John Branca being such a clever lawyer and missing to see this in advance... Why oh why would the Estate (Branca) not formally step away from the biopic? Then it would just be Lionsgate producing a movie and Lionsgate have nothing to do with Clause 10! Seriously, there would be no one to blame, much like we are not to blame for discussing the case. Would that not have been an option or might that not be an option for the second movie?
We know they filmed Dangerous era stuff even if they end up not using them. He seems to look pretty accurate in that MITM photo.
No we don’t, and I think 1$ Billion might be an overly optimistic estimate anyway, but my point was that since the studio and estate have made clear that they want the film to gross that much, having a short and snappy title for it can only help.
I didn’t say they weren’t common. I said having a one word title, especially using the artist’s first name, is better if one wants a film to have a lot of commercial success. Using long song titles not so much, in my eyes.
Yes but that was before all the reshoots due to not being able to include the 93 case.
Exactly. I am not saying that biopic has to be a rebuttal, no, but not showing it might look (for some people) like sugarcoating his path. Maybe at least they can make a huge warning before the movie saying that certain parts of Michael's life cannot be pictured due to legal stuff.
Michael alluded to them pretty strongly in HIStory and on the Diane Sawyer interview though.
the movie already has enough hype, literally everyone knows about it, even those who are very far from listening to MJFor a movie that comes out in April , is there enough promo? I wonder if it could possibly be pushed back an extra month?
Rumours of a trailer to be show at the Super Bowl , then only 2 months until the movie is released. I feel there needed to be more hype.
SOUNDTRACK or New album ?
Meh, it doesn't matter. All you gotta say is the film isn't being made by Michael or anyone who represents him.
Yes. They definitely could do it that way.
I don't know about you, but I have never decided to watch a movie based on the length of the title, and I have never liked/disliked a movie based on the length of the title.
But it is being made by people who represent him so they can’t. And they do want to talk about the allegations, which is why they originally had a movie that had it as it’s main plotline.
Matt Forger, who not only worked with Michael since April 1982, but is also thr technical consultant on the biopic and was on set. He also stated, after I asked him directly, that the song titles we didn‘t know of in the trailer, are not actual song titles and those tracks were never done or considered for Thriller
Weird.....Why would they put them on if they not real songs
as I said previouslyWeird.....Why would they put them on if they not real songs
Judging from the recent leaks, interviews with people like Sundberg and others as well as having been to 2 seminars, there are countless unreleased song embryos and very little songs with more than scratch vocals.
The perfect "stage" for a MICHAEL trailer!
Ahhhhh okay
