FT article: Michael Jackson estate says accuser is trying to extract $213mn

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nobody sounds like Mj because they are not Mj. No person or A.I not anybody.
There's literally an impersonator that sounds just like the songs, okay, let the excessive glazing stop already. MJ is still way more talented even if someone randomly has one or two moments or charactersistics that resemble him. It's all Opinions anyway.
 
There's literally an impersonator that sounds just like the songs, okay, let the excessive glazing stop already. MJ is still way more talented even if someone randomly has one or two moments or charactersistics that resemble him. It's all Opinions anyway.
Sorry Bro. It’s all for Love ❤️
 
Update: The MJcasts latest episode is talking about this via Charles Thomson, and he has gotten no additional information than the original article. So this means that probably nobody will know anything about this until there is a court ruling going either way! It appears the Cascios has never made an substantial detailed allegations, just said: "oh well, if you dont pay us we will say something bad".

Their credibility is so bad that even the mainstream media might realize it will undermine their anti-MJ campaign to include these scumbags!
 
Update: The MJcasts latest episode is talking about this via Charles Thomson, and he has gotten no additional information than the original article. So this means that probably nobody will know anything about this until there is a court ruling going either way! It appears the Cascios has never made an substantial detailed allegations, just said: "oh well, if you dont pay us we will say something bad".

Their credibility is so bad that even the mainstream media might realize it will undermine their anti-MJ campaign to include these scumbags!
Oh, this is interesting. If anyone can find out more about this story it's Charlie. Thanks for posting.
 
Update: The MJcasts latest episode is talking about this via Charles Thomson, and he has gotten no additional information than the original article. So this means that probably nobody will know anything about this until there is a court ruling going either way! It appears the Cascios has never made an substantial detailed allegations, just said: "oh well, if you dont pay us we will say something bad".

Their credibility is so bad that even the mainstream media might realize it will undermine their anti-MJ campaign to include these scumbags!

This is honestly one of the most dissapointing things I've had to read about in all my years as an MJ fan. It always seemed to me that even if the Cascio bros were a bit shady, they still cared about MJ and his legacy deep down inside. Frank's book really helped to make fans realize that even with the talent, fame, and fortune, MJ was still a human being like the rest of us and I still believe it was a genuine love letter to someone he considered his best friend.

Hell, even after Leaving Neverland, Frank Cascio went on record to say it was all bullshit.

But for them to basically demand money from the Estate after finding out they can't make money off of the Cascio tracks anymore and threaten to make allegations that they KNOW are false...They think they're just "getting back" at the Estate for "****** them over," but in reality they're ****** Michael over. They're ****** with his legacy, his fans, and worst of all hurting his children and his family.
 


Michael Jackson estate says accuser is trying to extract $213mn
The King of Pop’s legacy has generated $3bn since his death but remains overshadowed by child sex abuse claims

When Michael Jackson died, his estate was saddled with $500mn of debt after years of unsuccessful business practices and profligate spending © AFP/Getty Images

Anna Nicolaou in Los Angeles 21 MINUTES AGO


Michael Jackson’s estate has initiated legal proceedings against a former associate of the late pop icon, who threatened to raise fresh allegations of inappropriate conduct before the release of a film the executors hope will quell the child sex abuse claims that shadowed his later years.

The man and four others told the estate in about 2019, a decade after the singer’s death, that they might go public with allegations that he had acted inappropriately with some of them when they were children.

In 2020, the estate quietly struck a previously unreported settlement worth nearly $20mn, under which the man and the other accusers agreed instead to defend Jackson’s reputation.

Now, the people managing Jackson’s music and image rights are accusing the man of fabricating his earlier claims while seeking to extract $213mn more in a new settlement with the estate, according to an arbitration claim. They have reported the matter to the US Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles.

Jackson’s estate is asking an arbitrator to award damages, order the accuser to abide by the terms of the 2020 deal and issue an injunction barring him from releasing details he previously agreed to keep secret.

The episode illustrates how Jackson’s interactions with children, which led to a criminal prosecution and at least one out-of-court settlement, continue to hang over his estate years after his death in 2009 from an overdose of sedatives and anaesthetic. The Jackson estate maintains the singer never engaged in inappropriate conduct with children.

The estate, which was initially $500mn in debt, has since amassed more than $3bn — a figure revealed by its executors in an interview with the Financial Times for the first time.

The change of fortunes has come through the sale of his music catalogue, a Broadway musical and Cirque du Soleil shows. The beneficiaries are Jackson’s three children, his mother and charities.

In an interview, John Branca, a longtime Jackson aide who co-manages the estate, said: “The time has come to stand up, take a stand, tell Michael’s story.”

The man allegedly making the claims against the Jackson estate did not respond to repeated requests for comment. He is not being named by the FT.

Jackson is one of the most successful but controversial figures in pop music history, springing to fame as a five-year-old with a soaring voice on the pop, soul and funk songs performed by his family band, The Jackson 5. He went on to record Thriller, which remains the best-selling album of all time more than 40 years after its release.

But he was also accused on multiple occasions of inappropriate conduct with children, beginning in the 1990s and continuing until his prosecution in 2005. Though the accusers’ accounts were at times contradictory and Jackson was acquitted in the court case, the allegations took a toll.


Michael Jackson waves to his supporters in California after being acquitted in a 2005 court case © Reuters
When he died, Jackson’s will gave Branca and music executive John McClain the responsibility of managing his estate. Branca has spent the past decade and a half working to restore the singer’s troubled finances and his complicated legacy.

The strategy suffered a setback after HBO’s 2019 documentary, Leaving Neverland, which featured the graphic accounts of two men, Wade Robson and James Safechuck, who alleged Jackson abused them as children.

Shortly after, the five unnamed accusers — who were not featured in the Neverland documentary — made their allegations. According to Jackson’s estate, the man had previously denied Jackson ever engaged in inappropriate conduct.

The estate agreed to settle those claims under what it has described as a “business decision”. The settlement deal, signed in January 2020, was styled as a purchase of their life rights and a consulting agreement, with each of the five accusers to receive $3.3mn over six years.

Since then, it is claimed, each of the accusers received $2.8mn. But in January, before the final $500,000 payment was made to each of them, the man notified the estate that he no longer planned to abide by the agreement, and that he was seeking $213mn in new payments.

The claim is that the man’s lawyers demanded a “substantive response” to their overture for more payments, and warned they would “be forced to expand the circle of knowledge” if the ultimatum was not met.

The demands came at the time the estate was finalising terms for the $600mn sale of a 50 per cent stake in Jackson’s music catalogue to Sony, valuing the total package at $1.2bn. The accuser’s lawyer asked the estate if it had disclosed his claim to Sony, raising the spectre of risk for the new owners of Jackson’s music and potentially affecting the deal’s value.


Jackson’s estate has turned around its fortunes through lucrative ventures, including the Cirque du Soleil show ‘Michael Jackson ONE’ © Getty Images
When Jackson died, his estate was saddled with debt after years of unsuccessful business practices and profligate spending.

Progress has been uneven in digging out of the hole; the Broadway show has grossed $216mn, according to Broadway World. But in the aftermath of Leaving Neverland, according to Branca, national commercials with Nike and two banks that each paid $1mn to $2mn a year evaporated and attendance at MGM’s Cirque show dropped for an extended period.

The estate laid low for a few years but is now taking a more assertive approach as it seeks to defend Jackson’s name. The biopic is being directed by Antoine Fuqua, with actor Miles Teller playing Branca.

“We survived Leaving Neverland but I’m not sure we could have with those additional allegations,” Branca said. His lawyers, he said, told him: “You have no choice. If these people come forward and make these allegation
s, then Michael is over, his legacy is over, the business is done.”
Rumors are circulating that it's one of the Cascios. I wouldn't be surprised if it is, considering the family’s already scammed the Estate with fake songs.

Edit: Guess I was late to the party, this is my first time hearing of this. 😒
 
Last edited:
From what I’ve heard it’s been pushed back, hasn’t gone to trial yet.
:unsure:

I'm confused, lol.

Did you mean the MJE v HBO thing? Arbitration means it doesn't go to trial. A judge presides over it but it's a different process to a trial. The arbitration took place last year and then everything went quiet leaving everyone to assume HBO had succeeded in their request to not have the results of the arbitration made public. I don't know if we'll ever find out for sure what happened.

In May of this year @andjustice4some posted this:

 
Update: The MJcasts latest episode is talking about this via Charles Thomson, and he has gotten no additional information than the original article. So this means that probably nobody will know anything about this until there is a court ruling going either way! It appears the Cascios has never made an substantial detailed allegations, just said: "oh well, if you dont pay us we will say something bad".

Their credibility is so bad that even the mainstream media might realize it will undermine their anti-MJ campaign to include these scumbags!
When did the mainstream-media care if a person is a credible in regards of MJ? How many times they are interviewing this house-mad again and which is a proven liar.
 
Update: The MJcasts latest episode is talking about this via Charles Thomson, and he has gotten no additional information than the original article. So this means that probably nobody will know anything about this until there is a court ruling going either way! It appears the Cascios has never made an substantial detailed allegations, just said: "oh well, if you dont pay us we will say something bad".

Their credibility is so bad that even the mainstream media might realize it will undermine their anti-MJ campaign to include these scumbags!
Which only confirms that the Cascios just suck. They suck at making songs, they suck at ultimatums, they suck at just about everything under the sun.
 
Omer Bhatti...

Wasn't sure whether a separate thread was needed to I'll pose the question here. Omers behaviour regarding Michael has been questionable of late, more recently he has listed items such as a Military jacket and the HIStory era necklace for sale via an online auction.

With his close relationship to Prince, Paris and Blanket should it be worrying that he is selling off such personal items?
 
Omer Bhatti...

Wasn't sure whether a separate thread was needed to I'll pose the question here. Omers behaviour regarding Michael has been questionable of late, more recently he has listed items such as a Military jacket and the HIStory era necklace for sale via an online auction.

With his close relationship to Prince, Paris and Blanket should it be worrying that he is selling off such personal items?
No. He is not the first and there are a lot of other items from other celebrities like Lennon in this auction. They are his possessions to sell if he wants.
 
Omer Bhatti...

Wasn't sure whether a separate thread was needed to I'll pose the question here. Omers behaviour regarding Michael has been questionable of late, more recently he has listed items such as a Military jacket and the HIStory era necklace for sale via an online auction.

With his close relationship to Prince, Paris and Blanket should it be worrying that he is selling off such personal items?
Damn, I would be seriously dissapointed... and worried... if it were him.

No. He is not the first and there are a lot of other items from other celebrities like Lennon in this auction. They are his possessions to sell if he wants.
He can seel whatever he wants, but why would he? Only in a very bad financial situation would this be justified in my opinion.
 
He can seel whatever he wants, but why would he? Only in a very bad financial situation would this be justified in my opinion.
I doubt he has a large income and a regular job, so no doubt an easy thing to get an income.
Michael`s sister Rebbie for example sold more dubious things like a compact from Michael years ago.
 
"I will never be sad if I leave this World, because I know I will be in a better place. The only thing I care about is that people stop thinking that I did something wrong. I love the kids, and disgusting lies almost killed me. When I die, all the money I have will go to my Children and other Children of the World."

(Telephone Conversation with friend Frank Cascio, 2008)
 
The estate has named Frank Cascio... Cascio is being represented by Mark Geragos!
 
Remember, Frank Cascio was accused by the Arvizos of showing them porn. If he now says that the allegations against Michael are true, he's throwing himself under the bus at the same time.
 
Last edited:
Why is it not strange that people would fall for this? (Fall for it)
Who is that hated family you're thinking of? (You're thinking of)

THIS IS FAKIN' NEWS (FAKIN' THE NEWS)



This just proves that people working for big names publications (FT) are still horrible in verifying their so-called sources. LMAO!
Spreading complete nonsense like this is the very same social issue currently prevalent in the USA that led to a fraudster named Donald J. Trump becoming president in 2016 and Janet Jackson falling for tabloid reports about Kamala Harris' ancestry.
🧐
 
Haven't read this court document. It's 34 pages long. This bit jumped out at me, though.

v. FRANK CASCIO and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

wtaf??????? ☹️


THE MICHAEL JACKSON COMPANY,
LLC; JOHN G. BRANCA and JOHN
MCCLAIN, individually and as Officers of
THE MICHAEL JACKSON COMPANY,
LLC and Co-Executors of the ESTATE OF
MICHAEL JACKSON,
Petitioners,
v.
FRANK CASCIO and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,

Respondents.

posted online by @andjustice4some
"Here is the court document for the Estate to compel arbitration to Frank Cascio and his cohorts via The Blast."
 
Last edited:
Omer Bhatti...

Wasn't sure whether a separate thread was needed to I'll pose the question here. Omers behaviour regarding Michael has been questionable of late, more recently he has listed items such as a Military jacket and the HIStory era necklace for sale via an online auction.

With his close relationship to Prince, Paris and Blanket should it be worrying that he is selling off such personal items?

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top