Ms. BlueGangsta
Proud Member
It's gonna be lit.
This interview is new, and it's from Rogue Magazine.
This interview is new, and it's from Rogue Magazine.
Last edited:
Hopefully this isn't another person jumping the gun.
Hopefully this isn't another person jumping the gun.
Yeah, I feel the same way but I felt like I had to post this.
Miel;4168622 said:Good news !
Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
good luck for estate permission.
I'm glad everybody seems so glad about it, but unfortunately I always have skepticism
Personally, I welcome no docs unless they're estate approved.
^^I just read elsewhere that he sued Michael for non payment for the Fox special and he was yakking about propofol use.
Let me get this straight he is making claims that MJ has a prosthetic tip on his nose, and saw him being circumcised in his hotel room which is a lie.........seriously didn't he read the autopsy report?
Yes he talked about propofol but in a compassionate way. He tried to explain
that MJ had insomnia for a long time and he tried everything to get sleep
and after a while nothing worked but propofol which is actually true.
It's just that he failed to mention that MJ didn't get nightly propofol before he signed that damn contract for
50 shows. Before 2009 he only sporadically got it he was not addicted to it or anything.
It's not circumcised but circumscribed
"Footage varies from moments of MJ parasailing or monkeying around at the zoo, to evenings when Jackson is circumscribed to his hotel room. "
It wasn't Hamid who made the claim about the nose but the guy who wrote the article. It's nothing but stupid speculation
on his part because MJ wore a tape on his nose. We know that had nothing to do with any hole in his nose, if
he had needed a tape to keep a prosthetic nose on he would have wore it all the time which of course he didn't.
But this little fact somehow escaped the idiot who wrote the article.
He sued MJ because his managers failed to pay him in time so probably at least part of his story was legit.
^^I just read elsewhere that he sued Michael for non payment for the Fox special and he was yakking about propofol use. I would assume if he wasn't paid, he would have put in a creditors claim at the time of death.
Yes he talked about propofol but in a compassionate way. He tried to explain
that MJ had insomnia for a long time and he tried everything to get sleep
and after a while nothing worked but propofol which is actually true.
It's just that he failed to mention that MJ didn't get nightly propofol before he signed that damn contract for
50 shows. Before 2009 he only sporadically got it he was not addicted to it or anything.
It's not circumcised but circumscribed
"Footage varies from moments of MJ parasailing or monkeying around at the zoo, to evenings when Jackson is circumscribed to his hotel room. "
It wasn't Hamid who made the claim about the nose but the guy who wrote the article. It's nothing but stupid speculation
on his part because MJ wore a tape on his nose. We know that had nothing to do with any hole in his nose, if
he had needed a tape to keep a prosthetic nose on he would have wore it all the time which of course he didn't.
But this little fact somehow escaped the idiot who wrote the article.
He sued MJ because his managers failed to pay him in time so probably at least part of his story was legit.
Michael Jackson deserves a wonderful documentary. I hope this one will be it. :artist:
They already exist. 3 of them actually: This Is It, Bad 25 and MJ's Journey from Motown to Off the Wall.
Seriously though, I hope that this documentary gets off the ground in some way, shape, or form.
Me too. :/I hope this guy is trust worthy