Michael Jackson – the musical risk taker

Tony R

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
2,604
Points
0
Location
UK
Us Michael Jackson fans are a funny lot (some funnier than others) and like to complain, you may argue we have a lot to grumble about with the way the man was treated but also we’re never bloody satisfied. My favourite gripe is “Michael Jackson was under-rated”, which bearing in mind he’s one of the most successful artists of all time with the best-selling album of all time, that’s pretty funny.

Anyway, I digress already. The point I was going to make is that as a song-writer then the man probably was under-rated. When you consider that the man wrote the vast majority of his adult material single-handedly and that catalogue includes ‘Billie Jean, Beat It, Earth Song, Who Is It, They Don’t Care About Us, Black or White, Wanna be Startin’ Somethin’ and Don’t Stop Til You Get Enough’ alone, that’s pretty good!

But what occurred to me last week was another area, how does this sound – ‘Michael Jackson – the musical risk taker’?

I hear a lot about Bowie and Prince for example and how they are musical chameleons and have taken risks throughout their career which may well be true. But because Michael has been so successful and is mainly known for his pop music which people can be very snobby about, I don’t think that he’s recognised enough for being musically risky.

Let’s look at his back-catalogue from Off The Wall onwards and see some cases in point.

Don’t Stop Til You Get Enough from Off The Wall

We take it for granted now, but Off The Wall was a debut adult solo album that Michael was staking his whole reputation and future career on. It was already a risk that he had asked Quincy Jones from the jazz genre to produce it, but then kicking the album off with a track that was over 6 minutes long and began with a spoken intro. This isn’t a man who is playing things safely.

Beat It from Thriller

Michael is the epitome of genre fusion, you listen to Dangerous and you have pop, rock, soul, gospel and even opera for example. But in 1982 this was pretty much unheard of, so taking a black artist known for soul disco Motown primarily and getting a white heavy metal guitarist to play lead on it was one hell of a gamble. We know how it paid off now, and with this & Billie Jean Michael broke musical and racial barriers to become the first black artist on MTV.

Smooth Criminal from Bad

I remember playing the Bad album on day of release and there is always at least one track on an MJ album that you just can’t believe your ears on first few listens. For me this was Smooth Criminal. From the startling open, to the heartbeat, to the staccato rhythm, to the syncopated vocal, to that repeated refrain of ‘Annie, are you okay’ to the Police announcement, to the falsetto ‘I Don’t know’ ad-lib – the song on paper is completely mental, but it works unbelievably well and quickly became an MJ classic. Pair the song with the stunning short film and you have a piece of musical history.

Dangerous the album

I’ll highlight specific songs shortly, but for the moment let’s just look at the full package. The year was 1991 and the CD was well and truly music’s foremost medium. Instead of having most albums 45-50 minutes long we could now have up to 77 minutes of music. So Michael decided to take advantage of this. This meant that he didn’t have to trim songs to make them fit or throw amazing pieces away. On Dangerous none of the 14 songs fade out, they all have a beginning, middle and an end. Many of them are over 5 minutes long. It’s a far cry from the more instant pop previously heard from him. The whole album is themed, is darker and more adult. It’s a work of two halves where lead single Black or White breaks the album in two and those who have waited patiently are treated to the best work of MJ’s career as genre bending, vocally stunning, perfectly produced works such as Who Is It, Give In To Me and Will You Be There are delivered to an unsuspecting fan. It can be frustrating that the casual listener may never have heard of these, despite them being Top 10 hits in many countries. There was so much more to his catalogue that the radio friendly pop he is known for.

Will You Be There from Dangerous

You want evidence of risk taking? This song is 7 minutes and 40 seconds long. It includes a prelude featuring the Cleveland Orchestra performing a portion of Beethoven's ninth symphony. The segment is from the fourth movement and is a lesser known portion of the famous "Ode to Joy". It ends with a spoken poem. He cries on it. Evidence given.

The HIStory album

Michael could have taken the easy option after the 1993 allegations, made a nice, easy pop album reminiscent of Thriller with radio friendly hits on it. But no, he came out fighting. If you want to know how Michael Jackson felt about his treatment and the state of the world in 1995 then listen to this album. The closest to a concept album that he made, the music starts with vitriol, hatred, frustration and pain but ends with positivity and laughter. It’s not as 100% cohesive as earlier works but is absolutely stunning and musically risk taking for the examples given below.

Scream from HIStory

The first two tracks on HIStory instantly shows how Michael had changed musically. The feedback fuelled mechanical introduction on Scream illustrates the confusion and bitterness of the track’s sentiment. He even swears in it – we’re not messing around here! For a lead single, its very un-radio friendly but the sentiment needed expressing and it needed to be Track 1

They Don’t Care About Us from HIStory

It amazes me that Michael wrote this years before HIStory and was originally touted for Dangerous as it seems to be an instant reply to the allegations. Again like Smooth Criminal, I couldn’t believe what I was hearing at first, from the chanted intro to the earworm of a drum hook that is repeated beautifully throughout the song. Lyrically and musically, again this man isn’t resting on his musical laurels. I’ve said many a time that there are certain songs in MJ’s catalogue that only he could make, this is one of them.

Little Susie from HIStory

Another track over 6 minutes and again preluded by orchestral works, but then you hear a child playing and singing, you get a sense of the eerie, the macabre and before you know it you are immersed in a story of child neglect with the end result of a dead young girl covered in blood with no-one to care. The song is heart-wrenching as are the vocals. It is even too hard for some stalwart fans of Michael to take, with many not liking it & questioning its inclusion on HIStory, but for me it is a stunning piece of work and a hidden gem.

Morphine from Blood On The Dancefloor

A song about personal drug addiction to prescription medication from the same man that wrote happy pop songs like ‘The Way You Make Me Feel’ and ‘Remember The Time’. Again, the risk in this is immense, not to mention the comprehension that Michael can feel comfortable & confident enough to bare his soul like that.

The Lost Children from Invincible

You won’t find many moments of risk taking and innovation on Michael’s last album but giving credit where its due including a track called ‘The Lost Children’ is the height of a man saying F you. It’s brilliant in its non-conformity and bullishness. Musically, again it’s so different to what a ‘pop’ artist should be doing; it’s saccharine and lullaby-like and the record company must have been despairing at its inclusion. I love the thought of Michael standing his ground and his self-confidence in making it stick.

So there you are, many examples of a quality you can add to vocalist, songwriter, producer, dancer and performer; Michael Jackson – the musical risk taker.
 
Nice read! It annoys me how people instantly discard so much of what MJ accomplished, simply because it's "pop" or that "he had someone else write it for him" (which, as we all know, was barely true after Thriller). Ignorance and snobbery at it's finest.
 
Great post.

Critics are so contradictory when it comes to MJ. The criticize him for not taking risks (BS), but then they wanted him to recreate Thriller and OTW again and again. They should at least make up their mind about whether the problem is that MJ did not stick to OTW/Thriller style, or that he "did not take risks".

I personally love the fact that each of his albums is very different, yet they all have that distinct MJ style and feel to them (the only exception being Invincible, where that feel got a bit lost because of the too many co-writers and co-producers). There are many, many artists who do the same type of music throughout a career, so I don't get it why exactly MJ has to be criticized for "not taking risks" when it's the exact opposite.

I remember when J.K. Rowling (author of Harry Potter) ignorantly criticized MJ for trying to "recreate Thriller" for the rest of his career. Which is total BS when you actually know his career and do not just parrot what the media have been telling you. I mean how did he try to recreate Thriller when already Bad went to totally different directions and then he split up with Quincy and decided to go totally new directions on Dangerous? How is that not considered a risk?

And then HIStory. Can there be a more risky album from a mainstream pop artist than that? I mean it was clear from the beginning that a lot of the material there is not radio friendly light pop music. The media criticized it for being "too angry" and too personal (while they praise rock groups for the exact same - go figure!) and the only song that went #1 from there is the neutral, harmless love song YANA. But it was far from the album's best song. Only the rest of the material was less accessible to pop radio consumption in a world where Hanson and Spice Girls produced the #1s. But MJ needed to make this album and I'm glad he did. He could have made an album with 10 light dance and love songs - no one seriously can think he could not have gone that route if he had wanted. But I'm glad he did not. He grew as an artist and at the age of 35-40 he was past that period where everything was just light hearted fun. So I'm glad that is expressed in his music.

Also, MJ's criticism of the media and certain segments of society on HIStory. How is that not risky for a pop artist in a world where so much of an artist's success depends on PR and the media's good will? But MJ did not care about any of that, he just wanted to express himself. Again, how is that not a risk?

Since you mentioned Prince. I like them both and I have an MJ-Prince playlist on Spotify where songs from MJ and Prince alternate in a relatively chronological order. IMO Prince reached his peak towards the late 80s and then declined. Critics like to say that about MJ as well, but it's just so clearly not true. And it becomes very clear in that playlist. MJ's music from HIStory is just so superior to everything Prince did at the time. Musically, lyrically, thematically. Prince got somewhat stuck by the time IMO, but MJ just kept evolving. I wish he was given more credit for that.
 
^ I was hoping you'd post!

So true about Invincible having too many people on it & Michale getting lost.

I am also a big Prince fan & saw him live this year at last, but I think he had some great stuff in the 90s like Michael and even I noticed Prince dismissed that himself and barely sung any in his gig, just like I felt Michael do on his tours. Although my post is about his risk taking in music, on stage MJ seemed compelled to give the hits in the same style people wanted as I know most of us hardcore fans would have loved to see more 90's stuff in there (Who Is It, Give In To Me etc).

On the J.K. Rowling comment, she meant that in terms of success the same way she felt she needed to recreate Harry Potter's success with her new stuff rather than trying something new & not worrying about commercial success, I don't believe she meant musically.
 
Great read. I agree with nearly everything.

And Dangerous having no fade outs is a revelation to me!

Even going further, songs like HIStory, 2Bad, Tabloid Junkie - while as pop songs they might not be the complete package - they are just so utterly unique. An artist so above the heads and shoulders of his peers that he didn't take a single cue from any of them. I'd challenge anyone to find ANYTHING similar in structure or music that even rang similar to those three songs.
 
And there you go again. Why did not one single critic ever acknowledge Michael the risk-taker, the musical innovator? And why do we have posters on this board who ask what new Michael brought to the table musically? I suspect that it must be sheer jealousy (and Michael was aware of the "ghost of jealousy" too). The thing that pained me the most as a life-long Michael Jackson fan is that other artists always got that recognition so easily and freely, while Michael was such a in-your-face musical genius and would have to fight the hardest to receive a kind word of appreciation. How frustrating it must have been for him when I as a fan could hardly take this injustice that is still going on by the way. But yes, the things Michael Jackson did as an artist are mind-boggling, simply mind-boggling!
 
I remember when J.K. Rowling (author of Harry Potter) ignorantly criticized MJ for trying to "recreate Thriller" for the rest of his career.

"He wanted to do 'Thriller' again and again and again and instead of accepting that he had produced one of the best albums of all time, and he would always have that, and freeing him to do, I don't know, to do something maybe a little more offbeat or explore, and risk failure, I mean, it's tragic, actually. It's very, very sad that someone with that amount of talent would be chasing that," [Rowling] said.

Ugggghhhhh.
RnEL6xT.jpg

Not gonna lie, I've lost some respect for her after reading that.
 
Great topic! I'd like to add more later, but one thing that came to mind for me is MJ's beatboxing. Perhaps it falls more under the umbrella of originality rather than risk-taking, but I think it just goes to show he marched to the beat of his own drum (lame pun intended!).

He was certainly not the first to use his voice to produce rhythms, as the tradition of vocal percussion is ancient, but certainly one of the first and few major pop artists to utilize it. And he also used it differently than hip hop artists like Doug E. Fresh and Biz Markie were doing at the time, who became associated with beatboxing in the 80s. Beatboxing would be very central to their songs. And when people think of MJ beatboxing, they generally think of Who Is It at the Oprah interview, which is more in line with what those artists would do. But on record, the vast majority of MJ's beatboxing was more subtle. He'd use it as part of the many rhythmic textures of his songs. Added to that, he'd also create sounds beyond the typical drum machine sounds, such as cool breathing patterns (think of Speed Demon). Knowing that he composed his songs by singing into a tape recorder, I think it always just came naturally to him. Remember he was doing it in 1979 already, on the intro to Working Day And Night, before beatboxing was popularized through hip hop.

He continued to use it more frequently as his career went on. And in the later 90s, he seemed to like drum beats that were created using his sampled voice. It's quite interesting and original how it forms the backbone of a ballad like Stranger in Moscow, when beatboxing would traditionally be associated with dance tracks.

I think MJ's constant interest in using 'new sounds', as in newly created, unique sounds, is in a way similar to this.

And then HIStory. Can there be a more risky album from a mainstream pop artist than that? I mean it was clear from the beginning that a lot of the material there is not radio friendly light pop music. The media criticized it for being "too angry" and too personal (while they praise rock groups for the exact same - go figure!)
At that point, it's like MJ could not do right anymore anyway. If he had made a 'light'/happy album, I'm sure it would have been praised in some regards, but would at the same time be criticized for being superficial and too similar to Off The Wall and Thriller (I also think it's ridiculous those albums get called 'light', but that's another discussion). And you are right, there's definitely hypocrisy there regarding different genres, which I think also has racial undertones.

and the only song that went #1 from there is the neutral, harmless love song YANA. But it was far from the album's best song.
True, but let's remember that there was a big difference between the reception MJ got in the US and in Europe at this time. Earth Song, They Don't Care About Us and Stranger in Moscow did very well on the European charts, whereas Earth Song did not even manage to chart on the Billboard 100 and SIM never got further than no. 91 (can you imagine that?).
 
It annoys me when critics say that HIStory was too whiny
 
Tony R;4040291 said:
Don’t Stop Til You Get Enough from Off The Wall

We take it for granted now, but Off The Wall was a debut adult solo album that Michael was staking his whole reputation and future career on. It was already a risk that he had asked Quincy Jones from the jazz genre to produce it, but then kicking the album off with a track that was over 6 minutes long and began with a spoken intro. This isn’t a man who is playing things safely.
6 minute songs weren't really unusual in the 1970's though. That could even be considered short compared to many disco, funk, progressive rock, and jazz songs of the time. :D The first track on Stevie Wonder's Songs In The Key Of Life album is over 7 minutes. Barry White, Isaac Hayes & Bobby Womack were known for long spoken intros to songs. In Barry's case, he had some songs consisting entirely of talking and so did James Brown.
 
Since you mentioned Prince. I like them both and I have an MJ-Prince playlist on Spotify where songs from MJ and Prince alternate in a relatively chronological order. IMO Prince reached his peak towards the late 80s and then declined. Critics like to say that about MJ as well, but it's just so clearly not true. And it becomes very clear in that playlist. MJ's music from HIStory is just so superior to everything Prince did at the time. Musically, lyrically, thematically. Prince got somewhat stuck by the time IMO, but MJ just kept evolving. I wish he was given more credit for that.

I don't think it's fair to say Prince declined (unless you mean in mainstream music) the guy was releasing an album every year he was bound to have a lot of fillers. You could make up two albums like how mj had two albums in the 90's, of Prince material and it would be mostly killer only
 
Back
Top