dam2040;4305155 said:
Me neither. Invincible at one point was outselling Thriller. “Needed to be relevant” my ass.
Are you one of those people who are convinced "invincible" wasn't a flop? It left the charts all over the world within 2 months, it peaked high because MJ has a huge fanbase that go out in droves to buy an album in the first week (including myself) the general public was cold on the release. At that point Michael should have realized his time in the charts was over to pursue other career goals for example classical music, film music or quite simply do different genres.
So many artists reinvent themselves later on and revive their careers like that.
I believe MJ had to release pop albums to please his record company, they didn't give him room to be creative. A versatile talent like Michael should be given the freedom to explore his creativity. Invincible was a huge letdown in which he barely had a hand in the writing process.
He doesn't need to be relevant imo but I'm sure he wanted to keep being relevant (he was always very ambitious), but you don't stay relevant making pop albums for over 3 decades, you need to reinvent yourself.