackson as saying.

Jackson stands to earn $50 million for the O2 shows, "This Is It" -- $1 million per performance not including revenue from merchandise sales and broadcast rights. Jackson is considering options including pay-per-view and a feature film. But the real money would kick in after his final curtain call in London.

A PROPOSED TOUR

AEG has proposed a three-year tour starting in Europe, then traveling to Asia and finally returning to the United States. Although Jackson has only committed to the O2 engagement thus far, Phillips estimates ticket sales for the global concerts would exceed $450 million.

"One would hope he would end up netting around 50% of that," Phillips said.

Barrack, the man who set Jackson's comeback in motion, has seen his net worth drop with the financial crisis of the last year. Forbes estimated his wealth at $2.3 billion around the time he met Jackson, but he is now merely a multimillionaire. He said that the economic downturn makes Jackson even more attractive as an investment because his value has been overlooked: In times like this, he said, "finding little pieces of information that others don't have" is more important than ever.

His company isn't exposed to any risk by working with Jackson. All the money Colony has put up is backed by the value of Neverland and related assets, he said. If Jackson regains firm financial footing, Barrack's company could be a partner in future deals. "When he looks back and says, 'Who took the risk? Who was there?' I mean, he gets it. So that's my hope," Barrack said.

It all depends on what happens July 13 when the lights go down in the O2 Arena. Doubts about Jackson's reliability are widespread because of his long concert hiatus. Those concerns were heightened earlier this month when the show's opening night was pushed back five days. Phillips and Ortega, the director, blamed production problems and said Jackson was ready to perform.

Fans demonstrated their faith in Jackson months ago when they snapped up 750,000 tickets for shows through March 2010 in less than four hours. "We could have done 200 shows if he were willing to live in London for two years," Phillips said.

Amid the high stakes, Phillips has taken a hands-on approach more reminiscent of his early days as a talent manager for acts including Guns N' Roses and Lionel Richie than as the company's chief executive.

A REPUTATION, A DO-OR-DIE MOMENT

In addition to the more than $20 million AEG is paying to produce the shows, the company is putting its reputation on the line for a performer with a track record of missed performances and canceled dates. In a video news conference earlier this month, Phillips acknowledged that the company has only been able to insure 23 of the 50 "This Is It" performances. "In this business, if you don't take risks, you don't achieve greatness," Phillips said.

Phillips said he speaks with Jackson regularly and has closely monitored rehearsals in a Burbank soundstage. In response to questions about his physical condition, especially in light of his previous addiction to prescription painkillers, Phillips said that Jackson passed a rigorous medical examination. Associates also say he adheres to a strict vegetarian diet and works out with a personal trainer.

But the problems that have bedeviled Jackson in the past -- infighting, disorganization and questionable advisors -- persist.

In an interview last week, Tohme identified himself as the singer's "manager, spokesman, everything" and spoke about the benefits of dealing with business titans Barrack and Anschutz rather than their "sleazy" predecessors. "Michael Jackson is an institution. He needs to be run like an institution," Tohme said.

The next day, however, longtime Jackson associate DiLeo claimed he was Jackson's manager and said Tohme had been fired a month and a half earlier. Tohme denied being fired but declined further comment.

In April, Jackson fired the accounting firm, Cannon & Co., that had worked for him for a year, according to an accountant who worked on his finances. Jeff Cannon of Cannon & Co. said he received a phone call from an assistant of Jackson who said the singer no longer required his services.

Then there is Arfaq Hussain. A British man who met Jackson in the late 1990s, Hussain designed clothing for the performer -- including an air-conditioned jacket, a pair of self-adjusting, rhodium-plated shoes and the "Crystal Miracle," a jacket covered with 275,000 rock crystals -- and tried to launch a business selling $75,000 bottles of perfume by trading on Jackson's name.

In 2002, Hussain was jailed for four months in Britain for charges related to business fraud. Hussain and Jackson recently became reacquainted and the singer hired him as an assistant, DiLeo said.

The woman who was Jackson's public face during his criminal trial, former manager and spokeswoman Raymone Bain, is pressing a federal breach of contract suit against the singer. Bain claims that Jackson cheated her out of her 10% cut of several business deals, including the AEG concerts. Bain is to ask a judge in Washington, D.C., next month to seize the portion she alleges is hers, citing Jackson's history of evading creditors.

In his corner office high above Century City, Barrack is sanguine about reports of disharmony.

"You have the same thousand parasites that start to float back in and take advantage of the situation and that has happened a little at the edges," he said. But, he added, he had confidence in AEG's ability to keep Jackson focused.

The concerts, Phillips acknowledged, are a do-or-die moment for Jackson.

"If it doesn't happen, it would be a major problem for him career-wise in a way that it hasn't been in the past," he said.

--Chris Lee and Harriet Ryan

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/05/deep-pockets-behind-michael-jackson.html
 
A very interesting read.

Ouch at the 'do or die ' quotation .
 
Dr. Tohme disappeared faster than the speed of light. I haven't seen him since he showed up to the hospital claiming to be michael's manager.
 
Bring forth the evidence to prove every false bit.

What in the article do you believe is false?

i got a better idea. you bring forth the proof that the article is true. and you tell me why you automatically believe an article.

have you forgotten the lyrics to tabloid junkie?
 
Not every article is a tabloid now. and the articles that are mostly tabloids are the ones that downgrade Michael. This article here is obviously meant to be an informative writing on the people AROUND Michael.

we know dileo and thome have both claimed to be Michael's manager. We know there was firing letter to Thome. We know Barack had financial difficulties. We know the catalogue is worth A LOT. We know Dr. Thome Thome claimed to be a doctor. We know Thome said he was in charge of Michael's entire life. We know Michael reached out to Phillips through his manager.

This article basically elaborates on all of that in just a slight more detail, but IMPORTANT detail.

Now, as for Arfaq Hussain, never heard of him. That's going to take some looking into, and again, he may have nothing of him on the internet like Thome.
 
Last edited:
Not every article is a tabloid now. and the articles that are mostly tabloids are the ones that downgrade Michael. This article here is obviously meant to be an informative writing on the people AROUND Michael.

we know dileo and thome have both claimed to be Michael's manager. We know there was firing letter to Thome. We know Barack had financial difficulties. We know the catalogue is worth A LOT. We know Dr. Thome Thome claimed to be a doctor. We know Thome said he was in charge of Michael's entire life. We know Michael reached out to Phillips through his manager.

This article basically elaborates on all of that in just a slight more detail, but IMPORTANT detail.

Now, as for Arfaq Hussain, never heard of him. That's going to take some looking into, and again, he may have nothing of him on the internet like Thome.

no..in truth we don't know. i know the temptation to have control over knowledge is great, but humbling oneself is paramount, and admitting that it's mainly mystery. and, most importantly, painting MJ as being in deep debt, is a lie. the new york times had an article that is basically a copy and paste, with disclaimers that say words like, 'reportedly' and 'allegedly', and, 'sources say'.

this need to embrace the media, that maligned Michael, and painted him as a helpless, financially inept, flake, who needed rescuing, is a complete lie. ninety nine percent of the articles do this, and lie. i don't see why some people want so badly to embrace the articles. why can't Tabloid Junkie be the respected lyric? the fact is, media HAS gone tabloid. it's gone to a word that is well stated by a person who wrote a couple of paragraphs about the media, in another thread in this section. a word called 'medialoid'. the media has become tabloid.

the fact is, the respect factor doesn't seem to go toward Michael's lyrics, and belief that MJ spent years in the industry, and has brains in his head.

the fact is, some seem to find it easier to believe the article writers and the execs as being stable, and Michael, as being unstable. and that is very sad.

you see how disrespectful this article is, and the disrespectful quotes in it, attributed to Barrack. suggesting that Michael was into boys and drugs. i know you saw that in this article. are you going to believe that stuff at face value, even though he was acquitted in a court of law, and has been around to stay, when the Barracks of the world have come and gone?
 
Last edited:
I don't want so badly to embrace these articles. And I DON'T want control over knowledge. I simply WANT the truth.

There is PROOF of all that I mentioned above, in documents and filmed interviews coming straight from these people's mouths. How can it be mystery?

The only thing that may not be true is that Barack had financial difficulties. But there are other articles solely about just that too in deeper detail.

As for this article painting Michael as broke, I did notice that, but I ignored it. Reporters don't know EVERYTHING, but from a lot of what was written in this piece, these reporters don't know NOTHING. They aren't completley ignorant. In fact, I found this article against the people AROUND Michael, rather than Michael himself.

And pay attention to the date of this article, May 2009. Also, we didn't even know of Michael's two managers and firing Thome, until AFTER the 25th of June! This article is strange indeed. These people knew things before everyone.

....i'm not going to say anything else. this is heading more to the conspiracy side.
 
Last edited:
I don't want so badly to embrace these articles. And I DON'T want control over knowledge. I simply WANT the truth.

There is PROOF of all that I mentioned above, in documents and filmed interviews coming straight from these people's mouths. How can it be mystery?

The only thing that may not be true is that Barack had financial difficulties. But there are other articles solely about just that too in deeper detail.

As for this article painting Michael as broke, I did notice that, but I ignored it. Reporters don't know EVERYTHING, but from a lot of what was written in this piece, these reporters don't know NOTHING. They aren't completley ignorant. In fact, I found this article against the people AROUND Michael, rather than Michael himself.

And pay attention to the date of this article, May 2009. It talks about Barack and all of a sudden, Barack is back in Michael's life after the 25th. Also, we didn't even know of Michael's two managers and firing Thome, until AFTER the 25th of June! This article is strange indeed. These people knew things before everyone.

....i'm not going to say anything else. this is heading more to the conspiracy side.

documents can be forged. interviewees can lie. why read articles that mix lies with 'truth'? THEIR truth. it's just not worth believing. these reporters have a reputation, and it's not a good one.

for me, i'm not suggesting a conspiracy, or lack of a conspiracy. i'm just saying, that i don't believe the articles i read. i just deem MJ's life a successful mystery, and he didn't need a Barrack to save his life, or his career. He didn't need to tour. why? because he didn't, for 12 years. i give MJ the benefit of the doubt. not the reporters who like saying he desperately needed touring and saving. if MJ needed to tour so bad, then why did he still have the catalogue in his possession, the way he did, in 1995, by the time it was 2009, after 12 years of off time, to raise his kids?

and why wouldn't Barrack be in financial trouble? it's never a good idea to invest in gambling casinos.
 
This article is full of basic mistakes.
Its ridiculous, like recycled BSs trying to be real and objective.

The writers should google more than relying on "their perspectives" ... what they read or saw on TV or mags... and then wrote as an article.

This is a wannabe article.
 
documents can be forged. interviewees can lie. why read articles that mix lies with 'truth'? THEIR truth. it's just not worth believing. these reporters have a reputation, and it's not a good one.

for me, i'm not suggesting a conspiracy, or lack of a conspiracy. i'm just saying, that i don't believe the articles i read. i just deem MJ's life a successful mystery, and he didn't need a Barrack to save his life, or his career. He didn't need to tour. why? because he didn't, for 12 years. i give MJ the benefit of the doubt. not the reporters who like saying he desperately needed touring and saving. if MJ needed to tour so bad, then why did he still have the catalogue in his possession, the way he did, in 1995, by the time it was 2009, after 12 years of off time, to raise his kids?

and why wouldn't Barrack be in financial trouble? it's never a good idea to invest in gambling casinos.

i am going to agree with u on this one .media lied about everything including his skin condition and when truth came out ,they just started saying other lies so no one will question them about their previous lies .now they want to sell him as drug addict while autopsy says different things.we as fan know about autopsy report but normal people who satisfy their hunger of knowledge by watching bbc,cnn so called legitimate news outlet which we know they relied on tmz for news regarding to Michael.
they want to portrait him as debt redden ,drug addict and they are on mission to prove that his kids are not his kids and i can see people are falling for it.
 
i am going to agree with u on this one .media lied about everything including his skin condition and when truth came out ,they just started saying other lies so no one will question them about their previous lies .now they want to sell him as drug addict while autopsy says different things.we as fan know about autopsy report but normal people who satisfy their hunger of knowledge by watching bbc,cnn so called legitimate news outlet which we know they relied on tmz for news regarding to Michael.
they want to portrait him as debt redden ,drug addict and they are on mission to prove that his kids are not his kids and i can see people are falling for it.
The media knows that as forward, educated and modern this society claims they are, people are still gullible. Not to mention miserable in their own lives and need escapism---what better way to escape and feel good about yourself than hearing that the rich and famous is miserable or going through a scandal or having his/her life turned upside down. Add this to the fact that when it comes to Michael Jackson, even the most intelligent of persons have proven to possess the IQ of a cotton ball.
 
The media knows that as forward, educated and modern this society claims they are, people are still gullible. Not to mention miserable in their own lives and need escapism---what better way to escape and feel good about yourself than hearing that the rich and famous is miserable or going through a scandal or having his/her life turned upside down. Add this to the fact that when it comes to Michael Jackson, even the most intelligent of persons have proven to possess the IQ of a cotton ball.

quote of the day:clapping:
 
It's funny that Barrack and Tahome had the audacity to call MJ broke, when Tahome who worked for Barrack was siphoning off millions from Michael without his knowledge.

If MJ was so broke, then where did Tahome get the millions that he stole, only to return it when MJ passed?

These people seem to have been brought in to handle a complex situation and they decided to take advantage of it. Rather than have Michael refinance the ranch as Ramone Bain had managed to do, they failed to pursue another refinance deal and instead chose to tell MJ that things were bad, he needed to let them buy the ranch.

Then Tahome seemed to try and sell MJ's personal property, including the gate, through an auction, only for MJ to be told about the gravity of this, someone Tahome was fired, cut off and the auction stopped.

And there they were talking about how they were great for MJ. What good did they do him?

Manipulate him to sell the ranch to them?

Steal his millions only to bring it back when he died?

Attempt to auction his property?

Lie about his finances so as to be a darling of the media and lend credence to the stories of financial chaos?


Of course Michael had financial difficulties, but not to the level to be broke. It was due to mismanagement by self-serving managers seeking to enrich themselves from one crisis to another.

My question would be, if Michael had a $20 million loan on Neverland, and Tahome could get hold of $3 million in cash of Michael's money in just a year, surely that loan on teh ranch could have been refinanced.

Tahome could have renegotatited a refinance deal, and paid the financier 15% in advance towards the refinancing, which was the 3 million in cash.

Then had a deal to pay more or less the same amount each year.

But no, Barrack wanted his hands on the ranch to turn it into some attraction so that they could generate hundreds of millions.
 
Yeah "deep pockets behind Michael Jackson" really? dont tell me?
, all these things makes me all the more suspicious....

Michael was KILLED and all this with Murray is just a big act, like if Michael was "accidentally" killed.... yeah right and i am God.....writing here... please... makes me sick :puke:
 
Yeah "deep pockets behind Michael Jackson" really? dont tell me?
, all these things makes me all the more suspicious....

Michael was KILLED and all this with Murray is just a big act, like if Michael was "accidentally" killed.... yeah right and i am God.....writing here... please... makes me sick :puke:

You know what? I'm noticing that more and more fans EVERYDAY are going against the possibility that Michael's death was a mistake, and are shifting their opinions towards it being *intentional murder* (I'm not pinning this on you at all Fedora, just talking about fans in general). In the few months following Michael's death, everyone was on the same boat - that it was Murray's idiotic and stupid actions that caused Michael to die (a mistake on his part). Now, a year later everyone is on a different boat - some believe he was murdered, some still believe it was just a mistake, some believe he's still alive, some believe in the enormous amount of conspiracy theories...the list is endless.

I myself believe that Michael's death was just a horrible, horrible mistake. No conspiracy, nothing shady or planned. I dunno...maybe I've just convinced myself to look at all this from a simple perspective. I think I'm just too afraid to be sucked into the world of conspiracy. If I go into the world of researching his death and all the circumstances around his life during his final days, I'm afraid I'll never be able to come out. There's always enough fuel to keep one hooked to all those conspiracy theories. Frankly, I'm just tired of it. I'm tired of ALL of it. I just want the truth...and nothing but the truth to come out. Guess it's easier said then done :(.
 
My question would be, if Michael had a $20 million loan on Neverland, and Tahome could get hold of $3 million in cash of Michael's money in just a year, surely that loan on teh ranch could have been refinanced.

Tahome could have renegotatited a refinance deal, and paid the financier 15% in advance towards the refinancing, which was the 3 million in cash.

Then had a deal to pay more or less the same amount each year.

But no, Barrack wanted his hands on the ranch to turn it into some attraction so that they could generate hundreds of millions.

Or are you speaking of something else?

Great points brought up, but I thought it was $5.5 million he turned over.
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/MichaelJackson/story?id=8172668&page=1
 
Last edited:
You know what? I'm noticing that more and more fans EVERYDAY are going against the possibility that Michael's death was a mistake, and are shifting their opinions towards it being *intentional murder* (I'm not pinning this on you at all Fedora, just talking about fans in general). In the few months following Michael's death, everyone was on the same boat - that it was Murray's idiotic and stupid actions that caused Michael to die (a mistake on his part). Now, a year later everyone is on a different boat - some believe he was murdered, some still believe it was just a mistake, some believe he's still alive, some believe in the enormous amount of conspiracy theories...the list is endless.

I myself believe that Michael's death was just a horrible, horrible mistake. No conspiracy, nothing shady or planned. I dunno...maybe I've just convinced myself to look at all this from a simple perspective. I think I'm just too afraid to be sucked into the world of conspiracy. If I go into the world of researching his death and all the circumstances around his life during his final days, I'm afraid I'll never be able to come out. There's always enough fuel to keep one hooked to all those conspiracy theories. Frankly, I'm just tired of it. I'm tired of ALL of it. I just want the truth...and nothing but the truth to come out. Guess it's easier said then done :(.

I tend to agree with you. I have nothing against conspiracy theories. People do conspire to kill. What Murray did was sufficient to kill Michael. I do think he deserves a murder charge for depraved indifference. If he was working for someone else, well, it seems he would rat them out rather than spend too much time in prison.

I did believe Princess Diana was assassinated. It was not until the full inquest 10 years after her death, which I read every day, I was more satisfied we had the truth.

I would like to say the truth comes out eventually, but we still are not satisfied with regard to President Kennedy, so.
 
There are no fans like Michael Jackson fans. The truth WILL come out.
 
Certainly was a do or die moment....wasn't it.
 
Back
Top