Never understood why they didn't go for this first time around since everything to do with the trial is in the public domain. Otoh, I don't want to go down that rabbit hole. I'm just waiting patiently to see how it all plays out.
It would simply lose all credibility. With everyone.
Of course it's funny. All these companies want to create headlines, so they just make stuff up to get clicks. Some of them predict it will be a hit, others predict it will be a flop. Nobody knows the future. What's not to get?
The irony being that if the movie is incomplete, it will encourage more LN sequels, because they will see it as an opportunity to cash in on the Lionsgate publicity.
I never said that? Don’t need to be so mean just cause I don’t appreciate lack of detail in art…
oh definitely. those bums already tried it last year before the date for the biopic changed again, to piggyback off the campaign for the movie to gain visibility for their little sequel. wouldn't surprise me if they tried it again
This thread here is for discussion of the Robson and Safechuck case, updates are usually posted there or you can ask in there if anything more is happening
www.mjjcommunity.com
Or maybe it’s just not that deep and not everything revolves around the Michael album. Ray, Selena, Elvis, Amy… there are enough other examples where you have this. Nobody cares about the Cascio songs outside of the MJ community in 2026.
They most likely won't cover history era
The irony being that HIStory would actually be a fitting title for the biopic, lol.
Do we really have to make a guess at the profits every time we mention the movie?! It gets very tiresome.
Actually, song titles are quite common. Possibly the most common.
It’s a light hearted poll and MJ was doing the worst in it, not to be taking too seriously.
One thing that speaks for Jafaar's acting skills would be the fact that he was chosen for a 100+million movie that has a potential of hitting one billion. Would they really risk such a big earning potential with a poor actor?
Michael was such a unique individual that it would be almost impossible to pick an actor who could really become MJ on screen.
and was disappointed that Jaafar was picked. He seems perfect so far.The similarities end with the 90s though, let alone with the 00's.Michael was such a unique individual that it would be almost impossible to pick an actor who could really become MJ on screen.
Jaafar being a Jackson and having similarities in the blood was always gonna be an outstanding candidate for the role. Just hope he can pull off the emotional moments , from the teaser it looks promising!
I had originally wanted Myles Frost
Agree about the 90’s era
I remember reading in earlier interviews how both Fuqua and Branca mentioned that they would not avoid addressing the allegations. I think they're smart enough to realize this is the chance of a lifetime to get Michael's POV actually projected to the world, and from a very personal angle at that: by putting the audience in Michael's shoes, forcing the audience to see the events unravel from his standpoint. I have my own misgivings about the Estate, but as many other fans already pointed out, even the Estate must realize that glossing over the allegations will ultimately hurt Michael's image (and posthumous earnings), which we know is against their interests.
movieweb.com
I know that , hence why I don’t see this going beyond the late 80s
Well you're the one who said it. That wasn't even on my mind so.........
I've seen a few instances now where the term "complicated" is used to describe MJ. I don't know if they will cover the entirety of his life but I think if you lay the groundwork in his beginnings the rest becomes obvious.I remember reading in earlier interviews how both Fuqua and Branca mentioned that they would not avoid addressing the allegations. I think they're smart enough to realize this is the chance of a lifetime to get Michael's POV actually projected to the world, and from a very personal angle at that: by putting the audience in Michael's shoes, forcing the audience to see the events unravel from his standpoint. I have my own misgivings about the Estate, but as many other fans already pointed out, even the Estate must realize that glossing over the allegations will ultimately hurt Michael's image (and posthumous earnings), which we know is against their interests.
I will be adding a segment from one of those interviews (and the link) just in case others have not read what I mentioned yet.
"While the trailer for Michael depicts some of the singer's standout moments, such as the recording of his iconic Thriller music video, the upcoming biopic will not shy away from the controversies. Shortly after boarding the project, Fuqua asserted that he is aiming to tell a factual story and will not be sugarcoating the darker moments in the star's career. He said during an appearance on Good Morning America at the time:
First Look At Jaafar Jackson As His Uncle In Michael Jackson Biopic Trailer
The title role is played by the real-life singer's nephew Jaafar.
Ohhh, I am excited for this!!!!
That was before the rewrites. The 1993 allegations can’t be covered in any form.I remember reading in earlier interviews how both Fuqua and Branca mentioned that they would not avoid addressing the allegations. I think they're smart enough to realize this is the chance of a lifetime to get Michael's POV actually projected to the world, and from a very personal angle at that: by putting the audience in Michael's shoes, forcing the audience to see the events unravel from his standpoint. I have my own misgivings about the Estate, but as many other fans already pointed out, even the Estate must realize that glossing over the allegations will ultimately hurt Michael's image (and posthumous earnings), which we know is against their interests.
I will be adding a segment from one of those interviews (and the link) just in case others have not read what I mentioned yet.
"While the trailer for Michael depicts some of the singer's standout moments, such as the recording of his iconic Thriller music video, the upcoming biopic will not shy away from the controversies. Shortly after boarding the project, Fuqua asserted that he is aiming to tell a factual story and will not be sugarcoating the darker moments in the star's career. He said during an appearance on Good Morning America at the time:
First Look At Jaafar Jackson As His Uncle In Michael Jackson Biopic Trailer
The title role is played by the real-life singer's nephew Jaafar.
Yes, you are correct, I am aware of this. I imagine they can still cover the 2005 ones, though. I'm curious what "not covering the 1993 allegations" actually means though. Don't get me wrong, I know it sounds very straightforward at first glance, but I do wonder: are they not allowed to, say, allude to "accusations of ab*se" without mentioning the Chandler name and the year 1993, for instance? Because I think there is a way to work this in without naming them or involving them? Maybe just sort of tying the incident in while maintaining the key details censored in order to set the ground for what happened in 2005? I know we, the fans, are not privy to such sensitive information, but ever since news of the rewrites appeared, this has been on my mind. I find it hard to believe they won't touch on the subject at all, especially the 2005 trial and the media treatment Michael received.
Clause 10 of the settlement, which I have linked to below, states what they can and can’t cover.
Oh!! Bless you, thank you for this! Will read asap!
According to Clause 10, as shared by @StellaJackson, they can't discuss the allegations or allude to them in any capacity.
