Datsymay: There is no "two separate companies that have merger". Merger happened in 1995 and only one company exists since then.
Michael is shareholder of Sony/ATV MP, please read Sony SEC filings for that. I hope You will not go arguing with SEC filings?
Also, merger as business process has nothing to do with any "partnership" other than creating one company from two which are merged. So we have one united single entity with one central office, one CEO, one chain of over 40 offices around the world.
"Partnership" is not a merger, it when two (or more) companies kept as separate entities. Please see Renault-Nissan partnership for that.
Lets not confuse business terms (executive/consultant, merger/partnership) or else we will confuse other readers, what would be better to avoid.
Anyway Denisr, what you've said enhance my sayings even MORE. Maybe I am not too good with those terms, and I am sorry, but the main idea stands up, let's not to lose ourselfs in details... It's impossible for Michael to take a huge loan ofering as garant Sony/Atv company, for personal or other business purposes. Stories from media are beyond messy and outrageous.
Last edited: