maral
Proud Member
Re: Michael's mom reported missing /TJ temp Guardianship/Grandma's Home
^^i'm confused. doesn't KJ get her share monthly?
^^i'm confused. doesn't KJ get her share monthly?
I am sorry my brain and fingers arent in synch. Yes, she gets her monthly stipend. It is just that some people feel she should get 40% of what the estate is worth in one lump sum. That would be around $100 million or more. And that is not what Michael intended.^^i'm confused. doesn't KJ get her share monthly?
I am sorry my brain and fingers arent in synch. Yes, she gets her monthly stipend. It is just that some people feel she should get 40% of what the estate is worth in one lump sum. That would be around $100 million or more. And that is not what Michael intended.
Her 40% is in a trust and she gets her allowance from that. When she passes her part of the trust goes to the 3 kids.
I have seen parts of it but I didn't know about the full letter. I only knew about the whole fiasco when the letter that Janet signed came public. Dunno if it makes any difference but it really didn't change my mind about anything. I'm trying, guys but I don't seem to get a breakJustMe - I can understand why Nadia1981 was incredulous (although I agree with you about the tone).
Your first post here was to lambast us and you hadn't even read the letter that set us off in the first place!!??
DEBBIE ROWE TO JUDGE:I Support Joint Guardianship of MJ's Kids
EXCLUSIVE
Debbie Rowe -- the woman who gave birth to two of Michael Jackson's children -- has filed legal papers saying she SUPPORTS the new joint guardianship arrangement ... but is warning TJ and Katherine that she WILL intervene if things don't work out.
Rowe filed the documents in L.A. County Superior Court today ... saying she has reviewed the co-guardianship application and signed off on the deal reached between TJ and Katherine to share parenting responsibilities for Paris, Blanket and Prince.
But in the docs, Debbie warns ... "Should the arrangement sought by TJ Jackson and Katherine Jackson become untenable, unstable, unsafe, or in any way contrary to the best interests of the children, Ms. Rowe will seek court intervention."
Rowe claims her concern is for the health, safety and well-being of HER children; and says she will continue to ensure their needs are met.
Remember, when TJ first petitioned for guardianship, the judge said that Debbie must be notified.
http://www.tmz.com/2012/08/09/debbie-rowe-michael-jackson-guardianship-children-tj-katherine/
^QFT. Marebear, unfortunately some people that pretend to be objective and not play sides continue to trivialize these facts alleging, ifs, buts and whatnot because it pains them to acknowlege that their idol did something serious enough to warrant legal intervention.
For sanity's sake it's better to ignore such people and their claims. Beating around the bush gets boring after a while.
I'm glad Debbie has issued a warning through the courts. Hope the Jacksons clean up their act or they stand to lose access to the monthly 70k for good.
shelly_webster;3687825 said:"You’ve dishonored everything that our brother Michael stood for. Your greed and hasty business decisions have shown that you have no regard for the preservation of his legacy, nor the quality of work that he exemplified. You have disrespected our parents and family too many times. We do not respect you as executors, and we do not respect the projects and choices you’ve made, nor do we appreciate the public perception the the Jackson family is behind all of this, exploiting Michael our brother for finacial gain, when clearly it’s the two of you and your affiliates who do so."
I wonder if he realized that the public likes their project and if the public think the family is exploiting his death it has nothing to do with the Estate.
ilmjj;3687840 said:I just read some comments on twitter bashing the estate for not giving Katherine her 40% inheritance now because that is what michael wanted. I really wish people would read what the trust and will say because giving Katherine 40% all at once was not what MJ wanted at all.
I think the family must have been mistaken about this too and then they realized it is only for her lifetime and then it goes to the kids. ALL OF IT!!!!
This is why the Jacksons are creating the wildfire of madness. They see it slipping away...
^Where is that letter from and when was it released?
I don't think it's about you getting a break but when you first started commenting on all this it seemed you were clearly on Team Jackson (though you seemed to be somewhere in the middle now) and your posts pissed people off and now you say you haven't even read the letter that started everything that has happened. that's why people are like :bugeyed I think people are finding it hard to believe you had strong opinions without reading the fuckery of a letter that revealed The Jackson true motives behind all of this, so don't take comments as personal attacks.I have seen parts of it but I didn't know about the full letter. I only knew about the whole fiasco when the letter that Janet signed came public. Dunno if it makes any difference but it really didn't change my mind about anything. I'm trying, guys but I don't seem to get a break
I don't really wanna keep this convo going, but I have to say a few things... I've read the letter in full for about 5-6 times and I already knew everything that was stated in it. I can understand that it upsets you but I already knew the points Randy had made, even though I had never before seen the full letter and where it was posted. I guess I've read nutshell-versions of it, and that's why I wanted to see the rest; which, again brought nothing new on the table.I don't think it's about you getting a break but when you first started commenting on all this it seemed you were clearly on Team Jackson (though you seemed to be somewhere in the middle now) and your posts pissed people off and now you say you haven't even read the letter that started everything that has happened. that's why people are like :bugeyed I think people are finding it hard to believe you had strong opinions without reading the fuckery of a letter that revealed The Jackson true motives behind all of this, so don't take comments as personal attacks.
Go Ms Rowe
I'm glad both Debbie and Diana put KJ and the Jackson's on notice that they have the children's backs. F up again and all bets are off.
Yeah, that made me glad too. I hope they really will act and remove the children if anything like this ever happens again.
But I can't help thinking... if anything else happens and Debbie steps in... what about Blanket?
She has no say in what happens to him.
Reminds me of sneddon saying we know theres more victims out there we just have to find them. he never did find them
But I can't help thinking... if anything else happens and Debbie steps in... what about Blanket? She has no say in what happens to him.
Maybe not legally, but from what I've read/heard she has spent time with all three children so that Blanket doesn't feel left out which I think says a lot about Debbie as a person.
If it comes down to Debbie having to get costudy I'm sure she'd take Blanket in a heartbeat as well if it's legally possible for her. Seeing as the court probably would prefer the children to stay together (we sure know the children themselves want to stay together) I think it would be possible for Debbie to take Blanket as well.
I believe in a few years when these kids come to understand a lot of things, they will stay far away from the Jackson family just like their dad