formj
Proud Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2015
- Messages
- 5
- Points
- 0
Regarding emails on wikileaks and emails that have been on twitter and on 2 other forums already for months before wikileak:
They are same emails.
You can locate the same emails on wikileaks . If something can not be located is either because of the limits of the online search engine of wikileak or also because wikileak have released a less amount of data compared to the 1st leak . There are at least 100gb of data (not emails) missing from wikileak rerelease.
Wikileaks posted 4 leaks related to documents:
https://wikileaks.org/sony/docs/filelist/
The original leak from SPE had more files and was about this:
1st part= more than 26 GB in data files
2nd part= more than 1GB of data files
3rd part= more than 100 GB of data files
4th part= more than 7GB of emails
5th part= 5gb of data
6th part= more than 3GB of emails
7th part= more than 6GB of data
8th part= more than 5GB of emails
9th part= about 800MB of emails
For the emails, It impossible to know if all the emails are on wikileaks unless u download them all and compare them/the number of emails with the number of emails released in the original leak.
Regarding the emails related to branca's job , they have been posted above in links.
About the ppl that talk about "partnership" with sony:
Branca ' sony/atv advisor job, is a job for sony in which John branca represents sony's interests in sony/atv. Branca is not representing the common interest by working for sony with this job.
That is what the emails and documents proves. Branca gets paid by sony and he has fiduciary duties Toward sony for his service for sony.
There would have been no need to get paid/sign up for a job for sony and for Sony wanting fiduciary duties toward them from branca , if it was something for the common benefit of the joint venture , since branca has duties toward MJ's benefits from sony/atv via his fiduciary duties toward MJ. if it was a joint venture, sharing common interests , there would be no need of this job and a salary from Sony with fiduciary duties.
The "joint venture" would not have required a job for Sony from branca and fiduciary duties toward sony for doing the common interest In sony/atv. There are 2 sides of the joint venture , and branca offered himself to work for sony's sides , representing them and having fiduciaries duties toward them.
It does't exist on earth a Joint venture with 1 half paying the lawyer that represent the other half , to represent the interest of 1 side with fiduciary duties Toward 1 side....that is not a joint venture...u do not get paid from 1 side of the partnership and have fiduciary duties toward 1 side if you are in a joint venture that should have no sides and together look after the common interests With no money and fiduciaries involved.
This is a job for sony and a conflict of interests that should have involved probate court. Point.
The conflict of interest has been discussed in the same email/document and they all hid and went behind probate court 's / beneficiaries' Back And they got exposed with these emails.
MJ did not trust John branca for his promiscuity with sony and there are other emails showimg how branca is after his own interest (for representing sony in sony's affairs) and after sony's interests .
The money that the executor makes via the estate is nothing compared to the money branca 's Law firm makes representing a big corporation like sony in their business affairs. Mj has been used as leverage for branca's personal business for sony and Sony has used MJ for their own gain.
This is the same old story that has seen MJ being exploited in life from Sony and from the same lawyers , that are corporation 's lawyers.
They are same emails.
You can locate the same emails on wikileaks . If something can not be located is either because of the limits of the online search engine of wikileak or also because wikileak have released a less amount of data compared to the 1st leak . There are at least 100gb of data (not emails) missing from wikileak rerelease.
Wikileaks posted 4 leaks related to documents:
https://wikileaks.org/sony/docs/filelist/
The original leak from SPE had more files and was about this:
1st part= more than 26 GB in data files
2nd part= more than 1GB of data files
3rd part= more than 100 GB of data files
4th part= more than 7GB of emails
5th part= 5gb of data
6th part= more than 3GB of emails
7th part= more than 6GB of data
8th part= more than 5GB of emails
9th part= about 800MB of emails
For the emails, It impossible to know if all the emails are on wikileaks unless u download them all and compare them/the number of emails with the number of emails released in the original leak.
Regarding the emails related to branca's job , they have been posted above in links.
About the ppl that talk about "partnership" with sony:
Branca ' sony/atv advisor job, is a job for sony in which John branca represents sony's interests in sony/atv. Branca is not representing the common interest by working for sony with this job.
That is what the emails and documents proves. Branca gets paid by sony and he has fiduciary duties Toward sony for his service for sony.
There would have been no need to get paid/sign up for a job for sony and for Sony wanting fiduciary duties toward them from branca , if it was something for the common benefit of the joint venture , since branca has duties toward MJ's benefits from sony/atv via his fiduciary duties toward MJ. if it was a joint venture, sharing common interests , there would be no need of this job and a salary from Sony with fiduciary duties.
The "joint venture" would not have required a job for Sony from branca and fiduciary duties toward sony for doing the common interest In sony/atv. There are 2 sides of the joint venture , and branca offered himself to work for sony's sides , representing them and having fiduciaries duties toward them.
It does't exist on earth a Joint venture with 1 half paying the lawyer that represent the other half , to represent the interest of 1 side with fiduciary duties Toward 1 side....that is not a joint venture...u do not get paid from 1 side of the partnership and have fiduciary duties toward 1 side if you are in a joint venture that should have no sides and together look after the common interests With no money and fiduciaries involved.
This is a job for sony and a conflict of interests that should have involved probate court. Point.
The conflict of interest has been discussed in the same email/document and they all hid and went behind probate court 's / beneficiaries' Back And they got exposed with these emails.
MJ did not trust John branca for his promiscuity with sony and there are other emails showimg how branca is after his own interest (for representing sony in sony's affairs) and after sony's interests .
The money that the executor makes via the estate is nothing compared to the money branca 's Law firm makes representing a big corporation like sony in their business affairs. Mj has been used as leverage for branca's personal business for sony and Sony has used MJ for their own gain.
This is the same old story that has seen MJ being exploited in life from Sony and from the same lawyers , that are corporation 's lawyers.