Latest on MJJC

Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date April 2, 2013

Status
Not open for further replies.
AEG lawyers win a round in Michael Jackson lawsuit


KFWB Staff
Celebrity,KFWB News,L.A. News
4/24/2012
12:30 pm

(AP Photo)

(CNS) – Attorneys for AEG Live won a round in court today when a judge ordered Michael Jackson’s mother and his three children to answer more questions about their lawsuit accusing the entertainment conglomerate of negligently hiring Dr. Conrad Murray to care for the late King of Pop.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Yvette Palazuelos also said AEG Live can continue taking Katherine Jackson’s deposition, which began last week but is still incomplete.

Jackson was set to perform a string of 50 shows in London for AEG Live, but he died June 25, 2009 of acute propofol intoxication in Los Angeles while rehearsing for the concert series.

The negligence suit was filed in September 2010 by Katherine Jackson on behalf of herself and her son’s three children, Michael Jr., Paris-Michael Katherine and Prince Michael, alleging the company was negligent in hiring Murray.

The complaint also alleges AEG Live is responsible for the medical decisions made by Murray, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in Jackson’s death and was sentenced Tuesday to four years in prison.

AEG Live attorney Marvin Putnam said he was pleased with the ruling, because the judge ordered everything the defense wanted except for monetary sanctions covering the cost of bringing the motion. He said Katherine Jackson’s lawyers cannot make “heinous” allegations in a lawsuit, then refuse to show proof.

Putnam has called the lawsuit a “shakedown” of AEG Live. However, plaintiffs’ attorney Kevin Boyle said the AEG Live motion was “typical defense gamesmanship.”

During the hearing, Boyle claimed some of the questions AEG Live posed to Jackson’s children were highly personal, including whether they had anything in their diary indicating their father “was going to kill himself.”

AEG Live lawyers maintain the firm was not Murray’s employer. They say Katherine Jackson has not provided all the information she has to show that AEG hired Murray to be her late son’s exclusive doctor as he prepared for the tour.

But Boyle said his side provided an extensive response, including statements from two AEG Live executives that Murray was given the job as the singer’s physician.

Attorney Jessica Stebbins, also representing AEG Live, said many of the responses the plaintiffs provided only arrived in her office Monday. Boyle replied that some of the answers took significant time to obtain, but he declined to elaborate, citing attorney-client privilege.

Boyle said he also may move later to amend the complaint further and to ask Palazuelos to appoint a third-party “discovery referee.” The referee, typically a retired judge, would sort out the materials exchanged between boh sides and make recommendations to the judge.

Stebbins said she was not sure a discovery referee is necessary, but would agree to have one if both sides concur on the person serving the role. She also said she may ask Palazuelos to postpone the trial date, now set for Sept. 10, because of the delays in getting the information needed in preparing AEG Live’s defense.

http://kfwbam.com/2012/04/24/aeg-lawyers-win-a-round-in-michael-jackson-lawsuit/
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

I will also do an update when / if court documents become available. As I said before it might take several days.
 
Jackson's Mom Ordered To Hand Over Docs In AEG Fight

Law360, Los Angeles (April 24, 2012, 7:07 PM ET) -- A California judge Tuesday ordered Michael Jackson’s mother to hand over documents and other discovery responses in her lawsuit accusing promoter AEG Live LLC of negligent hiring and breach of contract in connection with the pop icon’s death, but stopped short of issuing sanctions.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Yvette M. Palazuelos granted AEG’s motions to compel production of documents and interrogatory responses, rejecting Katherine Jackson's argument that the entertainment company’s requests were mooted when she turned over some of the information Monday afternoon.

“I’m going to order the responses without objection,” Judge Palazuelos told attorneys Tuesday. “I took into consideration the fact that there’s been a rolling production of documents and that you’ve been meeting and conferring, by not granting sanctions.”

Tuesday’s order marked the latest chapter in contentious litigation stemming from Jackson’s death from an overdose of the hypnotic agent propofol in June 2009, on the eve of an AEG-produced concert tour.

Jackson’s mother lodged the suit Sept. 15 on her own behalf and as guardian ad litem of Jackson’s children, naming Anschutz Entertainment Group Inc. and several individuals as defendants, in addition to AEG.

She alleges that in the run-up to Michael Jackson’s planned “This Is It” tour in the summer of 2009, AEG breached contractual duties with the pop star by putting a “desire for massive profits” from the tour ahead of Jackson’s health and safety.

According to the complaint, Jackson’s health was central to the tour agreement between AEG and Jackson, who was purportedly missing concert rehearsals due to health complications he suffered from taking prescription medications.

In response to Jackson’s health problems, AEG hired Dr. Conrad Murray to serve as Jackson’s personal physician, the complaint says.

Murray, under contract with AEG, provided Jackson with “cocktails” of drugs intended to help Jackson sleep, among them the powerful hypnotic agent propofol, the complaint says.

Jackson died on June 25, 2009, after what his mother claimed were several days during which Jackson, subject to AEG’s “grueling” rehearsal schedule, was physically shaken, disoriented and incoherent. A coroner’s report revealed Jackson died of a lethal dose of propofol, according to the complaint.

AEG’s alleged disregard for Jackson’s well-being and the company’s insistence that Murray alone treat Jackson contributed to the star’s death, Jackson’s mother claims, arguing that AEG failed to perform due diligence in hiring Murray, and recklessly and intentionally ignored her son's personal health.

Murray was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in November and sentenced to four years in prison for his role in the star's death.

AEG filed motions to compel discovery in March, saying that Jackson had ignored numerous discovery deadlines, failing to produce a single document or meaningful interrogatory response and not showing up to a March 1 deposition.

At the hearing Tuesday, AEG’s attorney Jessica L. Stebbins argued that Jackson’s failure to hand over documents and sit for a deposition until after the company filed its motions justified monetary sanctions. Jackson recently commenced her deposition, which is ongoing, according to AEG.

“Only after moving to compel did we finally get deposition dates for Ms. Jackson and responses to our discovery,” Stebbins said. “If we hadn’t moved to compel, I don’t think we ever would have gotten this discovery. We got it at 3 p.m. the day before this hearing.”

Jackson’s attorney Kevin Boyle denied that he and his client were intentionally delaying the handover of information.

“I know the timing looks like that, but that’s really not what happened,” Boyle said. “Yesterday, Monday, was the first day that we could have this ready.”

Judge Palazuelos granted AEG’s discovery motions but declined to order sanctions.

“You can’t file this type of heinous, heinous lawsuit, and then stand back and see what happens,” AEG’s attorney Marvin Putnam said Tuesday. “You are required to come forward and say what the basis is for making these claims, and [Jackson] has refused to do so, and has refused to do so since filing suit. And the court has now ordered that she has to.”

Jackson’s attorney Boyle applauded the judge’s decision to reject sanctions.

“AEG was, for whatever reason trying, to sanction Ms. Jackson and Michael Jackson’s children, and the judge wouldn’t allow it, and that was a good thing,” he said.

Jackson is represented by Brian Panish, Kevin Boyle, Peter J. Polos and Robert Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP, Michael Koskoff and Bill Bloss of Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder PC, and K.C. Maxwell.

The defendants are represented by Marvin S. Putnam, Jessica L. Stebbins and Kathryn Cahan of O'Melveny & Myers LLP.

--Additional reporting by Derek Hawkins and Roxanne Palmer. Editing by Kat Laskowski.

http://www.law360.com/commercialcontracts/articles/333673
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

Mrs Jackson's lawyer is a asshole
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

Jackson is represented by Brian Panish, Kevin Boyle, Peter J. Polos and Robert Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP, Michael Koskoff and Bill Bloss of Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder PC, and K.C. Maxwell.
Click to expand...

I hope the kids' money isn't being used to pay all these lawyers


A bit unusual for me... i feel a minuscule bit of sorry for Katherine. We all know this isn't her idea...but her good for nothing spawns' idea of a payday.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

I just realized that Katherine has 7 lawyers from 3 different firms while AEG has 3 lawyers from the same firm.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

ivy said:
I just realized that Katherine has 7 lawyers from 3 different firms while AEG has 3 lawyers from the same firm.
Click to expand...

There is a lot of money involved. They are all swarming around..hoping for a big win.

7 lawyers & they couldn't produce the documents on time?
 
ivy;3628150 said:
Jackson's Mom Ordered To Hand Over Docs In AEG Fight

Law360, Los Angeles (April 24, 2012, 7:07 PM ET) -- A California judge Tuesday ordered Michael Jackson’s mother to hand over documents and other discovery responses in her lawsuit accusing promoter AEG Live LLC of negligent hiring and breach of contract in connection with the pop icon’s death, but stopped short of issuing sanctions.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Yvette M. Palazuelos granted AEG’s motions to compel production of documents and interrogatory responses, rejecting Katherine Jackson's argument that the entertainment company’s requests were mooted when she turned over some of the information Monday afternoon.

“I’m going to order the responses without objection,” Judge Palazuelos told attorneys Tuesday. “I took into consideration the fact that there’s been a rolling production of documents and that you’ve been meeting and conferring, by not granting sanctions.”

Tuesday’s order marked the latest chapter in contentious litigation stemming from Jackson’s death from an overdose of the hypnotic agent propofol in June 2009, on the eve of an AEG-produced concert tour.

Jackson’s mother lodged the suit Sept. 15 on her own behalf and as guardian ad litem of Jackson’s children, naming Anschutz Entertainment Group Inc. and several individuals as defendants, in addition to AEG.

She alleges that in the run-up to Michael Jackson’s planned “This Is It” tour in the summer of 2009, AEG breached contractual duties with the pop star by putting a “desire for massive profits” from the tour ahead of Jackson’s health and safety.

According to the complaint, Jackson’s health was central to the tour agreement between AEG and Jackson, who was purportedly missing concert rehearsals due to health complications he suffered from taking prescription medications.

In response to Jackson’s health problems, AEG hired Dr. Conrad Murray to serve as Jackson’s personal physician, the complaint says.

Murray, under contract with AEG, provided Jackson with “cocktails” of drugs intended to help Jackson sleep, among them the powerful hypnotic agent propofol, the complaint says.

Jackson died on June 25, 2009, after what his mother claimed were several days during which Jackson, subject to AEG’s “grueling” rehearsal schedule, was physically shaken, disoriented and incoherent. A coroner’s report revealed Jackson died of a lethal dose of propofol, according to the complaint.

AEG’s alleged disregard for Jackson’s well-being and the company’s insistence that Murray alone treat Jackson contributed to the star’s death, Jackson’s mother claims, arguing that AEG failed to perform due diligence in hiring Murray, and recklessly and intentionally ignored her son's personal health.

Murray was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in November and sentenced to four years in prison for his role in the star's death.

AEG filed motions to compel discovery in March, saying that Jackson had ignored numerous discovery deadlines, failing to produce a single document or meaningful interrogatory response and not showing up to a March 1 deposition.

At the hearing Tuesday, AEG’s attorney Jessica L. Stebbins argued that Jackson’s failure to hand over documents and sit for a deposition until after the company filed its motions justified monetary sanctions. Jackson recently commenced her deposition, which is ongoing, according to AEG.

“Only after moving to compel did we finally get deposition dates for Ms. Jackson and responses to our discovery,” Stebbins said. “If we hadn’t moved to compel, I don’t think we ever would have gotten this discovery. We got it at 3 p.m. the day before this hearing.”

Jackson’s attorney Kevin Boyle denied that he and his client were intentionally delaying the handover of information.

“I know the timing looks like that, but that’s really not what happened,” Boyle said. “Yesterday, Monday, was the first day that we could have this ready.”

Judge Palazuelos granted AEG’s discovery motions but declined to order sanctions.

“You can’t file this type of heinous, heinous lawsuit, and then stand back and see what happens,” AEG’s attorney Marvin Putnam said Tuesday. “You are required to come forward and say what the basis is for making these claims, and [Jackson] has refused to do so, and has refused to do so since filing suit. And the court has now ordered that she has to.”

Jackson’s attorney Boyle applauded the judge’s decision to reject sanctions.

“AEG was, for whatever reason trying, to sanction Ms. Jackson and Michael Jackson’s children, and the judge wouldn’t allow it, and that was a good thing,” he said.

Jackson is represented by Brian Panish, Kevin Boyle, Peter J. Polos and Robert Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP, Michael Koskoff and Bill Bloss of Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder PC, and K.C. Maxwell.

The defendants are represented by Marvin S. Putnam, Jessica L. Stebbins and Kathryn Cahan of O'Melveny & Myers LLP.

--Additional reporting by Derek Hawkins and Roxanne Palmer. Editing by Kat Laskowski.

http://www.law360.com/commercialcontracts/articles/333673
Click to expand...

Ivy can I post this on one of my FB pages?
https://www.facebook.com/profile.ph...esponse-Team-to-Media-Attacks/129616393771526
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

Memefan said:
I hope the kids' money isn't being used to pay all these lawyers


A bit unusual for me... i feel a minuscule bit of sorry for Katherine. We all know this isn't her idea...but her good for nothing spawns' idea of a payday.
Click to expand...


I think you under estimate KJ. I think she is a lot more like her husband Joe than many may want to believe and she is responsible for a great deal of the shenanigans we have seen from the family sense June 25, 2009.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

The Jackson Camp had 2 years to prepare and what just happened??? They aren't ready???
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

Thanks ivy
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

That Jacksons prove once again that they are epic fails when it comes to chosen lawyers. Seven lawyers and none of them have their act together? That's just pathetic.
 
Jackson’s attorney Kevin Boyle denied that he and his client were intentionally delaying the handover of information.
“I know the timing looks like that, but that’s really not what happened,” Boyle said. “Yesterday, Monday, was the first day that we could have this ready.”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is understandable that they delaying the handover of information if they have nothing to handover.
This bit was Ivy's earliest summary:
In other words Katherine's lawyer say that they still do not have the full evidence but they are uncovering evidence from the documents / answers sent to them from AEG. They also argue that AEG have the answers / documents / evidence in their possession.

It is hard to handover anything if they depend on AEG to handover their evidence so Katherine's lawyers can use them against AEG.
It does sound a bit crazy to be honest.
 
AliCat;3628200 said:
The Jackson Camp had 2 years to prepare and what just happened??? They aren't ready???
Click to expand...

AEG is not ready as they have been waiting Jackson's docs, evidence etc and that was provided to them the last possible minute.
"Stebbins said she was not sure a discovery referee is necessary, but would agree to have one if both sides concur on the person serving the role. She also said she may ask Palazuelos to postpone the trial date, now set for Sept. 10, because of the delays in getting the information needed in preparing AEG Live’s defense."

Cannot blame them, they have right to defend themselves.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

jaydom7 said:
Why is Katherine upset with AEG or Kenny Ortega? what else did she have to do besides to check in on Mike to see how he was doing? if she can file this lawsuit and fight for money she could've easily checked on her son's health and well-being considering she was well aware he was about to embark on a 50 date tour.. All of this occurred on father's day.. Did anyone in MJ's lovely family call to wish him a Happy Father's Day that day?
Click to expand...

I remember an interview with Katherine after MJ had passed. Cant recall if it was for Dateline or a british paper but she said that she had seen MJ a week before he passed away and he looked good. She also mentioned how they used to talk on the telephone and he always sounded clear and in charge.

ivy said:
It seems like unless Katherine gives satisfactory explanation of her claims, in May AEG would ask for a summary judgement - kinda like a pretrial dismissal - arguing there's no factual base to the claims and the lawsuit is meritless.
Click to expand...

For some reason I wish it would be a trial just because that we finally MIGHT get some answers from the Jacksons. They have mentioned so many times about interventions without offering detailed information so maybe we will finally see what they really got. They need to be put on blast.

LastTear said:
Michael himself issued a statement in 2007 stating that he had no plans to tour with his family. Also that same year his family sign that statement saying that there has never been any intervention.
Click to expand...

MJs statement october 2008

"LOS ANGELES, Oct 30, 2008 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Michael Jackson's spokesperson, Dr.
Tohme, in response to recent rumors regarding Michael's participation in a Jackson 5 reunion,
has issued the following statement from Michael Jackson:

"My brothers and sisters have my full love and support, and we've certainly shared many great
experiences, but at this time I have no plans to record or tour with them. I am now in the studio
developing new and exciting projects that I look forward to sharing with my fans in concert
soon."
Click to expand...

The Jacksons denying any intervention 2007

254955_10150295075116729_218224486728_9023511_614140_n.jpg
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

Right Michael's statement was from Fall 2008. Around the same time Ms Jackson went around on Tyra, Oprah, and especially Larry King claiming she wanted to open for her brothers and that all of them were ready but ''one'' and that the one (Larry asked Michael? and she said yes) the one still had to be ''worked on/pushed''.

Anyone remember in Sep/October 2008 when that family got some award as the J5, and Janet gave them to them, and on the red carpet someone asked Marlon where Michael was and he said something like ''oh probably on some camel in Dubai/Bahrain''. Jermaine's nasty ass wasn't present with them either, but no mention or bitterness was shown toward him.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

Thanks Ivy for the updates.

7 lawyers, and they're not ready. L.O.L

Just asking but a lawyer it's expensive , so to hire 7 lawyers...... hope the Estate will not give money for that!
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

twinklEE said:
Anyone remember in Sep/October 2008 when that family got some award as the J5, and Janet gave them to them, and on the red carpet someone asked Marlon where Michael was and he said something like ''oh probably on some camel in Dubai/Bahrain''. Jermaine's nasty ass wasn't present with them either, but no mention or bitterness was shown toward him.
Click to expand...

That was the BMI awards in LA.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

Vici said:
That was the BMI awards in LA.
Click to expand...

yep the BMI awards in LA. Mike and Jermaine didn't attend but Katherine, Joe ,and the other brothers were there. Janet presented the award to them. Some reporter asked Marlon, where was Michael and he responded he's probably somewhere riding a camel.. I remember that so good.. Now if MJ was having so many issues and was drugged up why wasn't his family helping him instead of talking crap?
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

Amazing--Katherine's lawyers filed without having any evidence of what they wanted to prove. People sometimes forget that they have to give depositions and face cross-examinations when they file cases. I am so glad that AEG is not backing down. Let this family present proof; now they will be sorry that they told Walgren to forget about seeking restitution from Muarry. They thought that by making unsubstantiated claims against AEG, AEG would become nervous and hand over some BIG cash. AEG's name is on the line here. They do not want artists and people who buy tickets for concerts to think they cause harm to the artists they are in contract with.

Don't forget guys that the family had hinted that they will use Muarry in their case right after the trial.

I suggest that all family members who made plans to buy expensive cars, big houses, take expensive vacations, etc., to put their plans on hold.

Memefan do you remember you did an intervention thread and we collected a lot of documents. You could not find anyone to send it to. Now I know AEG has a lot of resources, but maybe you can send the information to AEG now. It would show a lot of their claims and lies.
 
Last edited:
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

jaydom7 said:
yep the BMI awards in LA. Mike and Jermaine didn't attend but Katherine, Joe ,and the other brothers were there. Janet presented the award to them. Some reporter asked Marlon, where was Michael and he responded he's probably somewhere riding a camel.. I remember that so good.. Now if MJ was having so many issues and was drugged up why wasn't his family helping him instead of talking crap?
Click to expand...

Mike didn't have problems after 2005 with drugs.

2001-2002, he had problems, it's not a secret anymore. But after 2005, the only INTERVENTIONS OF THE JACK$ON$ were for to do concerts with Mike! They needed him to sell tickets.

And when they heard, at the beginning of 2009, about the TII concerts, they were pissed! So they ALL tried, to catch the TII train....
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

Due to pure greed, a 82 year old grandmother is giving depositions in a suit she will surely lose listening to her greedy kids and greedy lawyers. I am so happy AEG is not backing down..
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

Bubs said:
In other words Katherine's lawyer say that they still do not have the full evidence but they are uncovering evidence from the documents / answers sent to them from AEG. They also argue that AEG have the answers / documents / evidence in their possession.

It is hard to handover anything if they depend on AEG to handover their evidence so Katherine's lawyers can use them against AEG.
It does sound a bit crazy to be honest.
Click to expand...

Bubs it sounds like an inverted Ponzi scheme--you know using the new investors money to pay off older ones. Here they use the information from AEG to give back to AEG as proof for their lawsuit.

I really hope this case is not postponed, but I see it is going along in the same way that Muarry's did. They held back information, told lies to the press, and engaged in delaying tatics. I expect to see more parallels as the case goes on.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

Petrarose said:
Amazing--Katherine's lawyers filed without having any evidence of what they wanted to prove. People sometimes forget that they have to give depositions and face cross-examinations when they file cases. I am so glad that AEG is not backing down. Let this family present proof; now they will be sorry that they told Walgren to forget about seeking restitution from Muarry. They thought that by making unsubstantiated claims against AEG, AEG would become nervous and hand over some BIG cash. AEG's name is on the line here. They do not want artists and people who buy tickets for concerts to think they cause harm to the artists they are in contract with.

Don't forget guys that the family had hinted that they will use Muarry in their case right after the trial.

I suggest that all family members who made plans to buy expensive cars, big houses, take expensive vacations, etc., to put their plans on hold.

Memefan do you remember you did an intervention thread and we collected a lot of documents. You could not find anyone to send it to. Now I know AEG has a lot of resources, but maybe you can send the information to AEG now. It would show a lot of their claims and lies.
Click to expand...

What do you mean they hinted that they will use Murray:bugeyed
I think I'll be sick if I see them ganging up with Murray:(

What intervention thread? Can you post a link where is it? I'm trying to figure out some sort of timeline of these "interventions" real or imaginary.
 
Jackson died on June 25, 2009, after what his mother claimed were several days during which Jackson, subject to AEG’s “grueling” rehearsal schedule, was physically shaken, disoriented and incoherent.
Click to expand...

Thanks Katherine....

:no:
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

I've got a question about this possible pending trial....

If this does end up going to trial in September (or another date), could this trial be aired on Live TV like the Murray trial did??
 
That intervention thread sounds interesting - but as far as i know the jacksons in their post 25 june interviews never gave dates and the useless interviewers never pressed them, obviously the clear inference taken away by the general public was that it was close to his mj's death. You've got that rog friedman article i posted upthread in june 07 talking about a family intervention with tmez. Re the concertventions - mj put out another statement (as well as that tohme one in 08) denying a concert with janet and bros in feb 07, as mere weeks after mj lands back in usa the rumour mill went into overdrive about a jackson reunion concert.

ivy said:
“Only after moving to compel did we finally get deposition dates for Ms. Jackson and responses to our discovery,” Stebbins said. “If we hadn’t moved to compel, I don’t think we ever would have gotten this discovery. We got it at 3 p.m. the day before this hearing.”
Click to expand...

3pm the day before the hearing? These lawyers are just playing a game. Their behaviour is like murray's lawyers, and also reminds me of the tricks sneddon did in the 05 trial, delaying handing over all the discovery material to tmez til the last minute, just to make things difficult.
 
Last edited:
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

Bubs said:
What do you mean they hinted that they will use Murray:bugeyed
I think I'll be sick if I see them ganging up with Murray:(

What intervention thread? Can you post a link where is it? I'm trying to figure out some sort of timeline of these "interventions" real or imaginary.
Click to expand...

Bubs about Muarry, right after the trial his lawyers spoke about this. You will find it in the trial thread. The intervention thread is on this forum in the Family Section. Memefan should know where it is.

Virginia I remember when Katherine made those comments about Michael being physically shaken, disoriented and incoherent when the family was filing the case. Of course right after his death she claimed that he was OK when she spoke to him. The possibility of money makes people change their minds.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012

It's all about the money and not about Michael at all. What makes me more mad are that his children are dragged into this and the kind of questions asked of them. Michael wouldn't want that for them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top