So, according to your theory, wouldn't Malachi get better on the Cascio tracks and sound less choppy?
But, based only on that argument it is impoosible to conclude if we are talking about the same person or two different people.
In case of Malachi vs Cascio style, you already pointed out that voice can be processed in such a way to
1) either give the flow by eliminating the blank between chopped words or chop the words by inserting blanks.
2) the singer can deliberately choose to chop the words for the pace sake or sing them with flow.
In my opinion, it is not a question of capacity, but of the singer's choice or even studio processing.
Isn't it a bit too much of a coincidence that not only so far all the vocals that have been compared are characterized by the same timbre, but the melody is quasi the same in the part I pointed out?
Also ivy, saying "Cascio singer" kind of makes it seem like you doubt the vocals are really Michael.
I wrote my answer yesterday and then lost it.
yes but not overnight such training takes time and malachi's most recent releases still has that issue.
and I didn't say it was conclusive. every comparison video is followed with why don't you hear that question. It was my "why".
I'm not sure if flow can be given that easily I have to ask it around and what I'm talking about isn't a compression or speed up.
and even if they did went between the words and eliminated blanks wouldn't that be extensive processing?
I agree partially but the issue is why there aren't any examples of Malachi with the flow? So I'm not sure if he has that capacity to be honest and that has been my feeling about him for several years now. As I always said I believe Malachi is overrated.
Like I said if it's a common chord order it can be found in multiple songs. and isn't monster turned into a faster pace and new music is written / recorded afterwards? so my question is who wrote that when?
already explained this before. I never said lead vocals were 100% Michael plus using a neutral term such as "Cascio singer" keeps the discussion less hostile.
Maybe I'd find some songs, if i knew what specifically to look out for!![]()
I think this is the case... He was doing something different when recording the Cascio songs, working with a new team. And like I said, James Porte probably recorded the songs that way and Jason had to adjust to that.However, my point is that it is not a question of capacity but of singer's deliberate choice according to the rhythm of the song. It is wanted.
Thing is, if I change the tempo of Monster to - 4, I can't hear any "flow" anymore. I hear "normal" flow, like in most of Jason songs and actualyl most songs in general... And this is the tempo it was recorded in (almost exactly).So, can you find a JM's song where he sings without using this chopping rhythm or voice. Where it flows more naturally
nope still got the flow , sorry
It's not imagining things but it's based on a personal experience like I said. I feel like I am not really expressing what I mean. It's kinda like one person says "iloveyou" almost like one word like in one breath and the other person says it like " I Love you" with words spaced. That's why I mentioned languages and said they had different rate and rhythm.
I'm looking from a wider listening perspective. Cascio songs have this "ease" to them, they have more flow . I mentioned KYHU before for example in monster -4 listen to " Everywhere you seem to turn there's a monster - When you look up in the air there's a monster- Paparazzi got you scared like a monster - monster - monster". Then the above JM song doesn't have that feeling to it. Still the words are more spaced and sound chopped to me. Like I said this is what I have been thinking about Malachi for years now.
anyway it was just a try to explain my part in regards to why I don't hear what you hear. no one has to agree obviously. and I'm not making any scientific or even objective claims it's just my feel on the subject.
Yup, Monster isn't in one take at all. Almost all lines have been copy pasted.
Heard you grew up in QueensHey, I heard you were back on MaxJax![]()
Heard you grew up in Queens![]()
Heard you grew up in Queens![]()
As a matter of fact. It's there that I was stabbed in the back. Now I've become serious.
As a matter of fact. It's there that I was stabbed in the back. Now I've become serious.
:lmao:
the phrase "as a matter of fact" reminds me of SBuke:
At least you dug a step into fame. But that don't mean a thang.Yeah, unfortunately I took a bullet to my brain, so I can never come back.
![]()
At least you dug a step into fame. But that don't mean a thang.
... Dah
Yeah, unfortunately I took a bullet to my brain, so I can never come back.
![]()
the "oh oh oh" at 1:34 and again at 4:48 in the -6 version pentum just posted, that sounds like mj to me. Is that one of the copy/pasted parts? if so, which mj song is it from? i can't place it.
that's the thing. i can pick out specific parts that sound like mj, without knowing if i'm right, or without studying up on it. i have a gut reaction when i hear mj, that's why i trust my instincts. (ha, watch me be wrong about that part lol! even if i am, at least i'm willing to put myself out there and voice my thoughts and identify specific portions of the song).
monster sounds absolutely nothing like michael jackson. i don't even know how this sounds close. it's so off it honestly blows my mind. i think stevie wonder back in the day (like his earliest records, when he was still lil' stevie wonder) sounds more like michael jackson than this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXVQIDlVoKs&feature=fvst
right? i still hear stevie, of course, i'm just saying it's CLOSER to michael (a young michael) than these crappy tracks.