Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael"/ Excerpt @pg151/New Interview Post 3743

Vici;3542068 said:
Originally Posted by ivy

"My mother was with Michael when he picked up the baby from the surrogate’s representative at a hotel. They brought baby Prince Michael Jackson II back to Neverland on a private luxury bus."


Does anyone else recall Brian Oxman saying he went to pick up baby Blanket from the hospital and brought him to Michael.. ??

who is my mother in ivys post? Also ivy is it difficult to read in english if your not native??? Please someone tell me so i can order it
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

On Amazon website, books in English section, you can read parts of the book, so you can see for yourself if the level of English is difficult. You can download it from Amazon, you'll need a Kindle or download the application to read it (from Amazon too, check, but I think the app is free)

thank you

edit: only photos with oneliners, no text :(
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

who is my mother in ivys post? Also ivy is it difficult to read in english if your not native??? Please someone tell me so i can order it

Frank's mother.

Go back to page 151 of this thread and you will find an excerpt ( a direct quote from the book) maybe that will help you to work out if you can manage the book. Hope that helps. :)
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

For the sake of writing a story cause the truth has no story value? some media exposure and publicity? isn't this the story he gave media when he announced his new book deal? To me it's the mockery to mj/liz's relationship.

Let me be clear with something. It's just in my opinion I don't think he is not telling the "truth" about this event. However, true doesn't equal to fact. That event is like 10 years ago and it might have a big chance he remembered it in a wrong way (I don't know). Maybe he felt like Liz didn't talk to MJ for a year (the truth he thought) but in "FACT" it's not that long. I just don't see why he wanted to lied about this. Why mock MJ/Liz's relationship?? As I said before, the reason I didn't see it as big deal is I really don't feel it is trying to mock the relationship between Liz and MJ. It also didn't change my opinion of Liz and MJ's relationship.

some think the inaccuracy of Liz's part is not sufficient, I disagree. To me it showed how truthful/accurate his book is, we cannot confirm everything Frank wrote it's truthful or not because Michael is not here to tell us; but when the things we do know didn't match with the things he described, how could we trust him with the rest bit of the book. How can we sure he didn't manipulate the events? Some fans tweet Karen Fyre about the AP article of this book and asked her the feedback, she said there were some inaccuracy just in that bit of excerpt, she also revealed she also recieved some book offers but she turned them down because the publishers want dirts.

In this whole book, he portrayed himself as the protector of MJ, kept saying how potective he was to Michael... However, "Actions speak louder than words", from the media's reports, his 20/20 interview, to the very private things about MJ he shouldn't put in this book, his actions seemed very contradict to what he tried to portray himself in this book.

As I said before, truth didn't equal to fact. Also, truth didn't equal to accurate. I think most of the part he did tell truth but it doesn't mean it's the fact. To me, Frank's book just another source to know MJ. It doesn't mean all he said is the fact. It's only his side of his story. It's just kind of reference.

As for Karen Faye, Lots of Frank's stories also fit with Karen's stories. However, the funny part is in Karen's story she was the lifesaver and protector of MJ (the 30 anniversary story). Like I said before, one event with multiple people in, you might hear all different kind of stories describing the same event. When the stories doesn't add up it doesn't really mean they are all lying. I am not saying Frank didn't manipulate the event (I really don't know whether he does or he doesn't). People can judge and discuss those after read the book if they want. To me I have some questions about the book and Frank but it just not enough for me to think he is being manipulative.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

Ok thx, and the next fallout was in 2005 with the testimony story. Why did it take a year or two to get that fixed? Seems so stupid they look like good friends. Its always so a waste to fight with good friends in my eyes. And michael felt so alone most of the time so he needed frank IMO

He claimed that MJ is avoiding him and the trial is too painful for MJ to go back. Although they started talking and keep in touch since 06 they just didn't talk about it. MJ didn't like to confront with people. Frank is also frustrated and feel hurt that how come MJ would believe that "someone".


Im out of my thinking and decided i want to read the book. Now is the question how do i get it? In holland it isnt out yet or at all.... Thx to ivy and missred you inspired me to read it. Thx both for helping and wonderfull posts!!!

Also can you download it??

edit: I can buy it in english ofcourse, is it hard to read in english, difficult words?? *im not native english*

I think you can for sure find the online version for free. I think there's used to be a site contains almost every books writing about MJ. I am not native English speaker and it's not really hard for me to read it. Way easier than man in the music. lol
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

As I said before, truth didn't equal to fact. Also, truth didn't equal to accurate. I think most of the part he did tell truth but it doesn't mean it's the fact. To me, Frank's book just another source to know MJ. It doesn't mean all he said is the fact. It's only his side of his story. It's just kind of reference.

So it's a fiction novel, inspired by a real case.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

He claimed that MJ is avoiding him and the trial is too painful for MJ to go back. Although they started talking and keep in touch since 06 they just didn't talk about it. MJ didn't like to confront with people. Frank is also frustrated and feel hurt that how come MJ would believe that "someone".




I think you can for sure find the online version for free. I think there's used to be a site contains almost every books writing about MJ. I am not native English speaker and it's not really hard for me to read it. Way easier than man in the music. lol

thank you so much! :) XXX
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

I understand some fans are putting excerpts of the book here probably to show good points of the book.. I know I talked about it too.. But now I am getting to think that those who are hating on the book are still reading the book HERE!! Why should anyone get to enjoy parts of the book yet denounce it? If they want to read it they can..

The book is great! I have 2 chapters left I think.. Some is contraversal, yet there is a lot to learn and enjoy.. I know I did.. If you don't want to read the book, than don't.. that also makes you as an individual not in position to talk badly on some situations. Like IF Frank was there for Michael, and some other things..

If you want to read the book than do it! simple... Its not a traditional MJ book and thats what I love.. its not MJ story or a version of an MJ story.. Its FRANKS story with MJ.. it does not go over the same old stuff we read in every biography.. so if that interests you than awesome! if you are not sure if you want to support it financially then check it out from the library!! If you want to buy the book because you appreciate the hard effort on making the book than buy it..

there are 3 options!! Feel free and I am not in position to tell anyone they are wrong.. That's all that really needs to be said, I have no idea why there are nearly 200 pages of back and forth argument.. Over what?? and why?? You either want to read or dont..


Those who read this thread, has read more actual writting ABOUT the book than IN the book.. I say enough with the arguing and either read it or not.. those who want to talk about the book than enjoy discussing what you took from it, no one should make you feel wrong for doing so..
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

So it's a fiction novel, inspired by a real case.

again you are twisting people's words.

It's not fiction, It's Frank's story. It's what he knows and what he remembers.

For example if I ask you what you did on August 11, 1998 and you don't remember it or you don't remember everything correctly and fully it doesn't mean that you are lying or making up stuff. If I ask the same question to you and your friend (let's assume who was with you) and you tell similar but yet different stories it doesn't mean that one of you lying. It just means you had different perceptions.

And actually his overall tone in which he doesn't claim to be the absolute indisputable truth (such as Karen Faye claims, or JRT writes) is refreshing.

Frank gives you his story and you can choose to believe all, some or none of it. And as multiple readers wrote overall he seems to be honest and truthful and in some instances he seem to not knowing everything or holding some things back.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

I understand some fans are putting excerpts of the book here probably to show good points of the book.. I know I talked about it too.. But now I am getting to think that those who are hating on the book are still reading the book HERE!! Why should anyone get to enjoy parts of the book yet denounce it? If they want to read it they can..

The book is great! I have 2 chapters left I think.. Some is contraversal, yet there is a lot to learn and enjoy.. I know I did.. If you don't want to read the book, than don't.. that also makes you as an individual not in position to talk badly on some situations. Like IF Frank was there for Michael, and some other things..

If you want to read the book than do it! simple... Its not a traditional MJ book and thats what I love.. its not MJ story or a version of an MJ story.. Its FRANKS story with MJ.. it does not go over the same old stuff we read in every biography.. so if that interests you than awesome! if you are not sure if you want to support it financially then check it out from the library!! If you want to buy the book because you appreciate the hard effort on making the book than buy it..

there are 3 options!! Feel free and I am not in position to tell anyone they are wrong.. That's all that really needs to be said, I have no idea why there are nearly 200 pages of back and forth argument.. Over what?? and why?? You either want to read or dont..

Yeah you caught me but not quite.I bought the book I read it, I laughed and I cried and then I came here and I kept on hating.:mello:
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

who is my mother in ivys post? Also ivy is it difficult to read in english if your not native??? Please someone tell me so i can order it

I'm not a native English speaker. But, I have lived in the States for 15 years and use English more regularly than my first language these days. To me, this book is not difficult at all. It's written in plain English. Ocasscionally, there are some vocabularies that I haven't seen that often before. But, if you read the paragraphs again, you most likely will be able to get the meaning of the words.

If you are able to read magazines, such as Rolling Stone and Time, without major issue, you'll be able to understand this book.

It's definitely much easier than some of the court testimonies... ;)
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

again you are twisting people's words.

It's not fiction, It's Frank's story. It's what he knows and what he remembers.

For example if I ask you what you did on August 11, 1998 and you don't remember it or you don't remember everything correctly and fully it doesn't mean that you are lying or making up stuff. If I ask the same question to you and your friend (let's assume who was with you) and you tell similar but yet different stories it doesn't mean that one of you lying. It just means you had different perceptions.

And actually his overall tone in which he doesn't claim to be the absolute indisputable truth (such as Karen Faye claims, or JRT writes) is refreshing.

Frank gives you his story and you can choose to believe all, some or none of it.
And as multiple readers wrote overall he seems to be honest and truthful and in some instances he seem to not knowing everything or holding some things back.

I can't understand how it could be refreshing if you know it might not be true.What's the point in reading and claiming you learned some more about Michael then?
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

I can't understand how it could be refreshing if you know it might not be true.What's the point in reading and claiming you learned some more about Michael then?

other people PUSH their versions to your throat like FACT. Randy Taraborelli writes like he was in the room, Karen Faye speaks like what she says is the ultimate truth and everything else is false. On the contrary Frank says "this is what I know, this is what I was told, this is what I believe" and the rest is on you. You can believe all, some or none. When you read it, most people believe the most and feel some parts might not be the full picture. So it seems like it's true but not perfect. and that's just normal.

Is it clear now? Nobody is saying that it's fiction or lies, it's just Frank's version of events. and he makes it clear that it's his story and that's refreshing.

And we all have functioning brains, we can take what Frank says, combine it whatever we might know from other people, media and such and make up our minds.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

Ivy, I apologize if this has been answered but I just haven't had the time to read the whole thread. Frank tells Prince, Paris and Blanket he will always be there for them. Do you have any idea if they have any contact?
 
And this is what I have to say with the risk of getting more hate. And I try not to be cryptic this time.

What Michael publically stated wasn´t always accurate. Sometimes he said more than one thing about the same subject. I´ve two versions when it comes to Blanket, one that Michael said on TV and one that he gave me in private.
I have avoided this thread for a long time. Many things in that book is fabricated, they are bits of what happened. Munich 99 for one thing. I know for sure Michael didn´t get propofol there, unless he is talking about the night he spent in hospital, because that I´ve no idea about. During History tour he did have a doctor with him and everyone knows by this point how he got some sleep there, so I´m not in denial about propofol. But in Munich? No

And then at one occassion in 2006 Michael said this (I don´t remember all his exact words, but horrible were something he said multible times.

One of my friends, and I know this happened, told journalists or if it was a column writer that I seduced my fans. And that is not true and it´s horrible such thing were told. And they put women by my side. And some of them went on TV to say they had a relationship with me, that is horrible too, and it´s not true and people around me kept saying it´s good for me, it´s good for me. I found it to be horrible. They didn´t care about what it put the one I love through, as long as they could make me look straight they didn´t care what it could have done with what I already had since a few years back. There is not such thing as women, there is a woman, one woman, except for my mother. And the thought about her being forced to take the stand for me gave me nightmares and is the last thing I would put her through, to be questioned and being mocked by one of the most evil men on this planet. It was horrible.

And the more he talked the faster he talked and in the end it came tears. And he was really upset. I wasn´t alone with him at this time, there were other people around, one of them was one of his photographers. And one girl (as I know now is a follower) were there with another fan (who I don´t know if it´s a follower). And a few more who I think worked with him and not for him, like I did.
I´ve been thinking about this friend being Frank, but of course I can be wrong. Michael talked many times about his brother Eddie and that he is very talented and how he hoped for him to get a few of his songs out there. But he never talked about Frank like that. Who I´ve seen around only a few times and the last time in 2003.

And before anyone say "well, why didn´t he deny it then?" about those going on TV, he got that question from a person being there and he said "I would never humiliate anyone in public by denying, what good would that do to that person? I´m not like that"
 
moodyblue97;3542169 said:
And this is what I have to say with the risk of getting more hate. And I try not to be cryptic this time.

What Michael publically stated wasn´t always accurate. Sometimes he said more than one thing about the same subject. I´ve two versions when it comes to Blanket, one that Michael said on TV and one that he gave me in private.
I have avoided this thread for a long time. Many things in that book is fabricated, they are bits of what happened. Munich 99 for one thing. I know for sure Michael didn´t get propofol there, unless he is talking about the night he spent in hospital, because that I´ve no idea about. During History tour he did have a doctor with him and everyone knows by this point how he got some sleep there, so I´m not in denial about propofol. But in Munich? No

And then at one occassion in 2006 Michael said this (I don´t remember all his exact words, but horrible were something he said multible times.

One of my friends, and I know this happened, told journalists or if it was a column writer that I seduced my fans. And that is not true and it´s horrible such thing were told. And they put women by my side. And some of them went on TV to say they had a relationship with me, that is horrible too, and it´s not true and people around me kept saying it´s good for me, it´s good for me. I found it to be horrible. They didn´t care about what it put the one I love through, as long as they could make me look straight they didn´t care what it could have done with what I already had since a few years back. There is not such thing as women, there is a woman, one woman, except for my mother. And the thought about her being forced to take the stand for me gave me nightmares and is the last thing I would put her through, to be questioned and being mocked by one of the most evil men on this planet. It was horrible.

And the more he talked the faster he talked and in the end it came tears. And he was really upset. I wasn´t alone with him at this time, there were other people around, one of them was one of his photographers. And one girl (as I know now is a follower) were there with another fan (who I don´t know if it´s a follower). And a few more who I think worked with him and not for him, like I did.
I´ve been thinking about this friend being Frank, but of course I can be wrong. Michael talked many times about his brother Eddie and that he is very talented and how he hoped for him to get a few of his songs out there. But he never talked about Frank like that. Who I´ve seen around only a few times and the last time in 2003.

And before anyone say "well, why didn´t he deny it then?" about those going on TV, he got that question from a person being there and he said "I would never humiliate anyone in public by denying, what good would that do to that person? I´m not like that"

Thank you from my heart for telling all this. :heart:

And this is what I have to say with the risk of getting more hate.

And I do hate you because you got the chance to be there with Michael ;)
 
moodyblue97;3542169 said:
I know for sure Michael didn´t get propofol there, unless he is talking about the night he spent in hospital, because that I´ve no idea about.

it's the night of the bridge fall.

Michael talked many times about his brother Eddie and that he is very talented and how he hoped for him to get a few of his songs out there. But he never talked about Frank like that. Who I´ve seen around only a few times and the last time in 2003.

Frank wrote Michael talked about Eddie like that as well and I had omitted it for obvious reasons :) Frank also said that he saw Michael around december 2003 / january 2004, then told by lawyers to cease contact, talked on the phone during 2006 but didn't see him again until August 2007 . After 2007 their contact seems to be more like phone calls and occasional get togethers and working on to repair their relationship. Frank also says that from 2004 and on Eddie was a lot closer to Michael than he was.
 
moodyblue97;3542169 said:
And this is what I have to say with the risk of getting more hate. And I try not to be cryptic this time.

What Michael publically stated wasn´t always accurate. Sometimes he said more than one thing about the same subject. I´ve two versions when it comes to Blanket, one that Michael said on TV and one that he gave me in private.
I have avoided this thread for a long time. Many things in that book is fabricated, they are bits of what happened. Munich 99 for one thing. I know for sure Michael didn´t get propofol there, unless he is talking about the night he spent in hospital, because that I´ve no idea about. During History tour he did have a doctor with him and everyone knows by this point how he got some sleep there, so I´m not in denial about propofol. But in Munich? No

And then at one occassion in 2006 Michael said this (I don´t remember all his exact words, but horrible were something he said multible times.

One of my friends, and I know this happened, told journalists or if it was a column writer that I seduced my fans. And that is not true and it´s horrible such thing were told. And they put women by my side. And some of them went on TV to say they had a relationship with me, that is horrible too, and it´s not true and people around me kept saying it´s good for me, it´s good for me. I found it to be horrible. They didn´t care about what it put the one I love through, as long as they could make me look straight they didn´t care what it could have done with what I already had since a few years back. There is not such thing as women, there is a woman, one woman, except for my mother. And the thought about her being forced to take the stand for me gave me nightmares and is the last thing I would put her through, to be questioned and being mocked by one of the most evil men on this planet. It was horrible.

And the more he talked the faster he talked and in the end it came tears. And he was really upset. I wasn´t alone with him at this time, there were other people around, one of them was one of his photographers. And one girl (as I know now is a follower) were there with another fan (who I don´t know if it´s a follower). And a few more who I think worked with him and not for him, like I did.
I´ve been thinking about this friend being Frank, but of course I can be wrong. Michael talked many times about his brother Eddie and that he is very talented and how he hoped for him to get a few of his songs out there. But he never talked about Frank like that. Who I´ve seen around only a few times and the last time in 2003.

And before anyone say "well, why didn´t he deny it then?" about those going on TV, he got that question from a person being there and he said "I would never humiliate anyone in public by denying, what good would that do to that person? I´m not like that"
Thanks.:flowers:
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

it's the night of the bridge fall.



Frank wrote Michael talked about Eddie like that as well and I had omitted it for obvious reasons :) Frank also said that he saw Michael around december 2003 / january 2004, then told by lawyers to cease contact, talked on the phone during 2006 but didn't see him again until August 2007 . After 2007 their contact seems to be more like phone calls and occasional get togethers and working on to repair their relationship. Frank also says that from 2004 and on Eddie was a lot closer to Michael than he was.

Sorry, I meant I saw Frank the last time in 2003, not Michael of course. Sorry if it was confusing.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

Frank wrote Michael talked about Eddie like that as well and I had omitted it for obvious reasons :) Frank also said that he saw Michael around december 2003 / january 2004, then told by lawyers to cease contact, talked on the phone during 2006 but didn't see him again until August 2007 . After 2007 their contact seems to be more like phone calls and occasional get togethers and working on to repair their relationship. Frank also says that from 2004 and on Eddie was a lot closer to Michael than he was.

I don't know if I should mention it here. Eddie named his new born daughter Victoria Michael. This gets me thinking a lot. If I'm going to name my child after someone. That individual has to be extremely special and important to me.

Yes, Frank did mention how Eddie bascially replaced him since 2003.

@moodyblue, have you read the book in its entirety?
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

Hi Moody, just wondering if you have read the book or just commenting based on summaries/review here. I have not receive my book yet so I will wait and see.

Actually, so far from Cascio's interview (Dr Drew), he did not say he witness the use of propofol in Munich 1999. He is saying that he thinks/suspect it is propofol from the way the doctor explains it to him back then. But, yeah I do agree that this part would have been best kept away from the book since the media is having a field day about it. The timing is just regretful but I sometimes wonder is whether the publisher is trying to push this story to sell the book. You can also see Frank very frustrated trying to make the interviewer understand the situation why Michael is sometimes using drug to ease whatever pain he might have but he pointed out many, many times that Michael dealt with it eventually.

Again, like what you said, Michael sometimes tells different version of the story but I believe is probably depending who the person he is talking to. It seems like that happen to the Cascio's family quite a bit as Michael explanation to the kids and the adult are also at times different.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

Sorry, I meant I saw Frank the last time in 2003, not Michael of course. Sorry if it was confusing.

I understood you perfectly and I was trying to say that Frank also says that he wasn't around Michael after 2003 for the most part. so it would make sense that you didn't see him (Frank).

I don't know if I should mention it here. Eddie named his new born daughter Victoria Michael. This gets me thinking a lot. If I'm going to name my child after someone. That individual has to be extremely special and important to me.

the angel nickname given by Michael and the reason for it was also interesting. and angelikson (angel and jackson)
 
^^Okay Ivy, thanks

HumanNature2210;3542194 said:
Hi Moody, just wondering if you have read the book or just commenting based on summaries/review here. I have not receive my book yet so I will wait and see.

Actually, so far from Cascio's interview (Dr Drew), he did not say he witness the use of propofol in Munich 1999. He is saying that he thinks/suspect it is propofol from the way the doctor explains it to him back then. But, yeah I do agree that this part would have been best kept away from the book since the media is having a field day about it. The timing is just regretful but I sometimes wonder is whether the publisher is trying to push this story to sell the book. You can also see Frank very frustrated trying to make the interviewer understand the situation why Michael is sometimes using drug to ease whatever pain he might have but he pointed out many, many times that Michael dealt with it eventually.

Again, like what you said, Michael sometimes tells different version of the story but I believe is probably depending who the person he is talking to. It seems like that happen to the Cascio's family quite a bit as Michael explanation to the kids and the adult are also at times different.

I know he didn´t say he saw propofol being used. Only that he suspected it. And I was wondering if he talked about he night at the hospital after the bridge fall or the other nights. The other nights I know he didn´t get any propofol, what happend at the hospital I don´t know.
 
missred07;3542102 said:
Let me be clear with something. It's just in my opinion I don't think he is not telling the "truth" about this event. However, true doesn't equal to fact. That event is like 10 years ago and it might have a big chance he remembered it in a wrong way (I don't know).

According to Frank, he also attended Liza Minnelli’s wedding in March 2002, so it meant he forgot that Liz was with Michael in that event. Liz had publicly attended muti-events with Michael from the beginning of 2002, the time peroid she was supposed to refuse talking to him. After he talked about Liz/Michael's alleged "fall out", he started to talk about his fall out with Michael, so this Frank's "truth" about the event is not useless.:smilerolleyes:

Reading this book, it's like reading what the tabloids had been reported during the years such as Roger Friedman's column. The contents is similar just in a "friend" tone, maybe fans thought he was "sincere" and believable? I found that Frank Cascio is very sly, he purposely ignore the Jacksons(claimed he didn't know why Michael distanced himself from his family), sugarcoat Rabbi Schumley and everyone in this book, because those people are alive and they can easily discredit him. I felt sad for Michael because he cannot speak for himself.

if people enjoy it, good for you. but I will never believe or enjoy a book Roger Friedman highly recommend.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

the angel nickname given by Michael and the reason for it was also interesting. and angelikson (angel and jackson)

Yes, the reason for the angel nickname is something to think about too.

People don't need to agree with me here. To me, by naming his new born baby girl after Michael, Eddie shows how important Michael is to him. Would he name his daughter after someone whom he has betrayed?

After reading Frank's book, I realize how so little I know about Eddie.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

Yes, the reason for the angel nickname is something to think about too.

People don't need to agree with me here. To me, by naming his new born baby girl after Michael, Eddie shows how important Michael is to him. Would he name his daughter after someone whom he has betrayed?

After reading Frank's book, I realize how so little I know about Eddie.
You bring up a good point.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

Everything written in this book, you can find it on any tabloids.

And one more time, if the Cascios were so close to Mike and his kids, why Mike didn't choose them, the parents Cascios, to be guardians of his kids when Katherine will die? They were there for the birth of his kids? So...

And it's so easy to write anything now, Mike is not here to say if it's true or not....


A waste of money to buy all these books. They betray Mike, like all the other.

 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

can someone fill me in.. for those who don't believe what Frank states in his book..

who aside from MJ (he's not here) are we supposed to believe? I can't think of one living person that we have said we shouldn't believe or trust..

I hope I dont get a responce about DTA
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151

I am quite certain that nobody put a gun to Michael Jackson's head to make him walk through the mall hand in hand with someone else. If he didn't like that stuff and knew that that would be hurtful to someone else- then I understand the pressure, but it is up to him to not do that.

Lastly- how come the privacy advocates are all over these supposed revelations on an internet board??? The double standards are plain amazing.
 
Back
Top