SmoothGangsta
Proud Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 6,600
- Points
- 113
Mods can't ban anyone so it's not their problem.Probably not, yet it takes days to get it done because there's never any mods around
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mods can't ban anyone so it's not their problem.Probably not, yet it takes days to get it done because there's never any mods around
oh ok. didn't know thatMods can't ban anyone so it's not their problem.
Correct, it's my problem, so message me only.Mods can't ban anyone so it's not their problem.
This is the problem. The "controversy" was not the issue in that thread, as per your post in the thread - MULTIPLE users here have reported and complained about 1 specific user who has been intentionally trolling and annoying people by posting absolute nonsense across various threads. The lack of acknowledgment, communication or action by the mods just means people like myself are visiting less because some of us are too old to be putting up with that nonsense.
I totally agree with you on these matters. Totally!Hiker, it's taken 4 days to get a response to my post. That's one point.
Secondly, my post was referring to how you mentioned that it was "controversy" surrounding the topic was the issue, and not a trolling poster.
My third point is nowhere is my post do I mention banning someone. My post was about the lack of communication or acknowledgement from mods here. Given the amount of complaints in each thread I have yet to see certain members even receive a warning like on other sites. From the average user's perspective, users are given free reign to troll in this forum.
I have read your and @Gaz 's response and won't be posting on the matter again.
PMed you.@MJ TinkerBell Thanks for reporting. I can cleanup the thread, but its too many pages, and offending posts mixed with proper posts. I have said this repeatedly, replying to such posts just creates even more mess that makes it even harder to cleanup. If you report offending posts and ignore, instead of replying to the poster, it's much easier to cleanup.
@MJ TinkerBell Thanks for reporting. I can cleanup the thread, but its too many pages, and offending posts mixed with proper posts. I have said this repeatedly, replying to such posts just creates even more mess that makes it even harder to cleanup. If you report offending posts and ignore, instead of replying to the poster, it's much easier to cleanup.
I reported all of the latest offending (slandering) posts, but they are still live. I've also reported the user profile in question and emailed the administration through the contact form.@MJ TinkerBell Thanks for reporting. I can cleanup the thread, but its too many pages, and offending posts mixed with proper posts. I have said this repeatedly, replying to such posts just creates even more mess that makes it even harder to cleanup. If you report offending posts and ignore, instead of replying to the poster, it's much easier to cleanup.
You need to back down with your demands, 197 posts in 6 years gives you no credit as a contributor to this community, me and my team will never be told who to ban, so you need to back off with that too, my team are instructed to respond to reported posts, as of now they see hardly any. Clearly, this person is doing nothing but hurting your feelings, so I suggest you put them on ignore in your profile settings, so you will not see anything they post.How is a mention of a vlogger, in response to a user who wants to know why certain people have an issue w/ the Cascio kids being awoken at night to see Michael, proof of being a stealth guilter? Rule #1 states such bold accusations can't be made on here.
Terms and rules
How is a thread on a singer who actually sang for MJ at the 30th anniversary concert proof of being a stealth guilter? Gilman made an odd comment, and I felt like discussing that w/ other fans who'd be interested in discussing it. Big deal?! Rule #18 states that those not interested in a thread should not enter the thread just to bash the topic or confront/attack the original poster.
I am outraged that I now have to defend myself against a regular member who's acting like she owns and runs the place. Older and newer members are equal, but she was here for less than two years and is now guilting members who've been here for 6 years or even 14 years with absolutely no rational evidence.
Such slander is very divisive; some members like such slanderous posts, which further infuriates the member who is falsely accused, and it creates hostility and distrust among members just because of one member's excessive distrust (paranoia).
I have to ask myself: why is she allowed to get away w/ such behaviour time after time after time again? Had she been dealt with months ago, Harun and I would never have been slandered by her this week.
That said, it's up to the moderation and administration to look into this matter and handle it. I cannot dictate what will or will not be done, but I can choose not to participate in this community if I deem that members are not protected from such disruptors. I have nothing more to add.
Post approved.Yeah this thread, but my post is not āapprovesā and still invisible.
Gaz will found nothing he knows i don't have a second account@Gaz, can you look into the @Tyler446 account?
He/she has registered here yesterday, posts only in the unreleased tracks thread; all of his/her posts are related in some way to @Jacksonunreleased. 2nd account?
just gonna foreshadow. i'm a whole different human behind the screen compared to Jacksonunreleased.@Gaz, can you look into the @Tyler446 account?
He/she has registered here yesterday, posts only in the unreleased tracks thread; all of his/her posts are related in some way to @Jacksonunreleased. 2nd account?
and its basically completely taken over the unreleased thread lol@Gaz, can you look into the @Tyler446 account?
He/she has registered here yesterday, posts only in the unreleased tracks thread; all of his/her posts are related in some way to @Jacksonunreleased. 2nd account?
Yep, pretty clearly just here to shit the place up.and its basically completely taken over the unreleased thread lol
You should go back and read some of your friend jacksonunreleased's posts before you start telling members here they are immature.Fuzball was making up lies about me being Jacksonunreleased.
and this guy was throwing a fit over me saying we should respect some collectors that are willing to give us material.
View attachment 7706
Just making that clear because i feel like a lot of people on this site are quite hypocritical about their very immature actions.
Dude it wasn't only that one guy the whole ordeal was immature and I'm being blamed for it. when in reality some other members decided to escalate an argument with me just because of me pointing out the lack of respect for leakers or collectors in the community.You should go back and read some of your friend jacksonunreleased's posts before you start telling members here they are immature.
your most likely assuming i was talking about every single collector in existence. when i wasn't. plus just because someone doesn't earn your respect doesn't mean you can go spreading lies about them.@Tyler446: respect's not given, it's earned![]()