I could almost imagine Michael speaking about the last quote... Something to do with what he said in that LWMJ documentary?
from nestanix :
I remember when Rolling Stone had a "tribute" edition published after Michael's death, they interviewed the director of the YRMW video. He said that he purposely tried to hide Michael's face with a dark shadow in the video.
Does anyone have that quote? That's heartbreaking.
And you know what I'll be brutally honest and I know some people won't like it.
There are some people here who are equally angry to anything and everything that comes out even slightly negative about Michael. For example Memefan is one of them she was against Jermaine's book, Klein's bs, Murray documentary and now Frank's book.
My opinion about this whole book issue is the fact that I don't believe a dear friend should be writing a book about Michael in the first place...A dear friend would know how much Michael valued his privacy...His FANS know how much Michael valued his privacy...And we have never met him, we don't know him in the way Frank and his family have had the honour to know him....That's where Frank went wrong...That's where he decided to unnecessarily fuel the fire that is the media and their treatment of Michael...That's right, a FRIEND did this to him...
Michael himself drew the line at what he wanted the public to know about him....What gives Frank or anyone else who wants to write a book that right?
I could care less that his last name is Cascio...It could be Joe Blow for all I care...The issue with the songs aren't even crossing my mind when talking about the book issue, and I'm able to differentiate between the two, thanks...
Ivy, please understand I'm not trying to be cynical. I'm curious. Did MJJC reach out to LaToya and Jermaine as well?
Again nobody's questioning if what Frank said is true.
Everybody is assuming that it is all true and Michael did and said all that and the only wrongdoing Frank does is making that public.
:no:
Sad. :sad:
On behalf of MJ legacy7. We supported the album Michael. Not for one second did we believe that the Estate, Sony and everyone involved would commit criminal fraud on the world by putting out a Michael Jackson album featuring a MJ impersonator. We really respected the friendship that Michael had with the Casio's and the fact that he called them three days before he died while there is no evidece MJ kept in touch with his own brothers and sisters.
With that being said we are shocked with the first quotes releaed from the book. Look no further than the Casio's interview with Oprah, when asked about Michael's drug use or addiction the whole Casio family answered they "never" saw anything like that. Frank went on to say that MJ may have had a drug problem based on what he heard after Michael died. His words were "based on what we know now" meaning he came to that conclusion based on what he heard, rumors after Michael passed. Despite how we felt before, changing his story and feeding this stuff to the media to sell a book is betrayal.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Michael-Jackson-was-NOT-an-addict/288817687803025
So that music-industry insider is John McClain? Well, I lost respect to him.
And that kind of tabloidish reports we have also now in Frank's book. He couldn't help it, could he?
That's also the issue where Rolling Stone claimed that Michael died without a nose. Who knows if a music- industry insider even gave them that quote.So that music-industry insider is John McClain? Well, I lost respect to him.
This does not look good.
Look at the titles (based on the article about the book):
http://www.7days.ae/article/news/global/troubled-jacko-was-king-pill-popping-30851
Troubled Jacko was king of pill-popping
New Book Details Jackson's Drug Woes (PHOTOS) | American Superstar Magazine
New Book Details Jackson's Drug Woes
Michael's face isn't hidden in the full length version of YRMW. It's only during the song portion. And there certainly isn't an extended dance sequence where Michael performs entirely in silhouette. And I would have thought Michael would have enough creative control to show as much of his face as he wanted.
rolling stone is not a tabloid and do you prefer this story has been printed 2 years ago be the only one out there and have a problem with Frank saying how this kind of behavior hurt Michael? Seriously?
I have to repeat what Last Tear has written before. What do you advocate? Let all the negative comments such as these, books from Ian Halperin , Arnold Klein , Arvizo's etc stay but have problem with people trying to explain the effects of such behavior from these people had on Michael?
do not let your thoughts about the songs cloud your better judgement.
I did not mention the songs in my posts. Frank's tabloidish stories just further is discrediting their intentions regarding Michael's name once he died.
I have problems with people unveiling private things or simply rubbing salt into the wound of their supposed friends.
edited to add: I did not say you mentioned the songs, I said your opinions about the songs clouded your judgement. basically I'm saying that even if Frank did something good you will be incapable of giving him the credit and continue to find something wrong with it.
kindly point me the "private" part that you just found out about this comment that we are talking about?
- that the director hid his face? - was published 2.5 years ago
- that michael was sensitive about his appearance? - wasn't he the one mentioned how being called "big nose" affected him and went on "Oprah" and "Bashir" to talk about how people's comments about plastic surgeries were wrong and hurtful
- the "freak" part? - surely I'm not the only one that watched ghosts
so what private ? please enlighten me
and surely you wouldn't have a problem with "any negative comments about Michael's face really really hurt him" part which might get some people from public to stop and think what they've been saying?
Rolling Stone may be a music magazine but it definitely behaves like a tabloid.That's also the issue where Rolling Stone claimed that Michael died without a nose. Who knows if a music- industry insider even gave them that quote.
It's all the same article. It's not new. It's not another review.
so now we are making excuses for the director that himself said to Rolling Stone that he hid michael's ravaged face , is that it?
do you realize how jaded you have become due to your opinions about the songs?
If you weren't and this was solely about Michael's privacy and such you should be equally angry to the director that gave the quote to the rolling stone.
That doesn't make this any better...I think the situation with the book is sad but not suprising, there maybe many more stories to come from close friends and family...Michael's no longer here so they have no value to me, they are what they are, just stories.yes and some weed in some US states and international countries are even legal.
@bumper - thank you for making my point.
I don't want to single you out but for some people in this thread this "anger" is not about the book. It's simply tied to the name "Cascio" and it's obvious when people thank Klein for saying bad things about Frank or make excuses for a YRMW director / or not get angry with the YRMW director for his own words.
I just wish that people just acknowledge it and act accordingly.
The media is doing its usual trick. Sensationalize and twist things to suit its own agenda. The book will be out in a few days. I wonder whether the book can neutralize the unfortunate headlines it has generated.This does not look good.Look at the titles (based on the article about the book):http://www.7days.ae/article/news/global/troubled-jacko-was-king-pill-popping-30851Troubled Jacko was king of pill-poppingNew Book Details Jackson's Drug Woes (PHOTOS) | American Superstar MagazineNew Book Details Jackson's Drug Woes
Personally, my anger is only about the things that i read in that article regarding the book. I was the one who supported Frank on another thread but come on. I'm seak and tired of friends speaking again and again about Mike's life and giving the public, that has already a bad opinion on Mike, even more food. That article is just digusting. Its like Mike wouldn't do anything else in his life than get stonned. Jesus man, enought already!
I'm no Frank supporter far from it, I never intended to buy this book, and Frank's recent interviews/media reporting on it doesn't make me like or appreciate this book or Frank as a person any more. I do believe he's in it for money, I do believe that he's going to exaggerate a lot, in order to attract mainstream media attention and eventually buyers. I do see this book as betrayal of their ''friendship'', someone in this thread commented early how fans have a problem with dealing with the real, non sugarcoated truth of Michael, his personality and life. I don't think that's the case, my point is that even if we are to believe to that Frank is doing this to set misunderstandings straight, and help Michael's image. What's the point in revealing of Michael being stoned? I've already stated this once many pages ago, I don't see the benefit of how portraying Michael as a drug user/occasional drug user/alcoholic/ etc benefits to clear any misconceptions about him up? Some keep stating that he may want to clear up where Michael's alleged drug use came from, i.e his health condition, the pain he was under etc, but even mentioning his health won't justify talking about random dependency's/addictions that Michael may have had at a certain point. I don't see how it helps Michael's image that he was getting stoned in the mountains (if there is any truth in it, in the first place)? Personally throwing in all the drugs talk, regardless if they are true or not- only helps to sensationalize the book and at the end only benefits Frank Cascio. Someone said that Michael's medical history isn't private anymore that it was dragged into court, and will most likely be talked about in future civil lawsuit trials, but my question is: So what?! So what if Michael it was already talked about in court, that doesn't give Frank Cascio the rigt to unfold Michael's secrets. I'm not just talking about Frank but about anyone,.
The thing is, if you are a good friend you should be minding your own business, you don't write a book on your deceased friend/brother/son etc.
Having said all that, it is hilarious to see Jackson family stans jump on Frank relentlessly,though they're busy turning a blind eye on the Jackson's behavior.
Oh I know it's the same article that was posted several pages ago. It's just that the media will run with the negative stuff and twist Frank words around.It's all the same article. It's not new. It's not another review.