Latest on MJJC

Net 'closing in on Jackson murderer'

  • Thread starter Dangerous Incorporated
  • Start date

Dangerous Incorporated

Guests
MICHAEL Jackson was murdered and his killer will be caught soon, one of his closest friends in showbusiness says. Teddy Riley, co-producer of Jackson's multi-platinum Dangerous album and founding member of R&B band Blackstreet, says he and Jackson's family are confident they know who the pop artist's killer is and that they will be caught soon.

Blackstreet are in Australia as VIP guests for Wednesday's world premiere of the film about Jackson's life, This Is It.

Asked if Jackson was murdered, Riley told AAP: "I said that the first day.

"I called the family and I said listen, 'He was murdered'.

"Somebody didn't like something he said or something he's doing or didn't want him to go to the top so they had to get rid of him."

Riley worked extensively with Jackson over the last 18 years and counted himself a close personal friend.

Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.

Related Coverage









End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.







Blackstreet co-founder Chauncey Hannibal agrees the singer was murdered.

Jackson's family have accused those close to the singer of murdering him and the Los Angeles County coroner has ruled Jackson's death was a homicide caused primarily by Propofol and another sedative.

Riley and Hannibal saw Jackson two days before he died on June 26, in rehearsal for his planned comeback sell-out tour in London.

Riley said Jackson was in "great health" just prior to his death but admitted he did suffer some pain because of his skin.

Asked who killed the singer, Riley replied: "You're going to find out.

"We've got so many people we think it could be. It's going to come out.

"He was doing so great at his rehearsals. I was over at the studio two days before ... two days later he was gone.

"He was in great health. Only thing that bothered him is he gets in pain. When he works hard, he gets home, he's in pain because of his skin. Other than that he was in great shape."

Riley said no current artist would ever enjoy the iconic status achieved by Jackson.

"(His death) has definitely affected us really badly, our whole family, we still think he's here, people think Elvis still lives, well Michael Jackson lives on in a lot of people's hearts."

Blackstreet are playing a two date mini tour of Australia in December.

They will be at Sydney Olympic Park Sports Centre on December 4 and The Forum, Melbourne on December 6.

It is the first time the band has played in Australia and is likely to feature some Jackson tribute material.

http://www.news.com.au/breaking-new...jackson-murderer/story-e6frfku9-1225791079422
 
I think that later he said he was misunderstood and he didn't actually say those things?
 
You are right JMie that is exactly what he said.
 
I don't think it shows any such thing. it seems to me to be people on the other side of him and he is speaking to them as well...But, I can't be sure.

I do know however, that i am going to move this to the conspirqcy section. Thanks!
 
The fragmental way the justice system works doesn't seem to serve the ideal of justice. We are about to witness the triumph of the motto "what is legal is ethical".
I'm 100% against that.
The way things crawl in the case, it makes statements like Ted Riley's sound as wishful thinking or even naive.
Aside any conspiracy theories, no net seems to be closing in on anybody.
Murray seems to be walking his way merrily through some simple felony case. Nothing in his life seems to have changed, I'd rather say if anything's changed it's for the better. His defense is well paid and fed information from everywhere, he has a pr team making sure he won't lose his clients, plus he's about to get off the hook with huge publicity and a slap in the wrist.
Doesn't even look like he's losing his licence after all.
 
What I don't get is why some medical expert can't just tell the D.A. to bump up the charges on this. If a medical expert comes up and says that what Murray did was far more than IM, does the D.A. STILL have the right to ignore that??? From the person I've been speaking to, "there were SO MANY things wrong". Not just propofol.

And I've kind of gotten that same response from a medical student I've spoke to. Well, all he just added was that it was too much lorazepam in a short amount of time which causes deprivation of quality sleep. How can Michael sleep while being deprived of quality sleep?

Oh, and about losing his liscene, they were laughing and chuckling at the last hearing while discussing that, according to Jermaine. And then Murray has this lawyer from houston who was an assistant for the D.A. and lost only one case in his career. So we have laughing defendants for Michael vs. a really good lawyer........

But there's still a way...I just know it.
 
Last edited:
i should have gone with my gut. i knew this wasn't news. the justice system doesn't work that way...
 
Maria MJ said:
The fragmental way the justice system works doesn't seem to serve the ideal of justice. We are about to witness the triumph of the motto "what is legal is ethical".
I'm 100% against that.
The way things crawl in the case, it makes statements like Ted Riley's sound as wishful thinking or even naive.
Aside any conspiracy theories, no net seems to be closing in on anybody.
Murray seems to be walking his way merrily through some simple felony case. Nothing in his life seems to have changed, I'd rather say if anything's changed it's for the better. His defense is well paid and fed information from everywhere, he has a pr team making sure he won't lose his clients, plus he's about to get off the hook with huge publicity and a slap in the wrist.
Doesn't even look like he's losing his licence after all.
Click to expand...
:coffee:
 
kasume said:
What I don't get is why some medical expert can't just tell the D.A. to bump up the charges on this. If a medical expert comes up and says that what Murray did was far more than IM, does the D.A. STILL have the right to ignore that??? From the person I've been speaking to, "there were SO MANY things wrong". Not just propofol.
Click to expand...

Because the DA prefers to secure that he wins the case even if the charges are not fair..
Didn't know that till now..It doesn't work this way where I live. There are certain standards by which a person is charged, it's not a game for the DA to win or lose to put it on his CV.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top