unfioredarancio
That's for all time
I agree with thisThat’s when you are looking at MJ from the media’s perspective.
Not from a fan. Not as an admirer of his art. You seem to have lost that point of view & look at him in an antagonistic way.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree with thisThat’s when you are looking at MJ from the media’s perspective.
Not from a fan. Not as an admirer of his art. You seem to have lost that point of view & look at him in an antagonistic way.
Of course, but...You don't need to like everything he did to be a fan lol
That one is the worst, just because of how referential it is. It's a nice artwork but MJ would not use it.To answer the question, Michael (2010) by far. It isn't even close either.
I like to see it as honoring Michael's memory using various points of his life.That one is the worst, just because of how referential it is. It's a nice artwork but MJ would not use it.
I want to believe there is a deeper meaning behind the right eye. Something like this:Maybe it's just to have parts of the pictures matching the random fonts for the artist name and album title.
Maybe just a trend because due to the web explosion, computer stuff were starting to become "cool".
Usually, how I see it is that most of this album gives me a "clinical" vibe compared to the other albums (not even sure how to describe it), a somewhat more electronic sound. And the cover matches this. Though, did the cover influence the way I perceive the album? Maybe.
Across cultures, the eye shares this symbolism of access to spiritual illumination. Among the Inuit, a shaman is called “theone who has eyes,” emphasizing visionary insight. In Indian Upanishads and Taoism, the right eye is linked to the sun (activity and the future)
I want to believe there is a deeper meaning behind the right eye.
looks like a rescue blanketMaybe...
But also, initially, if I'm not mistaken, this was the project for the Invincible cover:
I think it's Sony that refused it and "something else" had to be used. So, maybe they didn't have much time to think about it.![]()
Just yapping, trulylooks like a rescue blanket
It actually looks like another picture by the same photographer that MJ liked (I personally don't like it).looks like a rescue blanket
I think what @MJJuniorSinceMW meant is that Michael being called "bizzarre" is something very sad to hear coming by a fan. It's more common coming by a hater or tabloid...
define "normal"He was bizarre, though lol. His behaviors weren't that of a "normal" person. Same with Prince and a lot of other pop stars, but MJ was among the weirdest.
That's not entirely a bad thing. MJ was a likable eccentric in a lot of ways. But the man had issues, so much that he wasn't normal.
A guy who goes on to forums to be a heel of course, among other thingsdefine "normal"
It's a fairly decent photo, and fun, but not quite as good for a cover as the original. Plus I'm not a fan of the obnoxious Grammy logo. And cardboard is never as good for a cover.Thriller 2001 SE card sleeve cover