dam2040
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2005
- Messages
- 6,178
- Points
- 113
You kind of right. Michael story is kind of similar to Emmet Til story.
I've always used this comparison too. It's just as (if not more) sad.
You kind of right. Michael story is kind of similar to Emmet Til story.
Too sad.
I refuse to accept that this very complex, once in a lifetime unique phenomenon that is MJ, who brought as many careful joy as awareness to important issues to the world, who made the best dance songs while expressing pain and suffering as no other, who didn't just lay back to enjoy his success but used his unprecedented world fame and influence to try to make things a little better, and who of course had his faults as everyone is reduced to just a tragic figure.
If we accept this, even if at some point everyone realises what character assassination he was exposed to, but he's just seen as a one-dimensional tragic figure, his detractors win. We should keep his real spirit alive.
Square One has over 46,000 views so far. Why is this doing so much better than Leaving Neverland: Take Two? (Under 4000 views). I want them both to have the same exposure.
That's a re-upload. The first upload had a lot more views but was taken down, because the audio was taken from a podcast without permission. They somehow settled then and it was reuploaded. A shame really that the podcast guy couldn't just let it be for the good cause of it all. I think the original views were over 50k (or was it even over 100k?)
I do not see it on Rotten tomatoes, do you have a link?Left a review for Square One on Rotten Tomatoes. We'll see if they post it.
And then it was taken down AGAIN for copyright claim and this time by MUSO TNT LTD.
How can MUSO TNT LTD. keep the youtube video of "Leaving Neverland Take Two" taken down when Kew Media failed to so? What does MUSO TNT LTD. have going for them that Kew Media did not have? Thats a question I cant answer and neither could Ryan Michaels.
He's making so much more sense than the supposed "intellectuals".Paris78;4271865 said:<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">My heart just burst with joy listening to <a href="https://twitter.com/SnoopDogg?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SnoopDogg</a> standing up for <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MichaelJackson?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MichaelJackson</a> back 1994 - "Innocent until proven guilty" .. Love you Dogg!! 😘 <a href="https://t.co/z5A47pibOs">https://t.co/z5A47pibOs</a></p>— MJJJusticeProject (@MJJJusticePrjct) <a href="https://twitter.com/MJJJusticePrjct/status/1184256873156894721?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">15. Oktober 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
When, for a moment, it looked like the criminal case might get ahead of the civil, their reaction was: "Jesus Christ! We don't want that!" Remember: only a criminal trial can get a perpetrator in jail! A civil trial is only about money.
The Chandler book speaks about a desire for a settlement from the beginning. They even brag about how the friendship between MJ's and their lawyers would be beneficial for them to steer the case towards a settlement.
Those connections only became tighter when Johnnie Cochran (and his sidekick Carl Douglas) came on board in December. By the time Fields and Pellicano were also pushed out by the lawyers in favor of a settlement.
Cochran had a 20 years long friendship with Feldman (Feldman even represented Cochran in a case), so if Weitzman could not convince MJ of a settlement before, now he got pushed by two high profile attorneys to settle.
If MJ had wanted to settle, they could have very easily and quickly done it back in September, as that's all the Chandlers wanted. Apparently that's what MJ's lawyers wanted as well: "You make this go away and we'll all make a lot of money."
So the only obstacle must have been MJ's resistance.
Those are TROLLS with nothing else better to do.It's great it's still being premiered in various countries.
I am also glad to see the views for this documentary on youtube still go up in a steady trend. It's not slowing down it seems.
For a small budget documentary I think it's very well made and explains the case very clearly.
I spend five days last week adding Dutch subtitles but I guess Danny still needs to approve of them. (I am not sure how it works)
I hope it will come available soon so more Dutch people can understand it too. I tried to be as objective and clear as possible in translating it. It was hard. Despite already knowing the content it really got to me. When you have to translate and explain it in your own language. It just hit me even more. I felt so much for Michael... How on earth can anyone do that to another human being just for money? I just... I can't understand. And now we have two turds doing it again.
When you look up the hastag for square one on twitter you see 9 out of 10 people are very positive about it. What I found interesting is that there are a few twitter accounts constantly saying the same negative things about the docu and Michael. Even copying and reposting their own tweets every few days. I wonder what's going on with that. It's strange.
terrell;4273507 said:Those are TROLLS with nothing else better to do.
What I found interesting is that there are a few twitter accounts constantly saying the same negative things about the docu and Michael. Even copying and reposting their own tweets every few days. I wonder what's going on with that. It's strange.
I had no clue you could do that. Will look into it. Thanks!Might be bots. Report them to twitter (there should be a button for that somewhere).