Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate
I did not see the full "undisputed facts" docs (just the one about Blanca Francia), but you can see references to those in the Judge's ruling:
OK so we have a document like this:
http://radaronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/MJcase-signed.pdf
What you say is that every single undisputed fact has to be submitted in a document separate from the complaint
and claims in the complaint itself are not considered undisputed facts?
If they are not submitted separately then the judge cannot refer to those claims as undisputed facts in his summary judgement?
Once again you have to understand how summary judgement works and this as to why those were "undisputed facts" for the purpose of summary judgement even though the Estate made sure to note every time that they do not actually believe those claims to be true:
What is not clear in your argument is how the Estate submitting facts about Francia's depo would have changed the ruling?
And if it wouldn't have then why not fight on every possible front? Why let Robson bolster his claim that he is a poor abuse victim?
We all know why Robson submitted those testimonies. To generate sympathy and to bolster his chances for the civil case.
Why not inform the judge that he is using a proven liar's testimony to back up his story
if that cannot possibly hinder their effort to win the probate case?
You seriously don't believe that the judge would have allowed the claim against the Estate if they had submitted Francia's depo, do you?
I agree that it was not necessary. That's not the point. What is the problem is they let, once again, salacious claims go unchallenged both in court and consequently in the media
when they had the opportunity to challenge those claims.
It isn't just me who had that impression from your posts:
That was another post not the one you referred to.
I don't see how the heck you could conclude from that post that I criticized TM. I didn't. Your post about the magazines reminded me that there's a bunch of things the Estate's lawyers could use which were not used by TM.
And just because some are hypersensitive to anything anyone would say about TM not talking about some issues does not mean that I think he did a bad job.
It's a fact that TM didn't argue about a lot of things, but that's OK, he didn't have to.
The Estate however should do a much more aggressive job defending MJ.
