HIStory
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 6
- Points
- 0
So now that the Sunday People's so called "FBI files" from last week have been exposed for what they are they took Michael's real FBI files and try to twist that around into something that it's not by taking them out of context and omitting parts.
Not true.
The story in the FBI files about someone, who on December 27, 1993 (four months after the Chandler allegations became public) contacted the LAPD claiming he was writing a book about MJ and the alllegations. This person claimed to the LAPD that he's been informed that the FBI investigated MJ for abusing two Mexican boys in 1985 or 1986 but it was swept under the carpet because MJ was to receive an honor in the White House. (Never mind that Michael received that honor in 1984, not 1985 or 1986.) The person was most probably Victor Gutierrez and we have seen from the Tabloid Truth documentary that it's a commonly used strategy by tabloid journalists to contact authorities with the lies they make up about people so that then they can say "the police is investigating it" - making it look "more credible" for their readers.
Not surprisingly the Mirror "forgot" to add that the FBI checked out this claim and found it to be untrue!
"Writer searched indices, both manual and automated for any reference to above mentioned investigation. No references were found."
There is no such a thing there as an "open admission" that the FBI did not follow up the tip because of the White House honor. They simply did not find the tip true. As simple as that.
Once again, how stupid someone has to be that the FBI would cover up such a serious matter just because of an honor?
Here is the document in its full context:
Once again manipulating by not adding the context. That video was not found in Michael's possession. It was found in someone's possession during a custum check. It had nothing to do with Michael other than that the owner (who was not Michael) decided to name it like that. BTW, when the FBI watched the tape there was nothing on it.
Again, there is nothing in the FBI files verifying Terry George's claims. The files simply contain cuts out of tabloids with George's claims, which simply shows the FBI monitored what tabloids wrote about the allegations. It's very telling though that authorities never used George's story against Michael. Here is an article which contains info about George and his allegations: http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...ichael/page2?p=3863094&viewfull=1#post3863094
The file is not from 1992, but from 1993, after the Chandler scandal went public. Look at the date at the top of the document.
It's once again just a claim by someone that the FBI checked out, but obviously it did not lead them anywhere that could incriminate MJ as Sneddon never used this story. It was reported in August 1993, at a time when I guess a lot of people reviewed their experiences regarding Michael and looked for "suspicious" things in the hindsight of the allegations. "Questionable noises" is a very vauge term too.
By Jamba:
I didn't know the background to this story is in Margaret Maldonado's book. Can you show me that part?
And they can't help but to throw in their own BS once again. No such thing exists in MJ's FBI files. Of course, the Sunday People obtained them "exclusively". Of course... They do obtain such things but people who matter, like Santa Barbara District Attorney, Tom Sneddon, never does. How convenient!
An FBI probe into Michael Jackson’s sex abuse of young boys was shelved because he’d been invited to the White House, official records show.
The Thriller megastar was to be honoured with an award by Ronald Reagan in 1984 for his work with drug and alcohol charities.
And federal agents decided to save the President and wife Nancy embarrassment by scrapping their investigation into a tip-off that Jackson had molested two Mexican boys.
The disclosure – in papers released under America’s Freedom of Information Act – comes a week after the Sunday People revealed Jackson spent 23million in 15 years to buy the silence of at least 24 youngsters who had visited his Neverland ranch in California.
The Reagan document is part of a 333-page file made public by the FBI which show there were suspicions the singer had been abusing kids since at least 1978, when he was 20.
...
The FBI openly admits in the dossier it did not follow up the tip about the Mexican kids being abused “because Jackson was to receive an honour at the White House from the President”.
Not true.
The story in the FBI files about someone, who on December 27, 1993 (four months after the Chandler allegations became public) contacted the LAPD claiming he was writing a book about MJ and the alllegations. This person claimed to the LAPD that he's been informed that the FBI investigated MJ for abusing two Mexican boys in 1985 or 1986 but it was swept under the carpet because MJ was to receive an honor in the White House. (Never mind that Michael received that honor in 1984, not 1985 or 1986.) The person was most probably Victor Gutierrez and we have seen from the Tabloid Truth documentary that it's a commonly used strategy by tabloid journalists to contact authorities with the lies they make up about people so that then they can say "the police is investigating it" - making it look "more credible" for their readers.
Not surprisingly the Mirror "forgot" to add that the FBI checked out this claim and found it to be untrue!
"Writer searched indices, both manual and automated for any reference to above mentioned investigation. No references were found."
There is no such a thing there as an "open admission" that the FBI did not follow up the tip because of the White House honor. They simply did not find the tip true. As simple as that.
Once again, how stupid someone has to be that the FBI would cover up such a serious matter just because of an honor?
Here is the document in its full context:
FBI agents found a home-movie titled Michael Jackson’s Neverland Favorites An All Boy Video Anthology.
Once again manipulating by not adding the context. That video was not found in Michael's possession. It was found in someone's possession during a custum check. It had nothing to do with Michael other than that the owner (who was not Michael) decided to name it like that. BTW, when the FBI watched the tape there was nothing on it.
But other FBI files detail a late-night phone call from Jackson to Terry George, a boy of 13 in Leeds, with the singer describing how he was fondling himself during their chat. The young Brit had been befriended by the star in 1979 after asking for his autograph.
Again, there is nothing in the FBI files verifying Terry George's claims. The files simply contain cuts out of tabloids with George's claims, which simply shows the FBI monitored what tabloids wrote about the allegations. It's very telling though that authorities never used George's story against Michael. Here is an article which contains info about George and his allegations: http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...ichael/page2?p=3863094&viewfull=1#post3863094
A 1992 file tells how a couple complained ***** and a boy of 12 shared a sleeper train compartment next to theirs – and kept them awake with “questionable noises”.
The file is not from 1992, but from 1993, after the Chandler scandal went public. Look at the date at the top of the document.
It's once again just a claim by someone that the FBI checked out, but obviously it did not lead them anywhere that could incriminate MJ as Sneddon never used this story. It was reported in August 1993, at a time when I guess a lot of people reviewed their experiences regarding Michael and looked for "suspicious" things in the hindsight of the allegations. "Questionable noises" is a very vauge term too.
By Jamba:
This train journey is discussed in Margaret Maldonado's book "Jackson Family Values." Her 2 sons with Jermaine traveled by train with MJ back to LA from Chicago. She said that when they returned, she was amazed her boys had done a lot of homework--which was unusual for them. Uncle Michael made sure tthey filled up their school notebooks.
I didn't know the background to this story is in Margaret Maldonado's book. Can you show me that part?
And in a separate FBI file obtained *exclusively by the Sunday People – and not included in the Freedom of Information papers – a costume designer said the singer ordered paedo magazines while touring Europe 35 years ago with the Jackson 5.
And they can't help but to throw in their own BS once again. No such thing exists in MJ's FBI files. Of course, the Sunday People obtained them "exclusively". Of course... They do obtain such things but people who matter, like Santa Barbara District Attorney, Tom Sneddon, never does. How convenient!
Last edited: