Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I honestly think WR is doing this crap to get back at the Estate for not hiring him for the Cirque du soleil show. he's essentially telling the estate "I invested all my life in MJ and that's how you're repaying me? huh? now I'll teach you a lesson." enter molestation charges.
"Virtually no other individual to date in the entertainment industry has achieved success in so many diverse areas."
The more likely reason for his father's suicide:
![]()
isn't shame and guilt a contradiction if he didn't know it was wrong?
do we have him praising MJ in/after March 2012?
Lil;3856796 said:In addition to what was already posted a couple of pages ago about insight-oriented psychotherapy, I found this interesting info:
It is widely believed that the insight-oriented psychotherapies provide their clients with valid methods of self-exploration that lead to bona fide self-knowledge. It also is widely believed that clients' insights must be true in order to be therapeutically effective. Both these claims are implausible. I argue that because clients face significant epistemic pressures in the therapeutic encounter, the insight-oriented psychotherapies are highly susceptible to generating placebo insights, that is, illusions, deceptions, and adaptive self-misunderstandings that convincingly mimic veridical insight but have no genuine explanatory power. The insight-oriented psychotherapies also are highly susceptible to generating therapeutic artefacts that appear to confirm the insights acquired by clients. The powerful treatment methods to which clients are subjected generate some of the very psychological and behavioral facts that clients claim to “discover” in their explorations. This impugns the scientific status of the insight-oriented psychotherapies. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Clin Psychol 57: 19–36, 2001.
.... :thinking:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...ionid=C1A4DB550C9190189F4DAC8826F8BA41.d03t03
... guys, you have many great, shrewd observations.... so let the MJ Estate lawyers KNOW about them.
They dont have much time to browse MJ boards like MJJC and threads about WR, so we have to let them know about the facts, all the available docs and videos we have, we have to cooperate and be interactive, who else can defend Michael now if not we-the fans.
there are the same patterns, the same schemes (like the Arvizos), the same storylines, the nonsensical timeline (1990-1997???)...
A few weeks back we had a post about Robson's cousin talking about shame and guilt. And I said the same thing - you can only feel shame and guilt if you know what you were doing was wrong. The guys needs to find one reason why he was silent about abuse for so long, and stick with it! Sheesh!
Man... This is one of the most incoherent, crazy ramblings I've read since Janet Arvizo made her case about being whisked away in hot air balloons. I have no idea what I'm actually reading, other than it sounds like Wade failed at two big projects including Michael's Cirque du Soleil (drugs would not surprise me at all) and as a result decided to blame it all on Michael--due to Michael 'prophesizing' that he'd be a bigger director than Steven Spielberg. Michael "wrote his fate" and when that didn't happen then suddenly he says Michael molested him for much of his childhood? What a lunatic.