You absolutely Cannot skip over the second allegations. All of the controversy comes from Living with Michael Jackson and the 2005 Trial, not to mention the falling out with Sony Music, This is It etc.
They can't skip 2d allegations and TII. It's one of the most important moments in Michael's life
You absolutely can and I sincerely hope they do. He beat the case first of all, the Jordie stuff is the biggest black cloud over MJs legacy aside from Dan Reed, which basically go hand in hand. You dismantle that original flagrant foul, you dismantle them all. You can even go earlier and show how there were already attempts to make allegations stick that were just unsuccessful.
Everyone parrots what's said from Martin Bashir, i genuinely don't think 1993 was a bigger controversy then 2003-05
Creative Artists Agency. They represent sports stars and performing artists, afaik.
Make it an Easter Egg lol
Why would you want to see that in a "movie"? That would make sense for a anniversary release of History itself, and especially with real Michael being in studio.
Because apart from the song being one of the most popular songs in MJ's career it can also be used to show how Michael felt after 93 allegations which clearly brought a huge effect to his life afterwards? You're acting as if this is all what I want to see in the whole movie lmfao. All I had in mind was a scene that shows the song being written and it'd take no more than a few minutes of screen time at most. They can easily do something like this for songs like the way they did on the Bohemian Rhapsody film. I really don't see what's that fuss of yours about lol.Why would you want to see that in a "movie"? That would make sense for a anniversary release of History itself, and especially with real Michael being in studio.
I can promise you there will also not be any unseen Beat It music video scene, nor an unreleased song sung bx Jafaar.
Not gonna happen, it's biopic, not Marvel movie
I'm thinking of the possibility of a sequel, not a cinematic universe though lol.
That may be true but it's all kind of reductive anyway. It ain't a contest that's for sure. They can blend those events together in that case, Diane Diamond was attacking MJ for the same things and worse in 1995.
People that have seen the trailer said MJ in the 2000s can be seen. So that's certainly points against these claims. That's a decade I expected not to be seen.
Oh it absolutely was!!
Because he's not the director or one of the producers. And they have been saying the opposite.
Sharp edges of her speaking aside, she does have a point. The main point in fact. There's certainly conflicting info about this all, it's not cut and dry at all.
Hard to tell. We will know more shortly I’m sure. They could just address Chandler and stop at that... That’s the ghost that’s been haunting MJ for so long.
We already know what we are getting, 1979-2009 is 3 decades which is what Jafaar plays. We have a short section which covers young Michael featuring the actor.
?? Your response is relevant to what?
I'm trying to keep myself together during all of this contradictory shit that gets leaked.
Colman Domingo. It's one person.
He's done 3 or 4 of these little interviews now. Any of the main actors that do these interviews before next year aren't going to say much bc they won't be allowed to give anything away. Colman Domingo has more or less repeated himself each time. None of them would be allowed to discuss specific scenes, it's far too early for that. Although Colman did mention Motown 25 and I can't remember if that has cropped up already.
I suppose it would depend on whether they were going to include TII bc MP was on board for that. Not that I'm saying that proves any involvement from MP. I'm just saying he was working with Michael at the end. But there are plenty of other people they could consult for more details of the TII period. Kenny, Brad, Travis etc.
Well, they sat in their trailers. Actors don't leave the set just bc they are not filming that particular day. And the actors and crew talk to each other. Plus the actors have read the entire script and will know when script changes are being made. But they wouldn't be talking about all of that. Not yet, anyway.
All of this is understood. People will still speculate and have conversations.
If a soundtrack album comes out it makes no sense what comes to history30 how the estate worksWhy would you want to see that in a "movie"? That would make sense for a anniversary release of History itself, and especially with real Michael being in studio.
I can promise you there will also not be any unseen Beat It music video scene, nor an unreleased song sung bx Jafaar.
Okay, and where is it? Where is sequel to BR? It doesn't exist. Let's be realistic. There won't be sequels to biopics, because it doesn't fit with this genre
Are there any chances, that they can change his bio for the movie? For example, can they move second allegations from 00s to the end of 90s so it would be easier for them to cover every moment in MJ life? Or Michael biopic will be accurate with dates?