Nurse Cherilyn Lee Is a Liar and Possible Supporter of Dr. Murder Murray

[SoS]

^ lol thanks ... well what does she mean by "she could easily be proven wrong?"

I believe Kai's account is of her setting the table and MJ showing up in there ...

I don't think there were any independent witnesses lol

 

[indranee]

well, if it wasn't true, I guess the children could say so LOL.

though I doubt they were watching their dad watching Kai's butt!

thanks for asking about this btw.. I was getting kinda angry again but this visual of Michael made me laugh... aww he was only a guy after all :wub:

 

[144000]

I believe multiple doctors started Michael Jackson on an unhealthy course of over medication for his insomnia. If so, he would not be the first person
that had this happen to him or her.

However, in Michael Jackson's case in steps
Sony, AEG, Colony Capital, and Dr. Murray.
None of them giving a damn about our Angel, Michael Jackson. Conrad Murray began working together with the corporatists. AEG, Sony, Colony Capital,
Dr. Murray and all the other corporatists were motivated by greed. So, AEG, eventually, either set up or paid Dr. Murray to take the fall for
Michael Jackson’s death.

I, also, suspect, Nurse Cherilyn Lee was paid to go to the police and media and insert (plant) the Propofol addiction story.

Without the inplant of her lies, all anyone would have evidence of is
that Michael Jackson was known to use pure Oxygen therapy, and an i.v. drip to prevent dehydration.
I, believe Nurse Cherilyn Lee was paid to go to the police and media and insert (plant) the Propofol addiction story.

However, there is no honor among thieves. So, I pray that, now, Dr. Conrad Murray, in order to save himself, will start "singing like a bird", and bring his fellow conspirators down into Hell with him. Have you seen this video which captures the conspirators quite well; but it does not emphasize enough the roles of Colony Capital, Thomas Barrack and Dr. Tohme, Tohme?
Click on and Watch:
MICHAEL JACKSON'S DEATH- SUSPECT OR WITNESS (Unsolved Mystery)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41rdPR4_Lak&feature=related

"ANYTHING FOR MONEY" "KILL FOR IT"

Wow.

anyway...i'll never understand why so many people with so much wealth would have interest in someone who is supposed to be less wealthy than them, according to the media. anyway, the vid maker is misinformed. the ranch wasn't bought by Barrack, it was made into a joint venture.

 

[SoS]

well, if it wasn't true, I guess the children could say so LOL.

though I doubt they were watching their dad watching Kai's butt!

thanks for asking about this btw.. I was getting kinda angry again but this visual of Michael made me laugh... aww he was only a guy after all :wub:

and that is exactly the reason I feel she told that story in that way... (with all respect to u my fan/friend) she knew the world would "enjoy" it ...

and as for her, it seemed to have "meant" nothing to her, eg., "and I was like .... woah!!!"

I feel she told that, along with a few other things to distract people's attention. What reason I do not know. She was, afterall, asked the question, did MJ ever flirt with you ... which should have caught her by surprise, or been at least a bit "intrusive" - - afterall, it is a very private moment we're talking about here. Rehearsed, rehearsed, rehearsed ... that's what it seemed to me.... and FAKE ... not saying it didn't happen mind you she's a lovely lady...but that's just it - - here you are - - beautiful - - getting possibly the most amazing chance of a lifetime to possibly woo this amazing man - - it comes to an abrupt "unexpected" end - - someone asks you an intimate question about this person - - and you go "valley girl" on em ... "and I was like, woahh" - sorry inappropriate imo. WHY? Just 'off' that's all . . . something about it is 'off'.

I don't trust Kai she looked very on edge when talking...

She did, and somewhat 'scripted' somehow. I can't quite put my finger on it ... something (I'll say it again) "unnatural" about her manner and presentation...things she chose to focus on and emphasize ... on the one hand, she's sweet, "sincere", lovely, down to earth ..... and on the other hand, unnatural ...

At first I thought, well maybe she's just nervous ... and indeed that may account for some but not all of what I'm feeling from her ..

I do wonder if she was perhaps working according to instructions or ... something ...

Especially with (I'll say it again) the things she chose to focus on ... imho unnatural for somebody that just experienced such a (what should have been) indelibly shocking and basically traumatic loss ...

especially since she was there to basically witness it ...

and especially since/if she (I'll say it again) had no idea what was going to happen or what was happening as she was experiencing it.

It reminds me of acting class when the director would invariably remind us to remember just how many times this character has told this (whatever dialogue) to this person (the character they are talking to)

Why did she tell the same thing the exact same way on each talk show?

And just like the guy who was getting in the car with her outside that one TV studio ... she too seemed to have been doing a bit of an 'overkill' on some of the oddest things to focus on considering this phenomenal experience of hers was brought to such an abrupt end ..

The kids love/d me ... SEE???? (unabashedly showing the entire world the kids' hand made keepsakes given especially to her in the sacred privacy of their home)

MJ trusted me, SEE???? (tells how he pulled her aside JUST to tell her how much he needed her to do exactly what she was already doing ...........and even though it looked like 'nobody' was eating (according to her) he only talked about himself - or at least as far as she told it.

MJ liked me and I felt so flattered... SEE???? (gushing over the tush peek)
and mind you, she was asked the question, "did MJ ever flirt with you" which should have caught her off guard ... did she respond with guarded privacy? or with meloncholy or wistfulness? no ... 'faked' "flatterry", eg. " ... and I was like, woah"

I cooked with only his best interest at heart, SEE???? (already writing healthy food COOKBOOK bearing his name, "King" )

I was so concerned, SEE????? ("crying" and "praying" with the children while the EMTs were there even though she supposedly had no clue what was going on upstairs, "crying" according to her at least, which I did not totally 'buy' - "God please let this man be alright - yahhh he was their dad" ... that just made me wanna ... *sigh*

I only want to innocently share my eye-witness account, SEE???? (getting on dang near every entertainment talk show ever produced)

And WHY and HOW would Kai have such a strong opinion about whether Debbie should be allowed to visit the kids? Unless she was made privvy by MJ of the details of the kids' relationship with Debbie (which he evidently was not in full support of it seems to me anyway) what could she possibly have to say about it? Of all the things for her to have no comment on ... it would seem that would be one of them imho.

What does this all mean to me? NOTHING, except that something isn't right. I have no idea what it is exactly ... but its something.

I do know law enforcement should have interrogated each and every person who was in that house that fateful day, without exception ... including most certainly the person preparing his food (he "mysteriously died" hello???) and especially those in charge of "securing" MJ's body which they failed miserably at doing.

I am not believing MJ had a DOCTOR to protect his health, a Chef to protect his intake, SECURITY to protect his VERY BODY ... and ALL of them practically lived there ... and he ..............."MYSTERIOUSLY" died?

I don't want to hear any excuses that LAPD was only focused on the doctor. And while I can understand security (maybe) not being in the room with MJ and his personal doc 24/7 (and that's a maybe) ... for them to be called by the doctor AND NOT SHOW UP RIGHT AWAY (according to the doc statement which of course could be a lie) ...

...something is seriously wrong ...

Either the doctor is lying about that (entirely possible) or everyone in that house conspired ... the latter which I am seriously leaning toward atm with the possible exception of the housekeepers, the nanny/ies, and maybe the Chef, but for now, the Chef is not looking too good imho.

 

[Kizmic]

and that is exactly the reason I feel she told that story in that way... (with all respect to u my fan/friend) she knew the world would "enjoy" it ...

and as for her, it seemed to have "meant" nothing to her, eg., "and I was like .... woah!!!"

I feel she told that, along with a few other things to distract people's attention. What reason I do not know. She was, afterall, asked the question, did MJ ever flirt with you ... which should have caught her by surprise, or been at least a bit "intrusive" - - afterall, it is a very private moment we're talking about here. Rehearsed, rehearsed, rehearsed ... that's what it seemed to me.... and FAKE ... not saying it didn't happen mind you she's a lovely lady...but that's just it - - here you are - - beautiful - - getting possibly the most amazing chance of a lifetime to possibly woo this amazing man - - it comes to an abrupt "unexpected" end - - someone asks you an intimate question about this person - - and you go "valley girl" on em ... "and I was like, woahh" - sorry inappropriate imo. WHY? Just 'off' that's all . . . something about it is 'off'.


She did, and somewhat 'scripted' somehow. I can't quite put my finger on it ... something (I'll say it again) "unnatural" about her manner and presentation...things she chose to focus on and emphasize ... on the one hand, she's sweet, "sincere", lovely, down to earth ..... and on the other hand, unnatural ...

At first I thought, well maybe she's just nervous ... and indeed that may account for some but not all of what I'm feeling from her ..

I do wonder if she was perhaps working according to instructions or ... something ...

Especially with (I'll say it again) the things she chose to focus on ... imho unnatural for somebody that just experienced such a (what should have been) indelibly shocking and basically traumatic loss ...

especially since she was there to basically witness it ...

and especially since/if she (I'll say it again) had no idea what was going to happen or what was happening as she was experiencing it.

It reminds me of acting class when the director would invariably remind us to remember just how many times this character has told this (whatever dialogue) to this person (the character they are talking to)

Why did she tell the same thing the exact same way on each talk show?

And just like the guy who was getting in the car with her outside that one TV studio ... she too seemed to have been doing a bit of an 'overkill' on some of the oddest things to focus on considering this phenomenal experience of hers was brought to such an abrupt end ..

The kids love/d me ... SEE???? (unabashedly showing the entire world the kids' hand made keepsakes given especially to her in the sacred privacy of their home)

MJ trusted me, SEE???? (tells how he pulled her aside JUST to tell her how much he needed her to do exactly what she was already doing ...........and even though it looked like 'nobody' was eating (according to her) he only talked about himself - or at least as far as she told it.

MJ liked me and I felt so flattered... SEE???? (gushing over the tush peek)
and mind you, she was asked the question, "did MJ ever flirt with you" which should have caught her off guard ... did she respond with guarded privacy? or with meloncholy or wistfulness? no ... 'faked' "flatterry", eg. " ... and I was like, woah"

I cooked with only his best interest at heart, SEE???? (already writing healthy food COOKBOOK bearing his name, "King" )

I was so concerned, SEE????? ("crying" and "praying" with the children while the EMTs were there even though she supposedly had no clue what was going on upstairs, "crying" according to her at least, which I did not totally 'buy' - "God please let this man be alright - yahhh he was their dad" ... that just made me wanna ... *sigh*

I only want to innocently share my eye-witness account, SEE???? (getting on dang near every entertainment talk show ever produced)

And WHY and HOW would Kai have such a strong opinion about whether Debbie should be allowed to visit the kids? Unless she was made privvy by MJ of the details of the kids' relationship with Debbie (which he evidently was not in full support of it seems to me anyway) what could she possibly have to say about it? Of all the things for her to have no comment on ... it would seem that would be one of them imho.

What does this all mean to me? NOTHING, except that something isn't right. I have no idea what it is exactly ... but its something.

I do know law enforcement should have interrogated each and every person who was in that house that fateful day, without exception ... including most certainly the person preparing his food (he "mysteriously died" hello???) and especially those in charge of "securing" MJ's body which they failed miserably at doing.

I am not believing MJ had a DOCTOR to protect his health, a Chef to protect his intake, SECURITY to protect his VERY BODY ... and ALL of them practically lived there ... and he ..............."MYSTERIOUSLY" died?

I don't want to hear any excuses that LAPD was only focused on the doctor. And while I can understand security (maybe) not being in the room with MJ and his personal doc 24/7 (and that's a maybe) ... for them to be called by the doctor AND NOT SHOW UP RIGHT AWAY (according to the doc statement which of course could be a lie) ...

...something is seriously wrong ...

Either the doctor is lying about that (entirely possible) or everyone in that house conspired ... the latter which I am seriously leaning toward atm with the possible exception of the housekeepers, the nanny/ies, and maybe the Chef, but for now, the Chef is not looking too good imho.

Yeah I was watching that over again and see exactly what you saw. Especially that scene outside where that guy eventually comes in to speak for her.

 

[SoS]

Yeah I was watching that over again and see exactly what you saw. Especially that scene outside where that guy eventually comes in to speak for her.

and did you notice he said, "we" are not privvy to what really goes on in the Jackson household ...

and he kept emphasizing how much she liked Michael ..

Someone may call me paranoid (and maybe I am but as the old saying goes, 'just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean nobody's following me' lol)
but if she "thought the world of him" why o why does that need to be emphasized over and over. I didn't count the times he emphasized that but I'll guarantee you 3, and I'll go out on a limb and say 4. My question is, why say it at all, let alone over and over again.

 

[Kizmic]

and did you notice he said, "we" are not privvy to what really goes on in the Jackson household ...

and he kept emphasizing how much she liked Michael ..

Someone may call me paranoid (and maybe I am but as the old saying goes, 'just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean nobody's following me' lol)
but if she "thought the world of him" why o why does that need to be emphasized over and over. I didn't count the times he emphasized that but I'll guarantee you 3, and I'll go out on a limb and say 4. My question is, why say it at all, let alone over and over again.

Yes! I was thinking of false flatterers. It was very unemotionally put and he looked like he was really thinking "blah blah blah"

 

[SoS]

Yes! I was thinking of false flatterers. It was very unemotionally put and he looked like he was really thinking "blah blah blah"

That's exactly what it seemed like to me too.

Someone may say, 'well, maybe he was her publicist and they had another appointment and he was trying to get the reporters out of their faces"

To that I say, yes, ok, well, she showed up there to talk about it so why is it that, now that we're "off the air" (or so they would have thought when they left the studio)
do "we" NOW want to blow off the reporters like they have no business asking these questions ... but even more than that ...

nobody had asked him any of what he was going on about ...

he volunteered all that "overkill"

To be exact, he said:

"we're not eligible, um...how can I put it ... we're not privvy to what really goes on in the Jackson household,

she was the celebrity personal chef

Michael really liked her, he made great comments, and she worked there seven

days a week, and had a bond, with the children and with Michael Jackson, she thought

the world of him, I mean, great guy, you heard what she said"

"great guy you heard what she said"

?

Umm...no I didn't hear her say anything like that ...

random ... no context ... except apparently in his mind ..

and that's what bothers me

He's making sure to put how well liked, trusted, "bonded", she was in the forefront ...

in other words....

who in their right mind would ever suspect her of being in on anything

why nobody because we've seen to it, so no need to ask her any more questions ok? ok, thank you and goodbye

yeh ok.

oh well ... here it is again ... help me out .. maybe I missed something


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2nQlI9T2uE

 

[SoS]

Exactly. I feel like I am watching some kind of crime mystery written by the best scriptwriters in the world and played by the best actors in the world. And in the story, it's as if what happened is what happened. It was an ACCIDENT. That's the truth. And the rest of the movie is just watching how everyone else will survive without going down themselves. YET, this mystery is so crazy that it just seems like one big circus....and everyone is acting like such a fool that you start to wonder if fools are what these characters really are. And you question if you were fooled from the very beginning.

If anyone understood all that, then good for them. :clapping:

Man, do I REALLY wish it were just that.....and at the end...the truth prevails and Michael rots up from the grave as a zombie, a fan screams their lungs out...closes their eyes...reopens them. Michael says, "What's the problem? Come on, I'll take you home" revealing it was only a dream.

Exactly. Ironically, it almost seems like something only MJ could mastermind as a plot for some great movie.



*sigh*

If only ..

 

[Soso Deaf]

bootychatter aka bullshiiiiit

if she'slying, it's easy for thekids to prove her wrong by saying so.

 

[indranee]

I also thought it was interesting how she said that when MJ pulled her aside, he told her "I know you know what you're doing... I know you're good at what you do".

see, I don't think she's involved in any plots per se. but I do think this was an exercise in PR for her. she wanted her 15 minutes and got it.

now we'll have the book at some point (sooner than later -- can't let that window of MJ-mania go!), another round or two of PR interviews, perhaps a book signing or two even...

but I don't think she's implicated in his murder.

the Prince staying downstairs as opposed to going up business is just a mix-up. I doubt it's got much more to it.

 

[SoS]

I also thought it was interesting how she said that when MJ pulled her aside, he told her "I know you know what you're doing... I know you're good at what you do".

see, I don't think she's involved in any plots per se. but I do think this was an exercise in PR for her. she wanted her 15 minutes and got it.

now we'll have the book at some point (sooner than later -- can't let that window of MJ-mania go!), another round or two of PR interviews, perhaps a book signing or two even...

but I don't think she's implicated in his murder.

the Prince staying downstairs as opposed to going up business is just a mix-up. I doubt it's got much more to it.

Either that, or ...

..and the mix-up is odd to me ... I'm not feelin' that ... I guess because she seemed so certain .. she said Prince and the doctor talked at the bottom of the stairs ... she said it really fast so maybe I misheard her ..but y'never know maybe she's just jumping on the 15 min wagon which I had thought of ... that didn't/doesn't quite 'sit' right either tho ..

bootychatter aka bullshiiiiit

if she'slying, it's easy for thekids to prove her wrong by saying so.

oh ok, thanks for clearing that up - true

 

[kasume]

bootychatter aka bullshiiiiit

if she'slying, it's easy for thekids to prove her wrong by saying so.

Exactly! They should just show a picture of her to the children and ask if any of them have ever seen her or met her.

I wouldn't be surprised if any of them say they've never even seen her.

 

[Soso Deaf]

no. the kids do know her. lol....im saying she said prince stayed downstairs. murray or someone else is claiming he went up there...so one of them is lying.

and y would lee be defending murray when apparently all along he's been fingering her as the cause of his propofol addiction? and she said shecouldn't even get rx meds

 

[AllTheLovelyFlowers]

Lee aint defending Murray, true. What she is doing is covering for herself! She knows that Propofol was given to Michael and she may have been one of the doctors who gave it in her s-called "cocktail". So she went out there and took a proactive measure. What Lee is really saying is, "Hey, just for the record, I wasn't the one who gave him the propofol...in fact, I refused to give it to him when he asked me....so I'm clear". Yet Murray is pointing the finger right at her.

Now here is the deal.....if Michael's security personnel really did call her, he/she had to reach her by cell phone because they didn't know where she was. So if that phone call was really made, then it should show up in cell phone records between Holmby Hills and Florida.

And IMO, if Lee felt that she had information to help the case, then why didn't she go to the police with it FIRST? I believe she was scared that Murray would build a path to her since she was in Michael's world in the recent months before the death. When she heard all those media stores about numerous doctors possibly being implicated, she had to do something fast. It just pains me that she seems to be blaming the whole thing on the dead guy. IMO, she really had nothing to offer to the case, so she should have either volunteered her files or shut her mouth. Cheryl Lee spoke up because she was scared.

 

[SoS]

Interesting the characters that immediately got in the public eye to seemingly basically say, 'hay don't look at me'

 

[Ohood]

i read one of the TMZ comments a month ago ..a comment by someone who said that Lee is great at covering her wrong deeds,,, the commentator said that she/he knew her since 80's and is familiar with her suspicious conduct..

at first i did don't take this seriously but now i do.

 

[AllTheLovelyFlowers]

Don't worry. The truth about Lee will come out. Notice, the police didn't raid her office until after she showed up on tv. Yet, Murray had already told his story to the LAPD. This woman knew she had been mentioned so she went into proactive mode. There is something not right about her.

 

[CherubimII]

Don't worry. The truth about Lee will come out. Notice, the police didn't raid her office until after she showed up on tv. Yet, Murray had already told his story to the LAPD. This woman knew she had been mentioned so she went into proactive mode. There is something not right about her.

Thanks for pointing this out, AllTheLovelyFlowers.

 

[Autumn II]

Lee aint defending Murray, true. What she is doing is covering for herself! She knows that Propofol was given to Michael and she may have been one of the doctors who gave it in her s-called "cocktail". So she went out there and took a proactive measure. What Lee is really saying is, "Hey, just for the record, I wasn't the one who gave him the propofol...in fact, I refused to give it to him when he asked me....so I'm clear". Yet Murray is pointing the finger right at her.

Now here is the deal.....if Michael's security personnel really did call her, he/she had to reach her by cell phone because they didn't know where she was. So if that phone call was really made, then it should show up in cell phone records between Holmby Hills and Florida.

And IMO, if Lee felt that she had information to help the case, then why didn't she go to the police with it FIRST? I believe she was scared that Murray would build a path to her since she was in Michael's world in the recent months before the death. When she heard all those media stores about numerous doctors possibly being implicated, she had to do something fast. It just pains me that she seems to be blaming the whole thing on the dead guy. IMO, she really had nothing to offer to the case, so she should have either volunteered her files or shut her mouth. Cheryl Lee spoke up because she was scared.

This is all very logical. I didn't know WHAT to think, until Lee's name turned up in an early interview of Murray. That changes everything. . . . .

 

[mischief]

Don't worry. The truth about Lee will come out. Notice, the police didn't raid her office until after she showed up on tv. Yet, Murray had already told his story to the LAPD. This woman knew she had been mentioned so she went into proactive mode. There is something not right about her.

I'm wondering whether she was paid for her interview? Does anyone know? If she did get paid then as a potential witness at any future trial she made herself into an "unreliable" one. Same goes for the chef too, if any payment was made. Is giving an interview to the press in return for payment not a nifty way of ruling yourself out of being a witness ...or at least a credible one..at a future trial? Think about it.

 

[Autumn II]

I'm wondering whether she was paid for her interview? Does anyone know? If she did get paid then as a potential witness at any future trial she made herself into an "unreliable" one. Same goes for the chef too, if any payment was made. Is giving an interview to the press in return for payment not a nifty way of ruling yourself out of being a witness ...or at least a credible one..at a future trial? Think about it.

Interesting point. I'm sure she was paid for all of them, and she did a LOT of interviews. The chef, too, I'm sure was paid, plus she plugged her book-to-come.

Having given interviews and being paid for them doesn't rule a person out as a future witness, but it DOES make them less credible, I'd think. Lee was all-over-the-place for several days, and the vanished. And then her name turns up in one of Murray's early interviews with police. So clearly he was aware of her and was trying to shift the blame TOWARD her (for Michael's. . .alleged. . .propofol "addiction.") So, this raises the question as to her motive for her tv appearances. Was she just being proactive? Does she KNOW Murray?

It's possible for a nurse to have given propofol or other meds. She'd have to work with a doctor to write the prescription, but yeah, she COULD have given Michael. . anything.

 

[TinaG]

Don't worry. The truth about Lee will come out. Notice, the police didn't raid her office until after she showed up on tv. Yet, Murray had already told his story to the LAPD. This woman knew she had been mentioned so she went into proactive mode. There is something not right about her.

I think it's important to note that Lee's name and statements about propofol were detailed in the search warrant that was issued in July. Detectives interviewed Lee , likely before she made her video statements and before the search warrant was issued. The search warrant was issued July 23. You can view the search warrant here:

http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/images/08/24/murray.search.warrant.affadavits.pdf

Though I don't think the warrant specifies when the police talked to her.

 

[applepie]

When I heard Cherilyn's account about Michael's "begging" for Proprofol, I did not want to comment on it because almost everyone was supporting her courage to come out and say something.

However, my burning question was, "Why didn't she reported this to the CA State Heath Department, or a public health nurse since there might be a questionable treatment plan (i.e. using anesthesia outside the operating room)?

I know of friends who are registered nurses who question the numbers on doctor's prescriptions. I'm also aware of the health privacy too, but if a professional caregiver is using a plan that would harm a patient, would it be better to report it to appropriate authorities. Can someone in health care help me out here?

I apologize if this has been discussed already h34r::question:

 

[parli123]

That is malpractice. You cannot use Propofol outside the Hospital..They do use them in ICU as well. But there is monitoring and nurses around. Not an incompetent Murray.
I would like to see Murray's california state board Licence.
Why would a pharmacy sell this drug to anyone but a hospital or surgery center?
It does not make sense.
This drug has a lot of people scared. They are asking lots of questions before proceedures.

 

[Soso Deaf]

the issue is can she report something if she doesn't know for sure?

can she likely assume mj was using this thru the help of his doctor if he never said so? she claims he didn't tell her which doctor told him it was ok.

and murray is claiming mj never told him he was on other stuff. the drugs found in his system were all given to mj by murray. all w/in half hrs of each other.

 

[Autumn II]

the issue is can she report something if she doesn't know for sure?

can she likely assume mj was using this thru the help of his doctor if he never said so? she claims he didn't tell her which doctor told him it was ok.

and murray is claiming mj never told him he was on other stuff. the drugs found in his system were all given to mj by murray. all w/in half hrs of each other.

Good points. It all just seems too convenient. As far as reporting something she "doesn't know for sure," what she would have been reporting is that MJ ASKED for Propofol, not that she gave it. But. . . did she giveit? Did she KNOW Murray? He sure knew HER name. Why?

 

[indranee]

if he didn't tell her the name of the doctor who gave him the Propofol, I don't see how she could go to the authorities (when he was still alive). that's probably why he never told her. let's face it, Michael wanted/needed the Propofol. he knew what he was doing when he didn't tell her the doctor's name.

it still sounds fishy to me... but if I don't think about it too hard, then HER behavior makes sense. she didn't have recourse when he was alive because she wanted to stay in his good books (didn't want to turn HIM in -- and it would have been difficult anyway seeing that he wasn't self-prescribing; he wasn't a doctor -- the other guy was, so it'd be complicated and she would be at the lose-lose end anyway), and after he died, she wanted to save herself.

the question still stands: is Murray right? is she telling the truth here? did she give Michael Propofol? there's no evidence either way other than her word and her files. and she could have doctored them. Mike's not here to back her up either way.

what Pharmacy was she affiliated with? does anyone know?

 

[SoS]

The more and more I examine the affidavit the more and more absurd it becomes, almost like a straight up joke.

Just keep examining it while thinking about everything we've been told and you will see a fair number of oddities and inconsistencies.

I just want to wait for a bit to see what unfolds. This is all very interesting, that's for sure.

 

[Oceangirl]

you keep forgeting one thing Murray mentioned another doctor Abrams , he also claims he once administered propofol to mj , but his account of what happened with Abrams does not make any sense . lee said mj wanted a doctor who would administer propofol to him constantly , since he needed to sleep everydaywhich makes sense , he thought propofol was a good treatment for his insomnia , but murray's story about Abrams is like MJ suddenly felt he wanted to seelp and asked for Dr. Abrams . it was a one time thing , and sleep is not a one time thing . he would not go take a dosage of "sleep" once a month and that's it . the story does not make any sense. Murray wants to blame others , he is trying to explain the needle marks on mj's body by saying Lee was responsible for these marks , while he himself admitted he was injecting mj with propofol for six weeks . he is contradicting himself .