Update: Behind the Scenes on Jan 28th 8PM ET OWN Channel / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

[StacyJ]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Randy is pissed when is not on the medias.

He must be happy now...


Anyway, Katherine should cancel this interview.Oprah want use the name of Michael one more time for the ratings, she'll be sad with Katherine, and after she will sill think that Mike is a pedophile.

To see Katherine smile with this woman, it's an insult for Mike.

I agree with that..

 

[rockstar]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

i saw this today in my newspaper

 

[StacyJ]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Randy's comments have made the newspapers

 

[blankyluvdoodoo]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

that is what he wanted.....smh

 

[nonth]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

i saw this today in my newspaper

Randy is not helping at all

 

[rockstar]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

:no: Nope :no:

 

[rockstar]

Michael Jackson Wouldn’t Have Allowed Oprah to Talk to His Kids

<img onload="if(this.width>1290){ document.getElementById('imgfgf').innerHTML = '<img src=/_img/generic/warning_16.gif align=absmiddle /> The image below has been resized. Click on it to enlarge.'; document.getElementById('imgfgf').style.display = 'block'; this.width=810; }" src="http://i1-news.softpedia-static.com/images/news2/Michael-Jackson-Wouldn-t-Have-Allowed-Oprah-to-Talk-to-His-Kids-2.jpg" alt="Oprah Winfrey has interviewed Michael Jackson’s kids, Randy Jackson is fuming" title="Oprah Winfrey has interviewed Michael Jackson’s kids, Randy Jackson is fuming" style="border: 1px solid rgb(238, 238, 238); padding: 5px;" border="0">




Oprah Winfrey recently taped an interview with the parents of the late Michael Jackson, Joe and Katherine, but also got to have a few words with the star’s children. Brother Randy Jackson is upset – and very vocal – about it.

As we also informed you a few days ago, Oprah and her production trucks were outside the family’s Encino home, which meant she was inside doing the interview with Katherine and Joe Jackson.

Photos of them sitting down for the interview have already surfaced online, but, according to Randy, Oprah also included Michael’s three children in the talk as well, says E! Online.

Since word of this got out, Randy has taken to Twitter to vent, saying the last thing Michael would have permitted, had he still been alive, had just happened.

“I found out Oprah was at our family home, my stomach ached and it still hasn’t gone away,” Randy tweets. He then goes on to explain why he was so upset.

“I had no prior knowledge this was going to happen. It was deliberately kept from me because they knew I would have tried to stop it,” he says.

“I know how Oprah feels about my brother and family. I also know that he would not have wanted this,” Randy continues.

Back in the day when Michael was being trialed on molestation charges and the entire world turned its back to him, so did Oprah. And she didn’t stop here either.

Michael never forgot that, Randy adds. “In fact, she is the last person on earth he would want around his children...” Michael’s brother says.

As Randy sees it, it was no coincidence that Oprah ran a show on child abuse precisely when Michael was being accused of the same crime – she was pointing a finger at him.

This means she has no right to be sitting down with Michael’s children to see how they’re doing now that he’s gone, says Randy.

“That was no coincidence. I know there are a lot of you out there upset and angry over this. I don’t blame you... can you imagine how I feel. I’m angry 2...” he explains.

“Let our anger be the fuel that ignites our desire for truth, and keeps us unified on the road to justice for him,” Randy urges his followers in a more recent tweet.

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Mich...llowed-Oprah-to-Talk-to-His-Kids-161238.shtml

Report: Michael Jackson's Children To Be Involved In Oprah Interview

According to recent reports, Michael Jackson’s three children – Prince Michael, 13, Paris, 12 and Blanket, 8 – will open up about their late father in a candid interview with Oprah Winfrey.
It was originally rumoured that the talk show queen visited Michael’s mother, Katherine Jackson, at her home in Encino, Calif. on Saturday (October 9), where she sat down with the children’s grandmother as well as their grandfather, Joe Jackson. Oprah was also treated to a tour of the family’s property.

here is link:http://celebritybabyscoop.com/taxonomy/term/282

Randy Jackson hits out at Oprah
(UKPA) – 2 hours ago






Randy Jackson has hit out at Oprah Winfrey over an interview she did at the Jackson family home.
Randy didn't say who Oprah interviewed, but tweeted: "I know everyone wants to know my position on the Oprah interview.
"First, let me say that I love my mother and father. I am humbly grateful to have them as my parents. But I don't always agree with the choices they make. This is one of those times."
He went on: "I found out Oprah was at our family home, my stomach ached and it still hasn't gone away. I had no prior knowledge this was going to happen. It was deliberately kept from me because they knew I would have tried to stop it.
"I also know that he [Michael] would not have wanted this."
Meanwhile, Oprah is set take the hot seat for a change when she is grilled by US presenter Barbara Walters.
Barbara will chat to Oprah about the end of the daytime star's talk show.
The Oprah special will also include the star talking about memorable moments in her 25-year-old show. She is giving it up at the end of this season and concentrating on her own cable network.
ABC said that Barbara will do the interview in Chicago at Oprah's home and Harpo Studios.




here is link:http://www.google.com/hostednews/uk...XOKJmJU26oR_CyHzw?docId=N0285971287131048652A

 

[yaazgurl]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

that is what he wanted.....smh

LOL. Randy is not saying anything different than the fans who do not want this interview. And I think he highlighted the main reason perfectly. Yet fans are upset that the truth about Oprah is being printed for the world to see. LOL. I don't think anyone on here can prove that Randy did not love his brother. Even with the Sony catalog issue, I guess I didn't love Michael since I thought he should have sold it several times including after I learned that he had died. The only thing it proves is that Michael had more foresight not that Randy did not love his brother. This thing about the MJJSource. Personally, I don't feel it was a scam. It was something I enjoyed immensely and I benefitted from in many ways but from my understanding there were several people involved in that so I'm still waiting on official word before I blame Randy for scamming people. I don't expect to change anyone's opinion concerning Randy. People are out to prove how evil he is. LOL. I don't support him with everything but I do support him on this. I think its silly to fight against someone when they are on the same page as you on an issue.

Edit: I see the media is still skating around the main issue. Well at least one publication printed exactly what he said about Oprah.

 

[Jabz]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

^^^

This! A thousand times this!

 

[Indra]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

LOL. Randy is not saying anything different than the fans who do not want this interview. And I think he highlighted the main reason perfectly. Yet fans are upset that the truth about Oprah is being printed for the world to see. LOL. I don't think anyone on here can prove that Randy did not love his brother. Even with the Sony catalog issue, I guess I didn't love Michael since I thought he should have sold it several times including after I learned that he had died. The only thing it proves is that Michael had more foresight not that Randy did not love his brother. This thing about the MJJSource. Personally, I don't feel it was a scam. It was something I enjoyed immensely and I benefitted from in many ways but from my understanding there were several people involved in that so I'm still waiting on official word before I blame Randy for scamming people. I don't expect to change anyone's opinion concerning Randy. People are out to prove how evil he is. LOL. I don't support him with everything but I do support him on this. I think its silly to fight against someone when they are on the same page as you on an issue.

Edit: I see the media is still skating around the main issue. Well at least one publication printed exactly what he said about Oprah.

I couldn't agree more. It's about time someone said something about Oprah and I'm glad some parts of the media are reporting this. Not that I think Oprah cares at all, but at least some peopel will read it and see how false she is.

 

[blankyluvdoodoo]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

LOL. Randy is not saying anything different than the fans who do not want this interview. And I think he highlighted the main reason perfectly. Yet fans are upset that the truth about Oprah is being printed for the world to see. LOL. I don't think anyone on here can prove that Randy did not love his brother. Even with the Sony catalog issue, I guess I didn't love Michael since I thought he should have sold it several times including after I learned that he had died. The only thing it proves is that Michael had more foresight not that Randy did not love his brother. This thing about the MJJSource. Personally, I don't feel it was a scam. It was something I enjoyed immensely and I benefitted from in many ways but from my understanding there were several people involved in that so I'm still waiting on official word before I blame Randy for scamming people. I don't expect to change anyone's opinion concerning Randy. People are out to prove how evil he is. LOL. I don't support him with everything but I do support him on this. I think its silly to fight against someone when they are on the same page as you on an issue.

Edit: I see the media is still skating around the main issue. Well at least one publication printed exactly what he said about Oprah.

i don't know why u are telling me this but lets just agree to disagree .u don't believe it ,that is ur opinion and i have mine .i don't trust randy and action speak louder then word.i have seen all his stunt and i am done with him .if he has issue with hoprah then why throw ur parents under the bus,go home talk to ur parents.why he is the only one trying to sell himself sane one in family by throwing every one under the bus.

 

[elusive moonwalker]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

randys only going off on his tweet cause someone called him out on that radar article. hes such a terrible lair and so fake its laughable

he likes playing devils advocate and tries to become a hero for some fans cause he says what they want to hear. ie the interviews terrible i never knew about it blah blah blah.

 

[Sharon B. Sidney]

Tipareth you wrote:
"I've been on other board for lot of time, but now I think is time for me to return here and stay. I am not pleased with the level of censorship over there. . . it's very worrying....

It's started simple, with some fans getting mad on others criticisms over the Jacksons. Now we can't open mouth to say few words. It's fear regime in there.

So pay attention folks here is like in old good times, a board dedicated to Michael Jackson, but if we fear criticism and confuse criticism with hate, then this is the path to censorship."
You quoted this:
Originally Posted by Sharon B. Sidney http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showthread.php?p=3017766 / post3017766
I wonder if it is possible for us to step away from our thoughts and opinions and seek God on what is right and appropriate to say...

I wonder if those who don't know God could step back forgetting thoughts and opinions and search the heart for what is right and appropriate to say...

I wonder where does criticism and love abide together... Criticism is not a friend to love but I imagine love would take criticism in with a smile and warm welcoming arms... Criticism would likely find a way to criticize the actions of love...

If love encouraged criticism to be kind would criticism feel criticized or would the two perhaps find a new place of understanding???

I am at loss for the words to say to one who does not understand me, my words or beliefs... I speak out in love, not in hopes of obtaining love but rather expanding the LOVE that already exists...

I am not intent to offend, hamper or harm but to provoke LOVE...

&#12288;
then you wrote:
&#12288;

Really? How come criticism and love cannot live together? These are dictatorial remarks, sorry.
They can coexist together, Mike for exemple got very analitical and critical mind. In interviews he try to not come as very critical, but in personal discussions, or in that book of dialogues with Schmuley.... read the adobe text fans made, and see how critical Michael himself could be!! LOL
Anyway this rapport between love and critic is not the point over here, anyway. Here people have a topic of discussion first. Apart of some short bursts,
I didn't see hate, or gross disrespect, so why is so hard to tolerate this normal discussion, a bit heated here and there, but it's normal process....
Instead of people forcing themselves to behave 'appropriate'.....
As for the family they are in the spot light, they need to face those criticisms with grace, because it's normal. They wanna sell products, they wanna fans to buy tickets at their shows, they wanna all this attention, but they suffer criticisms, coming from various people on various continents? One come with another, people are not robots, fans are not robots of buying stuff and smile at everything you do. This is very narrowed view of a fan, a human being that follows you passively without judgment of his own. ( I saw this view on Janet, telling us to know our place, even Mike had it long time ago, almost till mid 80s ) But Mike grew up, and come to see us for what we really are. Human beings with soul and brains, human beings that out of love give him ideas, inspiration, courage and yeah even criticize him!! Flash news, he took this with class and received this so well, not crying like a baby.
Taj should accommodate himself with his thought, and stop paying attention to every fan on twitter, loving or less loving. Fans are MILLIONS, Taj dear. You need to grow thicker skin, and understand this.Twitter is nice tool, but also can exhaust you and make you waste lot of time twittering to all those various people, that are fans of your uncle, not necessarily of your entirely family.

I am curious, but perhaps this is not a question, perhaps this is more of me stating the thoughts inside of my own mind for whatever reasons they may be there, but I do wonder out of all of the posts you have chosen to read and comment to- why was it this one?
It seems your statements concerning my post on criticism and love has twisted my words and distorted the meaning and even go so far as to imply as if I had said that criticism and love could not abide together. I am sorry you misunderstood me but perhaps if you were to read it again you may find a way to understand what I was saying.
You also claimed that post had “dictatorial remarks” in it well, I do believe LOVE has absolute rule and conquers all so if that is what you mean then fine, however if there is something else you are inferring then again I humbly ask you to reread the post.
At some point you said:
“One come with another, people are not robots, fans are not robots of buying stuff and smile at everything you do. This is very narrowed view of a fan, a human being that follows you passively without judgment of his own.”
And I wondered - where did I recently hear a comment about robots revently… I don’t think people are robots but I do believe Michael encouraged the world to live and show love to others
&#12288;
Another thing on my mind and I have pondered whether or not I should address it, but I can’t help but wonder could you possibly have more than one user name in which the other is ginvid, I do wonder but I wont ask that question…
Before I go I do want to say that the interview Michael did with Schmuley was private and the parts that were harshly critical were not suppose to be there.
Love and blessings to you who were here before and have decided to return! I hope everyone treats you well… Welcome!!!

 

[yaazgurl]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

i don't know why u are telling me this but lets just agree to disagree .u don't believe it ,that is ur opinion and i have mine .i don't trust randy and action speak louder then word.i have seen all his stunt and i am done with him .if he has issue with hoprah then why throw ur parents under the bus,go home talk to ur parents.why he is the only one trying to sell himself sane one in family by throwing every one under the bus.

Yeah, let's just agree to disagree. But you posted your opinon and I posted mine. And my post wasn't specifically directed at you so sorry if you took it personal.

 

[blankyluvdoodoo]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Yeah, let's just agree to disagree. But you posted your opinon and I posted mine. And my post wasn't specifically directed at you so sorry if you took it personal.

lol i am not taking it personally,i respect ur opinion and i just stated mine that is all .we are all grown ups .:hugs:

 

[Tipareth]

Tipareth you wrote:

And I wondered - where did I recently hear a comment about robots revently&#8230; I don&#8217;t think people are robots but I do believe Michael encouraged the world to live and show love to others
&#12288;
Another thing on my mind and I have pondered whether or not I should address it, but I can&#8217;t help but wonder could you possibly have more than one user name in which the other is ginvid, I do wonder but I wont ask that question&#8230;
Before I go I do want to say that the interview Michael did with Schmuley was private and the parts that were harshly critical were not suppose to be there.
Love and blessings to you who were here before and have decided to return! I hope everyone treats you well&#8230; Welcome!!!

- Well Sharon I've replayed to you because you I felt your text to be more pertinent text to replay to.

- Then the robots remark, got nothing to do with your sayings... indeed.... But when reading various fans asking again and again, for fans to behave and to be 'appropriate' toward Jacksons, and to not critic them too much, or at all.... I've kinda started to form a view toward that .... Even Janet herself said it, fans to know their place. Meaning even if some are in the wrong we got not right to express....
So this remark got nothing to do with you, but more with an idea, a concept of what fans 'should do', how fans 'should behave'. That 'should' attitude toward fans, then the high expectation from stars and media ( not only Jacksons ) that those fans should go and buy products.

In their heads fans are like robotic buy things machines, but when it comes to criticism, or expressing not so comfy ideas, then yeah they are rapidly hurt. Including journalists. For them we are 'rabid fans', 'fanatics' not people with brains, jobs, some of us even with master or doctorate degrees.

In a word, shut up and buy! This is the mentality I was talking about and this was a bit of a digression inside my replay to you.



- As for me being ginvid, so far away from the truth. Even if you do not ask ( in fact you cleverlly asked ) I give you an answer because it's simple. I am girl and I am from far away, from Romania.
On KOP Board people know me as Cecilia ( my true name ), and here I am Tipareth. I do not have multiple accounts. :cheers:

- regarding the Mike talks with Schmuley, it was private yes. But it was also true criticism there, not hate but criticism. And here is a mere Board, so I do not see it as something very, very serious if we dare to express true opinions and true criticism. So in the same boat as Mike. We are individuals the same as him, or journalists, or whatever therfor we are entitled to express opinions and criticism as long as we do not curse, wish death or other awful things.

- Thank you for the welcoming

 

[ivy]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

LOL. Randy is not saying anything different than the fans who do not want this interview. And I think he highlighted the main reason perfectly. Yet fans are upset that the truth about Oprah is being printed for the world to see. LOL. I don't think anyone on here can prove that Randy did not love his brother. Even with the Sony catalog issue, I guess I didn't love Michael since I thought he should have sold it several times including after I learned that he had died. The only thing it proves is that Michael had more foresight not that Randy did not love his brother. This thing about the MJJSource. Personally, I don't feel it was a scam. It was something I enjoyed immensely and I benefitted from in many ways but from my understanding there were several people involved in that so I'm still waiting on official word before I blame Randy for scamming people. I don't expect to change anyone's opinion concerning Randy. People are out to prove how evil he is. LOL. I don't support him with everything but I do support him on this. I think its silly to fight against someone when they are on the same page as you on an issue.

Edit: I see the media is still skating around the main issue. Well at least one publication printed exactly what he said about Oprah.

The issue with Randy's twitter posts aren't his tweets/opinion/dislike about Oprah ( I agree that he stated the already known truth about the situation) but airing too much family's private business in the process.

On one hand you have Taj who apparently knew about the interview beforehand, discussed with Katherine what Oprah did (again before the interview) and it was decided to do set the record straight.

Then you add Randy's tweets to it in which he states "it was deliberately kept from me because they knew i would have tried to stop it"

so now not only openly he states the disagreements in the family but he also introduces schemes , backstabbing etc that happens in the family. According to his tweets not only he knows best (in multiple situations) and the other ones are wrong but they are having deliberate attempts to get their way, to block other family members. Randy single handily paints a dysfunctional and arguing and divided family portrait and IMO this is too much information to share with public.

Secondly not once , not twice but several times he states lapse of judgement (bad decisions) on his parents part which is once again should be kept private and should be discussed with the individual (regardless of whether it's true or wrong) IMO. Now can you blame fans for criticizing Katherine and Joe when their son has no reservation of not doing it publicly?

 

[ginvid]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Uh Sharon, I'm staff here. You are not allowed to have more than one user name. And believe me, Gaz keeps up on that. Staff members are definitely checked. Don't assume because people have similar thoughts that they are automatically the same person. Our whole writing style isn't even similar.

And I don't need to create another user name to get my point across. One of me is enough.

Thank you.

 

[elusive moonwalker]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Before I go I do want to say that the interview Michael did with Schmuley was private and the parts that were harshly critical were not suppose to be there.

the tape conversations? mj did that with schumk for a book they were writing together about raising kids etc although the "rabbi" seems to go alot futher with his questioning

 

[yaazgurl]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

The issue with Randy's twitter posts aren't his tweets/opinion/dislike about Oprah ( I agree that he stated the already known truth about the situation) but airing too much family's private business in the process.

On one hand you have Taj who apparently knew about the interview beforehand, discussed with Katherine what Oprah did (again before the interview) and it was decided to do set the record straight.

Then you add Randy's tweets to it in which he states "it was deliberately kept from me because they knew i would have tried to stop it"

so now not only openly he states the disagreements in the family but he also introduces schemes , backstabbing etc that happens in the family. According to his tweets not only he knows best (in multiple situations) and the other ones are wrong but they are having deliberate attempts to get their way, to block other family members. Randy single handily paints a dysfunctional and arguing and divided family portrait and IMO this is too much information to share with public.

Secondly not once , not twice but several times he states lapse of judgement (bad decisions) on his parents part which is once again should be kept private and should be discussed with the individual (regardless of whether it's true or wrong) IMO. Now can you blame fans for criticizing Katherine and Joe when their son has no reservation of not doing it publicly?

Who said Katherine and Joe can't be criticized by fans? That's the problem. There's this whole mentality that certain Jacksons should be criticized no matter what they do and certain Jacksons shouldn't be criticized no matter what they do. Randy didn't disrespectfully disagree with his parents and imo fans can respectfully disagree with Randy but to assume things about him like he is behind this interview, he faked his heart attack, he had a hand in Michael's death is taking things too far. Just because many of the mods don't like Randy doesn't mean that all of that should be tolerated because he is a Jackson that its deemed okay to criticize. That's my point.

Edit: And some people did have a problem with Randy even pointing out the obvious simply because it was coming from him. If he remained silent then its because he's behind this whole "wrong" interview. If he talks then its because he's covering for the fact that he's behind this interview and he's looking to be the hero. Anything coming from Randy is a problem for some people.

 

[StaceyMJ]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Um, hang on...we have never allowed for anybody to be overly attacked. No we will not mute people who like one person but not others about someone else. I suggest if you have a problem with the moderation of the site then report posts or come to us. We can't see everything and be everywhere on this site.

 

[elusive moonwalker]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

randy likes to cause trouble. u only have to look at the way he acts as ivy has pointed out. hes nothing but a shit stirer and has been for years we all know the crap he pulled around mj over the last 10 years.now hes going off on taj. and his buddies on twitter are claiming it was taj who leaked those photos taken from inside the house after tajs comment in his twitter. and as always he plays the victim and goes with what ever opinion the majortiy of fans are saying so it looks like hes on the fans side.. his actions are of someone who wants to split the family. no wonder he got sectioned.

Edit: And some people did have a problem with Randy even pointing out the obvious simply because it was coming from him. If he remained silent then its because he's behind this whole "wrong" interview. If he talks then its because he's covering for the fact that he's behind this interview and he's looking to be the hero. Anything coming from Randy is a problem for some people.

randy will never remain silent cause hes an attention seaker. everything is about him anyone whos followed his ramblings on twitter over the last year can see that.

 

[yaazgurl]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Um, hang on...we have never allowed for anybody to be overly attacked. No we will not mute people who like one person but not others about someone else. I suggest if you have a problem with the moderation of the site then report posts or come to us. We can't see everything and be everywhere on this site.

I think you can simply read through this thread or the one on Joe Jackson in 2300 where a mod said no one in MJ's family loved him all they saw was money. To me that sets a very bad example. But you're right, I will report posts from now on.

 

[StaceyMJ]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

I think you can simply read through this thread or the one on Joe Jackson in 2300 where a mod said no one in MJ's family loved him all they saw was money. To me that sets a very bad example. But you're right, I will report posts from now on.

Well OK, perhaps you're right. But we're fans too, we have opinions too. All that we ask is opinions are expressed in a respectful way, but yes please do report posts and they'll be looked into.

 

[Sharon B. Sidney]

Tipareth you are very welcome for the welcome,.<BR><BR>
I suspect perhaps you missed some of the things some fans were stating... Perhaps the moderators have removed them or you haven't read through the many pages. In any case there are people who have expressed that they feel people have made wrong choices and there are those who have in essence passed judgment on peoples motives- even going so far as to claim things similar to the blatant statement being attributed to Karen Faye..<BR><BR>
I personally do not think it is wrong for someone to express that they do not agree with someone&#8217;s actions however when people call people names, insult their character and motives I think it has changed from a form of criticism to an outright attack and that sickens me.<BR><BR>
I just want to encourage people to show love in what they say realizing our words have power. There is a scripture that I believe says life and death is in the power of the tongue. I believe that to be true in so many ways... One of which is when someone&#8217;s heart is broken and their spirit is crushed it's like a dying inside- would you agree? Many find a way to overcome these things still may others replay hurtful words until it buries them in some form or fashion... People also learn from others words and actions especially children and replicate them elsewhere&#8230; Shouldn&#8216;t we be examples to each other on how love and criticism can co exist in the form of encouragement<BR><BR>
We also have the power to speak blessings and curses over others lives, the bible states I am paraphrasing I think - that with the same mouth we speak blessings with we curse others. I learned a long time ago that our words have power so I try to be really careful and honor God....<BR><BR>
Imagine if you loved and cared for a group of people like I feel right in presuming Michael and his family has so loved his fans. Imagine if a group of them were being harshly critical of your flesh and blood... What if they were bashing your mother? Wouldn't you think that they should know their place as in where the borders of what's appropriate or not appropriate to say? I don't know what quote you took such a statement from Janet from nor why or if she said it but if in fact she did perhaps that is why or she had another reason....<BR><BR>
We all stand on reasons and understanding another persons reasoning will help both us and them... One wise thing to do is state our opinions as I think rather than directly accuse someone of something or say it appears to me that this or that may be happening instead of saying this is what is happening when in fact we can't read anyone&#8217;s mind or know their motives or intentions...<BR><BR>
I have never perceived the Jacksons of having a &#8220;shut up and buy it attitude. I have seen them as hardworking individuals who have strived to create material worthy of being bought and Michael specifically as one who encouraged others to buy it, listen to it, get the message then share the love..<BR><BR>
Blessings to you and all!!!<BR><BR>

 

[yaazgurl]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

randy likes to cause trouble. u only have to look at the way he acts as ivy has pointed out. hes nothing but a shit stirer and has been for years we all know the crap he pulled around mj over the last 10 years.now hes going off on taj. and his buddies on twitter are claiming it was taj who leaked those photos taken from inside the house after tajs comment in his twitter. and as always he plays the victim and goes with what ever opinion the majortiy of fans are saying so it looks like hes on the fans side.. his actions are of someone who wants to split the family. no wonder he got sectioned.


randy will never remain silent cause hes an attention seaker. everything is about him anyone whos followed his ramblings on twitter over the last year can see that.

Well Elusive, I have not seen his tweets concerning Taj and I do not agree with Randy's buddy Karen. However, I don't think Randy has done all wrong in the last ten years. In fact, I believe he literally saved MJ's life during the trial. He was not a good business man obviously but he did make a significant decision in MJ's favor and if people are looking at actions they should look at all of them imo.

Edit. Elusive, I checked my tweets and I don't see anything new from Randy about Taj or about anything. And please do not mention Johnny Cochran to me regarding MJ because if Cochran knew that Mez was such a good lawyer he could have gotten him for Michael the first time around instead of encouraging Michael to settle. No, I give the credit to Randy and people can try to discredit himfor that if they want.

Re-Edit. You actually said Cochrane? I don't know who that is.

 

[ginvid]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Edit, It isn't even necessary. I will say that fans sometimes need to read more carefully and stop attributing words to people that were never even said.

 

[elusive moonwalker]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

I believe he literally saved MJ's life during the trial.

oh please cause he brought mez in he didnt save anyones life.. it seems randy gets a pass for all the shit he has done and continues to do cause of one thing that he actually did right that didnt hurt mj.like he should be thanked for not hurting his bro! and it was jonnie cochrane that mentioned mez

 

[AllForLove]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

oh please cause he brought mez in he didnt save anyones life.. it seems randy gets a pass for all the shit he has done and continues to do cause of one thing that he actually did right that didnt hurt mj.like he should be thanked for not hurting his bro! and it was jonnie cochrane that mentioned mez

:bugeyed do you really think that ? :mello:

 

[Justthefacts]

Re: Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Randy gets way to much credit