Galactus123
Proud Member
I saw someone saying that Letterboxd lists the runtime as 136 minutes.
Edit: Here: https://letterboxd.com/film/michael-2026/
Edit: Here: https://letterboxd.com/film/michael-2026/
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Perfect!I saw someone saying that Letterboxd lists the runtime as 136 minutes
The interviews and the aftermath will be really interesting, given how much actors loathe massive overhauls to what they signed onto. Thats of course IF even a percentage of the rumours are true.I hope they do go forward with a second movie. Must have been gutting to the whole team that they had to change it so much.
I second that. I think a middle way would be a good idea. As a sensitive person, I will not watch the movie in the cinema if there will be explicit violence. I will then wait for the movie to be streamed and skip those scenes. At the same time, it shouldn't turn the known past into something it really wasn't. I think it is possible to show Joe in a critical but not derogative way. I don't think the movie will call Joe to account - and I think that that's ok, because that is a private matter and a Biopic on Michael is not the place for that. But Michael's childhood should still be shown in a way that Michael could relate to. Imho "The Jacksons, An American Dream" has done well with that.Well, it shouldn't be too dramatic, but also not too vanilla imo...I hope they bring across how much Michael had to deal with. I think it's an important part of his life, formed his character and made him who he was. People need to understand that about him, that's why it is nonsense to only show "Michael at his best". He was that great because of his background, it made him a fighter throughout his whole life.
You mean it doesn’t look like the music video?but that Beat It section looks more like the Wii game from 15 years ago than a film,
Probably more that it looks fake , they could have made it look authentic without the lighting turned up to the max and looking all shiny and plastic. CGI infused mush.You mean it doesn’t look like the music video?
The Beat it section looks extremely artificial, surely they could have easily filmed a more authentic Beat it video.Having watched the trailer a couple of times now, I'm not sure how I feel about it.
I don't want to be negative when every feels so positively about it, but that Beat It section looks more like the Wii game from 15 years ago than a film, it just feels very artificial. A lot of the trailer feels CGI heavy to me
The Bad section looks great (aside from that initial Moonwalk being a bit off) I wish more of it was based off the Bad era as Jaafar looks most like Mike from that period.
I think Colin Domingo as Joseph was inspired casting, same with Nia Long as Katherine.
I'm still looking forward to it coming out and hearing Michael's blasted on big cinema speakers.
X3 production budgetBudget is about 150 mln. Marketing will cost about 100 mln. So box office must be at least 700-800 to greenlight Part 2.
part 2 ( 200% sure)X3 production budget
Not anymoreOnly because we're used to 360p video taken from TV tape.![]()
Yeah mate, I just don't think it looks real or very much like the music video. It looks like a video game rather than filmYou mean it doesn’t look like the music video?
The runtime constantly changes on Letterboxd. It's been added and removed multiple times throughout the months, along with the poster.I saw someone saying that Letterboxd lists the runtime as 136 minutes.
Edit: Here: https://letterboxd.com/film/michael-2026/
You’re comparing a blurry screenshot to a (photoshopped) promotional picture. Kinda rankling my brain dude, honestly. They weren’t supposed to be 1:1.Yeah mate, I just don't think it looks real or very much like the music video. It looks like a video game rather than film
Now granted this is just a screenshot from the video, but it's got more depth and texture than the released still from the Michael biopic. The still of Jaafar looks like a video game cut scene
![]()
![]()
Whatever about the comparison, that is not the kind of image to promote your film with. It absolutely looks like CGI.You’re comparing a blurry screenshot to a (photoshopped) promotional picture. Kinda rankling my brain dude, honestly. They weren’t supposed to be 1:1.
Whatever about the comparison, that is not the kind of image to promote your film with. It absolutely looks like CGI.
That's the thing. We don't know. We don't need to know. I don't care to speculate or second-guess what might or might not be in the movie. They've not told us. So what?For all we know
Exactly.You couldn't really skip over his marriage
Lots of biopics get famously criticised for their running length.I saw someone saying that Letterboxd lists the runtime as 136 minutes.
I remember a quote by Katherine somewhere about Michael insisting on a white faced chimpanzee (i looked it up, it's the east African sub species) and how this one is rare and was difficult to get. So a film trained individual might be especially hard to get. Maybe that's another reason for faking bubbles.Both good points... it would make sense to use CG in such cases. I just wish it looked more natural. Maybe my eyes are too good, lol.
You mean just like that first poster was not the one to waste man hours on?Whatever about the comparison, that is not the kind of image to promote your film with. It absolutely looks like CGI.