KOPV
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 13,085
- Points
- 113
Re: Verdict Watch - Discussion- Katherine Jackson vs AEG
While I don't think AEG can be fully at fault for MJ's death and the blood is really on Murrays hands however according to California law they do hold some responsibility in the well being of there client Michael Jackson. May not be 100% fair, but they did act recklessly with the circumstances and did have the capability to do something about it.
If AEG stepped up they as they should have for there employee (MJ) Murray would not have done what he did. They fed the belly of the beast that killed him.
In terms if you are in a store and you slip on some water and break your leg, the store is liable for your injury and not having a safe place for customers. While it could be a single employee or customer that spilled that water. They did not keep it safe for Michael and to make it worse they knew the "spill" was there (Yeah they didnt know the content of the spill) but they did nothing to clean it up!!
While I don't think AEG can be fully at fault for MJ's death and the blood is really on Murrays hands however according to California law they do hold some responsibility in the well being of there client Michael Jackson. May not be 100% fair, but they did act recklessly with the circumstances and did have the capability to do something about it.
If AEG stepped up they as they should have for there employee (MJ) Murray would not have done what he did. They fed the belly of the beast that killed him.
In terms if you are in a store and you slip on some water and break your leg, the store is liable for your injury and not having a safe place for customers. While it could be a single employee or customer that spilled that water. They did not keep it safe for Michael and to make it worse they knew the "spill" was there (Yeah they didnt know the content of the spill) but they did nothing to clean it up!!